Skip to main content

Full text of "The architectural annual"

See other formats


qNA 


«5'<»5 


■Mi 


-    i 


1 


7_ u~  — 


i — r 


ASPECT-(9NPASS 


THE 

ARCHITECTURAL  ANNUAL 

PUBLISHED  UNDER  THE  AUSPICES  OF 

THE  ARCHITECTURAL  LEAGUE  OF  AMERICA 

AND   EDITED   BY 

ALBERT    KELSEY 

LATE  HOLDER  OF  THE  TRAVELLING  SCHOLARSHIP  IN  ARCHITECTURE   OF   THE   UNIVERSITY 
OF    PENNSYLVANIA;    FORMER    PRESIDENT    OF    THE    T-SQUARE    CLUB;     DELEGATE 
TO    THE    INTERNATIONAL    CONGRESS    OF    ARCHITECTS,     BRUSSELS,     1897; 
MEMBER  OF  THE  COMMITTEE  ON  WORKS  OF  ART  OF  THE  FAIR- 
MOUNT    PARK    ART    ASSOCIATION,   AND   PRESIDENT   OF 
THE    ARCHITECTURAL   LEAGUE   OF   AMERICA 


ISSUE    FOR 

1900 


PHILADELPHIA 

£be  architectural  annual 

931   CHESTNUT    STREET 


COPYRIGHT,    1900 

ALBERT   KBLSEY 


Press  of 

Rdw.  Stem  &  Co.,  Inc. 

Philadelphia 


7 


TO  THE  YOUNG  MAN  OF  AMBITION: 

BE  HE  ARCHITECT  OR  DRAUGHTSMAN, 
EITHER  RICH  OR  POOR,  WHO,  NOTWITHSTAND- 
ING THE  TEMPTATIONS  OF  UNPROFESSIONAL 
EMINENCE,  RELIES  UPON  HONEST  PERSEVER- 
ANCE, HIS  OWN  STRONG  EFFORTS  AND  A  DEEP, 
GROUNDED  DEVOTION  TO  HIS  ART. 

MAY  HE  AVAIL  HIMSELF  OF  THE  FREELY 
OFFERED  OPPORTUNITIES  FOR  EDUCATION, 
AND  MAY  HE  ACQUIRE,  THROUGH  A  KNOWL- 
EDGE OF  HIS  FELLOW-WORKERS  CENTURIES 
REMOVED,  AN  ENTHUSIASTIC  SPIRIT  THAT  WILL 
URGE  HIM  TOWARD  THE  CREATION  OF  VITAL 
ARCHITECTURE. 

MAY  HIS  MIND  BE  BROADENED  BY  THE 
FOSTERING  OF  HIS  IMAGINATIVE  AND  INVEN- 
TIVE FACULTIES,  AND  BY  THE  INTERPRETATION 
OF  THE  SIGNIFICANT  FORCES  THAT  SURGE 
ABOUT  HIM;  AND  LAST  OF  ALL,  MAY  HIS  CON- 
TRIBUTIONS TO  AMERICAN  ARCHITECTURE  SIN- 
CERELY AND  LOYALLY  DEMONSTRATE  A  REALI- 
ZATION  OF  AMERICAN  PROGRESS. 


Publishers'  Note 

/'JV  looking  forward  to  the  Architectural  Annual  for 
ipoi,  the  publishers  find  pleasure  in  feeling  that  in 

taking  its  place  among  the  motithly  and  weekly  periodi- 
cals as  a  resume  of  Architectural  history  for  the  year  it 
holds  a  place  entirely  its  own,  and  does  not  enter  a  field 
already  ably  filled  by  contemporary  periodicals ;  and 
neither  pains  nor  expenses  will  be  spared  to  make  it 
absolute  in  its  own  place  as  a  carefully  arranged  reference 
book  of  Architectural  a?id  related  subjects  for  the  year. 

To  keep  the  standard  of  accuracy  in  all  details  at 
the  highest  point  shall  be  the  aim  of  the  publishers ,  and 
as  an  assistance  towards  this  end,  the  Architectural  An- 
nual solicits  exchanges  with  contemporary  journals  of 
the  profession,  and  will  at  all  times  be  glad  to  receive 
books  for  review,  announcements  and  reports  of  architec- 
tural schools,  reports  of  meetings,  data  of  all  sorts, 
MS.  contributions  ranging  front  500  to  1 ,000  zvords,  as 
ivell  as  notes  and  suggestions  of  architectural  interests. 
It  is  the  aim  of  the  Annual  to  record  above  all  the 
growth  and  influence  of  those  changes  of  architectural 
sentiment  that  cannot  be  felt  or  measured  week  by  week, 
but  the  course  of  which  may  be  traced  in  a  review  of 
the  longer  period  covered  by  the  Annual,  and  in  the  light 
of  which  the  significance  of  contemporary  variation  may 
be  more  accurately  judged.  All  communications  should 
be  addressed  to  the  Editor  of  the  Architectural  Annual, 
at  pji  Chestnut  Street,  Philadelphia. 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


1  1 


CONTENTS 


Portrait.     Charles  Follen  McKim 14 

Editorials         15-26 

"  The  Modern  Phase  of  Architecture."    Louis  H. 

Sullivan 27 

President  Van  Brunt's  Address 28-  31 

A  Letter  by  Ernest  Flagg 31 

Extract  from  the  Cleveland  Architectural  Club 

Catalogue 32 

Charles  Follen  McKim,  Architect 33 

A  Competition  Free  from  Spurious  French  Orna- 
ment  34-  35 

Art  in  America        36-  37 

Extract   from   the    Detroit    Architectural    Club 

Catalogue 

"  From  Generation  to  Generation."     Chas.  Graf- 
ley,  Sculptor 

"  The  Architectural  School,  from  the  Architect's 

Standpoint."     George  R.  Dean        

Richard  Morris  Hunt 

"  The  Municipal  Building  Problem  in  Cleveland." 

Herbert  B.  Briggs  .    .    ■ 43-  46 

"  The  Baltimore  Conference  on  Municipal  Art." 

George  Kriehn 

' '  Obligation    of    Architects    to    City    Beauty. ' ' 

Charles  Mulford  Robinson 

Baron  Haussmann.     Wm.  P.  Cresson 49- 

The  National  Committee  on  Municipal  Improve- 
ments and  Civic  Embellishment 

The  Phcebe  A.  Hearst  Plan  for  the  University  of 

California 53-  90 

A   Letter  from   J.    L.    Pascal,   Membre  de  Pln- 

stitut      55-56 

A  Paper  by  John  Belcher,  A.R.  A 56-58 

"Commercial    Architecture."      Wm.    Copeland 

Furber,  M.  Am.  Soc.  C.  E 91-  95 

The  Travelling  Fellowship,  Cornell  University    .    96-  98 
"  A   Code  Governing   Competition."     Julius  F. 

Harder 99-'03 

"  Lessons  from  the  Paris  Exhibition" 104-111 

Extracts  from  Papers.     H.  K.  Bush-Brown      .    .  112-115 
Statuary.     J.  Massey  Rhind,  Sculptor 1 16- 117 


37 

33 

39"  4o 
41-  42 


47 


The  Cleveland  Convention  of  the  Architectural 

League  of  America 1 18-120 

"Wilson    Eyre,    Jr.      His   Work."      Alfred   M. 

Githens 121-184 

Statue   of  Benjamin   Franklin.    John  J.    Boyle, 

Sculptor    . 185 

Historical  Figures.     J.  M  issey  Rhind 186-187 

Designs    for    the     New    United     States     Naval 

Academy.     Ernest  Flagg,  Architect 188-193 

Two  Spandrels.     J.  Massey  Rhind,  Sculptor     .    .  194-195 
"Indian    and     Buffalo."      H.    K.    Bush-Brown, 

Sculptor 196 

"  The  Science  of  Cities."     Parti 197-212 

United  States  Immigrant  Station,  New  York    .    .  213 

Lofty  Buildings,  Two  Notable  Examples     .    .    .  214-215 
Arthur  Spayd  Brooke.     An  Appreciation  ....  216-217 

A  Proposed  Bridge 217 

Public  Toilet  Facilities 218-219 

City  Bridges 220-226 

Extract  from  the  Book  of  the  Chicago  Exhibi- 
tion       226 

A  Chain  of  Beacon  Monuments 227 

Extract  from  the  T-Square  Club  Catalogue  .    .    .  228 
Proposed  College   Drinking   Fountain.     Alexan- 
der Stirling  Calder,  Sculptor 229 

Enigmas 230-231 

A  Country  House.     Horace  Trumbauer,   Archi- 
tect       232 

Street  Pageantry 233-240 

Au    American    Basement    House.        Boring    & 

Tilton,  Architects      241 

The  Pillory 242-244 

The  New    York    Custom    House    Competition. 

Two  Designs 245 

The  Dewey  Arch 246-250 

The  Marquise      251-255 

The  Fifth  International  Congress  of  Architects    .  256-257 

A  Paper  by  Edwin  Henri  Oliver       258-259 

Some  Lessons  from  the  United  States 260-261 

The  Directory 262-292 

Advertisements i-xxiv 


12 


ARCHITECTURAL   ANNUAL 


CLASSIFIED  LIST  OF  ADVERTISERS 

The  publishers  of  the  Architectural  Annual  desire  to  thank  the  advertisers  for  their  confidence  in  the  pages 
of  a  new  publication,  and  hope  for  a  continuance  of  their  favor. 

In  the  Architectural  Annual  for  1901  it  is  intended  to  reduce  the  amount  of  space  devoted  to  advertise- 
ments, and  all  announcements  will  be  accepted  only  subject  to  the  approval  of  the  editor,  who  reserves  the  right 
to  reject  any  arrangement  of  matter  which  he  mav  consider  detrimental  to  the  appearance  of  the  work. 

It  is  the  intention  to  advance  the  rates  of  advertising,  and  by  reducing  the  number  of  pages  to  make  these 
columns  a  convenient  reference  list  of  the  announcement  of  standard  products. 


ART  METAL  WORK 

Bayer,  Gardner  &  Hinies 

De  Kosenko  Mfg.  Co.,  The 

Shannon  Mfg.  Co 

Tuttle  &  Bailey  Mfg.  Co 

Williams,  Jno 

BLUE  PRINTS 
Blumhard,  C.  A 

BOILERS 
Smith  Co.,  H.  B 

BRICKLAYERS  AND  CONTRACTORS 

Atkinson,  John 

Stewart  &  Co.,  Chas 

BRICK  MANUFACTURERS 

White  Brick  and  Terra-Cotta  Co 

CARPETS 

Goldthwait  &  Co.,  Joel 

CEMENT 

American  Cement  Co 

Knickerbocker  Lime  Co 

Lawrence  Cement  Co 

Sears,  Humbert  &  Co 

WTarnerCo.,  Chas 

CONTRACTORS  AND  BUILDERS 

Fuller  Co.,  Geo.  A 

Pinkerton  Construction  Co 

Seeds,  Thomas  M.,  Jr. 

Smedley  Construction  Co 

DECORATIVE  GLASS 

Heineke  &  Bowen 

MacLean  Co 

Smith,  H.  J 

Tyrolese  Art  Glass  Co 

ELECTRICAL  CONTRACTORS  AND  ENCINE 

Buchanan  &  Co.,  J.  F 

D'Olier  Engineering  Co 

ENGRAVING 

Electro-Tint  Engraving  Co 

FIRE  BRICKS  AND  RETORTS 

Borgner  Co.,  Cyrus 

FIREPLACE  FURNISHINGS 

Vulcanite  Tile  and  Mosaic  Co 

FIREPROOF   BUILDING    MATERIALS 

New  York  and  New  Jersey  Fireproofing  Co 

Rapp,  John  W 

ROOFING  PAINT,  GRAPHITE 

Dixon  Crucible  Co.,  Joseph ,    .    . 

ROOFING  MATERIALS 

Fay  Manilla  Roofing  Co 

Garrett-Buchanan  Co 

RUBBER  TILE,  INTERLOCKING 

New  York  Belting  and  Packing  Co 

SASH  CORDS 

Silver  Lake  Co 

SHINGLE   STAINS 
Cabot,  Samuel 


xxi 

vii 

xviii 

XX 

ix 


xv 

xxiii 


XIV 

xxii 

xv 

xxix 

xiv 


xxii 

xxiii 

XX 

xiv 

xii 
xxi 

XV 

xiii 
ERS 

viii 
iii 


XI 

xvii 


xm 
viii 


STEAM    SPECIALTIES 

Watson  &  McDaniel  Co xv 

FURNACES  AND  RANGES 

Makin-Kelsey  Co v 

Thomas,  Roberts,  Stevenson  Co xxi 

GAS  AND  ELECTRIC  FIXTURES 

De  Kosenko  Mfg.  Co.,  The vii 

HARDWARE 

Bayer,  Gardner  &  Himes xxi 

IRON-STRUCTURAL  AND  ORNAMENTAL 

Shannon  Mfg.  Co xix 

LAUNDRY  MACHINERY 

Troy  Laundry  Machinery  Co vii 

MANTELS 

Vulcanite  Tile  and  Mosaic  Co xxiii 

MARBLE,  IMITATION 

Mycenian  Marble  Co xvi 

MODELLERS  AND  CARVERS 

Emmel,  Charles xii 

PAINTING  AND  DECORATING 

Black  &  Son,  F.  A xiii 

PAINTS,  OILS  AND  VARNISHES 

Dixon  Crucible  Co.,  Joseph vi 

Felton,  Sibley  &  Co ' xvi 

New  Jersey  Zinc  Co viii 

PAPERS 

Garrett-Buchanan  Co viii 

PARQUET  FLOORS,  GRILLES 
Heaton  &  Wood xiii 

PHOTOGRAPHS 

Dillon,  James  L xxiii 

PIPE  COVERING 

Keasby  &  Mattison  Co i 

PLASTER  MANUFACTURERS 

Knickerbocker  Lime  Co xxii 

PLUMBING    COODS 

McCambridge  &  Co iv 

PUBLISHERS 

Leach  &  Co.,  T.  S ii 

RADIATORS 

Smith  Co.,  The  H.  B xiv 

REFRIGERATORS 

Ridgway  Refrigerator  Co xxiii 

REGISTERS 

Tuttle  &  Bailey  Mfg.  Co xx 

STRUCTURAL  STEEL  PAINT 

Dixon  Crucible  Co.,  Joseph vi 

TERRA-COTTA 

White  Brick  and  Terra-Cotta  Co xi 

TILES  AND  MOSAICS 

Vulcanite  Tile  and  Mosaic  Co xxiii 

VENTILATORS 

Berger  Bros.  Co -.     xii 

National  Paucoast  Ventilator  Co xx 


The  Architectural  Annual 


AN  ILLUSTRATED  REVIEW  OF 
VOL.  I.  CONTEMPORANEOUS  ARCHITECTURE 

THE  PROGRESS  OF  THE  PROFESSION 


1900 


Responsive,  To  a  desire  to  know  our 
introductory,  brother  architects  whose  work  we 
already  knew  so  favorably  ; 

To  a  desire  to  co-ordinate  the  work  of  various 
architectural  clubs  and  to  secure  the  benefits  of 
co-operation  ; 

To  a  desire  to  profit  by  the  experience  of 
others,  and  to  share  the  result  of  our  own  ; 

And  to  a  call  issued  by  a  number  of  archi- 
tectural clubs, 

We  met  at  Cleveland,  June  2  and  3,  1899. 

Resulting,  In  our  returning  to  our  homes  in 
possession  of 

The  memory  of  a  beautiful  city  and  hospitable 
friends, 

The  acquaintance  of  new  friends,  and  the  dis- 
covery that  independent  thought  is  general, 

The  inspiration  growing  from  conference  with 
fellow-workers, 

The  organization  of  the  Architectural  League 
of  America, 

And  two  dominant  convictions  : 

First,  That  the  architectural  club  has  an  im- 
portant and  unique  civic  relation,  that  it  may 
lead  its  city's  development  in  beauty,  and  that  it 
may  and  must  interest  the  public  and  co-operate 
with  it ;  and 

Second,  That  much  as  we  revere  precedent, 
that  it  is  not  honest  to  follow  it  blindly,  that 
progress  demands  of  us  that  we  make  our  work 
express  our  civilization  as  correctly  as  the  works 
of  antiquity  interpreted  their  times,  and  that  our 
duty  is  to  study  conditions  and  guide  develop- 
ment along  organic  lines,  placing 

Progress  before  Precedent,  and  showing  our 
meaning  by  building  our  ideals  and  by  solving 
problems  of  utility  in  terms  of  beauty. 


The  Spirit  of 
the  Cleveland 
Convention. 


The  Architectural  League  of  Amer- 
ica has  received  much  commendation 
for  its  principles  set  forth  in  the 
Cleveland  Convention.  Scattered  clubs  of  artists 
and  sculptors  have  followed  a  similar  impulse  and 
the  consolidation  of  art  societies  has  become  a 


new  phase  of  art  development.  The  League  was 
formed  as  a  federation  of  clubs  rather  than  a 
complete  association,  so  its  policy  of  "the  open 
door  "  in  membership  will  insure  a  large  attend- 
ance at  the  Chicago  Convention  next  June.  All 
architectural  organizations  and  municipal  art 
societies  are  given  cordial  invitation.  Since  the 
League  was  established,  not  in  a  spirit  of  rivalry, 
but  in  a  spirit  of  modest  emulation  of  the  Insti- 
tute, the  Chicago  Convention  will  offer  the  oppor- 
tunity for  a  pleasant  exchange  of  ideas  and 
courtesies  between  the  older  and  younger  national 
organizations  and  may  lead  to  the  establishment 
of  a  formal  "  entente  cordiale." 

Iu  its  relation  to  the  community  the  conven- 
tion at  Cleveland  sought  to  discover  the  social 
purpose  of  the  nation,  and  it  very  significantly 
asked  if  exotic  architecture,  however  suitable  to 
foreign  needs,  tells  our  history  aright.  It  mani- 
fested a  keen  interest  in  municipal  adornment 
and  sought  to  aid  public  taste  in  its  development, 
placing  at  the  service  of  any  community  the 
knowledge  and  acquirements  within  the  League's 
possession. 

In  determining  its  attitude  toward  the  profes- 
sion, the  convention  emphatically  declared  itself 
opposed  to  political  preferment  in  competitions  and 
it  decided  to  be  energetic,  active  and  fearless  in 
revealing  the  existence  of  such.  It  set  the  cri- 
terion of  quality  and  character  above  the  magni- 
tude of  a  man's  professional  practice  and  looked 
with  no  favorable  countenance  on  hypocrisy  in 
architecture. 

Toward  the  profession  at  large  the  League 
stimulated  thought  along  broader  lines,  and 
called  attention  to  the  necessity  for  worthy  ideals 
and  higher  standards.  Its  life  shall  be  spent  in 
singling  out  real  talent  wherever  it  exists,  and  in 
its  duties  of  mentor  of  the  young  art  societies 
now  in  its  train. 

American  vim  and  vigor  are  behind  the  move- 
ment, and  men  whose  countenances  are  once 
turned  from  greed  of  money  toward  the  higher 
ideal  of  fame  are  not  to  be  halted  until  an  impress 


16 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


has  been  made  upon  ignorance  and   prevailing 
wrongs. 

There  was   a   time   when   the   pro- 
Professionai    fession  was   disorganized   and   pos- 

Self-respect.  CT  .    .  t_ 

sessed  of  mercenary  ambitions,  but, 
even  then,  a  few  loyal  workers  were  striving 
incessantly  to  give  the  architect  a  standing  be- 
yond that  of  the  mere  romantic  designer  and 
the  hustler. 

They  were  rewarded  by  unexpected  encour- 
agement from  without.  Recognizing  such  efforts 
as  commendable,  an  art  patron,  a  writer,  or  a 
college  professor  would  claim  for  architecture  its 
deserved  reception  as  a  dignified  and  worthy 
profession.  In  it  they  saw  opportunities  for  the 
loftiest  careers. 

College  architectural  courses  have  been 
formed,  newspaper  and  periodical  writers  have 
been  produced  whose  contributions  are  on  archi- 
tectural subjects,  until  at  present  the  profession 
is  receiving  more  sincere  encouragement  from  the 
world  at  large. 

Thus  far  evolution  has  gone,  but  degeneracy 
is  threatening  us.  If,  with  our  present  hard- 
earned  prestige,  we  are  too  weak  to  maintain  our 
ideals,  if  we  countenance  scandals,  such  as  that 
of  the  Pennsylvania  State  Capitol,  or  work  for 
unremunerative  commissions,  we  have  ourselves 
to  blame  for  the  degradation. 

Something  must  be  done  to  place  a 

Honesty.       premium  upon  professional  conduct. 

The   unscrupulous  rapacity    of  the 

"plan-factory-boodlers"  who  enjoy  their  eminence 

unrebuked  sets  a  bad  example,  which  must  be 

corrected. 

The  time  has  come  for  drawing  a  sharp  line 
of  demarcation  between  the  architect  and  the 
"sheister,"  and  this  task  should  not  be  left  to 
the  younger  element  of  the  profession  to  perform. 
It  is  not  their  province  ;  yet  already  they  are 
preparing  for  the  task,  and  unless  something  is 
done,  and  "you  cannot  make  an  omelet  without 
breaking  eggs,"  these  vampires  will  have  to 
encounter  a  moral  force  from  a  quarter  on  which 
they  have  not  reckoned,  and  one  which  also 
escaped  the  discernment  of  the  Pittsburg  Conven- 
tion. 


Young  Men 
Forging  to 
the  Front. 


Much,  doubtless,  of  the  mass  of 
work  done  by  the  architectural 
clubs  of  the  country,  more  especially 
the  younger  societies,  seems  elementary  and  of 
small  value,  and  therefore  the  increasing  recogni- 
tion the  young  men  are  commanding,  for  them- 
selves and  the  reforms  they  advocate,  is  as  much 
out  of  proportion  to  their  experience  as  to  their 


years.  In  consequence,  some  claim  their  promi- 
nence is  due  to  youthful  aggressiveness  alone,  and 
fail  to  see  that  it  is  simply  the  result  of  a  lack  of 
whole-hearted  leadership  on  the  part  of  those  yet 
best  able  to  direct  the  advancement  of  the  pro- 
fession. 

The  development  of  the  club  and  its  activity 
in  the  architectural  life  of  the  country  is  moving 
more  rapidly  than  ever  before  ;  thus,  under  the 
circumstances,  and  in  view  of  its  new  work  and 
responsibilities,  it  is  bound  to  push  its  own  mem- 
bers more  and  more  to  the  front. 


Quality 

in 

Architecture. 


Architecture  as  a  business,  architec- 
ture as  a  profession  and  architecture 
as  an  art  are  not  synonymous  terms. 
As  a  business,  it  involves  building  ;  as  a  profes- 
sion, it  has  to  do  with  design  and  building,  and, 
as  an  art,  it  includes  the  former  elements  and  be- 
comes a  vehicle  of  thought. 

With  but  few  exceptions,  until  five  or  ten 
years  ago,  architecture  in  the  United  States  was 
but  a  business.  Now  it  is  a  recognized  profession, 
notwithstanding  that  several  of  its  most'  'eminent" 
members  are  nothing  more  than  unscrupulous 
business  men,  and  signs  are  not  wanting  of  the 
development  of  that  higher  type  in  which  art  and 
intellectuality  vitalize  and  add  soul  to  the  design. 
As  a  business,  architecture  is  ground  out  like 
any  other  commercial  product,  and  is  paid  for  on 
a  competitive  basis,  the  lowest  bidder  frequently 
being  retained.  As  a  profession,  a  certain  stand- 
ard of  excellence  is  aimed  at,  and  uniform  charges 
prevail.  As  an  art,  it  becomes  a  matter  of  indi- 
vidual Lalent,  far  removed  from  competitive  busi- 
ness, and,  in  consequence,  like  a  portrait  painter, 
the  great  architect  must  receive  a  special  price 
for  his  services  to  enable  him  to  give  the  neces- 
sary time  and  study  to  his  work. 

Year  by  year  these  classifications  become  more 
and  more  distinct,  and,  in  that  the  professional 
man  and  the  specialist  receive  more  and  more  and 
better  and  better  patronage,  the  advancement  of 
architecture  is  assured.  Their  absolute  leadership 
may  for  some  time  yet  go  unrecognized,  as  archi- 
tecture also  has  its  jealousies  and  its  bigotries, 
but  the  men  who  think  rationally,  study  deeply 
and  design  unaffectedly   will  yet  have  their  day. 


Commission 

vs. 

Quality. 


It  is  gratifying  to  note  the  ad- 
vance in  architectural  design,  but 
such  an  advance  seems  even  more 
amazing  when  the  present  state  of  architectural 
commissions  is  considered.  An  architect  now  is 
paid  not  in  proportion  to  the  excellence  of  his 
design,  the  watchfulness  of  his  superintendence 
or  the  conscientious  efforts  on  his  part  to  mini- 
mize the  expense,  but  in  proportion  to  the  entire 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


17 


cost  of  the  work — even  more  remunerative  when 
the  operation  is  ground  out  rapidly  and  freed  of 
all  time-consuming  details. 

That  this  has  encouraged  the  structural  steel 
companies  to  include  in  their  bids  the  services  of 
an  engineer  who  works  out  the  construction  and 
enabled  the  terra-cotta  companies  to  make  detail 
drawings  from  very  small  scale  suggestions  with- 
out apparently  charging  either  architect  or  owner 
for  them  is  perfectly  apparent  to  any  student  of 
this  system.  In  extreme  cases,  it  has  led  to 
bribery  and  corruption.  A  sincere  love  for  the 
ideals  of  architecture  has  enabled  the  best  men 
to  avoid  these  temptations  and  achieve  the  best 
possible  results  in  the  face  of  a  constantly  dimin- 
ishing profit. 

Architects  give  their  time  and  money  to  their 
work  as  do  the  members  of  no  other  profession, 
while  the  appreciation  of  such  efforts  is  entirely 
disproportionate.  Some  few  boldly  assert  them- 
selves and  are  well  paid.  It  is  to  such  men  that 
we  must  look  for  the  maintenance  of  the  pro- 
fession's standards.  Unless  conscienceless  archi- 
tects can  be  brought  to  see  that  by  cutting  rates 
and  preparing  free  preliminary  sketches  they  are 
both  standing  in  their  own  light  and  casting  a 
shadow  over  the  entire  profession,  little  further 
can  be  expected  in  original  design.  The  natural 
outcome  must  be  either  strengthened  opposition 
by  honest  architects  or  superficial  work  by  dis- 
honest ones. 

Few  stop  to  consider,  as  the}7  pass 
ViTeechUa"regres  stately  old  city  residences,  that 
for\vorkStic    wnen    those    monotonous    lines    of 

dwellings  were  built,  row  upon 
row,  often  from  the  same  plans,  with  the  same 
simple  detail  drawings,  the  architect's  "5  per 
cent,  commission  on  the  total  cost  of  each"  was 
about  commensurate  with  his  labor.  If  they  do 
consider  it,  they  seldom  realize  that  the  homes 
for  the  same  class  of  people  to-day  need  entirely 
separate  designs,  each  intricate  in  plan  and  orna- 
mentation, with  varied  material,  complicated 
mechanical  plants  and  peculiarly  individual  re- 
quirements. The  architect's  office  expenses — 
more  than  doubled  in  this  class  of  work — are 
overlooked  by  those  old-fashioned  owners,  who 
expect  to  procure  good  architects  on  the  com- 
mission of  the  past  generation.  Some  grudg- 
ingly pay  six  or  seven,  but  the  more  enlightened 
clients  are  willing  to  pay  the  proper  charge  of 
from  7  to  12  per  cent.,  according  to  the  difficul- 
ties encountered  and  the  method  adopted  in 
letting  contracts.  Eight  per  cent,  upon  the  total 
cost  of  a  thoroughly  well-designed  and  superin- 
tended private  residence  is  only  a  fair  compensa- 
tion for  the  architect,  and,  should  the  cost  of  the 


dwelling  exceed  $50,000,  a  clerk  of  the  works 
should  exclusively  superintend  the  house  at  the 
client's  expense. 


Open 


A  promising  sign  of  advance  in  the 
,.  profession  is  the  unanimous  decision 

by  its  better  element  that  open,  un- 
limited competitions  are  demoralizing  and  are 
usually  productive  of  most  unsatisfactory  results. 
That  most  of  these  men  support  their  belief  by 
refraining  from  participating  in  unpaid  and  un- 
limited contests  is  greatly  to  be  commended. 
Already  competitions  by  invitation  or  by  limited 
invitation  are  becoming  general  among  intelli- 
gent people  ;  they  realize  that  great  expense  is 
involved  to  the  architect,  and  that  doing  his  best 
is  out  of  the  question  when  all  may  be  hazarded 
for  nothing.  While  there  are  some  architects 
who  clamor  for  these  open  competitions,  the 
world  sees  that  these  are  not  the  representative 
architects  of  proven  experience,  but  are  usually 
either  the  young,  unrestrained  enthusiasts,  or 
the  unscrupulous,  who  count  upon  something 
more  than  architectural  merit  to  see  them  through. 

^    .    .    *.   From  Boston  and  Pittsburg  rumors 

An  Ecclesiastic  °  . 

Architectural  have  reached  us  that  efforts  are  being 
put  forth  to  form  an  ecclesiastic 
architectural  society.  Evidently  architects  are 
beginning  to  specialize,  as  men  of  other  profes- 
sions. In  consequence  of  this,  church  architec- 
ture, so  sadly  neglected  of  late,  may  once  more 
become  the  boast  and  pride  of  the  people.  We 
trust  that  the  proposed  society  may  speedily  be 
formed,  for  one  can  plainly  foresee  possibilities  for 
worthy  achievements  by  such  an  organization. 

In  the  train  of  the  Municipal  Art 
moBnr"^e"*al    Movement  that  so  widely  distributed 

itself  over  the  country  tangible  re- 
sults are  appearing.  The  monumental  treatment 
of  American  bridges  is  at  last  being  considered 
within  the  realm  of  reason.  We  have  seen  de- 
signs for  two  such  structures,  and  they  are  vast 
and  imposing  enough  to  stagger  those  accustomed 
to  only  the  utilitarian.  It  is  a  hopeful  sign  of 
the  times  that  Washington,  under  the  patronage 
of  the  Federal  Government,  contemplates  erect- 
ing a  bridge  across  the  Potomac,  which  will  more 
than  rival  that  designed  to  span  the  Charles 
between  Boston  and  Charleston.  The  former  is 
double-decked,  with  trolley  tracks  below;  an  archi- 
tectural viaduct  of  beauty  leads  to  it,  and  the 
central  feature,  like  the  Charles  River  bridge,  is  to 
be  extremely  high  and  monumental.  Instead  of 
the  twin  bascule-bridges  of  the  latter,  both  decks 
are  to  be  raised  by  hydraulic  force,  like  an  eleva- 
tor, between  four  towers,  supporting  above  them 


II 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


an  open  metal  dome.  Should  both  of  these  de- 
signs be  executed,  the  United  States  will  possess 
two  bridges  of  imposing  character,  architecturally 
considered  ;  and  if  in  their  development  local 
history  is  symbolized,  they  will  form  landmarks 
of  national  significance. 

Again,  it  has  been  proposed,  and  wisely,  too, 
to  transform  the  Dewey  Arch  or  Naval  Arch,  in 
New  York,  into  a  monumental  approach  to  one 
of  the  great  bridges  of  the  upper  city.  The 
harmony  and  embellishment  of  cities  is  thus 
being  worked  out  hand-in-hand  with  utilitarian 
problems. 

The  life  of  contemporary  journalism 

Relation  of  the   .  .      ,,         ,  ,  r  J   J 

Daily  Press  to  is  vitally  dependent  upon  progres- 

Architecture.       .  ,        .     .       .,  ,TM 

sive  and  original  news.  That  news- 
paper which  can  gather  to  itself  the  largest 
"  scoop  "  in  any  field  of  activity  is  decidedly  sure 
of  its  sales  among  the  workers  in  that  field  when 
the  "  scoop  "  appears  in  its  columns.  However 
much  the  press  may  seek  to  mount  the  pedestal 
which  places  it  in  the  position  of  a  dictator,  it  is 
continually  in  need  of  even  scraps  of  news  on 
almost  every  line  of  work.  By  referring  to  every 
great  building  enterpiise  with  enthusiasm  a 
daily  journal  realizes  that  it  is  touching  a  sym- 
pathetic chord  among  the  people.  A  building 
operation  must  be  heralded  and  described  to  the 
smallest  detail  as  soon  as  the  first  move  is  made 
toward  the  demolishing  of  its  predecessor  or  the 
first  pick  is  driven  into  the  ground  that  will  later 
support  it. 

Not  only  must  the  general  public  be  informed, 
but  the  press  feels  that  a  duty  rests  upon  it  to 
praise  the  public  spirit  of  the  promoters — whether 
such  a  spirit  exists  or  not — and  to  dwell  upon  the 
superlative  grandeur  and  purity  of  style,  even 
though  the  structure  may  be  the  most  hideous  of 
buildings.  No  real  estate  editor  exists  who  will 
not  garnish  and  amplify  his  brief  announcement 
of  a  building  event  with  a  meaningless  jargon  of 
adjectives  and  phrases  rarely  found  outside  a 
schoolgirl's  composition.  It  is  all  very  logical, 
for  it  is  of  interest  to  both  the  newspaper  and 
the  promoter  of  the  scheme. 

Recognizing  the  attitude  of  the  papers  toward 
such  matters  some  years  ago,  the  T-Square  Club 
sent  the  following  request  to  all  the  leading  dailies 
of  Philadelphia: 

;'  Whereas,  The  daily  journals  of  this  city 
devote  periodically  certain  space  to  'Art  News ' 
and  '  Real  Estate  Notes,'  making  all  critical 
reports  of  architecture  under  one  or  the  other  of 
these  headings  ; 

"Be  it  resolved,  That  the  T- Square  Club  com- 
municate officially  with  the  managing  editors  of 
the  principal  Philadelphia  daily  papers,  and  re- 


quest their  co-operation  in  bringing  architecture 
as  a  fine  art  to  the  attention  of  the  public  ;  and, 

"Be  it  resolved,  That  this  be  accomplished  by 
allotting  periodically  a  column  to  "Architectural 
Notes  ;"  and  that  under  this  head  all  news  relat- 
ing to  architectural  development  and  criticism  be 
inserted." 

Although  the  editors  did  not  comply  with  all 
the  intentions  of  the  T-Square  Club,  beneficial 
effects  of  this  appeal  have  been  noticed  in  many 
instances. 

Frequently  editorial  comments  have  been 
made  upon  architectural  projects,  problems  and 
achievements  ;  prominent  architects  have  been 
interviewed,  and,  altogether,  the  newspaper  world 
has  come  to  the  realization  of  the  importance  of 
architecture  in  our  daily  life. 

One  evening  paper  recently  published  a  list 
of  questions  bearing  upon  the  greatest  events  of 
the  year.  Among  them  was  one  :  "  What  is  the 
most  notable  building  erected  in  Philadelphia 
during  the  past  twelve  months  ?"  Such  a  ques- 
tion stimulated  public  interest  in  a  subject  that 
lacks  proper  study  by  the  masses.  It  manifested 
a  healthy  tendency  toward  the  intelligent  regard- 
ing of  architectural  successes. 

In  the  "End  of  the  Century  Supplement," 
published  by  the  New  York  Journal,  on  December 
31st,  four  pages  were  devoted  to  a  review  of  the 
progress  of  the  past  100  years  in  eighteen  differ- 
ent lines  of  activity.  In  the  discussion  of  these 
subjects  appeared  such  prominent  names  as 
Charles  Dudley  Warner,  Seth  Low,  Henry  M. 
Stanley,  Joseph  Jefferson,  Rudolph  Virchow, 
Rabbi  Gottheil,  Max  Nordau,  Dr.  Ernest  Haeckel 
and  Susan  B.  Anthony.  Architecture  was  given 
an  honored  place  in  the  "Supplement,"  and  the 
discussion  of  its  progress  was  entrusted  to  J.  S. 
Barney.  We  quote  from  his  well-written  article 
the  following  : 

"  Conditions  create  a  style.  Genius  furnishes 
examples.  Our  advance  to  a  pure,  true  and  dis- 
tinctive style  in  architecture  is  as  certain  and 
irresistible  as  is  the  march  to  our  natural  posi- 
tion in  the  front  rank  of  the  nations  of  the  earth. 
Architecture  is  much  affected  by  fashion  and 
fad,  but  we  must  not  forget  that  the  conditions 
of  life,  ambitions  and  religion  of  a  people  deter- 
mine the  style  of  their  architecture,  and  not  the 
whims  of  misguided  imitators.  We  are  great, 
powerful  and  rich,  full  of  youth  and  vigor,  and 
it  is  but  natural  to  expect  that  we  will  develop 
an  architecture  upon  which  we  will  impress 
these  characteristics." 

These  and  many  other  evidences  should  con- 
vince the  architectural  world  that  the  press  is 
stretching  forth  a  fraternal  hand  toward  the  pro- 
fession, and   that  it  desires  to  give  publicity  to 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


19 


architectural  aims,  theories  and  achievements 
just  as  much  as  it  desires  to  please  ever y one  by 
its  universality.  A  much  greater  opportunity  in 
this  matter  of  publicity  is  before  the  clubs  and 
architectural  organizations,  for  the  events  that 
occur  in  the  routine  of  club  work  are  valuable 
"  write-ups"  from  the  newspaperman's  point  of 
view.  Again,  clubs  are  given  attention  where 
an  individual  would  be  neglected.  From  the 
side  of  the  club  it  is  a  decided  advantage  and  a 
help  in  its  work.  It  advertises  the  workers 
sufficiently  to  encourage  and  sustain  their  efforts. 
When  with  such  ease  widespread  publicity  is  to 
be  obtained,  the  club  that  neglects  these  oppor- 
tunities is  injuring  itself  and  hindering  the  prog- 
ress of  architecture.  The  public  are  gradually 
coming  to  realize  that  the  architect  is  an  im- 
portant factor  in  their  dail}T  life,  and  architecture 
is  becoming  one  of  the  chief  objects  of  pride  to 
the  American  people. 

With  great  reluctance  the  Judiciary 
a  scandal.  Committee  of  the  American  Institute 
of  Architects  at  last  has  investigated 
the  case  of  the  Philadelphia  Chapter  vs.  Henry 
Ives  Cobb  for  his  participation  in  the  second 
competition  for  the  Pennsylvania  State  Capitol 
Building. 

It  will  be  remembered  that  the  T-Square  Club 
requested  the  resignation  of  one  of  its  members 
over  two  years  ago  for  participating  in  this  out- 
rageous scramble,  that  the  members  of  a  firm  in 
New  York  and  the  members  of  another  firm  in 
Philadelphia  were  compelled  to  resign  from  the- 
local  chapters  for  the  same  offence,  and  yet  the 
Judiciary  Committee  of  the  Institute,  in  censuring 
Mr.  Henry  Ives  Cobb  for  entering  the  competition 
and  securing  the  work,  find  nothing  against  him, 
as  he  is  one  of  the  most  "  eminent  "  members  of 
the  pro'tssion. 

The  verdict  recalls  a  sentence  once  imposed 
by  the  celebrated  Judge  Walker,  of  Macon,  Mis- 
sissippi: "The  learned  Court  finds  you  guilty, 
sah,  very  guilty,  and  sentences  you  to  banish- 
ment, sah,  for  the  period  of  one  whole  year,  sah, 
from  Noxubee  County,  Mississippi,  sah — so  help 
you  Gawd,  sah  !" 

The  student  fresh    from   the  Eeole 

Expression  in 

Architectural   des    Beaux-Arts    thinks    himself  a 

Forms. 

cosmopolitan  and  believes  contempo- 
raneous architecture  should  be  a  universal 
language. 

He  scorns  uncertain  archaeologists.  He  ridi- 
cules their  charming  adaptations  and  refers  to 
"that  Midway  Plaisance  architecture  of  the 
Streets  of  Cairo"  and  "Old  Oxford  Type" 
with  profound  contempt. 


In  short,  he  will  not  admit  that  it  is  serious  or 
anything  but  a  decadent  fad.  And  yet  often  his 
own  productions  are  but  servile  copies,  usually 
meaningless  and  always  lacking  in  sentiment  ; 
but,  if  confronted,  he  will  tell  you  that  they  are 
modern  and  therefore  of  this  day  and  generation. 

Bewildered  by  the  self-consciousness  of  both 
factions,  the  seeker  after  truth  reasons  that  it  is 
not  because  native  themes  are  lacking  at  the 
present  time  in  the  United  States  that  our  archi- 
tects and  sculptors  fail  to  symbolize  in  original 
terms,  but  because  they  do  not  feel  as  deeply  as 
they  should.  Mere  ornament,  composition  or 
frank  structural  expression  is  usually  the  limit. 
But  there  are  a  few  exceptions  and  it  is  pleasant 
to  bear  testimony  to  the  fact  that  in  one  or  two 
recent  instances  buildings  of  note  have  been 
accented  with  new  symbols  whose  significance  is 
as  apparent  as  the  art  is  true.  It  shows  that  there 
are  some  architects  striving  to  put  architecture,  as 
a  living  fine  art,  upon  a  higher  level  ;  and  it  also 
shows  that  there  are  still  others  who  believe  that 
our  civilization  does  not  necessarily  grind  the 
romance  out  of  life. 

Listen  to  the  words  of  Phillips  Brooks  :  "  What 
is  there  anywhere  more  poetic,  anything  that 
more  appeals  to  the  imagination  than  the  bril- 
liant advance  of  natural  science?  What  is  there 
in  chivalry  more  exalted  and  thrilling  than  the 
lives  of  men  who  have  lived  and  died  in  privation 
and  delight  for  science  and  its  progress?  When 
have  men  ever  proved  themselves  morecapableof 
lofty  and  large  ideas  than  in  these  days,  when 
thej'  are  dreaming  of  a  '  federation  of  mankind,  ' 
war  replaced  by  peaceful  arbitration,  and  crimi- 
nals reformed  by  industry  and  kindness,  and 
povert}'  obliterated  by  universal  organized  char- 
ity ?  No  crusade  of  the  Middle  Ages  has  anything 
like  the  real  romantic  inspiration  that  belongs  to 
the  modern  crusade  against  ignorance — the  dream 
of  universal  education.  No  old  vision  of  a  splen- 
did feudalism  so  taxed  and  exalted  the  imagina- 
tion as  the  modern  picture  of  self-government. 
No.  It  is  not  that  our  age  is  sordid.  Itisnotthat 
it  has  proved  itself  incapable  of  large  ideas  and 
glowing  visions.  It  has  a  romance  brighter  than 
any  other  age  ever  possessed.  And  so  long  as  it 
has  that,  it  has  not  lost  the  capacity  of  faith.  " 

The  problem  given  in  the  competi- 
stlndarao"  tioii  for  the  John  Stewardson 
scholarship  work.Memorial  Travelling  Scholarship 
at  the  University  of  Pennsylvania  demonstrates 
the  liberal  and  progressive  way  in  which  that  insti- 
tution does  its  work  An  institution  that  does  not 
hesitate  to  place  its  own  graduates  in  a  competi- 
tion freely  opened  to  all  young  architects  of  the 
State   may  well  be  expected  to  foster  aggressive 


20 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


American  ideas.  The  problem  called  for  "a 
design  for  the  improvement  of  the  entrance  to 
Fairmount  Park,  Philadelphia,  by  a  proper  treat- 
ment of  a  plot  of  ground  bounded  by  several  city 
streets,  and  of  the  bank  of  the  reservoir  opposite 
the  plot.  "  Although  the  problem  from  its  practi- 
cal side  resembles  the  T-Square  Club's  series  of 
connected  programs,  it  could  not,  of  course, 
possess  the  same  unity.  Of  the  latter,  The  Archi- 
tectural Review  recently  said,  editorially  .• 

"Apart  from  the  interesting  and  valuable 
nature  of  this  scheme  so  far  as  the  profession  at 
large  is  concerned,  it  possesses  another  element 
of  value  that  should  not  be  overlooked  by  similar 
architectural  societies  throughout  the  country. 
It  gives  a  unity  to  the  work  of  the  club  and 
affords  an  element  of  vital  interest  to  the  men 
who  may  be  working  in  it  that  has  been  difficult 
to  obtain,  and  has  therefore  been  lacking  in  work 
of  a  similar  nature.  ' ' 

The  presence  of  local  color  and  immediate  re- 
quirements in  the  Stewardson  Competition  must 
be  highly  commended.  The  city  contemplated 
the  purchase  of  the  site  and  it  was  within  easy 
access  of  the  students.  Such  a  tangible,  practical 
problem  compelled  them  to  work  in  an  unaffected 
light  and  made  their  reasoning  and  design  a  most 
natural  growth. 

The  standard  of  prize  work  has  considerably 
increased  during  the  last  few  years  ;  in  two  or 
three  instances  advanced  students  and  those 
studying  abroad  have  entered  and  won  scholar- 
ships at  home.  Mr.  Pulsifer  won  the  Rotch 
Travelling  Scholarship  last  spring,  after  several 
years  abroad  and  after  he  had  made  a  commenda- 
ble record  in  the  Ecole  des  Beaux-Arts.  His  own 
strong  design  made  the  entire  competition  of  a 
higher  standard.  So  frequently  Paris  upsets  a 
young  American's  ideas  that  no  small  time  is  re- 
quired to  reacclimate  oneself;  so  that  some 
advanced  minds  have  come  to  think  that  no 
longer  is  it  advisable  to  journey  abroad  to  obtain 
the  best  education. 

Another  beneficial  effect  on  the  standard  of 
work  has  been  the  close  association  between  col- 
leges and  architectural  clubs  in  the  cities.  When 
prize  memberships  in  the  club  have  been  offered 
to  students  and  the  college  lectures  thrown  open 
to  members  of  architectural  societies  there  has 
always  resulted  a  higher  respect  for  the  older 
members  of  the  profession,  the  young  men  have 
been  given  a  broader  future,  and  in  return  have 
brought  to  the  clubs  that  new  life  so  necessary  to 
any  club's  existence. 

A  technical  education  of  high  calibre  is  now 
demanded  of  every  architect,  just  as  it  is  demand- 
ed in  other  professions.  The  outcome  has  been 
either  the  success  of  those  technically  trained  or 


the  necessity  for  some  of  the  older  architects  to 
hire  such  men,  because  their  own  training  is 
insufficient  to  cope  with  present-day  problems. 

Elsewhere  are  printed  the  entire  conditions  of 
the  recently  organized  Travelling  Scholarship  at 
Cornell,  and  to  our  thinking  it  is  a  most  enlight- 
ened program.  Unlike  the  regulations  of  other 
institutions,  this  scholarship  compels  the  holder 
to  return  to  his  college  after  a  number  of  months 
abroad  and  upon  the  completing  of  a  period  of 
home  study  to  return  for  a  prescribed  line  of 
work. 


Competition 
Code. 


The  general  code  governing  compe- 
titions in  design,  recommended  by 
the  first  Convention  of  the  Archi- 
tectural League  of  America  for  adoption  by  archi- 
tectural bodies,-  has  been  formally  ratified  by 
five.  The  President  of  the  American  Insti- 
tute of  Architects  has  appointed  a  committee 
to  confer  with  a  committee  from  the  Archi- 
tectural League  of  America  to  consider  the 
subject,  together  with  other  matters  of  mutual 
interest.  While  several  hundred  copies  of  the 
code  have  been  distributed  and  a  number  of 
competitions  held  under  its  regulations,  in  its 
present  form,  as  printed  on  page  102,  it  is  a  docu- 
ment somewhat  too  lengthy.  The  proposition 
to  reduce  it  to  a  single  sheet,  a  business  blank 
form,  which  may  be  filled  out  to  suit  every-da3>- 
problems,  is  a  good  one.  Under  such  an  arrange- 
ment all  architects  could  keep  a  supply  at  hand 
to  distribute  upon  their  first  knowledge  of  a  con- 
templated competition. 

The  enforcement  of  the  code,  trials  or  penal- 
ties that  may  result  from  it,  or  the  question  of 
rate  and  basis  of  remuneration,  the  code  does  not 
now  cover,  but  such  matters  may  be  decided 
when  the  committee  from  the  American  Institute 
of  Architects  has  given  its  opinion  at  its  meet- 
ing with  the  committee  from  the  Architectural 
League  of  America. 

The  societies  having  adopted  the  code  an- 
nounce their  willingness  to  assist  in  formulating 
competition  programs,  and  they  urge  the  adop- 
tion of  the  code  by  other  societies,  for  they 
believe  it  furnishes  a  standard  for  the  client,  a 
basis  for  mutual  understanding  in  the  profession, 
and  will  undoubtedly  be  influential  in  producing 
a  morale  that  does  not  now  exist. 


In    many   different   States   and    for 

The  Licensing  .  ,  .  .     .         _,. 

of  some  time  past  the  subject  01  licens- 

Architects         • 

ing  architects  has  been  discussed 
quite  seriously.  Since  the  fall  of  1897,  an 
Illinois  law  has  required  architects  to  apply  for  a 
license  to  practice  in  that  State  and  has  defined 
an  architect  as  "  a  person  who  shall  be  engaged 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


21 


in  the  planning  or  supervision  of  the  erection, 
enlargement  or  alteration  of  buildings  for  others, 
and  to  be  constructed  by  other  persons  than  him- 
self." It  is  w.ll  known  that  builders,  with  their 
plan-factories  and  their  offers  of  high  wages  to 
good  draughtsmen,  have  worked  toward  the 
demoralization  of  the  profession.  Clearly  was 
this  demonstrated  at  one  of  the  leading  bnilders' 
exchanges, when  the  bnilders  who  make  drawings 
refused  to  post  theirs  for  other  builders  arrd  sub- 
contractors to  take  off  quantities  and  bid  upon. 
Architects  had  been  requested  to  do  so  and  the 
formal  request  of  the  latter  for  like  action  on  the 
designiug  builders'  part  compelled  the  culprits 
to  seek  shelter  in  silence. 

The  Cleveland  Convention  brought  the  matter 
before  the  country  and  since  then  the  profession 
in  many  States  have  been  actively  advocating  its 
adoption.  The  New  York  League  has  discussed 
it  frequently  and  maintained  a  strong  stand  in 
favor  of  the  passage  of  a  law  to  govern  the 
practice.  The  Architectural  Society  in  Louis- 
iana has  recently  been  organized  for  the  accom- 
plishment of  just  such  legislation. 

In  the  professions  of  law  and  medicine  the 
"  quack  "  is  to  be  deplored  and  he  is  rightly  sup- 
pressed by  legislation.  The  unprofessional  prac- 
titioner in  architecture  is  similarly  open  to  attack. 
The  Institute's  decision  to  require  candidates  for 
membership  to  pass  examinations  is  a  step  along 
the  broad  road  of  progress,  but,  as  Architecture 
has  said  in  its  issue  of  April  15,  1900  : 

"We  do  not  wish  to  belittle  in  any  way  the 
splendid  work  done  by  the  Institute  in  upbuilding 
the  profession  of  architecture,  or  to  detract  an 
iota  from  the  universal  respect  in  which  that 
body  is  held  by  the  public,  but  it  is  a  fact  that, 
numerically,  the  Institute  represents  but  a  small 
portion  of  the  active  practitioners.  In  every 
centre  of  population  the  local  architectural  asso- 
ciation outnumbers  the  chapter  in  the  same  town 
or  city  ten  to  one,  and  for  that  reason  alone  it 
seems  to  us  that  the  necessary  reforms  can  not 
be  expected  from  this  source,  however  com- 
mendable the  desire  may  be  to  enforce  them." 

If  this  degrading  of  the  architectural  profes- 
sion is  to  be  prevented  it  must  be  done  systemati- 
cally, strongly  and  immediately.  Reforms  from 
within  will  not  suffice,  for  the  greatest  danger  is 
from  without.  When  the  licensing  of  architects 
is  made  compulsory  through  the  passage  of  a 
law,  we  may  hope  for  the  brightest  accomplish- 
ments in  an  unhampered  profession. 


If    any   evidence    were    needed    to 
content?™?   establish  the  fact  that  the  American 
Institute   of  Architects   has   an  es- 
cutcheon sadly  in  need  of  scouring,  that  evidence 


might  be  taken  from  the  reports,  excursions  and 
general  proceedings  of  the  Pittsburg  Convention. 
We  shall  not  dwell  on  such  irritating  details  as 
the  insignificant  number  of  delegates,  the  un- 
comfortable accommodation  of  invited  guests,  the 
external  noise  and  the  internal  calm  of  the  meet- 
ing-hall, or  the  apparent  lack  of  business  to  be 
transacted.  All  of  these  particulars  have  been 
referred  to  in  other  publications.  An  important 
consideration,  however,  is  the  determining  of  the 
policy  and  beliefs  of  the  Institute,  as  judged  by 
its  discussions. 

Possibly,  taken  as  a  whole,  the  readings  were 
quite  above  the  average  performance  at  previous 
conventions,  but  it  would  be  wasting  time  to 
enter  into  a  discussion  of  many  of  them.  The 
dreary,  tedious  reading  of  an  essay  thus  took  the 
place  of  what  might  have  been  a  bright,  ex- 
temporaneous discussion  of  matters  in  hand. 
With  all  this  waste  time  and  effort,  the  conven- 
tion succeeded  in  establishing  a  code  of  examina- 
tion requirements — a  feat  which  no  other  Insti- 
tute convention  ever  had  sufficient  courage  to 
accomplish. 

Having  heard  so  much  of  "Spanish  pride" 
during  our  late  unpleasantness  with  that  nation, 
it  is  both  surprising  and  amusing  to  read  in  the 
Institute  President's  address  the  boast  that  out  of 
5,000  architects  in  the  United  States,  only  4,500 
are  outside  the  ranks  of  the  faithful,  or  "  that  the 
influence  of  the  Institute  is  in  proportion  rather 
to  the  wisdom  than  the  number  of  its  members," 
or  that  the  Institute  stands  for  "  the  enactment 
of  a  law  sufficient  to  secure  for  us  a  truly  national 
architecture  fit  to  represent  our  highest  standards 
in  art. ' '  We  regret  that  the  Institute  has  reached 
such  a  stage  of  inaction  as  would  appear  from 
the  following  portion  of  President  Van  Brunt's 
speech  : 

' '  If,  after  those  many  years  of  experiment,  we 
have  at  length  reached  an  era  of  tranquil  and 
prosperous  development,  let  us  realize  that  the 
best  we  can  make  of  this  peace  is  to  comprehend 
and  to  assume  all  the  grave  responsibilities  which 
belong  to  the  undisputed  position  of  the  Institute 
as  the  national  representative  and  protector  of  a 
great  profession,  and  a  greater  art." 

All  will  acknowledge  that  the  greatest  event 
in  the  convention  was  the  passage  of  a  law  provid- 
ing that  after  January  1,  1905,  graduation  from 
some  recognized  architectural  school,  or  the  pas- 
sage of  examinations  to  be  held  by  the  Institute, 
shall  be  required  of  all  candidates  for  admission  to 
membership.  And  hand-in-hand  with  this  meri- 
torious action  are  the  President's  address  and  the 
report  of  the  Committee  on  Education,  which 
dwell  at  length  upon  the  Institute's  need  for 
young  men  and  new  life.     All  possible  ways  and 


22 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


means  were  recommended  for  luring  the  young 
into  the  chapters.  The  suggestion  was  made 
that  "the  Institute  should  be  especially  hos- 
.pitable  to  the  graduates  of  the  schools  .  . 
so  that  the  professors  prove  the  most  effective 
recruiting  agents  and  that  their  pupils  be  made 
to  consider  that  junior  membership  in  the  Insti- 
tute is  essential  to  their  proper  and  regular  ad- 
vancement in  the  profession." 

Such  a  suggestion  would  have  been  received 
by  the  architectural  world  as  a  mark  of  sincerity 
upon  the  part  of  the  Institute,  but  when  con- 
sidered with  the  weak-hearted  position  which  the 
Institute  maintained  toward  Professor  Laird 
when  the  latter  made  his  manly  and  courageous 
stand  against  debased  political  schemes,  the 
words  seem  to  possess  more  a  spirit  of  sham 
than  sincerity.  Most  assuredly  Professor  Laird, 
and  all  other  architectural  professors,  will  refuse 
utterly  to  act  in  the  capacity  of  recruiting  agents 
to  a  society  whose  present  members  are  too  weak 
to  point  the  finger  of  scorn  at  the  culprits  in  their 
midst.  Young  men  are  Liberals,  not  Conserva- 
tives, and  their  object  in  joining  the  Institute,  as 
it  exists  at  present,  would  be  far  from  any  desire 
to  sanction  its  abuses. 

The  Institute  cannot  conceal  its  urgent  need 
for  young  men.  They  are  seeking  all  reasonable 
means  to  accomplish  it.  When  they  sent  to  the 
young  architects  who  have  gained  travelling 
fellowships,  asking  them  each  to  place  one  of  their 
drawings  on  permanent  exhibition  in  their  Wash- 
ington headquarters,  the  Institute  rightly  judged 
that  a  very  urgent  plea  had  been  made  to  the 
ambitions  of  youth.  The  results  of  the  request, 
however,  should  sufficiently  convince  the  Insti- 
tute that  the  young  architects  of  to-day  are  avoid- 
ing that  organization  while  it  countenances  men 
of  "eminence"  who  are  not  men  of  principle. 
If  the  Institute  will  give  only  one  demonstration — 
one  practical  example — of  its  firm  desire  to  make 
the  path  of  rectitude  attractive,  if  it  will  show  that 
an  obscure  man  in  the  right  is  more  to  be  honored 
than  an  "eminent"  man  under  suspicion, 
the  younger  architects  will  not  merely  furnish 
the  bare  walls  of  the  Octagon,  but  will  gladly 
ally  themselves  with  the  organization  and  give  it 
the  new  life  that  is  vitally  necessary  now. 

Too  much  has  been  written  and  read 
John  Ruskin.   about  the  late  John  Ruskin  for  us 

to  add  anything  new  as  a  tribute  to 
his  memory.  Be  it  sufficient  to  say  that  uncon- 
sciously his  spirit  will  ever  be  present  in  the 
world,  leavening  the  lethargic  minds  of  the  un- 
appreciative  and  unlearned.  His  influence  in  art 
was  for  a  time  almost  a  dictatorship.  Even  those 
art  critics  of  to-day  who  sympathize  but  little  with 


Ruskin's  views  are  compelled  to  respect  the  beliefs 
and  criticisms  of  a  man  who  rose  head  and 
shoulders  above  his  fellows.  The  impetus  he 
gave  to  art  appreciation,  in  an  age  when  all  crea- 
tion seemed  benumbed,  is  felt  even  now  and  will 
continue  permanent. 

Many  years  ago  he  refused  the  much-coveted 
royal  gold  medal,  annually  bestowed  by  Her 
Majesty,  through  the  Royal  Institute  of  British 
Architects,  upon  some  architect  or  writer  upon 
architecture.  He  said  medals  give  no  uplift  to 
art.  Just  so  he  lived  and  worked,  an  indepen- 
dent, honest  and  unselfish  man. 

The  University  of  California  eom- 
whoisWho?  petition  was  the  means  of  bringing 
to  light  the  name  of  the  real  author 
of  the  Fine  Arts  Building  at  the  World's  Fair. 
It  is  but  a  matter  of  time  ere  ability  receives  its 
due  reward.  Some  would  argue  that  no  great 
reproach  falls  upon  Mr.  Atwood  for  appropriat- 
ing M.  Benard's  design,  since  the  erection  of  the 
White  City  required  much  hurry,  and  the  same 
critics  would  commend  the  former  for  hidden 
possibilities  in  the  original  that  would  not  have 
been  brought  out  had  M.  Benard  detailed  the 
design.  However  that  may  be,  the  scheme  was 
plagiarized  without  acknowledgment. 

In  the  same  connection  we  know  of  a  talented 
but  impecunious  young  man  who  designed  two 
sets  of  drawings  for  an  exclusive  invitation  com- 
petition held  during  the  past  year.  Both  of 
these  were  submitted  under  firm  names  of  different 
architects  in  different  cities  who  employed  him. 

We  know  of  a  large  marble  building  now 
being  erected  which  was  designed  by  an  obscure 
draughtsman  who  for  months  past  did  night- 
work  on  ^4-inch  scale  detail  drawings  at  his 
home  more  than  a  hundred  miles  from  the 
so-called  architect's  office,  and  again,  it  has  been 
a  source  of  amusement,  not  unmixed  with  proud 
satisfaction,  to  the  Beaux-Arts  men  to  note 
the  radical  departure  and  improvement  in  tech- 
nique of  designs  recently  issued  by  several  large 
New  York  offices.  One  can  attribute  these 
changes  to  nothing  but  latent  talent  in  the  archi- 
tects themselves,  if  one  would  not  desire  to 
appear  skeptical. 

From  Chicago,  a  city  where  spades  are  labelled 
spades,  and  where  great  tasks  are  carried  out  on 
broad  plans,  we  know  of  an  office  where  the 
manager  boasts  of  his  ability  and  faculty  for 
getting  work,  and  he  frankly  acknowledges  that 
it  is  easy  enough  "  to  hire  "  talent  to  execute  it. 
America  has  many  disciples  of  the  school  of 
Pecksniff. 

A  dignified,  and  ordinarily  serious,  member 
of  the   profession  from   Boston,  whose  heartfelt 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


23 


interest  in  the  profession  must  be  unquestioned, 
recently  reproved  a  young  man  for  taking  too 
great  an  interest  in  the  general  conduct  of  com- 
petitions. His  expressed  belitf  was  that  young 
men  had  much  before  them  and  should  confine 
themselves  to  study  and  training  instead  of  con- 
cerning themselves  with  professional  affairs.  To 
quote  his  consoling  words:  "  By  virtue  of  their 
age  and  experience,  only  the  older  members  of 
the  profession  can  consider  these  things  with 
their  peers  (?).  " 

How  can  even  these  few  observations  be  re- 
conciled ?  If  the  young  men  are  performing  the 
work  of  successful  prominent  architects  even  at 
a  considerable  distance  from  the  office  itself, 
how  much  study  and  training  is  still  beyond 
them  ere  the  pinnacle  of  eminence  is  to  be 
attained — or  rather,  accorded  them  ? 


T.    r  .  .  While  there  is  no  abatement  of  busi- 

The  Commercial 

Value  of  a      ness  rivalry  in  the  practice  of  archi- 

Reputation.  * 

tecture,  certain  firms  are  being 
singled  out,  year  by  year,  for  excellence  in  a  special 
class  of  work.  This  is  but  a  natural  process  of  evo- 
lution. It  also  gives  evidence  of  a  just  appreciation 
on  the  part  of  the  public.  From  it  we  may  draw 
the  conclusion  that  architecture,  like  every  other 
profession,  is  beginning  to  develop  its  specialists. 
Church  architects,  theatre  architects,  residence 
architects  and  commercial  building  architects  are 
reaping  large  rewards  in  their  several  specialties. 
On  the  other  hand,  the  jack-of-all-trades  in  archi- 
tecture is  becoming  a  decided  drug  on  the 
market. 

The  men  who  have  reached  higher  ground  in 
the  profession  by  such  specializing  are  looked 
upon  as  the  most  competent  to  serve  on  juries 
whose  compensations  are  large.  They  are  in- 
vited to  enter  exclusive,  paid  competitions,  and 
by  the  world  generally  are  given  larger  and 
more  remunerative  practices.  When  a  munici- 
pality or  a  corporation  is  contemplating  some 
vast  improvement,  such  men  are  selected  merely 
upon  reputations  along  their  individual  lines. 
Men  of  this  calibre  may  be  found  among  both 
the  young  and  old.  It  is  the  quality  of  their 
work  that  marks  them  and  justly  brings  them 
honor. 

In  noting  the  signs  of  the  times,  it  is 
Mr'  TayforKnox  gratifying  to  bear  testimony  to  the 

improvement  in  the  office  of  the 
supervising  architect  of  the  Treasury  Depart- 
ment. Throughout  the  department  are  men  who 
have  higher  standards  and  clearer  consciences, 
but  Mr.  James  Knox  Taylor,  the  present  supervis- 
ing architect,  deserves  the  grateful  acknowledg- 
ment of  the   entire   profession   for    his   attitude 


toward  the  Tarsney  Act.  We  should  recognize 
him  as  a  true  friend.  It  requires  no  very  extensive 
stretch  of  the  imagination  to  bring  to  mind  super- 
vising architects  who  have  been  entirely  out  of 
harmony  with  the  profession.  Mr.  Taylor  tcok 
part  in  the  Baltimore  conference,  and,  with  higher 
ideals,  is  a  firm  ally  of  those  interested  in  better 
architecture. 

Another  important  consideration, 
Symbolism  hitherto  largely  overlooked,  is  the 
necessity  for  using  indigenous  sources 
of  imagination.  Let  no  one  label  this  as  a  ques- 
tion in  the  abstract  philosophy  of  art,  for  such  it 
is  not.  It  relates  itself  too  closely  with  our  every- 
day life.  Regardless  of  the  age  of  a  community, 
in  spite  of  the  sterility  of  the  region  as  regards 
legends,  there  must  be  some  individual  trait  that 
may  be  fruitful  of  inspiration  to  the  architect. 

We  plagiarize  because  we  are  weak.  How 
seldom  is  found  any  trace  of  local  symbolism  in 
the  designing  of  to-day.  Climatic  conditions  and 
inherent  suggestions  are  refused  admittance  to 
the  office  of  the  modern  American  architect. 
The  enthusiasm  that  inspires  the  historical  painter 
is  lost  to  him.  Yet,  how  much  more  necessary 
is  this  quality  in  a  monument  standing  amid  the 
very  deeds  of  the  modern  community  and  erected 
as  a  commemoration  of  some  great  native  cause. 

True,  to-day  an  architect  is  expected  to  be  a 
scientific  economist  as  well  as  an  artist  and  con- 
structor, but,  with  all  the  drawbacks  so  prevalent 
in  the  sham  culture  of  to-day,  it  must  not  be  for- 
gotten that  before  people  could  read  or  write  sym- 
bolism was  appreciated  in  spite  of  all  ignorance. 

That  it  will  be  generally  appreciated  again 
cannot  be  denied,  for  the  people  in  their  con- 
ception of  architecture  find  proportion  and  mass 
secondary  to  ornament  and  color.  Even  the 
busiest  and  most  unappreciative  are  at  once  im- 
pressed by  sculpture  and  detail ;  these  crude  dis- 
tinctions may  be  the  limit  of  their  appreciation. 
At  any  rate,  it  is  usually  these  they  first  look  for 
in  sizing  up  a  building,  and,  finding  them,  are 
pleased.  Where  a  well-proportioned  plain  build- 
ing appeals  to  one,  an  ornate  structure,  no  matter 
how  meaningless  its  decoration  may  be,  attracts 
the  attention  of  a  dozen.  Therefore  we  predict 
that,  now  that  the  art  of  composition  is  beginning 
to  be  mastered,  the  next  step  will  be  symbolistic 
expression.  What  permits  us  to  hope  for  such 
an  outcome  is  on  the  one  hand  the  rapid  develop- 
ment of  artistic  taste,  and  moreover  the  clear 
proof  of  the  commercial  value  of  art  in  attracting 
people,  beside  the  innate  love  of  our  own  past, 
which  seldom  fails  to  awaken  a  sympathetic 
chord.  What  our  best  architecture  now  most 
lacks  is  that  elusive  spirit,  soul. 


24 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


Recently  a  Senate  Committee  au- 
AF^neArtesr.°f  thorized  a  favorable  report  on  the 
bill  to  establish  a  Department  of 
Commerce  and  Industry,  with  a  new  cabinet  offi- 
cer at  its  head.  Many  of  the  great  nations  of  the 
world  have  governmental  departments  of  similar 
scope,  and  the  committee  appears  to  hold  the 
view  that  certain  bureaus  now  scattered  through 
various  other  departments  legitimately  belong 
together,  constituting  a  new  one. 

While  changes  in  the  structure  of  the  Cabinet 
are  being  considered,  another  department  even 
more  urgently  needed,  from  our  point  of  view, 
and  for  which  we  also  find  precedent  among  the 
older  nations,  is  a  Department  of  the  Fine  Arts. 
We  are  already  burdened  with  too  many  societies 
giving  gratuitous  advice  as  to  the  improvement 
of  the  artistic  possibilities  of  our  cities,  and, 
although  they  rarely  have  anjr  power  to  back 
up  their  opinions,  they  have  succeeded  in  doing 
considerable  good  in  the  preservation  of  natural 
beauties  and  in  giving  direction  to  public  taste 
in  matters  of  the  arrangement  and  decoration  of 
public  places. 

What  is  really  needed,  however,  is  a  depart- 
ment with  sufficient  authority  to  enforce  its 
decisions  and  the  right  to  pass  upon  the  artistic 
value  of  public  works,  and  of  all  structures  that 
seriously  affect  the  appearance  of  our  cities  and 
harbors. 

In  the  control  which  the  War  Department 
holds  over  the  water-fronts  of  navigable  streams 
we  have  a  parallel  case,  and,  as  it  controls  the 
wharf  and  navigation  lines  in  reference  to  safety 
and  navigability,  it  would  be  within  the  scope  of 
a  Fine  Arts  Department  to  see  that  the  shores 
were  not  heedlessly  disfigured  by  ignorant  and 
arrogant  corporations,  and  that  natural  opportu- 
nities were  preserved  and  developed  with  the 
growth  of  the  city  upon  its  banks.  And  even 
if  so  important  a  change  in  the  attitude  of  the 
Government  is  not  at  once  practicable,  the  War 
Department  itself,  through  a  special  bureau  with 
a  competent  architect  at  its  head,  could  perform 
similar  functions,  at  least  in  reference  to  our 
rivers  and  harbors  and  other  works  under  its 
control. 


Municipal 
Art. 


The  formation  of  numerous  muni- 
cipal art  societies  throughout  the 
country  is  a  gratifying  sign  of 
progress,  and  the  frequent  conferences  which 
are  held  from  time  to  time  in  different  cities,  and 
to  which  speakers  of  eminence  are  invited,  bear 
witness  to  the  increased  interest  of  the  public 
in  these  matters. 

In   the  formation  of  a  National   Committee 
for  Municipal  Improvement  and  Civic  Embellish- 


ment by  the  Architectural  League  of  America, 
with  Mr.  Cass  Gilbert  as  its  chairman,  and 
in  the  one  session  of  the  Congress  of  the  same 
association  soon  to  be  held  in  Chicago,  consist- 
ing of  a  public  joint  meeting  with  the  American 
Park  and  Outdoor  Art  Association,  are  seen 
two  future  steps  in  the  same  direction,  and 
constitute  hopeful  signs  for  the  future  appear- 
ance of  our  cities. 

As  we  go  to  press  the  first  Circuit 
Architectural  of    the     Architectural    League    of 

Exhibitions.       A  ,v'  <     ir 

America  is  more  than  half  com- 
pleted, the  travelling  exhibition  having  been 
displayed  in  Philadelphia,  New  York,  Chicago, 
St.  Louis  and  Detroit  thus  far.  While  it  is  too 
early  to  offer  an  opinion  as  to  the  success  of  this 
enterprise,  we  may  call  attention  to  some  of  the 
experiences  encountered  thus  far.  Theoretically 
the  circuit  offers  mutual  advantages  which 
can  scarcely  be  obtained  without  such  united 
effort,  and  in  practice  it  is  found  that  the 
responsibility  falling  upon  the  first  club  holding 
an  exhibition  is  counterbalanced  by  the  ad- 
vantages gained  by  being  first  to  exhibit  and  in 
having  first  choice  for  the  catalogue. 

That  the  circuit  is  a  good  thing  we  are  sure, 
and  the  difficulties  that  have  occurred  this  year 
have  been  more  due  to  inexperience,  a  lack  of 
careful  preparation,  and  to  mistakes  of  judgment 
than  to  any  obstacle  which  could  not  be  readily 
overcome,  and  we  know  that  the  circuit  can  be 
continued  to  advantage  in  future  years  if  the 
clubs  unite  heartily  to  secure  the  desired  result, 
and  if  each  club  will  remember  its  obligations  to 
the  succeeding  exhibition  committee. 

The  circuit  and  the  natural  growth 
ciub  of  the  profession  keep  the  number 

of  exhibitions  of  architectural  draw- 
ings steadily  on  the  increase,  and  as  advertise- 
ments in  the  catalogues  usually  cover  the 
exhibition  expenses,  the  catalogue  becomes  an 
important  factor  in  all  such  enterprises,  especially 
as  they  are  seldom  merely  illustrated  lists  of 
the  titles  of  drawings  and  the  names  and 
addresses  of  exhibitors,  many  of  them  being 
useful  for  reference  and  often  taking  the  form 
of  local  illustrated  reviews  of  value.  The  best 
are  regularly  edited  by  some  member  of  the 
club  selected  for  his  fitness  to  voice  the  architec- 
tural sentiment  of  the  locality. 

The  catalogue  of  the  exhibition  by  the 
Chicago  Architectural  Club  leads  in  interest 
among  the  rest  this  year,  and  Mr.  Dwight 
Heald  Perkins,  the  editor,  deserves  great  credit 
for  the  make-up  of  the  whole  book.  It  contains 
not  only  the   lists  and  illustrations,   but  also  a 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


25 


number  of  well-written  short  articles  on  local 
and  general  topics.  The  expense  of  getting  up 
this  catalogue  was  not,  however,  covered  by 
the  sale  of  advertising  space,  but  was  borne 
by  a  number  of  business  men  interested  in 
architecture,  their  names  being  given  on  a  page 
devoted  to  that  purpose,  as  Patrons  of  the 
exhibition  of  1900. 

No  criticism  is  therefore  possible  as  to  the 
soliciting  of  advertisements  by  the  profession, 
and  as  many  architects  figure  among  the  names, 
it  should  be  a  sufficient  proof  to  the  most 
exacting  critic  of  the  interest  of  the  architects  in 
these  catalogues. 

In  the  catalogue  of  the  St.  Louis  Exhibition 
there  is,  in  addition  to  the  usual  matter,  a  brief 
review  of  local  architecture  in  the  past,  and 
an  interesting  series  of  notes  on  present  con- 
ditions. It  was  edited  by  Mr.  S.  L-  Sherer. 
Among  others  we  may  mention  that  of  the 
T-Square  Club,  of  Philadelphia,  edited  by 
Mr.  David  Knickerbacker  Boyd,  and  that  of 
the  Detroit  Architectural  Club,  edited  by  Mr. 
Francis  S.  Swales,  as  being  well-arranged  ex- 
amples of  such  publications,  the  latter  being  the 
best  printed  catalogue  we  have  ever  seen. 

international  The  great  international  fairs  that 
EaXsP°EpochS    take   place   every    ten    years   or   so 

Markers.  jn  parjs  aiKj  elsewhere  are  ex- 
hibitions of  the  architectural  progress  of  the 
decade  quite  as  much  as  of  progress  in  other 
directions ;  even  perhaps  more  so  because  of 
the  importance  given  on  all  hands  to  the  ques- 
tion of  the  architectural  character  of  the  build- 
ings, and  because  of  the  public  interest  aroused 
by  the  sudden  erection  at  a  centre  of  interest 
of  so  many  and  such  extensive  buildings. 

The  educational  influence  of  these  expositions 
was  well  exemplified  in  the  case  of  our  own 
World's  Fair  at  Chicago,  which  was  deliberately 
planned  as  an  object  lesson  in  the  forms  and 
possibilities  of  permanent  architecture  and  was 
productive  of  much  good  in  spite  of  the 
archaeological  character  of  most  of  the  designs 
carried  out.  Since  that  time  there  have  been 
fairs  held  at  Atlanta,  Nashville  and  Omaha,  in 
which  similar  ideas  guided  the  designers  of  the 
exposition  buildings,  with  similar  results. 

In  contrast,  however,  with  this  exploitation 
of  the  ancient  and  alien  architectural  types,  is 
the  freedom  with  which  modern  impulses  have 
been  followed  in  recent  French  fairs,  the  manner 
in  which  the  festive  and  transitory  character 
of  the  occasion  has  been  expressed  and  how 
local  and  contemporary  thought  has  influenced 
the  form  and  construction  of  these  temporary 
palaces. 


As  far  as  indications  show,  this  modern 
spirit  will  be  an  important  factor  at  the  Buffalo 
Exposition  of  1901,  and  it  will  be  in  a  sense 
the  first  summing  up  of  modern  endeavors  in 
architecture  in  this  country. 

It  is  to  be  hoped  that  the  progressive  and 
public-spirited  citizens  of  St.  Louis,  having 
projected  a  world's  fair  for  1903,  will  see  that, 
as  the  buildings  of  the  fair  are  to  contain  the 
latest  and  highest  evidences  of  industrial 
and  artistic  progress,  the  designs  for  these 
buildings  should  be  chosen  in  the  same  spirit ; 
that  as  the  fair  is  a  festival  in  commemoration 
of  local  progress,  and  is  temporary  in  the  very 
nature  of  the  case,  these  facts  should  be  ex- 
pressed in  its  architecture,  and,  where  possible, 
emphasized  as  references  to  local  history  and 
growth. 

In  the  Chicago  Exposition  the  good 

How  the  Best  ,  L    r.    .    A  .      °    , 

Results  are  example  was  set  of  intrusting  the 
work  of  designing  the  buildings 
and  their  arrangement  to  a  board  of  architects, 
selected  on  their  reputation,  from  among  the 
ablest  men  in  the  country.  These  worked 
together  in  perfect  harmony  for  the  common 
end,  buildings  being  allotted  to  the  different 
members  of  the  board,  and  these  receiving  a 
stated  salary  for  their  services. 

The  Board  of  Architects  for  the  buildings 
of  the  Pan-American  Exposition  to  be  held  at 
Buffalo  in  1901  selected  Mr.  John  M.  Carrere 
as  their  chairman,  and  the  following  allotments 
have  been  made :  Liberal  Arts  and  Agricul- 
ture, Shepley,  Rutan  &  Coolidge,  of  Boston ; 
Machinery  and  Transportation  and  Electricity, 
Green  &  Wicks,  of  Buffalo ;  Electric  Tower, 
Howard,  Cauldwell  &  Morgan,  of  New  York; 
Stadium  and  Administration,  Restaurant, 
Station  and  Cloister,  Babb,  Cook  &  Willard, 
of  New  York;  Horticulture,  Forestry  and 
Graphic  Arts,  Peabody  &  Stearns,  of  Boston ; 
Temple  of  Music,  Esenwein  &  Johnson,  of 
Buffalo  ;  Mines,  Ethnology  and  three  entrances, 
George  Cary,  of  Buffalo  ;  landscape  plan,  bridge, 
south  approach,  and  all  formal  landscape  work, 
except  the  entrance  court,  Carrere  &  Hastings, 
of  New  York. 

The  board  has  also  retained  the  services  of 
Mr.  Karl  Bitter,  the  sculptor,  and  M.  C.  Y. 
Turner,  the  mural  painter,  to  take  charge  of 
the  decorations,  and  the  chief  of  construction  is 
Mr.  H.  S.  Kissam,  of  New  York. 

Not  only  every  city  has  its  public 
ArubraCriesal    libraries  as  a  matter  of  course,  but 
almost  every  little  town  has  a  col- 
lection of    books   open   to    all,  where    standard 


26 


ARCHITECTURAL   ANNUAL 


works  of  fiction,  of  science  and  of  reference  can 
be  found.  But  even  in  large  cities  a  well-se- 
lected group  of  books  on  architectural  matters 
is  very  rare,  and  is  usually  inadequate  to  the 
needs  of  the  student  worker  or  general  reader. 
Especially  in  important  works  of  reference,  man}' 
of  them  too  costly  to  be  within  the  means  of  the 
bulk  of  the  profession,  and  which  may  not  be 
consulted  by  any  one  man  twice  a  year,  are  the 
existing  collections  notably  deficient.  Every 
great  library,  and  above  all  every  college  library, 
should  have  these  special  works  where  they 
could  be  consulted  and  studied,  and  there  is  here 
an  opportunity  for  public-minded  men  to  assist 
the  existing  libraries  at  a  point  where  they  are 
now  lamentably  weak.  Beside  such  works  as 
these  there  are  at  least  two  architectural 
journals  published  in  this  country  that  should 
be  in  the  periodical  room  of  every  library. 
There  are  a  few  noble  exceptions  to  the  usual  con- 
ditions mentioned  above,  and  in  this  connection 
it  may  be  recalled  that  in  the  library  of  the 
Carnegie  Institute  at  Pittsburg  rooms  have 
been  devoted  to  the  purposes  of  the  architectural 
societies  of  that  city,  and  that  the  Institute  has 
solicited  advice  as  to  the  selection  of  books  on 
architectural  and  allied  subjects.  A  similar 
request  was  made  by  the  Philadelphia  Free 
Library  at  a  reception  given  to  the  T-Square 
Club,  the  members  of  the  latter  organization 
being  invited  to  attend  a  special  reception  to 
offer  suggestions  that  would  assist  in  the  forma- 
tion of  a  public  collection  of  works  on  architec- 
tural and  related  subjects. 


The 


The  initial  number  of  the  Archi- 
ArAnne Caiural  ^ctural  Annual,  appearing  as  it 

does  at  the  dawn  of  a  new  century, 
both  in  time  and  ideas,  seeks  to  represent  the 
age's  spirit  of  progression,  and  stands  as  an  out- 


post in  the  realm  of  new  and  vigorous  thought. 
Its  aims  are  far  beyond  those  of  a  merely  tech- 
nical publication  ;  rather  is  it  intended  as  a 
popular  book  of  reference,  suited  by  its  uni- 
versality to  the  library  shelf  of  the  professional 
and  layman  alike. 

There  long  has  been  lacking  a  ground  of 
common  interest  for  the  expression  of  the  client's 
needs  and  the  architect's  ideals.  It  remains  for 
the  Architectural  Annual,  in  its  unique  posi- 
tion, to  strike  the  chord  that  shall  bring  into  har- 
mony these  apparently  diverse  elements. 

In  the  past  incompetent  architects  have  too 
frequently  brought  down  upon  themselves  a  well- 
merited  storm  of  public  condemnation  through 
the  use  of  false  and  insincere  standards.  To 
thrust  upon  an  uninformed  public  alien,  obsolete 
styles  and  passing  fads,  simply  to  gratify  the 
"lust  of  the  eye,"  without  regard  to  logical, 
common-sense  architecture,  has  deserved  the  se 
vere  criticism  that  has  assailed  it.  Unfortunately, 
such  criticism  has  not  always  confined  itself  to  the 
offenders  alone.  The  results  of  these  capricious 
efforts  have,  in  most  cases,  been  sufficiently  im- 
practical to  show  the  inability  of  the  architect, 
but  too  often  a  whole  community  has  been  en- 
trapped, and  ignominious  reproach  has  been  cast 
upon  the  well-directed  and  earnest  endeavors  of 
the  profession.  Such  errors  of  the  past  have 
become  the  correcting  influences  of  the  present. 

Most  necessary  to-day  are  clearly- conceived 
ideals,  self  assurance,  based  upon  rigorous  train- 
ing, a  healthier  point  of  view,  realization  of  the 
needs  of  the  age,  and  a  judicious  application  of 
standards  that  are  in  accordance  with  American 
individuality  and  genius.  When  such  ideals  are 
realized,  the  layman  may  assume  that  his  trust 
in  the  architect  is  not  misplaced,  scandals  will 
cease,  and  the  fair  dignity  of  the  profession  will 
be  preserved. 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


27 


THE  MODERN  PHASE  OF  ARCHITECTURE 

BY  LOUIS  H.  SULLIVAN 
Paper  rend  at  the  first  convention  of  the  Architectural  League  of  America. 


THE  Cleveland  meeting  of  the  architectural 
clubs  of  the  country  will  mark,  I  believe, 
the  auspicious  opening  of  a  new  era  in  the 
growth  of  architectural  thought. 

It  should,  in  the  nature  of  things,  be  of  serious 
import  to  us  of  the  present  and  active  generation 
to  know  what  the  generation  to  follow  thinks 
and  feels. 

Its  thoughts  may  be  immature,  its  feelings 
vague  and  formless  ;  yet,  nevertheless,  in  them 
the  future  life  of  our  art  is  surely  working  out  its 
destiny,  and  the  sincerity  of  them  is  not  to  be 
denied. 

Youth  is  the  most  ambitious,  the  most  beau- 
tiful, but  the  most  helpless  stage  of  life.  It  has 
that  immediate  and  charming  idealism  which 
leads  in  the  end  toward  greatness  ;  but  it  can 
know  little  of  the  sorrow  and  bitterness  of  the 
struggle  for  greatness.  Youth  is  ineffable.  I 
have  said  good-bye  to  mine  ;  with  solicitude  I 
welcome  yours. 

Perceiving,  as  I  do,  the  momentous  sway  and 
drift  of  modern  life ;  knowing,  as  I  do,  that  the 
curtain  has  risen  on  a  drama,  the  most  intense 
and  passionate  in  all  history,  I  urge  that  you 
cast  away  as  worthless  the  shopworn  and  em- 
pirical notion  that  an  architect  is  an  artist — 
whatever  that  funny  word  may  mean — and  ac- 
cept my  assurance  that  he  is  and  imperatively 
shall  be  a  poet  and  an  interpreter  of  the  national 
life  of  his  time. 

Do  you  fully  realize  how  despicable  is  a  man 
who  betrays  a  trust  ? 

Do  you  know,  or  can  you  foresee,  or  instinct- 
ively judge  how  acutely  delicate  will  become,  in 
your  time,  the  element  of  confidence  and  depend- 
ence between  man  and  man  and  between  society 
and  the  individual  ? 

If  you  realize  this,  you  will  realize  at  once 
and  forever  that  you,  by  birth,  and  through  the 
beneficence  of  the  form  of  government  under 
which  you  live — that  you  are  called  upon,  not 
to  betray,  but  to  express  the  life  of  your  own 
day  and  generation.     That  society  will  have  just 


cause  to  hold  you  to  account  for  your  use  of  the 
liberty  that  it  has  given  to  you,  and  the  confi- 
dence it  has  reposed  in  you. 

You  will  realize  in  due  time,  as  your  lives 
develop  and  expand,  and  you  become  richer  in 
experience,  that  a  fraudulent  and  surreptitious 
use  of  historical  documents,  however  suavely 
presented,  however  cleverly  plagiarized,  however 
neatly  repacked,  however  shrewdly  intrigued, 
will  constitute  and  will  be  held  to  be  a  betrayal 
of  trust. 

You  know  well  what  I  mean.  You  know  in 
your  own  hearts  that  you  are  to  be  fakers  or  that 
you  are  to  be  honest  men. 

It  is  futile  to  quibble  or  to  protest,  or  to  plead 
ignorance  or  innocence,  or  to  asseverate  and  urge 
the  force  of  circumstances.  *         *         *        * 

If  you  take  the  pains  truly  to  understand 
your  country,  your  people,  your  day,  your  gene- 
ration, the  time,  the  place  in  which  you  live  ; 
if  you  seek  to  understand,  absorb,  and  sympa- 
thize with  the  life  around  you,  you  will  be  under- 
stood and  sympathetically  received  in  return. 
Have  no  fear  as  to  this. 

Society  soon  will  have  no  use  for  people  who 
have  no  use  for  it.  The  clairv037ance  of  the  age 
is  steadily  unfolding ;  and  it  will  result  there- 
from that  the  greatest  poet  will  be  he  who  shall 
grasp  and  deify  the  commonplaces  of  our  life — 
those  simple,  normal  feelings  which  the  people 
of  his  day  will  be  helpless,  otherwise,  to  express 
— and  here  you  have  the  key  with  which,  indi- 
vidually, you  may  unlock,  in  time,  the  portal  of 
3'our  art. 

I  truly  believe  that  your  coming  together  will 
result  in  serious  things.  You  have  my  sympathy. 
I  am  with  you  in  spirit ;  for  in  you  resides  the  only 
hope,  the  only  sign  of  dawn  that  I  can  see,  making 
for  a  day  that  shall  regenerate  an  art  that  should 
be,  may  be  and  must  be,  the  noblest,  the  most 
intimate,  the  most  expressive,  the  most  eloquent 
of  all. 

Your  youth  is  your  most  precious  heritage 
from  the  past.     I  am  with  you. 


28 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


PRESIDENT  VAN  BRUNT'S  ADDRESS,  1899 

REPRINTED  FROM  THE  OFFICIAL  REPORT  OF  THE  THIRTY-THIRD  ANNUAL  CONVENTION  OF 

THE  AMERICAN  INSTITUTE  OF  ARCHITECTS 


IT  is  my  province  and  my  privilege  to  welcome 
you  to  this  Thirty-third  Annual  Convention 
of  the  American  Institute  of  Architects  ;  to 
congratulate  you  on  the  national  prosperity  and 
progress  which  it  is  your  high  function  to  sym- 
bolize in  works  of  architecture  ;  to  refer  briefly 
to  the  main  incidents  in  the  history  of  American 
architecture  during  the  past  year ;  and  more 
especially  to  point  out  how  the  work  which  we 
are  organized  to  perform  may  be  more  effectually 
carried  out,  and  how  the  beneficent  influence  of 
the  Institute  may  be  more  widely  extended. 

If  architecture  during  the  past  year  has  made 
a  sufficiently  definite  advance  in  structural  inge- 
nuity or  artistic  beauty  and  fitness  to  be  noted  in 
the  official  review,  which  it  is  my  duty  to  lay 
before  you,  if  in  this  interval  it  has  earned  and  is 
receiving  from  the  public  and  the  nation  a  more 
intelligent  and  appreciative  recognition  as  a  fine 
art,  we  may  justly  attribute  these  results  to  two 
causes  :  first,  to  the  American  Institute  of  Archi- 
tects, through  the  cordial  affiliations  of  its  mem- 
bers and  its  organized  and  persistent  efforts  during 
the  more  than  forty  years  of  its  existence  ;  and, 
second,  to  the  schools  of  architecture,  which  are  now 
considered  so  essential  to  the  generous  culture  of  the 
youth  of  our  country  that  they  form  a  part  of  the 
systems  of  technical  instruction  in  many  of  the 
principal  institutions  of  learning  in  the  United 
States.  The  splendid  hospitality  of  the  Ecole  des 
Beaux-Arts  is  no  longer  essential  to  the  complete 
equipment  of  the  American  architect.  During  the 
past  year  the  results  of  the  special  training  obtained 
in  our  own  schools  have  become  very  evident.  The 
graduates  are  beginning- to  make  good  their  place  in 
the  ranks  of  the  profession ,  and  the  older  members 
find  that  they  are  stimulated  by  a  fine  emulation  of 
new  blood  and  fresh  inspiration.  Almost  daily  neiv 
names  become  prominent,  and  new  reputations  arc 
beginning  to  struggle  with  old  for  pre-eminence . 
The  impulse  of  this  new  and  healthy  dispensation 
is  already  felt  in  the  remotest  parts  of  the  country, 
and  the  vulgar  architectural  vernacular  which  lias 
there  prevailed  is  giving  place  to  coherent  and  disci- 
f  lined  style. 

The  Institute  should  take  immediate  measures  to 
refresh  itself  from  this  influx  of  new  and  abounding 
life.  It  is  most  evident  that  these  two  powerful 
influences,  the  Institute  and  the  schools,  which  arc 


thus  working  for  the  advancement  of  architecture , 
should  work,  not  apart  in  rivalry,  but  together  in 
closer  and  more  effective  co-operation  than  hereto- 
fore. 

To  this  end,  I  venture  to  suggest  that,  by  a  sim- 
ple amendment  of  the  By-Laws,  the.  Committee  on 
Education  should  include,  cx-ofificio,  all  those  pro- 
fessors and  instructors  of  the  architectural  schools 
ivho  are  members  of  the  Institute,  and,  if  there  are 
any  who  are  not  members,  that  they  should  be 
brought  within  our  folds,  so  that  this  committee 
may  act,  not  only  as  a  bond  of  union  between  the 
Institute  and  the  schools,  but  between  the  schools 
themselves ;  that  the  annual  report  of  this  commit- 
tee should  embrace  a  general  statement  of  the  work 
and  methods  of  the  schools,  the  number  of  pupils 
enrolled,  and  the  names  of  those  especially  dis- 
tinguished;  and  that  the  practical  interest  of  the 
Institute  in  the  "welfare  of  the  students  should  be 
made  evident  to  them  by  the  establishment  of  a  sys- 
tem of  Institute  prizes,  and,  if  possible,  of  one  or 
more  travelling  scholarships ,  open  to  students  of  all 
the  schools. 

There  are  nearly  5,000  persons  practising  as 
architects  in  this  country,  and  it  cannot  be  denied 
that  the  professional  practice  and  standing  of  this 
large  body  of  men  is  made  more  secure,  more 
honorable,  more  respected,  and  more  remunera- 
tive by  the  fact  that  one  tenth  of  their  number  is 
organized  and  united  in  a  national  Institute, 
which,  for  many  years,  has  labored  successfully 
to  promote  the  artistic,  scientific,  and  practical 
efficiency  of  the  profession.  It  is  true  that  the 
influence  of  the  Institute  is  in  proportion  rather  to 
the  wisdom  than  the  number  of  its  members. 
It  is  no  less  true  that  the  Institute  is  organized  for 
a  far  larger  and  a  far  more  widely  distributed 
membership  than  it  at  present  enjoys,  and  that , 
until  it  has  such  a  national  membership,  it  cannot 
have  its  full  and  proper  effect  as  an  instrument  for 
the  advancement  of  our  profession,  and  cannot  ade- 
quately represent  its  dignity  before  the  world. 

The  question  how  our  strength  and  resources 
can  be  best  e?ilarged  is,  therefore,  of  the  first  import- 
ance. The  men  whom  the  Institute  most  needs  are 
the  men  who  most  need  the  Institute.  A  late  ear- 
nest appeal  to  the  Chapters  has,  in  several  localities, 
been  fruitful  in  securing  many  valuable  members, 
as  will  be  explained  in  the  report  of  the  Board  of 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


29 


Directors.      The   Kansas    City    Chapter   has   been 
rehabilitated  and  is  restored  to  full  affiliation  with 
the  Institute   under  the  nee  By-Laws.     But   the 
strengthening  of  the  Institute    requires    measures 
much  more  far-reaching.      We  need  new  Chapters 
in   every   fart  of  o//r   wide   domain,    and,    within 
then/,  more  members,  and  a   much   more  active  and 
efficient  adjustment  of  their  machinery  to  the  needs 
of  young  men.     No  effor    should  be  spared  by  the 
Chapters  to  make  their  meetings  so  attractive  and 
so  essentia/  to  the  younger  men  that  the  necessity  for 
.  the  existence  of  junior  societies  and  leagues  in  their 
neighborhood   would   be   less    apparent,    and   there 
should  be  no  occasion  for  rivalry.       The  Institute 
should  be  especially   hospitable  to  the  graduates  of 
the  schools,   and  I  am  persuaded  that  if  the  con- 
nection between  the  schools  a?id  the  Institute  should 
be  established  on  some  such  basis  of  mutual  interest 
as  has  been  outlined  the  professors  would  prove  the 
most   effective    recruiting   agents,    and    that    their 
pupils  on  graduation    would  be   made  to  consider 
that  junior  membership  in  a  Chapter  of  the  Institute 
is  essential  to  their  proper  and  regular  advancement 
in  the  profession  and  a  necessary  preliminary  step 
in  their  ca>'eer  as  architects.      The  Institute  should 
not  only  be  the  guardian  of  professional  purity  and 
dignity   in  practice,   should  not  only  advance  the 
interests  of  our  art  and  act  as  the  fountain  of  pro- 
fessional honor,  but  should  aim  to  secure  a   more 
effective  unity  of  effort  between  old  and  young ,  so  as 
to  inspire  our  work  with  the  strenuous  spirit  of  our 
national  life,  and  in  this  service  to  make  our  art 
distinctively  stronger,    truer,   and  more  beautiful. 
Therefore  the  Institute  needs  in  its  membership  not 
only  the  wisdom  of  age  and  experience,    but  the 
enthusiasm  and  zeal  of  youth,  if  it  would  keep  in 
closer  toiich  with  the  most  healthy  aspirations  of  the 
profession  and  avoid  becoming  the  slave  of  its  own 
traditions.      To  this  end  the  junior  members  of  the 
Chapters,  recruited  from  draughtsmen  atid  gradu- 
ates of  the  schools,  should  be  made  to  feel  that  they 
are  wards  of  the  Institute  and  essential  parts  of  its 
organization,  and  to  anticipate  their  advancement 
in   due  time  to  the  successive  grades  of  Associate 
membership  and  fill  Fellowship  as  assurances  of 
honorable  professional  positions  before  the  world. 
It  seems  to  me  that  the  Institute,  under  its  present 
improved  organization,  would,  by  some  such  process 
as  I  have  suggested,    be  brought  into  closer  and 
more  effective  sytnpathy  with .  the  young  men  just 
entering  the  prof essioti,  and  through  such  sympathy 
would  receive  at  least  as  many  benefits  and  advan- 
tages as  it  would  confer. 

I  commend  these  propositions  to  your  careful  con- 
sideration ;  and  zvould  further  propose  that  the 
Board  of  Directors  be  requested  to  examine  into  the 


work  and  methods  of  the  most  successful  of  the 
juuioi  architectural  societies  or  leagues,  with  the 
object  of  formulating  from  their  experience  a  scheme 
of  exercises  and  duties  to  be  recommended  in  a  cir- 
cular to  the  Chapters,  so  that  they  may  learn  how 
to  give  greater  interest  and  a  more  abundant  life  to 
thai'  proceedings  and  become  more  active  and  effi- 
cient agents  in  the  practical  work  'which  this  Insti- 
tute is  organized  to  perform.  'Thus  may  be  estab- 
lished a  propaganda  in  the  interests  of  a  warmer 
comradeship,  a  purer  practice ,  and  a  nobler  a rt. 

In  considering  what  has  been  actually  accom- 
plished by  our  efforts  during  the  past  year,  it  is 
with  especial  pleasure  that  I  refer  to  the  fact  that, 
under  the  operations  of  the  Tarsney  Act,  public 
buildings  at  Norfolk,  Va.,  Camden,  N.  J.,  and 
Ellis  Island,  New  York  City,  are  now  erecting 
from  the  designs  and  under  the  care  of  private 
architects  ;  that  the  New  Custom  House  in  New 
York  and  the  Judiciary  Building  in  Washington 
have,  after  fair  competition,  been  assigned  to 
architects  capable  of  expressing  the  genius  of  the 
nation  in  monumental  architecture  ;  and  that  the 
Baltimore  Custom  House  and  the  national  build- 
ings at  Cleveland,  Ohio,  will  probably  soon  be 
the  subjects  of  competitive  design.  The  work  on 
the  buildings  for  the  Naval  Academy  at  Annapo- 
lis and  on  the  Government  building  at  Chicago 
is  in  the  hands  of  private  architects.  It  is  prob- 
able that  other  public  monuments,  especially  in 
the  West,  will  be  open  to  the  profession  as  soon 
as  the  sites  shall  have  been  vested  in  the  United 
States.  The  office  of  the  Supervising  Architect 
at  Washington  is  thus  gratefully  relieved  from  a 
labor  which  no  individual  genius,  however  strong, 
and  no  official  organization,  however  skilful,  can 
be  sufficient  adequately  to  perform.  But  while 
the  efforts  of  the  Institute  have  thus  far  succeeded 
in  opening  to  fair  and  honorable  competition  the 
designing  and  building  of  the  national  monuments , 
and  have  made  an  encouraging  beginning  in  render- 
ing them  more  worthy  to  represent  our  higher  civili- 
zation in  terms  of  art,  it  must  not  be  forgotten  that 
these  opportunities  have  been  opened  to  us  only 
through  the  intelligefit  sympathy  of  the  present 
Honorable  Secretary  of  the  Treasury,  operating 
under  the  provisions  of  the  Tarsney  Act ;  and  that, 
without  the  accident  of  this  intelligent  and  excep- 
tional sympathy  on  the  part  of  that  official,  the 
public  buildings  of  our  country  would  still  be  manu- 
factured by  the  architectural  machine  in  the  Treas- 
ury Department,  with  its  subdivided  professional 
responsibilities ,  its  baleful  political  affiliations,  and 
its  deliberate  and  extravagant  methods  of  adnmiis- 
tration.  Our  attempts  to  formulate  and  obtai?i  the 
enactment  of  a  lazv  sufficient  to  secure  for  us  a  truly 
national  architecture  fit  to   represent  our  highest 


30 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


standards  in  art  should  not  for  a  moment  be  relaxed, 
and  our  Legislative  Committee  on  Government 
Architecture  should  be  continued,  maintained ',  and 
encouraged  to  use  every  honorable  means  to  bring 
about  this  result  at  the  earliest  possible  day. 

I  am  glad  to  bear  witness  to  the  fact  that,  in 
the  conduct  of  competition  in  general,  the  dignity 
and  the  highest  interests  of  our  profession  have 
during  the  past  year  received  more  adequate 
and  respectful  consideration  than  heretofore.  But 
it  must  be  admitted  that  in  many  parts  of  our 
country,  especially  in  those  more  remote  from  the 
great  centres  of  activity  and  intelligence,  the  loose 
professional  habits  of  many  practitioners  of  our 
art  still  encourage  the  publication  of  ' '  Invitations 
to  Architects,"  which,  though  proposing  compe- 
titions, in  which  the  contestants  are  arbitrarily 
deprived  of  every  proper  safeguard,  and  are  asked 
to  submit  themselves  to  conditions  insulting  to 
their  self-respect  and  devised  to  secure  their 
services  at  the  smallest  possible  cost,  meet  with 
ready  and  humiliating  acceptance.  Near  every 
such  locality  the  Institute  should  maintain  a 
Missionary  Chapter  to  teach  the  primary  princi- 
ples of  honorable  practice  for  the  benefit,  not  of 
the  architects  alone,  but  of  the  public. 

Among  the  competitions  of  the  year  which 
have  been  managed  in  a  manner  creditable  to  the 
projectors,  the  contestants,  and  the  judges,  by  far 
the  most  conspicuous  and  memorable  is  that  for 
the  laying  out  of  the  buildings  and  grounds  of 
the  University  of  California,  under  the  "  Phcebe 
Hearst  Architectural  Plan."  Though  the  highest 
award  in  this  international  competition  fell  to  a 
Fre7ich  architect,  the  brilliant  part  borne,  especially 
by  some  of  the  younger  American  contestants,  is  a 
cause  for  congratulation.  I  should  like  to  see  this 
Institute,  by  formal  resolution,  recognize  our 
indebtedness,  not  only  to  the  munificent  and 
public-spirited  woman  through  whom  this  import- 
ant architectural  event  was  made  possible,  but  to 
the  Managing  Committee  for  furnishing  an  exam- 
ple so  conspicuous  of  a  fairly  conducted  competi- 
tion on  a  great  scale,  and  for  the  courage  and 
intelligence  with  which  they  have  conceived  a 
scheme  of  architecture  which,  in  extent  and 
importance,  has  not  been  exceeded,  if  it  has  been 
equalled,  in  modern  times. 

Another  cause  for  congratulation  resides  in 
the  cordial  and  effective  alliance  between  paint- 
ing, sculpture  and  architecture,  as  exhibited  in 
several  works  of  monumental  importance  which 
have  reached  completion  during  the  past  year. 
It  is  only  by  such  harmonious  and  fruitful 
co-operation  that  the  highest  civilization  of  our 
times  may,  at  length,  begin  to  receive  competent 
expression  in  art.  The  public  is  beginning  to 
understand  that  the  highest  and  noblest  expres- 


sions of  art,  not  only  in  permanent  monuments, 
but  in  public  pageants  of  merely  temporary 
significance,  are  possible  only  through  such  a 
concert  of  effort,  and  architecture  is  glad  to 
restore  to  her  sisters  of  the  brush  and  chisel  the 
field  of  high  endeavor  in  which  the  old  masters 
found  their  greatest  opportunities.  We  especially 
recognize  and  admire  the  splendid  service  rendered 
by  the  sculptors  in  the  decoration  of  the  Triumphal 
Arch  erected  in  New  York  in  honor  of  the  Navy 
and  the  victor  of  Manila. 

I  have  looked  forward,  gentlemen  of  the  Insti- 
tute, with  especial  solicitude  and  interest  to  this, 
your  thirty-third  convention,  as  it  is  the  first  in 
which,  under  our  finally  amended  laws,  the 
experiment  of  authorized  delegations  from  the 
Chapters  is  to  be  tried  ;  the  first  in  which  the 
remodelling  of  the  Constitution  and  By-Laws  has 
not  presented  itself  as  the  paramount  and  absorb- 
ing topic  of  report  and  discussion  ;  and  practi- 
cally the  first  in  which  the  Institute  has  given  to 
it  the  privilege  and  opportunity  of  considering  at 
peace  and  without  fear  of  interruption  subjects 
related  to  the  highest  interests  of  the  profession. 

If,  after  these  many  years  of  experiment,  we 
have  at  length  reached  an  era  of  tranquil  and 
prosperous  development,  let  us  realize  that  the 
best  use  we  can  make  of  this  peace  is  to  compre- 
hend and  to  assume  all  the  grave  responsibilities 
which  belong  to  the  undisputed  position  of  the 
Institute  as  the  national  representative  and  pro- 
tector of  a  great  profession  and  a  greater  art. 

You  may  be  sure  that  the  civilized  world  will 
receive  with  peculiar  interest  all  that  we  may  have 
to  give  forth  in  the  elucidation  of  the  strange  and 
unprecedented  conditions  under  which  a  rich  and 
prosperous  nation,  unembarrassed  by  patriotic  tra- 
ditions of  art,  is  developing „  style ;  that  it  will 
eagerly  hear  all  that  zee  may  have  to  say  on  the 
practical  applications  of  science  to  architecture,  on 
the  progress  of  invention  in  respect  to  building,  on 
the  discovery  of  new  materials  and  new  methods 
and  their  effect  upon  our  art,  and  on  the  incidents 
of  our  unimaginable  progress  in  the  future.  We 
alone  are  in  position  to  influence  the  expression  of 
the  immense  energies  of  our  nation  in  architecture. 
Let  us  endeavor  adequately  to  fulfil  these  duties. 

I  hope  I  may  be  permitted  to  close  this  address 
with  a  brief  personal  statement.  When  at  the 
last  convention  you  saw  fit  to  make  me  President 
of  the  Institute,  I  received  the  unexpected  honor 
as  an  expression  of  consideration  and  respect  for 
one  whose  connection  with  the  Institute  began  at 
its  first  conception  forty-seven  years  ago.  Recall- 
ing the  brilliant  services  of  my  old  friends  and 
predecessors  in  this  office,  I  undertook  its  respon- 
sibilities with  doubts  and  sincere  misgivings. 
But  as  the  culmination  of  a  professional  career, 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


31 


now  in  the  course  of  nature  drawing  towards  its 
close,  and  as  a  most  precious  testimonial  of  the 
good  will  and  kindly  feeling  of  my  professional 
fellows,  the  honor  was  very  grateful  to  me,  and 
I  now  resign  it  with  a  deep  appreciation  of  your 
generous  confidence.  If,  possibly,  it  may  be  the 
purpose  of  my  friends  to  propose  my  name  for  an 
election  to  a  second  term,  as  permitted  by  the 
By-Taws  and  as  customary  in  your  practice,   I 


must  with  gratitude  decline  the  compliment,  as  I 
have  in  contemplation  a  long  visit  of  study  and 
observation  in  Europe.  /  sincerely  trust  that  in 
choosing  my  successor  you  may  be  wisely  guided, 
and  that  he  will  receive  the  of/ice  with  the  conscious- 
ness  that  its  responsibilities  have  increased  and  are 
increasing  with  time,  and  that  a  merely  perfunctory 
consideration  of  it  will  delay  the  development  of  the 
great  future  of  the  Institute. 


A  LETTER  BY  ERNEST  FLAGG 

FROM  THE  SYMPOSIUM  PUBLISHED  IN  THE  T-SQUARE  CLUB  CATALOGUE,  J 89? 


U 


S1 


IR  : — You  ask  me,  '  Do  you  yet  see  any 
signs  to  indicate  the  development  of 
an  unaffected  style  of  architecture  in 
America?'  An  architectural  style  is  invariably  the 
result  of  an  evolution  and  is  therefore  necessarily 
affected  by  what  went  before.  I  do  see,  however, 
what  appear  tome  unmistakable  signs  to  indicate 
that  such  an  evolution  along  logical  lines  is  about 
to  take  place  here,  an  evolution  which  I  am  con- 
vinced will  result  in  the  formation  of  a  distinctly 
national,  ever-changing,  that  is  to  say,  live,  style 
of  architecture. 

"  Our  architecture  is  soon  to  pass  through,  I 
may  say  it  has  already  entered  upon,  the  first 
stage  of  a  most  important  crisis.  Heretofore  we 
have  had,  and  at  the  present  time  we  have,  no 
such  thing  as  American  architecture,  though  we 
have  architecture  in  America.  All  the  fashions 
and  phases  through  which  it  has  passed  have 
been  importations,  and  all,  with  the  exception  of 
the  Colonial  period,  have  been  illogical,  and 
therefore  not  lasting.  The  true  principles  of 
good  taste  in  design,  which  seem  to  have  guided 
our  Colonial  architects,  unfortunately  d;d  not 
take  root  deep  enough  to  long  survive  the  shock 
of  our  separation  from  the  mother  country.  Since 
then  we  have  imported  fashions,  losing  sight  of 
the  principles  the  use  of  which  resulted  in  those 
fashions — principles  which,  if  we  could  have 
retained  them,  would  have  given  us  fashions  of 
our  own,  in  other  words,  a  national  style. 

"  A  person  who  takes  a  broad  look  at  the  field 
today  will  discern,  amid  all  the  confusion,  two 
forces  warring  with  each  other ;  the  one  making 
for,  and  the  other  against,  the  formation  of  an 
architecture  of  our  own.  The  adherents  of  the 
former  are  yet  comparatively  few  and  feeble,  but 
certain  of  their  ground,  determined  and  endowed 
with  the  fire  of  youth. 

"The  adherents  of  the  latter,  representing,  as 
they  do,  the  conditions  which  have  prevailed  here 
since  the  Revolution,  are  more  numerous,  but  are 


wavering,  happily  soon  to  fall.  For  one  of  these 
forces  must  triumph  over  the  other,  and  no  one 
who  appreciates  the  American  character  at  its 
true  worth  can  doubt  for  a  moment  which  it 
will  be. 

"  One  of  these  forces  may  be  called  archaeo- 
logical ;  it  is  founded  upon  the  dry  bones  of  the 
past,  and  in  general  stands  for  the  unthinking, 
unreasoning  imitation  of  foreign  buildings  and 
ancient  styles  which  were  out  of  date  and  aban- 
doned by  the  people  who  produced  them  cen- 
turies ago,  which  have  nothing  to  do  with  modern 
ideas,  and  the  imitation  of  which  for  our  use  is 
inconsistent  with  the  dictates  of  common  sense. 
The  Chicago  Exhibition  was  a  characteristic  pro- 
duct of  these  methods.  The  love  for  this  sort  of 
thing,  not  the  thing  itself,  be  it  understood,  but 
the  modern  imitation  of  it,  is  fostered  by  a  sickly 
sentimentalism  and  a  love  for  the  picturesque 
divorced  from  reason,  which  to  satisfy  its  'un- 
healthy longings  would  stamp  out  all  virility  and 
substitute  imitation  for  invention  in  design.  In 
this  same  class  must  be  included  that  great  body 
of  self-styled  architects  who,  innocent  of  a 
knowledge  of  the  first  principles  of  the  art,  hav- 
ing never  been  taught,  think  they  are  called  upon 
to  do  something  wonderful  and  succeed  in  doing  it. 

"  It  is  not  by  this  road  that  we  shall  arrive  at  a 
national  style. 

' '  The  other  force  to  which  I  have  referred  may 
be  called  architectural,  for  it  has  for  its  aim  the 
introduction  into  our  architecture  the  true  living 
spirit  of  the  art  and  the  age,  without  which  it 
can  never  be  a  live  national  art.  I  mean  the 
introduction  of  modern  ideas,  modern  forms, 
modern  methods  adapted  to  the  life,  habits, 
modes  of  thought,  resources  and  appliances  of 
the  day.  It  would  draw  the  good,  that  is  to  say, 
the  spirit,  from  the  art  of  all  times  and  all  nations 
and  apply  it  to  modern  uses  in  modern  ways.  It 
would  make  use  of  modern  inventions  and  all  the 
resources  which  modern  science  has  placed  at  the 


32 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


disposal  of  the  architect,  which,  if  used  logically 
that  is,  with  the  aid  of  reason,  will  call  for  new, 
fresh  forms,  for  the  thought  and  invention  which 
this  implies,  and  thus  call  into  play  the  highest 
gifts  with  which  we  are  endowed. 

"  Its  adherents  are  being  taught  the  true  prin- 
ciples of  design  by  the  greatest  masters  of  the 
most  artistic  nation  of  Europe.  And  these  prin- 
ciples are  bound  to  take  root  here  because  they 
are  logical,  reasonable,  right  and  true.  In  time 
they  will  produce  their  legitimate  result,  and  we 
shall  have  an  architecture  of  our  own. 

"The  movement  is  young,  its  adherents  are 
young,  and  they  have  the  faults  of  youth. 
They  are  perhaps  a  little  arrogant  and  self-con- 
fident, they  assume  too  much,  think  they 
are  the  elect,  and  that  the  mantles  of  the  masters 
have  fallen  upon  them.  Many  of  them  make 
poor  work  of  what  they  have  learned.  All  are 
inclined  to  imitate  the  architecture  of  their  mas- 


ters, which  is  natural  and  harmless,  for  it  cannot 
be  lasting,  and  we  must  have  some  point  of 
departure.  Many  of  them  lose  sight  of  what  is 
good  in  the  work  of  those  with  whom  they  do  not 
agree,  and  are  disliked  in  consequence. 

"  It  is  not,  therefore,  to  be  wondered  at  that  the 
true  significance  of  the  movement  is  cot  always 
understood.  It  is  not  surprising  that,  looking  at 
the  surface,  some  take  it  to  be  an  attempt  to  Galli- 
cize American  art  and  regard  it  as  a  passing 
fashion,  like  those  which  have  preceded  it.  Nor 
is  it  surprising  that  some  regard  with  distrust  a 
movement  which  they  do  not  altogether  compre- 
hend. There  are  those  who,  unacquainted  with 
the  principles  which  lie  beneath  the  surface, 
make  light  of  a  movement  which,  in  spite  of  its 
apparent  contradictions  and  inconsistencies,  is 
destined  to  be  productive  of  the  most  far- 
reaching  and  momentous  consequences  to  Amer- 
ican art." 


EXTRACT  FROM   THE   CLEVELAND 
ARCHITECTURAL  CLUB  CATA- 
LOGUE,   1900 


HERBERT  B.  BRIGGS,  EDITOR 


U 


T 


*0  the  Architectural  Club  the  'Technical 
Club '  rooms  mean  more  than  a  home, 
for  they  made  possible  the  entertainment 
by  it  of  the  representatives  from  the  architectural 
clubs  and  kindred  organizations  of  the  United 
States  and  Canada,  who,  on  June  3,  1899,  organ- 
ized the  Architectural  League  of  America. 

"  Here  in  the  assembly  room  gathered  the  men 
who  represent  the  younger  brawn  and  sinew  of 
the  New  World's  architectural  profession.  Here 
were  presented  the  papers,  addresses  and  discus- 
sions which  preceded  the  act  of  organization. 
Here  plans  for  the  future  were  carefully  con- 
sidered and  promulgated.  Here  was  read  that 
memorable  letter  of  greeting  and  encouragement 


from  Mr.  Louis  H.  Sullivan,  of  Chicago,  one  of 
the  pioneers  in  the  true  development  of  a  national 
architecture. 

>£;  >f:  ^  >}c  ■% 

' '  The  first  year  of  the  League  has  been  largely 
an  experimental  one,  some  mistakes  have  been 
made,  the  exhibition  circuit  has  not  run  as 
smoothly  as  it  will  when  the  system  is  thoroughly 
perfected  ;  in  tangible  results  very  little  can  be 
shown  ;  but,  in  the  idea  started,  the  acquaint- 
ances formed,  the  experiences,  the  mistakes,  the 
lessons  of  the  year's  exhibition  circuit,  and  in  the 
concentrated  thought  of  many  minds  upon  ways 
and  means  for  its  improvement  and  development, 
a  most  decided  and  important  forward  step  has 
been  taken.  The  coming  Chicago  Convention 
will  show  results  that  the  Cleveland  Convention 
could  not  possibly  have  developed. 

"The  Cleveland  Club  hereby  reaffirms  its 
allegiance  to  the  Architectural  League  of 
America." 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


33 


CHARLES  FOLLEN  McKIM 


ARCHITECT 


THERE  should  be  no  hesitation  in  discuss- 
ing the  work  of  a  living  architect,  for,  no 
matter  how  it  may  be  in  other  professions, 
an  architect's  achievements  are  of  such  a  durable 
nature  that,  when  once  completed,  they  stand 
before  the  modern  critic  just  as  they  will  stand — 

"  When  Earth's  last  picture  is  painted,  and  the  tubes  are 
twisted  and  dried, 
When  the  oldest  colors  have  faded,  and  the  youngest 
critic  has  died." 

The  subject  of  this  biographical  sketch  is 
now  but  fifty-two,  being  born  in  Chester  County, 
Pa.,  August  24,  1847.  At  the  age  of  twenty 
he  had  completed  his  academic  training  in 
America  by  graduating  from  the  Harvard  Scien- 
tific School.  Then  he  spent  three  years  in  the 
Ecole  des  Beaux-Arts,  and  returned  to  study 
under  a  New  York  architect.  Upon  entering 
professional  life  in  1880,  he  became  partner  of 
Messrs.  William  R.  Mead  and  Stanford  White. 
Mr.  McKim  is  singled  out  for  this  sketch  more 
on  account  of  deeds  that  extend  beyond  the 
office  and  draughting  room,  than  because  he 
merits  an  unequal  share  of  the  praise  due  the 
firm.  Beside  being  an  architect,  he  is  a  clubman, 
a  connoisseur  and  a  patron  of  art. 

The  results  of  this  firm's  labor  and  thought, 
now  scattered  over  the  entire  country,  comprise 
university  buildings,  public  libraries,  churches, 
club  houses,  music  halls,  hotels  and  office  build- 
ings. The  Century,  Metropolitan,  University 
and  Harvard  club  houses  in  New  York,  and  the 
Algonquin,  in  Boston,  were  designed  under  the 
watchful  eye  of  Mr.  McKim.  His  libraries  are 
the  most  monumental  of  his  work,  and  speak 
loudest  of  the  firm's  ability. 

By  the  use  of  most  exquisite  Italian  and 
classic  ornament,  by  the  importation  of  rich 
marbles  and  old  art  iron  woik,  and  by  adap- 
tation of  ancient  forms,  McKim 's  work  has  had 
a  very  decided  direction.  We  have  grown  more 
critical,  more  sensitive  as  the  century  has  pro- 
gressed, and  optical  refinements,  such  as  existed 
in  the  horizontal  curves  of  the  Parthenon,  have 
been  reproduced  in  the  Columbia  Library,  thus 
acknowledgng  the  return  of  the  refined  Greek 
sense  of  beauty,  for  these  characteristics  of  design 
have  been  noted  by  some  unconsciously,  by 
others  wisely.  McKim's  method  of  suiting 
foreign  successes  to  American  needs  has  given  an 
impetus  to  archaeological  research,  and  demon- 
strated to  us  the  riches  of  other  architectures, 


never  to  be  wholly  acquired  after  years  of  aca- 
demic training. 

That  such  efforts  toward  the  realization  of 
the  beautiful  have  been  appreciated  has  been 
lately  shown  by  a  competition  held  in  a  con- 
temporary architectural  magazine.  Three  of  the 
ten  buildings,  voted  for  by  the  subscribers  as  the 
most  beautiful  in  America,  were  designed  by 
McKim,  Mead  &  White.  This  is  even  a  higher 
estimate  when  we  realize  that  two  of  the  remain- 
ing seven  were  not  of  the  present  generation — 
the  Capitol  at  Washington  and  Trinity  Church, 
New  York  City. 

Whatever  criticism  has  been  made  at  length 
on  the  use  of  precedent  in  their  buildings,  sepa- 
rately considered,  it  must  be  acknowledged  that 
the  firm  of  McKim,  Mead  &  White  have  always 
possessed  an  exact  estimate  of  the  value  of 
ancient  forms  as  stimulants  to  the  imagination. 
Theirs  is  a  method  of  selection — a  choosing  of 
the  beautiful  and  useful — a  rejecting  of  the  in- 
artistic and  commonplace  of  former  architectures. 
It  is  not,  as  some  would  suggest,  a  blind  groping 
after  a  harmonious  effect,  but  it  is  marked  by  the 
scientific  element  that  distinguishes  the  artist 
from  the  artisan.  They  seem  able  "out  of  a 
senseless  Nothing  to  provoke  a  conscious  Some- 
thing." Granting  that  several  of  the  best  exam- 
ples of  other  periods  have  been  bodily  trans- 
planted in  America,  such  adaptations  have  taught 
them,  in  their  maturer  work,  to  add  soul  and 
grace  to  purely  modern  products. 

With  all  such  efforts  to  relate  the  past  to  the 
present,  Mr.  McKim's  interest  in  the  progress  of 
the  world  about  him  has  been  paramount.  By 
introducing  mural  decoration  into  America  he 
offered  opportunities  for  developing  the  genius 
of  Sargent  and  Abbey.  Equally  great  sculptors, 
such  as  St.  Gaudens  and  Martiny,  have  profited 
by  him.  He,  among  the  few,  was  sincere  enough 
to  acknowledge  the  art  in  MacMonnies'  ' '  Bac- 
chante," above  the  clamor  of  falsely  Puritanic 
opinions.  Such  is  his  attitude  toward  the  aes- 
thetic tendencies  of  the  present.  As  friend  and 
patron  of  Columbia  University,  and  as  founder 
of  the  American  School  at  Rome,  he  must  be 
accorded  the  highest  praise  as  a  benefactor  of 
art  in  a  most  material  way,  His  name  is  the 
watchword  of  those  who  are  carrying  the  torch 
of  architectural  art  a  few  paces  forward  into  the 
future.  He  stands  forth  a  worthy  example,  little 
followed  in  these  hurried  days. 


2 

uj 

< 
2 

Oi 
O 

X 

o 

2 

UJ 

oi 
u. 

co 
D 
O 

a: 

D 

Oh 

CO 


o 

Oh 

[l 

UJ 

a: 


2  8 

UJ  ■ 

s  ; 

o  ? 

o  £ 


o 

2 

X 
CO 
UJ 

Oh 

UJ 
Oh 

CO 

H 

CO 
< 

< 

D 

CO 

D 
2 

D 

co 
< 


V) 

2 

u 

M 

UJ 
H 

I 

D 

U 

< 

2 

O 

uj~ 

2 

o 

Q 

< 

j 

o 
n 

cc: 

o 

o 

^ 

U, 

2 

< 

CO 

H 

2 

a: 

o 

CO 

a. 

Q 

UJ 

X 

UJ 

w 

s. 

H 
2 

UJ 

< 

2 

& 
O 

X 

o 

2 

UJ 

a: 

CO 

o 
a: 

D 
0, 
CO 


O 

OS 
u. 

uj 

UJ 

u. 


o   IS 

t  ^ 

UJ     Sn 

a.    s 

O    k- 

o 

< 

I 

a 

2 

I 
co 

UJ 

a: 
u. 

UJ 

a: 

CO 

H 

co 

< 

< 

D 
CO 

D 
2 
D 

co 
< 


to 

H 
O 

UJ  CO 

t  CO 

X  < 

a;  a; 

< 

2  CO 

o  H 

o  O 

Lj  UJ 

^  X 
c8 

UJ  £ 

D  UJ 


CO 
UJ 
I 

o 
a: 
o 

Q 

< 
UJ 

H 
< 

H 
CO 

UJ 


[/I 

T 

o 

H 

UJ 

7 

H 

>~ 

a 

I 
O 

CQ 

7; 

OS 

LU 

< 

U 

[Tl 

a 

(/J 

H 

j 

r* 

C) 

-> 

< 

[t1 

u. 

UJ 
h 

£ 

'J  J 

w 

UJ 

X 

*l 

t> 

V 

UJ 

o 

Q 

til 

3 

O 

cfl 

o 


in 
< 
uj     f— 

CL 

H 

2 

UJ 

D 
2 

O 


O 

H 

u. 

I) 

UJ 

H 

CO 

T 

2 

o 

n 

fK 

< 

CO 

M 

1/J 
o 

Q 

rv. 

D 

UJ 

> 

2 

f- 

o 

h 

H 

U. 

UJ 

_J 

n. 

U 

2 

cc 

O 

a 

36 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


ART  IN  AMERICA 

REPRINTED  FROM  THE  "AMERICAN  ARCHITECT,"  JUNE  3,  1899 


FOLLOWING  are  some  portions  of  an  in- 
teresting and  striking  address  made  by 
Brooks  Adams  at  the  joint  annual  dinner 
of  the  National  Sculpture  Society  and  of  the 
National  Society  of  Mural  Painters  in  New- 
York  : 

>lMr.  President,  Ladies  and  Gentlemen  : 

"  My  pleasure  at  meeting  you  here  to-night 
is  damped  by  my  diffidence  in  attempting  to 
address  so  distinguished  an  audience  on  any 
subject  akin  to  art,  and  yet  I  find  a  consolation 
in  the  thought  that  perhaps  even  my  words  may 
be  of  some  avail,  since  I  hope  I  represent  the  body 
of  our  people,  and  it  has  ever  been  the  function  of 
the  artist  and  the  poet  to  give  expression  to  the 
popular  aspiration  of  their  age. 

' '  Fortune  has  led  me  toward  a  wandering 
life,  and,  like  other  wanderers,  I  am  prone  to 
compare  the  countries  which  I  see.  I  am  sure 
I  do  not  err  in  saying  that  as  year  by  year  I 
return  to  Western  Europe  I  mark  a  subtile 
change  ;  the  energy  with  which  those  nations 
palpitated  when  I  was  a  boy  is  ebbing,  and  with 
the  national  vitality  ebbs  the  national  art.  The 
form  may  survive,  but  the  fire  which  quickened 
the  form  is  flickering  low.  Each  year  on  return- 
ing home  I  note  the  exact  converse.  Our  society 
is  gathering  monicntuni,  and  as  it  surges  onward 
our  art  gains  dignity  and  scope.  Well  do  I  remem- 
ber when  our  fathers  thought  this  land  a  barren 
soil  which  could  never  nurture  the  architect  and  the 
sculptor,  and  yet,  as  I  glance  about  me  now,  I  see 
toe  lead  the  van.  Since  the  medieval  Frenchmen 
tinted  the  rose  of  Rheims  no  such  color  has  glowed 
hi  glass  as  in  the  windows  of  fohn  La  Farge  ;  no 
nobler  statues  are  carved  than  those  conceived  by  St. 
Gaudcns  ;  while  in  power  and  technique  no  paint- 
ing or  etching  excels  that  of  Whistler  and  of  Sar- 
gent. Lastly,  in  architecture  we  stand,  in  some 
respects,  alojie.  In  'ingenuity  and  daring  we  have 
few  rivals,  but  architecture  is  a  great  subject,  and 
it  is  of  that  I  chiefly  wish  to  speak. 

"  Passing  over  such  effects  as  those  made  at 
Chicago,  which  were  ephemeral,  and  confining 
myself  to  durable  monuments,  I  will  take  the 
new  Library  of  Congress  to  illustrate  my  mean- 
ing. Now,  I  am  a  literary  man  ;  books  are  my 
trade,  and  in  talking  of  a  library  I  speak  of  what 
I  understand.  I  affirm  that  as  a  workshop  this 
building  approaches  perfection.  It  is  ample,  it 
is  light,  it  is  convenient,  while  in  rapidity  of  ser- 


vice it  can  hardly  be  excelled.  In  the  National 
Library  of  Paris  it  costs  an  hour  to  get  a  book, 
in  the  British  Museum  half  an  hour,  in  Wash- 
ington five  minutes.  In  Paris  and  London  one 
works  in  dark  and  gloomy  rooms,  often  crowded 
to  excess.  In  Washington  the  reading  rooms 
are  numerous,  cheerful  and  comfortable.  All 
this  and  more  may  be  said  of  the  practical 
side  of  this  building  ;  but  is  utility  all  that 
a  nation  may  demand  from  artists  ?  This 
year  forms  a  grave  epoch  in  our  national  life, 
and  to-night  I  would  speak  gravely.  I  apprehend 
that  zve  stand  tcpon  the  brink  of  a  new  era,  when  a 
rising  tide  of  national  feeling  will  demand  a  more 
serious  form  of  artistic  expression,  especially  in  our 
public  monuments.  I  return  to  the  Library  to  ex- 
plain myself.  The  plan  of  the  structure  is  good, 
but  the  plan  of  our  building  is  apt  to  be  bid  a  skele- 
ton— to  find  the  lip  we  often  have  to  seek  the  decora- 
tion. The  habit  of  our  artists  is  to  speak  through 
ornament,  and,  to  me  at  least,  ornament  has  been 
the  reproach  of  American  art.  It  has  been  the  re- 
proach because  it  has  been  redolent  of  money. 

"  How  fashionable  has  it  been  to  copy  foreign 
masterpieces,  without  regard  to  their  meaning, 
simply  as  a  toy.  Sometimes  we  have  found  a 
model  in  a  Hindoo  temple,  sometimes  in  a  Gothic 
shrine,  and  what  has  taken  our  fancy  we  have 
adapted  to  strange  uses,  as  a  savage  adapts  a 
white  man's  clothes.  Our  chief  preoccupation 
seems  to  have  been  to  produce  the  effect  of 
wealth,  to  exult  in  gold  and  marble,  and  elabo- 
rate carving,  only  for  display.  Doubtless  in  the 
Library  of  Congress  there  are  individual  works  of 
merit,  but  the  whole  lacks  gravity  and  unity,  and 
smacks  of  ostentation.  If  zve  have  nothing  more 
than  this  to  say,  no  tale  to  tell  save  that  we  once 
were  rich,  then  shall  we  leave  nothing  behind  us 
which  will  endure.  Those  who  follow  us  zvill  for- 
get us. 

1 "  Artistically  our  civilization  zvill  have  failed. 
For  my  part,  however,  I  believe  that  we  have  much 
else  to  say,  and  that  the  hour  when  you  shall  say  it 
is  at  hand. 

' '  We  have  only  to  look  back  into  the  mirror. 
Turn  for  an  instant  to  Rome.  The  Romans,  too, 
were  rich  and  ostentatious  ;  but  what  man  of  feel- 
ing has  ever  cared  for  the  vulgar  veneering  of  the 
baths  of  Caracalla  or  the  tiers  of  bastard  Greek 
pilasters,  one  above  another,  against  art,  the 
brick  core  of  an  amphitheatre?     Posterity  has 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


37 


recognized  the  coarse  and  sordid  side  of  the 
Roman  plutocrat,  but  happily  in  Rome  there 
was  something  beside  plutocracy.  What  ex- 
torted the  admiration  of  our  ancestors,  and  what 
extorts  our  own,  is  the  sweep  of  the  aqueduct 
striding  across  the  Campagna,  or  the  highway 
on  which  the  legions  marched,  pointing  straight 
to  its  goal,  as  inexorably  as  destiny.  Whose 
heart  has  not  kindled  with  enthusiasm  before 
the  arch  which  tells  us  of  the  nation's  triumph 
or  the  column  to  commemorate  the  glory  of  the 
victor?  These  great  works  are  as  eloquent  to  us 
to-day  as  to  the  men  who  reared  than ,  for  they  tell 
of  passions  which  cannot  be  vulgarized,  and  they 
speak  a  language  which  shall  never  die. 

"I  ask  you,  American  aiiists,  have  we  no  na- 
tional life  which  fires  your  imagination  and  stirs 
your  blood  f  I  tell  you  this  continent  is  quivering 
with  an  energy  beside  which  the  energy  of  Rome  is 
as  the  shock  of  the  galley  to  that  of  the  battleship. 
I  feel  it  about  me  on  every  hand ;  our  people  arc 
possessed  with  a  premonition  of  their  destiny. 

"  I  was  in  Puerto  Rico  last  February,  and  one 
sultry  morning,  strolling  upon  the  ramparts  of 
San  Juan,  I  fell  upon  a  regiment  of  regular  in- 
fantry at  drill.  I  suppose  three  quarters  of  that 
regiment  were  volunteers  of  a  few  months'  ser- 
vice ;  they  did  not  look  like  any  troops  I  ever 
saw  ;  they  were  rough  fellows  in  blue  shirts  and 
slouch  hats,  and  they  did  not  line  up  as  regularly 
as  I  have  seen  men  do  in  Germany  and  England. 
But  I  watched  them  finish  their  parade,  and  as 


they  marched  off  the  ground   I  knew  that  in  all 
my  life  I  had  never  felt  such  power. 

"Only  the  other  day  I  travelled  from  Pitts- 
burgh to  New  York,  and  from  New  York  to 
Albany,  and  in  this  whole  round  globe  there  is 
no  sight  which  can  compare.  That  great  artery 
through  -which  throbs  the  life-blood  of  this  nation  is 
to  -what  has  existed  elsewhere  as  the  Hudson  is  to 
the  Thames.  We  must  accept  the  world  as  we  find 
it.  Probably  mankind  has  lost  the  passionate  devo- 
tion  which  created  Chartres  and  Bourges ;  that 
magic  instinct  for  form  -which  was  the  heritage  of  the 
Greek  has  died,  but  one  great  emotion  still  remains 
to  us  ;  ive  have  a  country ,  and  we  have  the  sense  of 
power  which  made  the  dignity  and  majesty  of  Rome. 
That  is  the  emotion  which  is  destined,  if  we  survive 
and  flourish,  to  be  the  dominant  instinct  of  our  land. 
That  emotion  shall,  I  trust,  become  incarnate 
through  you. 

" Gentlemen,  it  lies  with  you  to  give  this  passion , 
which  I  believe  to  be  one  of  the  noblest  -which  can  in- 
flame the  human  mind,  befitting  expression  ;  it  lies 
with  you  to  clothe  the  aspirations  of  your  generation 
in  color,  in  marble  and  in  bronze  ;  it  is  for  you  to 
conceive  and  execute  memorials  which  shall  com- 
memorate our  empire.  And  I,  for  one,  believe  in  you, 
as  I  believe  in  our  race,  our  soldiers  and  our  destiny, 
and  I  believe  that  when  the  hour  of  our  decay  shall 
come  you  -will  have  raised  to  the  honor  and  glory  of 
your  country  monuments  as  eloquent  and  as  strong 
as  those  which  still  make  live  before  us  the  triumphs 
on  the  Tiber. ' ' 


EXTRACT    FROM    THE    DETROIT  AR- 
CHITECTURAL CLUB  CATALOGUE,  1900 


FRANCIS  S.  SWALES,  EDITOR 


44 


T 


1  HE  principal  object  for  which  the  Detroit 
Architectural  Club  exists  is  the  advance- 
ment of  architecture  and  the  allied  arts. 
"  For  the  improvement  of  its  members,  meet- 
ings are  held  regularly,  at  which  lectures  are 
delivered,  matters  of  interest  are  discussed  and 
classes  are  conducted.  We  realize,  however,  that 
no  great  advancement  can  be  made,  and  that  the 


motto,  "  progress  before  precedent,"  adopted  by 
the  Architectural  League  of  America — of  which 
the  Detroit  Architectural  Club  is  a  chapter — can- 
not be  upheld  without  the  intelligent  apprecia- 
tion of  the  public.  In  presenting  to  the  people 
of  Detroit  this  and  future  exhibitions,  we  are 
making  an  effort  to  bring  before  them  the  best 
work  being  produced,  both  in  the  United  States 
and  Europe,  to  the  end  that  interested  laymen 
may  note  the  progress  of  architecture  and  archi- 
tects, and  by  giving  to  capable  men  their  dis- 
criminating encouragement  afford  them  one  of  the 
artists'  greatest  rewards." 


o 

< 

Id 
2 

^    >- 

O    m 

j 

O    < 


2 

O 

< 
DC 
Id 
2 

o 


O 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


39 


THE  ARCHITECTURAL  SCHOOL  FROM  THE 
ARCHITECT'S  STANDPOINT 

BY  GEORGE  R.  DEAN 

Delivered  at  the  banquet  tendered  by  the  Cleveland  Architectural  Club  to  the  visiting  delegates  to  the  first  convention  of  the  Architec- 
tural League  of  America. 


THE  practice  of  architecture  resolves  itself 
into  the  proper  handling  of  any  problem  in 
building. 

The  ideal  architect  is  a  poet,  a  dreamer  of 
dreams,  a  builder  of  air  castles,  with  the  technical 
ability  to  reproduce  those  visions  in  lasting 
material. 

He  is  able  to  see  his  building  completed;  he  sees 
the  plan,  the  arrangement  of  part  to  part,  the 
suitability  to  purpose,  the  simplicity  of  cause  and 
effect.  He  sees  the  component  parts  of  materials, 
he  paints  the  walls  in  colors,  he  carves  the  caps  oj 
columns,  he  models  cornices,  he  stains  the  glass  in 
the  windows,  forms,  colors ;  shadows  and  highlights 
come  and  go.  He  rejects,  adopts,  invents,  a?id 
brings  forth  a  unit,  a  whole,  a  harmony. 

It  is  his  right,  given,  in  the  same  degree,  to  no 
other  artist,  to  show  what  he  has  discovered  of 
beauty  in  the  forms  of  nature.  The  entire  earth  is 
before  him  ;  its  animal,  vegetable  and  mineral 
kingdoms  abound  informs  of  surpassing  loveliness. 

The  trained  mind  is  able  to  see  deeper  into 
the  character  of  these  forms,  to  search  out  the 
dominant  quality,  to  separate  the  dross  from  the 
metal  and  put  before  the  toiler  in  other  fields  the 
product  of  his  toil. 

No  other  art  has  such  possibilities ;  it  is  abso- 
lutely limitless.  There  is  space  on  a  single  building 
for  the  study  of  a  lifetime.  It  would  be  to  the  evet- 
lasting  glory  of  an  architect  to  reduce  one  form  to 
the  perfection  attained  by  the  Egyptian  who  con- 
ceived the  lion,  or  the  Greek  who  modelled  the  palm. 

Do  we  pay  the  painter  to  slavishly  copy  for  us 
the  works  of  Michael  Angelo  ?  No,  we  dema?id 
that  he  go  forth  and  search  and  toil  and  show  us 
something  which  he  alone  has  seen  ;  to  trace  for  us 
one  thread  in  the  inti  icate  mesh  of  nature.  This, 
then,  is  the  goal  of  the  student. 

It  is  generally  conceded  that  the  architectural 
school  does  not  and  cannot  produce  the  practising 
architect  ;  that  the  business,  and  to  a  great  extent 
the  technical  side,  must  be  learned  through  a 
certain  experience.  This  experience  the  student 
acquires  during  that  period  wherein  he  is  a 
draughtsman.  Since  the  draughtsman  is  the 
only  step  between  the  school  and  the  architect, 
the  student  should  be  a  draughtsman  at  the  time 
he  leaves  the  school. 

It  is  by  the  draughtsman,  the  product  of  the 
school,  that  the  architect  judges  of  the  school. 


It  is  the  province  of  the  draughtsman  to  assist 
the  architect  in  the  assembling  of  his  construc- 
tion, to  work  out  its  minor  details,  to  play  the 
part  of  the  actor,  to  put  himself  in  the  place  of 
tbe  architect  and  carry  out  generalities.  He 
must  be  so  constructed  that  he  is  able  to  see 
something  of  the  whole,  to  grasp  something  of 
the  situation,  to  catch  the  keynote  and  never 
cause  a  discord.  It  is  the  province  of  the  school 
to  so  construct  him. 

It  is  the  privilege  of  the  architect  to  nourish 
and  train  him,  to  broaden  his  experience,  to  show 
him  the  refinements  and  the  technicalities,  to 
teach  him  to  grasp  the  simple  whole. 

The  first  truth  that  the  school  should  instil 
in  the  mind  of  the  student  is  the  necessity  to  see 
in  the  solid;  he  must  ever  deal  in  the  third  dimen- 
sion, not  only  in  its  beginning  and  end  out 
throughout  its  entire  length,  to  feel  the  mass  ;  he 
must  see  further  into  the  building  than  the  color 
on  the  surface  of  the  Whatman  paper  ;  the  450 
wash  is  not  to  show  him  the  depth  of  the  angle 
or  the  projection  of  the  cornice  ;  it  is  his  method 
of  expressing  his  thoughts  to  others.  This 
brings  us  to  another  great  object  of  the  school — 
draughtsmanship.  Since  the  architect  does  not 
himself  reduce  his  vision  to  earthly  materials,  he 
must  have  a  language.  It  must  be  a  language 
clear  and  concise,  yet  capable  of  most  varied  ex- 
pression. This  language  is  for  a  purpose  ;  it  is 
the  medium  between  the  idea  and  the  reality. 
Any  tricks  practised,  any  play  on  words  will  lead 
astray  the  intelligent  artist,  as  well  as  the  architect 
himself. 

Since  he  must  begin  to  think  from  the  solid, 
so  he  must  begin  to  draw  from  the  solid  ;  since 
his  visions  are  to  be  ideal,  be  must  draw  from 
ideal  subjects. 

His  architecture  is  to  have  continuity  to  ex- 
press growth,  refinement  and  nobility.  Subjects 
expressing  these  characteristics  should  ever  be 
put  before  him. 

Nowhere  can  he  find  examples  so  good  as 
those  in  nature.  The  architect  who  has  learned 
how  well  nature  knits  together  the  various  por- 
tions of  her  creations,  how  a  certain  character,  a 
feeling,  takes  possession  of  a  plant  from  root  to 
blossom,  how  it  carries  itself  throughout  an 
animal,  how  each   mineral  has  its  characteristic 


40 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


crystal,  will  never  be  able  to  produce  the  con- 
glomerate so  universally  perpetrated. 

The  architect  who  truly  knows  the  pine  and 
oak  tree,  who  has  studied  and  drawn  them,  who 
has  had  the  character  and  growth  brought  home, 
is  incapable  of  dreaming  a  dream  of  ugliness. 

The  architect  who  knows  and  loves  the  lily 
and  anemone,  has  been  taught  to  draw  iheir 
essential  qualities,  is  incapable  of  conceiving  an 
ornament  of  vulgar  character. 

During  his  school  period,  to  still  further 
sharpen  his  sensibilities,  to  make  him  more 
quick  to  detect  discord,  to  know  harmony,  let 
him  study  color,  but  let  him  get  it  from  the  true 
source. 

The  architect  who  knows  the  woods  and  fields 
will  be  incapable  of  sky  pink  and  baby  blue 
sentimentalities,  as  well  as  the  quivering  horrors 
daily  thrust  upon  us. 

The  question  of  materials  should  obtain  its 
share  of  attention.  The  student  should  have  a 
consciousness  of  the  different  textures,  as  well  as 
the  bodily  construction  of  material,  that  the  treat- 
ment should  vary  with  the  material,  that  ivood 
should  not  appear  to  be  moulded,  that  iron  should 


not  appear  to  be  carved;  that  the  methods  of  con- 
struction  vary  zvith  materials,  and  the  principles 
governing  this  construction  should  be  put  before  him. 
We,  the  architects  of  to-day,  were  not  so  trained. 

Whatever  of  this  we  possess  we  have  fought  for, 
scrambling  back  over  text-books  of  dogmas  and 
ruins  of  Gothic,  Roman  and    Gi'eek  architecture. 

We  went  into  offices  with  magnificent  ideas  of  these 
in.  our  minds.  Some  of  us  have  had  the  oppor- 
tunity to  construct  them  to  the  utter  damnation  of 
the  art  and  the  agony  of  the  public.  For  the  sake 
of  that  thing  which  lives  forever  let  us  give  the 
student  of  the  next  generation  a  school  which  will 
start  him  in  accord  with  nature,  for  zvith  her  he 
will  have  to  deal. 

I  believe  that  the  study  of  the  various  styles  of 
architecture  with  the  intention  of  using  them  in 
practice  is  pivductive  of  conglomeration  and  lack  of 
continuity.  I  believe  that  the  study  of  one  style  of 
architecture  with  the  intention  of  using  it  in  prac- 
tice is  productive  of  absolute  death.  I  believe  that 
the  study  of  the  vital  styles  of  architecture  with  the 
idea  of  finding  wherein  they  met  the  reqtiircments 
of  their  periods  and  the  processes  of  their  perfection, 
productive  of  mental  development  and  general  in- 
telligence.    (Applause.) 


RICHARD  MORRIS  HUNT 

(1828-1895) 


THREE  men  who  bear  the  name  of  Hunt 
must  be  placed  on  the  list  of  those  who 
reached  the  highest  ideals  of  Art  in  the 
Nineteenth  Century.  William  Holman  Hunt 
led  that  school  of  idealizing  painters  called  Pre- 
Raphaelites  ;  William  Morris  Hunt  was  a  noted 
American  artist,  a  pupil  of  Contune  and  Millet ; 
and  Richard  Morris  Hunt,  brother  of  the  Ameri- 
can artist,  was  one  of  the  greatest  architects  that 
the  United  States  has  ever  produced.  It  would 
be  an  idle  and  fruitless  discussion  that  would  seek 
to  determine  the  relative  value  of  these  three 
lives,  but  we  must  not  overlook  the  fact  that,  al- 
though the  painter's  canvas  may  rest  on  the  walls 
of  mansions  and  art  galleries,  perpetuating  his 
name  for  many  years,  the  work  of  Richard  Morris 
Hunt  must  outlive  them  all  and  speak  to  an  ever- 
increasing  audience  in  each  generation  that  is  to 
come. 

The   mere  recital  of   his  life  events  will   de- 
monstrate what  volumes  of  well-deserved  praise 


would  but  feebly  give.  He  was  born  in  Brattle- 
borough,  Vt.,  October  31,  1828,  of  Jonathan 
Hunt,  M.C.,  and  upon  his  father's  death  was 
sent  to  school  in  Boston.  Graduating  from  the 
Boston  High  School  in  1843,  ^e  went  to  Switzer- 
land in  1844,  and  entered  the  atelier  of  Samuel 
Darier,  at  Geneva,  in  the  following  year.  In  the 
same  year  he  became  a  pupil  of  Hector  Lefuel,  at 
Paris,  and  in  1846  was  admitted  to  the  Ecole  des 
Beaux- Arts.  Here  his  studies  lasted  ten  years, 
during  which  time  he  travelled  in  Europe,  Asia 
Minor  and  Egypt.  In  1854  Lefuel  was  given 
charge  of  the  new  work  on  the  Louvre.  Under  his 
direction,  Hunt,  as  Inspecteur  des  Travaux,  de- 
signed the  Pavilion  de  la  Bibliotheque,  opposite 
the  Palais  Royal.  He  returned  to  America  in 
1855  and  opened  an  atelier  on  the  plan  of  the 
French  architectural  ones.  After  that  he  was 
engaged  in  the  extension  of  the  Capitol  at  Wash- 
ington and  settled  down  to  an  independent  pro- 
fessional career  in  New  York. 


42 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


He  was  President  of  the  American  Institute 
of  Architects  and  of  the  New  York  Chapter.  He 
was  made  Honorary  and  Corresponding  Member 
of  the  Academie  des  Beaux-Arts,  Institut  de 
France,  in  1882;  Chevalier  de  la  Legion  d'Honneur 
in  1884  and  Member  of  the  Societe  Centrale  des 
Architectes  Francais  in  1886.  He  was  elected 
Honorary  and  Corresponding  Member  of  the 
Royal  Institute  of  British  Architects  in  1886,  and  of 
the  Ingenieur  and  Architecten  Verein,  of  Vienna, 
in  1887.  Harvard  conferred  the  honorary  degree 
of  LL.D.  upon  him  in  1892,  being  the  first  archi- 
tect so  honored.  He  became  Academician  of  St. 
Luke's,  Rome,  in  the  same  year — the  first  Ameri- 
can in  that  position  ;  was  awarded  the  Gold  Medal 
of  the  Royal  Institute  of  British  Architects  in 
1893  ;  and  later  in  the  same  year  was  nominated 
Associate  Member  of  the  Institute  of  France,  of 
which  Franklin  had  been  the  only  other  Ameri- 
can member.  He  served  on  juries  of  the  Exposi- 
tion Universelle,  Paris,  1867  ;  of  the  Centennial 
Exposition,  Philadelphia,  1876;  and  of  the 
Columbian  Exposition,  Chicago,  1893.  After  an 
illness  of  two  weeks  he  died  at  Newport,  July  31, 

1895- 

As  a  man,  Richard  Morris  Hunt  was  a  pic- 
turesque figure,  stalwart  for  his  height,  with 
something  in  his  carriage  and  manner  of  speech 
that  made  you  suspect  the  military  officer,  rather 
than  the  architect.  His  handsome  head  conveyed 
an  expression  of  stateliness  at  times,  but  in  the 
main  Hunt  was  extraordinarily  vivacious,  almost 


a  Frenchman  in  some  of  his  quick  passages  ot 
talk,  and  the  talk  itself  was  explosive.  Most 
characteristic  was  his  aggressive  and  forceful 
enthusiasm.  The  bust  that  heads  this  article  is 
by  Daniel  C.  French,  and  is  taken  from  the 
Central  Park  Monument  erected  in  his  memory 
through  private  subscriptions  of  the  arts  societies 
of  New  York  City.  He  is  the  first  architect  in 
the  United  States  to  be  honored  in  such  a  manner. 
To  Richard  Morris  Hunt  is  also  due  the  great 
movement  toward  broader  architectural  training, 
represented  by  nearly  one  hundred  advanced 
American  students  all  the  time  in  Paris,  either 
competing  for  admission  to  the  Ecole  des  Beaux- 
Arts  or  already  in  the  school.  Moreover,  he  was 
the  chief  mover  in  the  project  of  establishing  the 
Prix  de  Reconnaisance,  or  Prix  Americaine,  as 
the  Frenchmen  term  it,  which  is  open  to  French 
students  alone  and  stands  as  a  perpetual  recogni- 
tion of  French  liberality  in  admitting  the  entire 
world  to  her  school  of  art.  And  we  must  not 
overlook  the  powerful  influence  that  Hunt  ex- 
erted upon  American  architecture.  Richardson's 
power  was  that  of  a  stylist,  and  therefore  personal 
and  limited.  Hunt's  power  is  continual,  for  it 
represented  a  principle.  It  was  successful  in 
giving  to  American  architecture  that  purpose, 
design  and  attention  to  academic  principles  which 
were  entirely  lacking  before  this  New  Englander 
brought  back  to  his  native  country  the  lessons 
France  had  learned.  His  life  and  reputation  will 
live  and  even  increase  with  time. 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


43 


THE   MUNICIPAL   BUILDING  PROBLEM   IN   THE 

CITY  OF  CLEVELAND 

BY  HERBERT  B.  BRIGGS 
Chairman  of  the  Current  Work  Committee  of  the  Cleveland  Architectural  Club 


THE  municipal  art  idea,  the  germ  that  is  to 
regenerate  the  American  city,  has  taken 
root.  Upon  every  hand  the  layman  citizen 
is  beginning  to  traverse  the  route  that  the  Ameri- 
can architect,  the  artist,  the  sculptor  and  the  land- 
scape architect  have  long  since  trod,  with  the 
feeling  that  it  ouly  led  to  the  ideal,  the  Utopian, 
and  not  to  realization.  As  the  citizen  broadens 
his  view,  the  air-castles  of  the  architect  and  his 
confreres  take  tangible  form.  In  these  days  of 
intense  commercialism  and  bitter  competition,  it 
is  a  hopeful  sign.  It  foreshadows  a  broadening 
public  mind,  it  appeals  to  the  finer  and  truer  sen- 
sibilities of  man,  and  it  makes  possible  an  object- 
lesson  education  to  the  masses. 

Cleveland,  with  her  sister  cities,  east,  west, 
south  and  north,  is  awakening  to  her  possibilities. 
She  is  conservative.  Her  capitalists  make  invest- 
ments carefully.  Her  progress,  along  many  lines, 
has  been  painfully  slow.  Her  population  shows 
a  healthy,  steady  increase.  She  went  through 
1893-4-5  and  6  without  a  bank  failure,  and  com- 
paratively few  business  failures.  She  was  slowly 
evolved  from  the  town  to  the  city .  Her  commer- 
cial buildings  have  developed  from  the  two-, 
three-  and  four-story  office  building  to  the  mod- 
ern, fire-proof,  sixteen  story  idea,  whose  vital 
force  is  electricity.  She  has  ever  been  a  city  of 
homes,  those  of  the  detached  house  and  spacious 
lawn.  Cleveland  and  Euclid  Avenue,  names  in- 
separable !  Her  magnificent  park  and  boulevard 
system,  started  some  six  or  seven  years  ago,  and 
yet  incomplete,  stand  among  the  best  of  the  coun- 
try. Her  natural  location  upon  Lake  Erie,  added 
to  the  fact  that  she  is  the  largest  city  in  the  State, 
makes  her  the  commercial  city  of  Ohio,  and  she 
has  already  taken  the  initiatory  steps  toward 
making  herself  the  city  of  municipal  art,  of  not 
only  Ohio,  but  the  Middle  West. 

Such  is  Cleveland.  Born  from  the  hardy, 
education-loving  pioneer  stock  of  the  Connecticut 
Western  Reserve,  she  has  grown  a  healthy 
growth,  and  as  she  enters  upon  the  second  hun- 
dred years  of  her  life  she  feels  the  need  of 
better,  larger,  more  convenient  and  more  artistic 
buildings  in  which  to  house  and  transact  the 
varied  municipal,  governmental,  educational,  art 
and  civic  functions. 

The  conveniences  of  the  century  gone  for  this 
work  are  inadequate  to  the  demands  of  the  city 


and  count}'  governments,  and  in  meeting  these 
demands  it  has  been  determined  that  the  purely 
utilitarian  shall  not  predominate,  but  that  the 
artistic  and  aesthetic  side  will  be  given  due  con- 
sideration, not  alone  for  the  buildings  themselves, 
but  for  their  location  and  relation  one  to  another. 

The  buildings  now  needed  and  for  which  pro- 
vision has  already  been  made,  in  one  form  or  an- 
other, are :  a  government  building,  city  hall, 
public  library  and  a  county  court  house  and 
jail.  Other  buildings  which  will  eventually 
enter  into  the  problem  are  :  the  Case  Library,  an 
auditorium  and  the  Union  Railway  Station. 

Two  million  five  hundred  thousand  dollars 
have  been  voted  by  Congress  for  the  government 
building,  which  will  be  located  upon  the  site  of 
the  present  building,  and  that  of  the  Case  build- 
ing, occupying  the  block  bounded  by  the  public 
square,  Superior,  Wood  and  Rockwell  Streets 
upon  the  east  side  of  the  square. 

A  bond  issue  has  been  authorized  by  the 
State  Legislature  and  a  Building  Commission  ap- 
pointed to  build  a  much-needed  city  hall.  The 
present  building  is  a  rented  one.  Politics  pre- 
vents immediate  commencement  of  this  structure. 

The  Public  Library  Board  stands  ready,  with 
the  authority  to  issue  bonds,  to  take  the  prelimi- 
nary steps  toward  the  new  library  building,  but 
is  wisely  waiting  to  group  this  building  with  the 
others. 

In  1898  a  County  Court  House  Commission 
and  a  bond  issue  to  meet  the  cost  of  the  erection 
of  the  court  house  were  authorized  by  the  Legis- 
lature. Upon  the  appointment  of  the  Commis- 
sion it  was  declared  to  be  unconstitutional.  No 
action  has  since  been  taken,  but  the  great  need 
for  better  facilities  in  this  department  will  com- 
pel early  action. 

Case  Library,  a  quasi-public  institution,  will 
be  driven  from  its  present  home  when  the  Gov- 
ernment begins  its  building.  Its  trustees  are 
broad-minded  men,  and  want  to  make  this  library 
a  part  of  the  grouping  system. 

Cleveland  is  without  a  large  and  convenient 
public  auditorium,  and  when  this  building  is 
erected  it  will,  without  doubt,  be  made  one  of 
the  features  of  this  great  municipal  art  idea. 

The  railroads  centering  in  Cleveland  have 
for  many  years  been  considering  the  erection  of  a 
modern   Union  Railway  Station,  and  have  inti- 


44 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


mated  that  they  would  be  pleased  to  make  this 
building,  if  possible,  a  feature  of  the  group. 

An  art  museum  will  soon  be  built  in  Cleve- 
land, but  present  plans,  unfortunately,  make 
provision  to  locate  this  building  by  itself  in  Wade 
Park,  some  four  miles  from  the  centre  of  the  city. 

From  the  foregoing,  it  is  seen  that  Cleveland 
has  an  opportunity.  The  necessity  for  the  build- 
ings is  germinating  the  group  idea  and  crystalliz- 
ing public  opinion  for  it. 

In  March,  1895,  the  Cleveland  Architectural 
Club  held  a  competition  upon  the  "  Grouping  of 
Cleveland's  Public  Buildings,"  which  was  given 
favorable  newspaper  comment,  but  accomplished 
little  in  a  public  way.  Little  as  was  actually 
accomplished  at  the  time,  the  Club  builded  wiser 
than  it  knew,  for  it  had  fortunately  chosen  as  one 
of  the  judges  of  the  competition  one  of  Cleve- 
land's foremost  citizens,  the  man  who  afterward 
became  a  member  of  the  Public  Library  Board, 
in  which  position  he  has  done  much  to  bring  the 
Board  to  its  present  status  upon  the  group  ques- 
tion, and  who,  in  1898,  introduced  a  resolution  in 
the  Cleveland  Chamber  of  Commerce  which 
created  the  "  Committee  on  Grouping  Plan  for 
Public  Buildings."  He  was  intensely  interested 
in  the  competition  at  the  time,  and  his  interest  in 
the  idea  has  never  grown  less. 

In  January,  1899,  the  Club  held  another 
competition  upon  the  same  subject.  When  the 
drawings  were  hung,  a  public  meeting  was  held, 
to  which  were  invited  the  members  of  the  various 
boards  and  commissions.  The  drawings  were 
carefully  explained,  commending  and  criticising, 
keeping  to  the  idea  in  its  abstract  form  and  stimu- 
lating the  then  small  sentiment  in  its  favor. 
Addresses,  in  a  favorable  vein,  were  made  by 
several  of  the  city's  leading  citizens.  Following 
this  meeting  the  drawings  were  placed  upon  pub- 
lic exhibition  at  Case  Library,  where  hundreds 
inspected  them. 

Throughout  that  winter  the  Club  continued 
the  work  of  enlightening  and  educating  the  pub- 
lic by  talks  given  by  its  members,  before  men's 
leagues  and  similar  organizations,  using  the 
competition  drawings  for  illustration. 

An  address,  by  Mr.  H.  K.  Bush-Brown,  of 
New  York,  at  the  time  of  the  Convention  of  the 
Architectural  League  of  America  in  June,  1899, 
was  made  a  public  one  through  the  courtesy  of 
the  Chamber  of  Commerce,  and  was  listened  to 
by  a  representative  and  appreciative  audience  of 
Cleveland's  best  citizens. 

Later,  in  1899, *Mr.  John  M.  Carrere,  of  New 
York,  upon  the  invitation  of  the  Chamber  of 
Commerce,  delivered  an  illustrated  lecture  upon 
the  same  subject,  which  served  to  increase  the 
sentiment  favorable  to  the  new  movement. 


January  2,  1899,  the  Cleveland  Chamber  of 
Commerce  created  its  Committee  on  "Grouping 
Plans  for  Public  Buildings,"  naming  as  members 
of  the  committee  five  of  the  city's  most  public- 
spirited  men.  The  committee  at  once  organized 
and  conferred  with  the  commissions  and  boards 
having  in  charge  the  erection  of  the  public  struc- 
tures, finding  that  all  were  favorable  to  the 
group  idea.  Encouraged  by  this,  it  formed  a  con- 
sultive  body,  consisting  of  the  committee  and 
representatives  from  the  following  boards  :  Board 
of  Education,  Case  Library  Trustees,  City  Hall 
Commission,  Court  House  Commission,  Library 
Board  and  the  Park  Board. 

Quoting  from  the  report  of  the  committee, 
which  was  unanimously  adopted  by  the  Chamber, 
December  19,  1899  : 

"Many  locations  and  plans  have  been  sug- 
gested, but  it  had  been  deemed  wise  to  favor  no 
one  of  them,  your  committee's  thought  ever 
being  to  first  convince  people  of  the  desirability 
of  the  idea,  avoiding,  if  possible,  the  antagonism 
of  those  who  might  be  particularly  favorable  to 
any  specific  site  or  plan." 

The  Public  and  Case  Library  Boards  practi- 
cally decided  that  they  must  begin  the  construc- 
tion of  their  buildings,  which  decided  the  com- 
mittee upon  declaring  for  a  particular  site  as 
follows  : 

"The  site  suggested  takes  in  the  land 
bounded  on  the  west  by  Seneca  Street,  on  the 
east  by  Erie  Street,  on  the  south  by  Lake  Street 
and  on  the  north  by  Summit  Street  or  Lake  View 
Park.  This  block  is  now  far  from  attractive,  or 
useful,  or  valuable,  though  situated  in  the  heart 
of  the  city  and  on  the  lake  front.  It  adjoins  one 
of  our  public  parks,  which  can  thus  be  utilized, 
without  any  additional  expense  for  land,  to  form 
the  necessary  environment  or  frame  absolutely 
needed  to  set  off  a  noble  building.  It  is  flanked 
on  the  east  by  the  Government  Hospital  Grounds 
and  the  Lakeside  Hospital.  On  the  west  it  could 
be  connected  by  a  high-level  driveway  or  boule- 
vard with  Water  Street,  thence  to  the  viaduct 
and  the  new  boulevard  to  Edgewater  Park  ;  thus 
making  it  a  link  in  our  magnificent  scheme  of 
parks  and  boulevards.  It  is  on  the  lake  front, 
that  distinguishing  and  attractive  feature  of  our 
city,  the  advantages  of  which  have  been  sadly 
and  incomprehensibly  neglected  in  the  past. 

"  It  will  put  our  library,  our  city  and  county 
buildings  and  possibly  our  public  auditorium  in 
the  very  heart  of  the  city,  and  on  its  most  beau- 
tiful and  commanding  site.  Broad  streets,  100 
feet  wide,  running  north  and  south,  connect  it 
with  the  rest  of  the  city.  It  will  be  convenient 
to  the  new  Union  Railway  Station,  which  will 
doubtless  be  built  in  the  near  future  in  the  fine 


manner  characteristic  of  modern  passenger  sta- 
tions and  which  will  also  practically  form  a  part 
of  this  noble  group. 

' '  This  site  destroys  no  existing  structures  of 
importance  ;  it  does  not  take  at  great  expense 
any  section  of  the  city  already  well  utilized  ;  but 
instead,  it  makes  an  unsightly  section  beautiful 
and  transforms  it  into  a  notable  monument  of 
usefulness  and  of  art,  and,  most  important  of  all, 


it    maintains    practically    the    present    business 
centre. 

"You  will  notice  by  the  sketch  that  the  lake 
north  of  this  site  is  filled  in  and  converted  into 
a  park  or  recreation  ground,  and  is  provided 
with  safe  and  commodious  wharves  for  passen- 
ger and  excursion  boats  ;  and  that  the  water 
basin  is  most  suitable  for  bath-houses,  skating 
rinks  and  other  purposes    of  public  recreation. 


46 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


Consider  the  beautiful  effect  of  this  collection  of 
buildings  crowning  the  brow  of  the  lake  front, 
as  they  will  appear  from  the  lake,  as  boats  leave 
and  enter  the  harbor,  and  from  the  public  rec- 
reation grounds  of  more  than  fifty  acres,  north 
of  the  railroad  tracks. 

"  An  advantage  of  converting  this  land,  at 
present  useless  and  of  but  small  value,  into  a 
quarter  both  useful,  beautiful  and  valuable,  is 
that  it  will  give  an  opportunity  and  a  practical 
reason  to  our  street  railway  systems  to  run  a 
series  of  loops  up  and  down  the  streets  between 
Brie  and  Seneca.  Such  arrangements  will  relieve 
the  present  almost  unbearable  congestion  on  the 
square  and  lower  Superior  Street,  and  will  serve 
to  connect  all  parts  of  the  city  with  these  build- 
ings and  the  recreation  grounds  adjoining  ;  also 
with  the  steamer  wharves  and  railway  station 
near  by.  The  sketch  shows  that  one  of  the 
streets  leading  from  the  lake  front  to  Superior 
Street  could  be  improved  and  used  as  a  connect- 
ing boulevard.  This  street  may  be  any  one  of 
the  streets  between  Seneca  and  Erie,  whichever 
one  the  development  of  this  plan  may  show  to  be 
best  adapted  for  the  purpose. 

"  It  may  be  argued  that  the  smoke  in  this 
quarter  is  objectionable  ;  your  committee  would 
reply  that,  inasmuch  as  these  public  buildings 
must  necessarily  be  located  as  near  the  centre  of 
the  city  as  possible,  smoke  and  dirt  to  some  ex- 
tent are  unavoidable,  but  that  there  is  less  of  it 
on  the  lake  front  than  further  to  the  south. 
There  will  be  practically  no  dirt  and  dust  from 
the  streets,  as  the  immediate  surroundings  will  be 
grass,  flowers,  shrubs  and  trees.  The  smoke 
from  the  southern  part  of  the  city  is  unavoidable 
anywhere,  but  from  the  north  comes  only  from 
locomotives,  and  before  long  they  will  burn 
smokeless  fuel  within  the  city  limits,  as  in  other 
large  cities. 

"  This  brings  us  to  the  question  of  the  break 
in  our  beautiful  grounds  north  of  the  group, 
caused  by  the  railroad  tracks.  Your  committee 
is  confident  that  the  railroads  will  co-operate  with 
the  city  either  in  spanning  the  tracks  by  numer- 
ous bridges  of  attractive  design,  or  in  covering 
them  altogether,  as  in  Park  Avenue,  New  York, 
so  that  there  would  apparently  be  no  break  what- 
ever in  the  grounds  from  the  buildings  to  the 
lake. 

*  *  >fc  %  *  %. 

"  If  all  this  lake  front  land  could  be  secured, 
then  the  Library  Board  could  well  afford  to  de- 


cide now  to  locate  there,  in  the  confidence  that 
public  sentiment  would  insist  upon  the  location 
there  of  the  other  buildings  in  the  same  place, 
and  thus  the  group  plan  would  be  assured  in 
that  locality.  It  is  not  necessary  to  wait  until 
all  the  commissions  have  their  plans  ready. 
This  land  can  be  secured  now,  and  that  the 
buildings  will  locate  there  is  almost  as  certain 
as  the  law  of  gravitation  ;  but  even  if  they 
should  not,  nothing  will  have  been  wasted,  be- 
cause the  city  will  have  secured  a  new  pleasure 
ground  for  the  people  where  it  is  most  needed. 

•}»  iji  s£*  'J^  rfc  *f+ 

"Your  committee  recommends  that  steps  be 
taken  to  secure  all  this  land  by  appropriation  or 
purchase,  as  socn  as  possible,  for  park  and  public 
building  purposes,  and  that  this  work  be  placed 
in  charge  of  either  an  existing  commission  or 
one  for  which  provision  shall  be  made  during  the 
present  session  of  the  Legislature.  This  having 
been  done,  the  commission  in  charge  of  it  can 
then  arrange  with  the  several  building  commis- 
sions and  boards,  as  fast  as  they  are  ready  to 
negotiate,  to  sell  to  them  such  parts  of  this  new 
purchase  as  may  be  needed  for  each  building, 
the  city  thus  receiving  back  a  part,  if  not  all,  of 
the  money  it  has  expended  in  its  acquirement." 

A  bill  is  now  pending  in  the  State  Legisla- 
ture reorganizing  the  Park  Board  and  giving  it 
authority  to  proceed  along  lines  similar  to  the 
ones  above  suggested. 

None  of  the  boards  or  commissions  have 
taken  definite  steps  toward  erecting  the  build- 
ings, but  are  awaiting  the  outcome  of  the  action 
of  the  Legislature. 

Cleveland's  citizens  are  reasoning  that  there 
is  wisdom  in  making  haste  slowly  in  this  great 
undertaking  which  the  present  generation  is 
handing  down  to  posterity. 

They  reason  that  there  is  a  commercial  value 
in  the  artistic  phase  of  the  problem,  that  there  is 
economy  in  heating,  lighting  and  operating  the 
buildings  from  a  central  plant;  above  all,  they 
are  beginning  to  see  that  there  is  an  educational, 
an  uplifting  and  ennobling  side  that  demands 
recognition,  and  they  begin  to  realize  that  Cleve- 
land must  group  her  buildings  to  keep  abreast  of 
the  onward  march  of  improvement  and  civiliza- 
tion. 

Cleveland  has  within  her  grasp  the  oppor- 
tunity to  make  herself  one  of  the  foremost  cities 
of  the  United  States  in  a  municipal  art  way. 
She  may  be  counted  upon  not  to  pass  it  by. 

Cleveland,  April  6,  1900. 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


47 


THE  BALTIMORE  CONFERENCE  ON 
MUNICIPAL  ART 

BY  GEORGE  KRIEHN 

Mr.  Kriehn  was  graduated  from  William  Jewell  College  in  1887  with  the  degree  of  A.H.,  spent  five  years  in  thcj  stud}'  of  histoi  \  and 
history  of  art  in  Europe,  received  the  degree  of  Ph.D.  from  the  University  of  Straslmrg,  and  from  1S92  to  1S94  was  instructor  of  history  in 
Johns  Hopkins  University,  and  after  that  for  four  years  assistant  professor  of  history  and  the  history  of  art  in  Stanford  University.  At 
present  is  engaged  in  original  research  and  in  lecturing  upon  municipal  art. 


THE  Baltimore  conference  marks  an  epoch  in 
the  history  of  municipal  art  in  America. 
On  December  13-14,  prominent  authorities 
on  this  subject  were  invited  by  the  Municipal  Art 
Society  of  Baltimore  to  enjoy  the  hospitality  of 
their  city  and  take  part  in  a  conference  there. 
The  meeting  resulted  not  only  in  a  valuable 
interchange  of  opinion  on  the  part  of  the  delegates 
and  the  Baltimore  Society,  but  in  arousing  great 
enthusiasm  for  the  City  Beautiful  among  the  citi- 
zens of  Baltimore. 

The  first  session  of  the  conference  was  a  pub- 
lic meeting  held  on  the  13th  of  December  in 
McCoy  Hall,  of  the  Johns  Hopkins  University. 
President  Gilman,  of  the  University,  and  also 
of  the  society,  opened  the.  session  with  an 
appropriate  address.  He  gave  a  concise  his- 
tory of  the  society,  announcing  its  plans  and 
work  for  the  future,  and  called  attention  to  Balti- 
more's needs  of  artistic  adornment.  The  remain- 
ing program  of  the  evening  consisted  of  two  illus- 
trated lectures  by  Messrs.  E.  H.  Blashfield,  of 
New  York,  and  George  Kriehn,  of  Chicago.  The 
former  is  a  prominent  mural  painter,  and  in  his 
lecture  particularly  emphasized  this  phase  of 
municipal  art,  warning  against  the  popular  clamor 
for  exclusive  use  of  American  historical  sub- 
jects in  the  decoration  of  public  buildings.  He 
spoke  of  the  achievements  of  Greece,  Rome,  Italy 
and  France,  emphasizing  the  need  of  national 
monuments  in  America,  and  pointed  out  the  com- 
mercial value  of  municipal  art  through  the  num- 
ber of  tourists  and  travellers  attracted. 

In  his  lecture  on  "The  City  Beautiful,"  Mr. 
Kriehn,  with  the  aid  of  the  stereopticon,  showed 
the  inartistic  state  of  the  American  municipality, 
and  what  improvements  the  introduction  of 
municipal  art  would  entail.  He  exhibited  streets 
disfigured  by  hideous  signs  and  bill-boards,  claim- 
ing that  these  might  as  well  be  artistic.  He  advo- 
cated the  enforcement  of  smoke  ordinances,  and 
the  judicious  use  of  color  to  relieve  the  dull 
monotony  of  business  streets.  Referring  to  pub- 
lic places,  he  urged  their  decoration  with  trees, 
fountains  and  statues,  and  that  the  public  build- 
ings should  be  massed  together  around  such  cen- 
tres  of  traffic.      Public  buildings,    he  claimed, 


should  be  the  grandest  and  most  beautiful  in  the 
community,  worthily  decorated  with  painting  and 
sculpture.  "  Nothing  is  too  good  for  the  people 
when  it  builds." 

The  second  part  of  the  lecture  demonstrated 
that  the  City  Beautiful  was  a  good  financial  in- 
vestment. It  is  a  perpetual  exposition,  drawing 
visitors  to  the  city,  and  attracts  a  desirable  class 
of  residents.  Beautiful  streets  increase  the  value 
of  real  estate.  The  educational  value  of  public 
monuments,  not  only  in  the  beautiful,  but  also  as 
a  school  of  patriotism,  is  incalculable. 

In  the  afternoon  of  the  following  day,  Decem- 
ber 14th,  a  conference,  attended  by  all  the  invited 
guests  and  by  an  appreciative  audience,  was  held 
in  McCoy  Hall.  The  subjects  discussed  were  the 
treatment  of  parks,  boulevards,  open  spaces  and 
suburban  improvements,  and  the  interior  decora- 
tion of  public  buildings.  Among  the  speakers 
were  Sylvester  Baxter,  of  Boston;  Charles  DeKay, 
F.  S.  Lamb  and  C.  Y.  Turner,  of  New  York  ;  J. 
K.  Taylor,  of  Washington  ;  Elihu  Vedder,  of 
Rome  ;  Albert  Kelsey  and  Joseph  M.  Wilson,  of 
Philadelphia.  The  addresses,  though  brief,  were 
very  instructive  and  aroused  much  enthusiasm, 
notably  those  of  Messrs.  L,amb  and  Kelsey.  After 
the  conference  there  was  a  charming  reception  to 
the  delegates  at  the  home  of  President  Gilman, 
and  in  the  evening,  a  banquet  at  the  Maryland 
Club.  At  this  function  it  was  the  privilege  of  the 
guests  to  meet  a  number  of  the  most  influential 
citizens  of  Baltimore,  men  whose  advocacy  of  the 
cause  of  municipal  art  will  not  fail  to  achieve  im- 
portant results. 

A  description  of  the  conference  would  be  in- 
complete without  a  few  words  in  regard  to  the 
Baltimore  Society. 

Though  not  yet  a  year  old,  it  numbers  over 

600    members    and    has    raised    above    $7,000. 

Besides    instituting    this    conference    and    other 

active   work,  it   has   offered   $5,000  to   the  city 

for  the  mural  decoration  of  a  room  in  the  new 

$3,000,000   court-house,   provided   the   city  vote 

$10,000  additional.     It  is  to  be  hoped  that  other 

cities   will   emulate  the   example  of  Baltimore, 

and  that  such  conferences  on  municipal  art  will 
t 

be  a  matter  of  frequent  occurrence. 


48 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


OBLIGATION  OF  ARCHITECTS  TO  CITY  BEAUTY 


BY  CHARLES  MULFORD  ROBINSON 


Mr.  Robinson  was  graduated  from  Rochester  University  in  1891  with  the  degree  of  B.A.  Editorial  writer  on  the  Rochester  Post 
Express,  and  regular  contributor  to  various  publications.  Travelled  in  Europe  in  1891,  1894  and  1899.  Contributed  a  series  of  articles  on 
"Improvement  in  City  Life  "  to  Atlantic  Monthly,  1899.  Sent  abroad  by  Harper's  Magazine  in  1899  to  make  study  of  Municipal  Art  in 
Europe.  Member  of  the  National  Committee  on  Municipal  Improvements  and  Civic  Embellishment  of  the  Architectural  Eeague  of 
America. 


THE  custom  of  the  Architectural  League  of 
New  York  City  to  discuss  at  its  monthly 
dinners,  in  recent  years,  some  phase  of  the 
city's  development — now  the  water  front,  now  the 
street  plan,  and  now  the  ideal  approaches  for  new 
bridges — is  one  to  be  commended.  Though  it 
should  happen  that  no  one  of  the  suggestions 
made  in  the  course  of  these  talks  ever  have  ful- 
filment, yet  the  questions  that  they  raise  set  men 
to  thinking.  An  effort  is  made  to  limit  the  propo- 
sitions to  the  practical ;  but  were  they  artists' 
dreams,  they  would  still — if  not  beyond  hope — 
have  value.  For  they  would  set  up  a  new  stand- 
ard. They  would  offer  to  the  man  engaged  in 
other  professions,  or  in  business,  a  new,  tangible 
and  pertinent  civic  ideal.  He  would  begin  to 
compare  the  city  of  to-day  not  with  that  of  ten 
years  ago,  to  wonder  at  its  progress  and  be  satis- 
fied, but  with  the  city  that  might  be,  with  the 
city  that  may  be  ten,  or  twenty,  or  thirty  years 
hence.  And  so  aspiration,  desire,  endeavor, 
would  take  the  place  of  satisfaction  ;  and  little  by 
little  the  city  would  march  surely  toward  that 
aesthetic  ideal. 

Yet  the  main  triumph  is  not  there.  It  is  in 
the  reaction  upon  the  architects  themselves,  in 
the  publicly-avowed  recognition  of  their  obligation 
to  the  city  at  large,  in  the  perception  that  the 
architect  best  serves  himself  who  serves  best  the 
community  ;  for  in  the  narrowest  field  his  first 
duty  is  not  to  his  employer,  but  to  the  street  upon 
which  the  building  is  to  stand.  In  his  own  con- 
science there  should  be  a  moral  code  defining 
professional  conduct  quite  as  stringently  as  any 
of  the  rules  that  abroad  demand  regard  for  the 
"  raccordement  et  Vharmonie  des  lignes  de  con- 
struction." 


The  perfect  opportunity  of  the  architect  will 
not  come  until  men  dream  of,  and  work  earnestly 
and  rationally  for,  cities  beautiful.  It  is  for  him 
to  suggest  that  dream.  He  can  do  it  in  formal 
discussions  that  will  have  popular  interest,  be- 
cause they  deal  with  conditions  visible,  concrete 
and  familiar  ;  and  he  can  do  it  by  substituting  in 
his  own  heart  the  principles  of  cooperation,  the 
realization  of  the  duty  of  harmony  over  the  too 
common  notion  of  individual  rivalry.  With 
thought  of  his  high  office,  let  him  scorn  to  be 
subject  to  the  whims  of  tasteless  and  egotistic 
wealth.  Let  him  lead,  direct ;  let  him  mould 
personal  ambitions  into  the  shape  that  will  do 
most  to  raise  the  architectural  standards  of  the 
town,  not  fearing  to  say  to  Croesus,  "  You  shall 
build  better  than  you  know,  for  your  ideal,  which 
is  personal,  shall  give  way  to  one  that  is  com- 
munal, typical  of  a  harmony  which  shall  last 
when  individualism  falls.  You  shall  build  not 
for  a  generation,  but  for  an  epoch  ;  and  not  the 
untried  notions  of  one  man,  but  the  Zeitgeist, 
shall  go  into  your  walls." 

So  in  one  more  case  the  individual  ideal  will 
be  supplanted  by  a  civic  ideal,  the  true  secret  of 
city  beauty  imparted.  But  the  architect  must 
have  first  in  his  own  heart  appreciation  that  he 
has  a  higher  function  than  to  "  get  ahead  "  of  a 
rival ;  that  conscientiousness,  not  docility,  is  the 
secret  of  success.  If  the  members  of  architectural 
societies  everywhere  would  meet  for  the  discus- 
sion of  the  aesthetic  possibilities  of  their  own 
communities,  they  would  do  much  to  substitute 
in  themselves  this  broad  for  the  narrow  view, 
and  popularly  to  educate  to  appreciation  of,  and 
wish  for,  cities  beautiful.  To  do  that  is  the  archi- 
tect's duty,  and  upon  success  in  it  rests  his  hope. 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


49 


BARON  HAUSSMANN 


BY   VM.  P.  CRESSON 


Editor's  Note. — A  short  biographical  notice  of  Baron  Haussmanu  is  particularly  timely.     It  is  the  first  of  a  series  on  the  transfoi 
illation  of  Paris  dining  the  reign  of  Napoleon  III.     As  many  American  municipalities  are  to-day  grappling  with  the  same  problems— new 
streets  and  boulevards,  parks  and  water  supply— the  example  of  the  French  capital  is  of  great  interest.     Mr.  Cresson,  during  a  long  stay 
in  Paris,  has  made  a  careful  study  of  the  subject. 


PARIS  is  once  more  to  become  a  centre  of 
pilgrimage  for  the  whole  world.  For 
twenty  years  at  least  she  has  been  able  to 
claim  the  proud  title  of  "The  Greatest  Modern 
City,"  and  from  everywhere  travellers  have  come 
to  learn  from  her  broad  streets  and  parks  the  les- 
sons and  possibilities  of  municipal  art.  That 
this  is  so  is  due  principally  to  the  genius  of  two 
men — an  Emperor  who,  whatever  his  other  faults 
may  have  been,  did  not  lack  the  courage  for  an 
Augustinian  plan,  and  a  man  whose  rare  mind 
combined  the  qualities  of  administrator  and  artist 
necessary  for  its  realization. 

Louis  Napoleon  and  Georges  Haussmann  first 
met  at  Bordeaux,  during  the  famous  voyage  of  the 
Prince- President  that  ended  in  the  proclamation 
of  the  Second  Empire.  As  prefect  he  had  already 
executed  some  important  public  works  in  differ- 
ent parts  of  France,  and  his  plans  and  theories 
favorably  impressed  the  future  emperor.  One 
year  later,  from  the  Tuileries,  he  summoned 
Haussmann  to  Paris,  where,  as  Prefect  of  the 
Seine,  he  became  governor  and  administrator  of 
the  capital  Napoleon  III  proposed  to  transform 
and  embellish  as  the  first  and  most  lasting  act  of 
his  reign. 

In  the  tenth  century  Philip  II,  by  opening 
new  ways  and  by  paving  and  lighting  the  prin- 
cipal streets,  had  tried  to  direct  the  growth  of 
the  medieval  city.  Later,  Henry  IV,  by  gener- 
ous concessions,  attempted  to  build  up  a  new 
quarter,  whose  architecture  should  harmonize  in 
one  general  effect,  and  the  Place  des  Vosges  and 
its  neighboring  streets  exist  almost  unchanged 
to-day,  a  monument  to  his  enlightened  policy. 
To  Louis  XV  Paris  owes  the  broad  promenade 
of  the  Champs  Elysee  and  the  stately  Place 
Vendome  near  by. 

But  the  Paris  of  1853  was  a  different  city 
from  that  of  the  year  1900.  Many  of  its  noblest 
monuments  rose  from  among  encroaching  houses, 
masses  of  sordid  masonry  that  tolerance  and  cus- 
tom had  left  in  poverty  and  decay.  Many  build- 
ings were  still  of  medieval  wood  and  plaster.  A 
labyrinth  of  crooked  streets,  through  which  the 
growing  traffic  slowly  forced  its  way,  were  often 
the  only  means  of  communication  from  one  popu- 
lous quarter  to  another.  Though  fairly  correct 
plans  of  some  parts  of  the  city  existed,  many  of 


the  poorer  regions  were  unrecorded  on  the  official 
maps. 

The  first  step  towards  their  improvement 
was,  therefore,  an  accurate  set  of  plans  and  levels 
of  the  whole  city,  which,  by  the  Emperor's 
orders,  was  carefully  made  for  the  first  time. 

Already,  under  the  regime  of  the  Republic, 
some  strictly  necessary  improvements  had  been 
made.  One  short  boulevard  to  accommodate  the 
traffic  caused  by  the  new  railway  stations  was 
laid  out  and  opened  by  a  private  company,  with 
government  aid.  Some  of  the  streets  in  the 
neighborhood  of  the  Louvre  had  also  been  broad- 
ened and  extended  and  others  proposed.  But 
the  plan  submitted  by  Baron  Haussmann  to  the 
Emperor  was  so  thorough  and  gigantic  in  con- 
ception that  the  first  system  became  insignifi- 
cant beside  it. 

In  principle  it  comprised  two  great  avenues, 
cutting  each  other  at  right  angles  in  the  direc- 
tions of  the  most  important  traffic,  that  is  to  say, 
parallel  and  at  right  angles  to  the  Seine.  These 
imperial  ways  (Rue  de  Rivoli  and  Brd.  Sebasto- 
pol)  passed  in  parts  through  the  darkest  slums 
of  Paris,  letting  in  light  and  air,  and  razing 
from  the  map  whole  quarters  of  crime  and 
anarchy.  A  third  avenue  (Brd.  St.  Germain), 
following  in  general  the  line  of  existing  streets, 
joined  the  first  two  with  the  old  aristocratic 
quarter  of  St.  Germain.  A  second  system,  radi- 
ating from  a  square,  easily  connected  with  the 
first,  opened  up  the  great  quarters  to  the  east, 
inhabited  by  the  middle  and  laboring  classes. 
In  this  way  two  great  results  were  accomplished: 

(1)  The  congested  districts  were  freed  and 
opened  to  traffic. 

(2)  The  poor  and  laboring  classes  were 
driven  from  the  unhealthy,  demolished  parts  of 
the  city  to  seek  homes  in  the  suburban  quar- 
ters, where  light  and  air  were  not  unattainable 
luxuries. 

Such  a  scheme  could  not  but  excite  a  storm 
of  opposition  as  well  as  of  approval.  The  excited 
population  and  those  whose  property  and  rents 
were  affected  by  the  great  changes  in  value  caused 
by  the  new  streets  resisted  violently  what  they 
considered  an  arbitrary  measure.  The  Emperor 
was  accused  of  having  but  one  end  in  view,  to 
secure  for  his  troops  a  way  through  the  very  cen- 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


51 


tresof  revolution  and  barricades.  Haussmannwas 
treated  as  an  unscrupulous  speculator,  trying  to 
enrich  himself  and  his  associates  at  the  expense 
of  established  interests.  A  still  more  difficult 
obstacle  was  the  question  of  finances.  The  City 
of  Paris,  with  a  yearly  budget  of  fifty  million 
francs,  was  to  be  called  upon  to  increase  it  to 
many  milliards  !  Haussmann  was  then  the  first 
to  point  out  a  fact  which  has  to-day  been  entirely 
proved,  that  such  improvements  in  a  compara- 
tively short  time  should  pay  for  themselves  by 
the  increase  in  taxes  and  the  added  value  of  prop- 
erty. 

Five  years  later  the  whole  plan,  as  outlined 
above,  had  been  carried  out  in  every  detail.  In 
many  cases,  to  encourage  the  proprietors  on  either 
side  of  the  new  ways  to  build  handsomely,  and  in 
harmony  with  a  general  design,  twenty  years  of 
taxes  were  remitted.  Everywhere,  regulations 
concerning  the  height  and  projection  of  the  new 
edifices  were  strictly  enforced.  While  these  new 
streets  may  lack  something  of  the  picturesqueness 
of  the  old,  it  is  worthy  of  remark  how  few  monu- 
ments of  any  real  artistic  or  historic  value  were 
destroyed. 

The  Emperor  desired  also  to  furnish  his  capi- 
tal with  a  system  of  parks  and  squares  so  com- 
plete that  no  quarter,  however  humble,  should  be 
without  its  breathing  space.  Until  this  time  the 
citizens  of  Paris  had  been  dependent  on  the  gar- 
dens surrounding  the  various  palaces,  the  prom- 
enades of  the  Champs  Elysee  and  the  old  boule- 
vards, whose  double  row  of  trees  had  been  the 
wonder  of  generations. 

To  accommodate  the  rapidly  increasing  popu- 
lation of  the  workingman's  quarter  to  the  east, 
the  Bois  de  Vincennes,  a  large  park,  well  wooded 
and  with  several  artificial  lakes,  was  laid  out.  On 
the  other  side  of  the  city  the  famous  Bois  de  Bou- 
logne, a  royal  chase,  surrounded  by  a  stone  wall, 
was  transformed  by  broad  walks  and  promenades. 
To-day,  even  after  the  loss  of  its  finest  trees  dur- 
ing the  siege,  with  its  public  clubs,  race-courses, 
lakes  and  drives,  it  is  perhaps  the  finest  public 
playground  in  the  world.  Beside  these  two 
principal  suburban  parks,  three  others  of  some 


size  were  created  within  the  city  proper,  while 
all  the  old  open  squares  and  market-places  were 
planted  with  shade  trees. 

Near  the  gates  of  the  new  Bois  de  Boulogne, 
on  a  low  hill  overlooking  the  older  portions  of  the 
town,  stands  the  huge  triumphal  arch  erected  by 
Napoleon  I.  From  the  central  space  surrounding 
this  Haussmann  laid  out  new  avenues  radiating 
to  the  four  quarters  of  the  compass.  Here,  on  lots 
once  given  over  to  suburban  cabbage  fields,  has 
grown  up  the  new  quartier  of  the  Champs  Elysee, 
now  the  finest  and  most  aristocratic  of  Paris.  It 
is  here,  unhampered  by  previous  constructions, 
that  he  foresaw  the  rows  of  tall  apartment  houses 
and  private  residences  that  now  line  its  broad,  airy 
streets.  Situated  on  high  ground,  drained  with 
all  the  skill  that  modern  sanitary  science  com- 
mands, few  residential  quarters  can  compare  with 
it.  Here,  as  elsewhere,  one  must  remember  that 
it  was  Haussmann  who  planned  the  greater  part 
of  that  second  invisible  city,  Paris  below  ground, 
the  great  system  of  sewers  that  carries  its  drainage 
to  the  Seine,  some  miles  away. 

In  so  short  an  article  it  is  impossible  to  more 
than  catalogue  Haussmann's  works.  Every  de- 
partment of  the  municipal  economy  of  Paris  is 
indebted  to  him.  The  water  supply,  the  greater 
part  of  which  had  been  drawn  from  the  polluted 
Seine,  was  during  his  administration  entirely  re- 
organized and  taken  from  pure  and  lasting 
sources.  The  gas,  and  lighting  of  the  streets, 
the  pavements,  the  burial  of  the  dead,  and  the 
public  slaughter  houses,  were  each  in  turn  the 
subject  of  his  profound  study  and  intelligent 
reform. 

His  Memoirs,  containing  the  results  of  his 
researches,  must  remain  the  subject  of  a  future 
volume.  While  others  reaped  the  fruits  of  his 
wisdom,  the  man  through  whose  hands  the  mil- 
liards of  francs  expended  had  passed  ended  his 
days  the  hard-working  director  of  a  financial 
company.  What  more  eloquent  reply  could  he 
have  found  to  those  who  for  so  long  had  slan- 
dered his  acts  and  the  liberal  policy  that  governed 
them  ? 

Paris,  November  30,  1899. 


."-*. 


52 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


THE    NATIONAL   COMMITTEE    ON    MUNICIPAL 

IMPROVEMENTS    AND    CIVIC 

EMBELLISHMENT 


OF  THE 


ARCHITECTURAL  LEAGUE  OF  AMERICA 


IT  is  a  satisfaction  to  announce  the  appointment 
and  acceptance  of  Mr.  Cass  Gilbert,  of  New 
York  and   St.   Paul,    to  the  chairmanship  of 
the  Committee  on  Civic  Improvements. 

As  every  one  knows,  Mr.  Gilbert  is  a  very 
able  and  successful  architect,  and,  by  special 
studies,  is  well  qualified  to  develop  to  great  effi- 
ciency this  department  of  work  which  this  new 
organization  has  undertaken. 

The  Architectural  League  of  New  York  has 
already  accomplished  something  in  this  field  for 
the  city  of  New  York,  and  their  success  has  been 
the  inspiration  which  has  brought  about  this 
committee. 

The  field  is  so  new  and  so  comparatively 
untouched  that  it  seems  desirable  to  outline  in  a 
few  words  what  the  purpose  is,  and  how  inti- 
mately their  work  may  be  associated  with  the 
municipal  life  of  all  our  cities. 

It  is  not  open  to  argument  that  the  sur- 
roundings of  our  daily  lives  should  be  clean,  tidy 
and  attractive.  This  is  universally  accepted  as  a 
truism  so  far  as  the  individual  lot  owners  are  con- 
cerned, and  they  take  a  pride  in  well-kept  door- 
yards,  trim  houses,  and,  when  attainable,  fine 
architecture.  This  same  principle  has  been  ap- 
plied by  city  authorities  to  the  larger  opportu- 
nities offered  for  its  application  to  city  lots  in 
the  aggregate  or  the  general  appearance  of  the 
municipality. 

Without  wishing  to  depreciate  the  good 
things  that  have  been  accomplished  for  many 
of  our  American  cities,  it  yet  remains  a  fact  that, 
not  infrequently,  the  best  of  opportunities  have 
been  neglected  or  only  partly  developed. 

Unfortunately  it  has  been  considered  as  only 
an  engineering  or  surveyors'  problem,  instead  of 
an  artistic  one,  which  it  really  is,  and  we  are  glad 
to  note  this  is  the  artists'  entrance  into  this  field, 
which  is  essentially  their  own. 

We  have  reason  to  expect  great  things  of 
them,  for  the  general  treatment  and  setting  of  the 
World's  Fair  at  Chicago  was  a  demonstration  of 


what  they  could  do.  This  demonstration  has 
appealed  to  the  understanding  and  imagination 
of  the  people  of  the  United  States,  and  from 
many  cities  and  towns  come  evidences  that  their 
citizens  are  aware  of  the  intrinsic  value  of  the 
artistic  appearance  of  our  civic  homes  ;  that 
these  things,  which  involve  the  planning  of  cities 
and  laying  out  of  streets  and  parks,  the  placing 
of  public  buildings  and  monuments,  are  just  as 
important  as  good  sewers,  pavements,  police  and 
light. 

The  results  aimed  at  by  this  committee  are  to 
be  obtained  by  their  giving  advice  to  munici- 
palities or  corporations  without  charge  or  fee, 
travelling  expenses,  of  course,  excepted. 

The  committee  is  made  up  of  architects, 
sculptors,  mural  painters,  writers  on  these  sub- 
jects, etc.  ;  and  they  are  residents  of  various 
cities  from  New  York  to  New  Orleans. 

The  method  of  procedure  is  this  :  A  muni- 
cipality or  corporation  in  need  of  advice  may 
appeal  to  the  President  of  the  League,  931  Chest- 
nut Street,  Philadelphia,  Pa. ;  the  member  of  the 
General  Committee  who  is  nearest  to  the  locality 
applying  he  appoints  as  chairman  of  the  special 
committee  to  visit  that  city,  and  with  him  he 
associates  some  artists  near  by  who  have  made  a 
study  of  these  problems. 

After  one  or  more  visits  to  the  place  they 
write  a  report  to  the  authorities  who  invited 
them,  a  copy  of  which  is  sent  to  the  President  of 
the  League  for  future  reference 

As  this  kind  of  artistic  advice  has  been 
sought  for  and  obtained  before  this  committee 
was  appointed,  it  is  reasonable  to  suppose  that 
this  new  machinery  which  the  Architectural 
League  of  America  now  offers  to  the  public  will 
be  put  in  active  operation  at  once,  for  every  city 
and  town  is  interested  in  making  the  most  of  its 
natural  artistic  resources. 

H.  K.  Bush-Brown. 
107  East  Twenty-seventh  Street, 
New  York. 


Mrs.   Phoebe  A.   Hearst 


THE  INTERNATIONAL  COMPETITION  FOR  THE 
PHCEBE  A.  HEARST  PLAN  FOR  THE 
UNIVERSITY  OF  CALIFORNIA 


THE  trustees  of  the  Phoebe  A.  Hearst  Ar- 
chitectural Competition  for  the  University 
of  California  have  issued  a  volume  that 
contains,  beside  excellent  reproductions  of  all 
the  second  competition  drawings,  the  eleven  sets 
of  preliminary  plans  that  were  awarded  prizes  at 
Antwerp,  thus  entitling  their  authors  to  enter 
the  final  competition.  The  letter-press,  printed 
in  four  languages,  gives  a  historical  account  of 
this  great  concours,  together  with  numerous  re- 
ports of  much  interest. 


The  League,  through  the  kindness  of  these 
gentlemen,  is  enabled  to  use  much  of  the  infor- 
mation and  illustration  contained  in  this  article, 
and  is  equally  indebted  to  them  for  a  series  of 
enlarged  photographs  used  by  the  League  in  its 
travelling  exhibits.  The  same  spirit  of  liberality 
has  characterized  the  attitude  of  the  competition 
judges,  Mr.  Belcher  and  M.  Pascal,  both  having 
kindly  sent  the  letters  printed  herewith. 

The  University,  started  in  1853  as  a  con- 
gregational   school    and    soon    abandoned,    was 


54 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


revived  under  an  Act  of  Congress  in  1862,  and 
in  1868  was  chartered  and  received  an  endow- 
ment from  the  State  as  an  unsectarian  institu- 
tion. "It  began  building,  as  most  American 
colleges  have  begun  and  nearly  all  have  con- 
tinued, without  device  or  knowledge  or  wisdom. 
That  is  to  say,  every  architect  employed  has 
built  what  seemed  to  him  good,  without  refer- 
ence to  the  works  of  his  predecessors  or  his 
contemporaries  or  his  successors."  At  the  same 
time,  the  growth  of  the  University  has  been 
phenomenal.  At  present  it  has  enrolled  over 
2,500  students,  and  the  architectural  plans  are  in 
anticipation  of  a  student  body  of  5,000. 

A  young  professor  at  the  University  first 
conceived  the  idea  of  making  the  buildings  of 
one  character,  and  Mrs.  Phoebe  A.  Hearst,  widow 
of  the  late  Senator  George  R.  Hearst,  became  the 
benefactress  of  the  plan  by  offering  to  pay  the 
cost  of  a  competition  and  to  erect  two  buildings 
of  the  accepted  design,  one  being  a  memorial  to 
her  husband. 

Accordingly  the  following  program  was  dis- 
tributed throughout  architectural  offices  of  Eu- 
rope, America,  and  even  Japan  : 

"  I. — (1)  The  administration  building  or  build- 
ings. This  group  is  to  comprise  the  entrance  to 
the  university,  janitor's  lodge,  etc.,  and  will  con- 
tain the  necessary  ball  and  reception  rooms  and 
offices  for  the  regents,  faculties  and  executive 
offices. 

"(2)  The  library.  This  building  should  have 
a  capacity  of  750,000  volumes,  and  should  be 
built  with  all  the  accommodations  of  a  modern 
building. 

"(3)  A  museum.  Provision  should  be  made 
in  this  division  for  departments  of  art,  antiquities, 
ethnology,  etc. 

"(4)  and  (5)  Two  auditoriums,  one  of  a 
capacity  of  5,000  people,  and  the  other  of  a 
capacity  of  1,500.  Each  should  be  adapted  to 
lecture,  concert,  or  theatre  purposes.  A  garden 
for  open-air  celebrations  is  also  included  within 
this  group. 

"(6)  Lecture  rooms,  armory  and  covered  courts 
for  drill  in  rainy  weather  are  required  by  the 
military  department. 

"(7)  The  gymnasia  also  constitute  an  import- 
ant division  and  are  to  provide  separate  depart- 
ments, both  for  gymnastics  and  swimming,  for 
male  and  female  students.  Besides  these  depart- 
ments there  will  be  printing  and  publishing 
establishments,  an  infirmary,  dormitories,  and 
club  houses  for  professors  and  students. 

"II.  Buildings  for  all  things  pertaining  to  the 
general  service  of  the  several  departments,  such 
as  central  power,  heat  and  light  stations  and 
postal,  telephone  and  telegraph  systems. 


"III.  The  departments  of  instruction  so  far 
contemplated  number  fifteen,  and  the  buildings 
for  their  accommodation  differ  much  as  to  their 
relative  size  and  importance.  These  departments 
are  as  follows  : 

"(a)  Higher  historical  and  literary  instruction, 
with  departments  of  philosophy,  pedagogy,  juris- 
prudence, historical  and  political  science,  and 
ancient  and  modern  languages. 

"(£)  Higher  scientific  instruction,  with  depart- 
ments of  mathematics,  physics,  astronomy,  chem- 
istry and  natural  history  (zoology,  botany, 
geology,  mineralogy). 

"(c)  Technical  and  applied  instruction,  with 
departments  of  fine  arts,  agriculture,  mechanical 
engineering,  civil  engineering,  mining,  draught- 
ing and  graphical  analysis. 

"All  are  to  be  so  connected  as  to  ensure  easy 
communication,  both  open  and  covered,  between 
the  groups  of  buildings  and  to  contribute  to  the 
stately  aspect  of  the  whole." 

A  first  and  open  competition  was  to  be  judged 
by  an  international  jury  of  the  highest  class,  dis- 
tributing not  less  than  $15,000  in  prizes  ;  and  at 
least  ten  plans  were  to  be  retained,  the  authors  of 
which  were  invited  to  enter  the  second  compe- 
tition, in  which  $20,000  should  be  distributed  in 
prizes  to  not  fewer  than  five  plans,  giving  not  less 
than  $8,000  to  the  best  plan. 

The  judges  named  were  Mr.  Norman  Shaw, 
of  England,  for  whom  Mr.  Belcher  was  afterwards 
substituted  ;  M.  Jean  Louis  Pascal,  of  France, 
member  of  the  Upper  Council  of  the  School  of 
Fine  Arts  ;  Herr  Wallot,  of  Germany,  the  archi- 
tect of  the  new  legislative  palace  at  Berlin  ;  Mr. 
Walter  Cook,  of  New  York,  of  the  firm  of  Babb, 
Cook  &  Willard,  and  Mr.  J.  B.  Reinstein,  of  San 
Francisco,  a  graduate  of  the  University  and  mem- 
ber of  its  board  of  regents. 

The  first  or  open  competition  was  decided  at 
Antwerp  in  July,  1898,  and  attracted  ninety-eight 
competitors.  The  number  was  reduced  to  eleven 
prize-winners — six  Americans,  three  Frenchmen, 
one  Dutchman  and  one  Swiss.  These  competitors 
had  six  months  in  which  to  prepare  their  designs 
for  the  second  competition.  This  was  decided  at 
San  Francisco,  and  the  design  of  M.  Benard  was 
unanimously  chosen  as  the  best.  The  author  re- 
ceived a  prize  of  $10,000.  The  other  four  prize- 
winners, in  their  order,  are  :  Howells,  Stokes  & 
Hornbostel,  of  New  York,  $4,000  ;  Despradelles 
&  Codman,  of  Boston,  $3,000  ;  Howard  &  Cauld- 
well,  of  New  York,  $2,000 ;  Lord,  Hewlett  & 
Hull,  of  New  York,  $1,000. 

In  arriving  at  their  decision  of  the  respective 

position  and  merit  of  the  several  designs,  the  jury 

considered  the  following  as  of  special  importance : 

(1)  That  the  buildings  should  generally  rep- 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


55 


resent  a  university  rather  than  a  mere  architec- 
tural composition. 

(2)  That  there  should  be  a  convenient  group- 
ing of  the  educational  sections  without  undue 
crowding  or  prevention  of  possible  future  exten- 
sion. 

(3)  That  the  purpose  of  the  several  depart- 
ments should  be  clearly  defined  in  the  design. 

(4)  That  the  architectural  forms  should  be 
adapted  to  the  configuration  of  the  grounds  and 
preservation  of  their  natural  beauties. 

Monsieur  Edward  Benard,  who  won  the  first 
prize,  is  a  native  of  Goderville,  France,  being 
born  there  in  the  year  1844.  He  1S  a  member  of 
the  jury  of  the  Ecole  dcs  Beaux- Arts.     He  won 


From  P Illustration. 

M.  Edward  Benard. 

the  Grand  Prix  de  Rome  on  August  10,  1867,  de- 
signed the  Tribune  of  Commerce  at  Fecamp  and 
restored  the  Chateau  de  Sasselot  and  the  churches 
of  Bleville  and  Mare-aux-Clercs.  He  also  deco- 
rated the  Casino  de  Nice  and  the  Franco-Ameri- 
can Club,  of  Paris.  Just  before  his  departure  for 
America  M.  Benard  was  tendered  a  reception,  at 
which  time  he  was  presented  with  the  cross  of 
the  Legion  of  Honor,  in  the  name  of  the  Presi- 
dent and  the  Republic.  His  brother  architects 
gathered  and  wished  him  godspeed  on  his 
journey. 

If  Monsieur  Benard  is  chosen  to  execute  any 
of  his  buildings  according  to  his  general  scheme 


it  will  not  be  the  first  acquaintance  Americans 
will  have  with  his  work. 

M.  Benard,  in  his  capacity  of  winner  of  the 
Prix  de  Rome  of  1887,  produced  the  projet  which 
was  executed  at  the  World's  Fair  in  Chicago,  in 
1893,  f°r  the  Art  Building,  the  most  admired  of 
the  many  buildings  on  the  grounds. 

Of  a  right,  the  universities,  of  all  other 
places,  should  be  the  home  of  correct,  impressive 
and  meaning  architecture.  Those  who  throng 
there  are  in  a  formative  stage  of  their  lives.  If 
the  buildings  around  them  are  the  expression  of 
present  conditions  and  higher  ideals,  the  lives  of 
the  students  will  be  stronger,  and  the  graduate's 
love  for  his  Alma  Mate}  will  be  based  upon  some- 
thing more  substantial  than  the  ivy  of  the  college 
walls.  Tuscany  brickwork,  no  matter  how 
quaint  ;  the  collegiate  architecture  of  old  England, 
no  matter  how  homelike  and  hospitable  ;  Gothic 
spires,  no  matter  how  impressive,  are  not  within 
the  demands  or  requirements  of  an  American 
university.  A  competition  such  as  the  present 
one  should  awaken  the  college  world  to  such 
errors. 

The  closing  months  of  the  year  1899  saw  the 
success  of  this  philanthropic  movement,  whose 
influence  will  extend  far  into  the  centuries  yet  to 
come.  By  such  a  munificent  gift,  Mrs.  Hearst 
has  placed  herself  beside  the  greatest  philanthro- 
pists of  all  ages.  The  patronage  of  art  and  letters 
by  the  Medici  family  was  from  generation  to 
generation  ;  by  her  individual  beneficences  Mrs. 
Hearst  performs  their  work  in  one  generation. 
What  Mrs.  Hearst  has  done,  a  Carnegie  or  a 
Rockefeller  might  do,  and  thus  add  to  their  many 
wise  benefactions  a  living  symbol  of  "  triumphal 
democracy"  in  lasting  stone. 

A  LETTER  FROM  J.  L.  PASCAL,  MEM- 
BRE  DE  L'INSTITUT 

HAVING  been  connected  with  the  American 
architecture  movement  in  its  relation  to 
France  from  the  beginning  of  my  studies 
to  the  time  the  lamented  Hunt  completed  his 
education  in  practice  and  theory  in  Paris  ;  having 
followed  with  attention  the  interesting  progress 
of  your  joint  and  parallel  efforts  — on  the  one 
hand,  to  continue  the  traditions  of  the  Old  World, 
and,  on  the  other,  to  find  solutions  for  the  new 
problems  of  your  social  condition  ;  having  helped 
numerous  students  among  those  who  crossed  the 
Atlantic  to  receive  instructions  from  our  Ecoles 
des  Beaux-Arts,  by  chance  I  found  myself 
selected  to  represent  France  on  the  jury  of  that  in- 
comparable competition,  opened  by  Mrs.  Hearst, 
for  the  University  at  Berkeley. 

The     exceptionally     rapid     journey     which 


56 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


brought  us  to  San  Francisco  allowed  us  but  a 
hasty  glimpse  of  some  of  your  already  historic 
cities;  of  others,  whose  happy  beginnings  presage 
a  rapid  growth,  and  of  others  which  exist,  so  to 
speak,  as  yet  only  in  an  embryonic  state  Every- 
where I  perceived  a  double  movement,  and  was 
forcibly  impressed  that  there  is  no  doubt  that 
you  soon  will  be  able  to  proceed  without  bor- 
rowing from  the  systems  of  instruction  organized 
so  laboriously  and  traditionally  among  us,  that 
your  American  architecture  will 
keep  up  with  that  of  our  old  con- 
tinent, which  sends  you  cease- 
lessly the  overflow  of  its  own 
and  of  its  acquired  art.  In  the 
first  place,  the  time  has  passed 
when  contemporary  civilizations 
ignore  even  their  nearest  neigh- 
bors. There  are  no  materials, 
no  inventions,  no  new  processes 
of  one  country  that  are  not  im- 
mediately known  over  all  the 
world  and  employed  every- 
where. These  two  factors  of  the 
renaissance  in  art  prevent  us 
all,  you  as  well  as  us,  from 
creating  significant  forms,  or  a 
so-called  new  style,  which  will 
not  be  a  growth,  a  development; 
one  epoch  simply  in  the  upward 
and  continuous  evolution  of 
architecture.  More  and  more 
will  architecture  become  uni- 
versal— there  will  be  little  beside 
the  conditions  of  climate  and 
material  which  will  make  di- 
versity— unless  there  comes  a 
religious  evolution,  and  that  is 
hardly  to  be  looked  for  in  this  century  of  toler- 
ance. 

It  is  necessary  to  glance  at  your  side.  Hav- 
ing at  the  first  step  reached  the  culminating  point 
of  all  civilizations,  having  had  no  childhood  apart 
from  ours,  your  composite  country  can  offer  no 
solutions  which  are  not  the  consequence  of  our  past 
conquests,  which  are  yours  now,  as  well  as  ours. 

Certain  problems,  whose  different  terms  open 
the  possibility  of  new  discoveries,  might  furnish 
starting-points  for  interesting  combinations  ;  but 
just  as  your  discoveries  in  science,  in  literature, 
in  military  art  and  in  all  the  branches  of  human 
attainment  tend  more  and  more  to  make  uniform 
the  march  of  progress,  just  as  the  easy  communi- 
cation suppresses  more  and  more  the  local  char- 
acteristics which  constitute  the  physiognomy  of 
all  people,  and  by  bringing  all  together  gives  to 
them  the  atmosphere  of  the  provinces,  and  to 
the  provinces  the  individuality  of  cities  and  vil- 


lages, so  architecture  from  day  to  day  will  tend 
more  towards  uniformity  in  future  solutions. 
This  consequence,  this  extension  of  civilization, 
will  prove  a  great  blow  to  artists.  It  has  taken 
us  centuries  to  lose  our  native  originality,  which 
makes  the  differences  and  peculiarities  of  diverse 
styles  synonymous  with  differences  in  beauty  ; 
but  it  has  taken  us  as  much  time  to  attain  that 
proficiency  which  means  to  a  certain  extent  the 
negation  of  originality,  while  it  is  the  index  of 
the  greatest  security  to  the  art 
of  composition. 

Like  us,  you  are  now  con- 
demned for  not  giving  proof  of 
innocence,  for  not  cultivating 
your  art,  for  not  refining  your 
tastes  and  not  cherishing  your 
architecture  as  much,  and  more, 
in  the  conception  of  plans,  as  in 
the  arrangement  of  facades. 

Having  attained  your  ma- 
jority at  the  start,  we  now  can 
only  wish  reciprocally  that  each 
of  us  may  reach  old  age  as  late 
as  possible,  to  uphold  each 
other  in  the  strength  of  our 
maturity,  for  decrepitude  and 
death  alone  can  produce  from 
decay  and  ruin  that  renaissance 
of  which  all  generations  have 
dreamt,  and  which  is  the  flower 
of  the  grave. 

There  is  no  sadness  in  this 
thought  !  The  highway  is  long, 
and,  above  all,  it  is  broad,  and 
we  may  all  walk  in  it — prob- 
ably in  uniform  step — at  any 
rate,  free  and  powerful  in  that 
vast  clearing  which  replaces  the  charming  foot- 
paths in  which  our  fathers  lingered. 

J.  L.  Pascal. 
January  31,  1900. 

8  Boulevard  St.  Denis, 
Paris,  France. 

A  PAPER  BY  JOHN  BELCHER,  A.  R.  A. 

THE  remarkable  interest  taken  in  the  Inter- 
national Competition  for  the  University  of 
California  cannot  fail  to  have  a  permanent 
influence  on  the  architecture  of  that  State. 

The  public  not  only  recognized  that  the  art 
had  an  educational  value,  but  that  it  had  a  prac- 
tical and  commercial  one. 

The  employment  of  a  jury  free  from  all  sus- 
picion of  jobbery  or  favoritism  was  a  guarantee  of 
the  excellence  and  fitness  of  the  designs,  and  the 
wisdom   of    the    course    adopted    was    speedily 


ARCHITECTURAL   ANNUAL 


57 


demonstrated  by  offers  made  by  wealthy  men 
who  were  eager  to  provide  for  the  erection  of  one 
or  more  buildings. 

The  indiscriminate  erection  of  incongruous 
and  faulty  buildings  by  independent  donors  failed 
to  induce  others  to  be  represented  in  their  com- 
pany. Thus  the  interests  of  the  University 
suffered,  until  the  practical  foresight  of  Mrs. 
Phoebe  Hearst  and  her  advisers  originated 
the  well-organized  scheme  for  a  complete  and 
harmonious  combination  of  university  build- 
ings. 

If  the  work  is  well  carried  out  the  architec- 
ture not  only  of  the  neighborhood,  but  of  the 
United  States  generally,  will  be 
benefited  and  the  art  receive  a 
considerable  impulse  in  the 
right  direction.  The  proximity 
of  San  Francisco  to  the  mag- 
nificent site  opposite  the 
' '  golden  gates' '  may  cause  that 
city  to  review  its  condition, 
and  to  be  infected  with  the 
laudable  ambition  to  take  ad- 
vantage of  the  natural  beauties 
of  its  site  and  surroundings. 
Its  position  on  the  "Pacific" 
coast,  its  splendid  and  unique 
harbor  indicate  that  San  Fran- 
cisco is  destined  to  become  one 
of  the  most  important  of  mod- 
ern cities.  With  but  few  ex- 
ceptions the  buildings  of  this 
city  are  poor  in  character  and 
wanting  in  essential  architec- 
tural qualities ;  a  large  num- 
ber are  of  timber  construction, 
of  a  vulgar  type.  Its  citizens 
are  aware  of  and  deplore  its 
present  deficiencies.  The  con- 
sciousness of  defects  is  the  pri- 
mary condition  of  amendment. 
The  past  is  the  result  of  an  ignorance  for  which 
the  future  will  hold  no  excuse. 

As  a  member  of  the  jury  on  the  International 
Competition,  who  received  the  "freedom  of  the 
city"  in  recognition  of  this  service,  one  could 
not  fail,  with  such  exceptionable  opportunities,  to 
judge  of  the  effect  of  the  competition  upon  the 
city.  The  ambition  of  its  energetic  leaders  ma)T 
render  it  possible  that  similar  methods  may  be 
adopted  to  improve  it.  There  can  be  no  doubt 
that  the  architectural  treatment  of  a  city  is  as 
important  as  that  of  a  university.  The  enhanced 
value  of  the  "  sites  "  in  an  orderly  and  well-laid- 
out  street,  treated  architecturally  (an  important 
distinction),  is   obvious.      The   London  County 


ment   of    the   new   street   from    Holborn  to  the 
Strand. 

American  architecture  generally  shows  signs 
of  breaking  away  from  the  prevalent  low  types  of 
French  work.  Its  exponents,  after  servilely  copy- 
ing, have  now  out-Frenched  the  French.  The 
meanest  and  poorest  models  have  been  taken  for 
every  purpose,  and  text-books  of  meretricious 
ornament  have  been  ransacked  for  its  decorative 
forms.  So  far-  has  the  imitative  faculty  been 
cultivated  that  wood  is  used  to  imitate  stone, 
marble,  brick  and  tiles — instead  of  being  made 
use  of  as  a  constructive  material — after  the 
manner  of  the  "half  timber"  work  which  is 
the  pride  of  the  timber  counties 
in  this  country.  In  cities — 
which  grow  so  rapidly  in  Amer- 
ica— the  use  of  timber  will  be 
discarded  in  the  future.  Apart 
from  the  risk  by  fire,  however, 
the  use  of  steel-frame  construc- 
tion must  supersede  it,  as, 
where  ground  becomes  suddenly 
valuable,  economy  of  space  is 
essential,  and  increased  facility 
for  rapid  extension  important, 
both  perpendicularly  and  hori- 
zontally. The  importance  of 
concentration  is  one  cause  of 
the  increased  height  which 
these  steel-constructed  build- 
ings make  possible.  The  re- 
sultant "  sk}r-scraper  "  is  not 
likely  to  be  a  lasting  problem 
in  American  architecture.  Un- 
less these  lofty  buildings  are 
restricted  in  height  and  locality, 
obvious  difficulties  and  objec- 
tions must  supervene.  These 
buildings  may  be  regarded  as 
distinctly  American.  Archi- 
tects had  no  precedent  to  fol- 
low in  France  or  elsewhere,  and  it  is  to  their 
credit  that  they  have  dealt  boldly  with  this 
difficult  problem.  Its  bearing  on  the  future  of 
American  architecture  is  important,  for  it  will 
convince  them  of  their  own  strength  and  ability 
to  deal  with  new  conditions.  This  is  the  most 
that  can  be  advanced  in  favor  of  the  ' '  sky- 
scraper" architecturally.  Separately  they  are 
too  often  hideous.  Collectively,  as  in  New 
York,  they  are  not  without  artistic  value  as 
seen  from  the  river  and  on  approaching  the 
city.  Here  they  pile  up  majestically  and  group 
well  in  the  vast  area.  Perhaps  the  most  suc- 
cessful of  these  lofty  erections  are  those  which 
have  been  treated  as  huge  "towers."     Crocker's 


Council   should   bear  this  in  mind  in  its  treat-     building  in  San  Francisco,  with  its  domed  termi- 


58 


ARCHITECTURAL   ANNUAL 


nation,  while  it  dominates  the  city,  forms  a  fine 
feature  in  distant  views.  On  the  other  hand, 
Trinity  Church,  in  New  York,  with  its  fine  spire 
and  good  proportions,  is  made  ridiculous  by 
enormous  buildings  on  either  side,  which  are 
higher  than  its  spire. 

These  lofty  buildings  have  received  every 
variety  of  treatment  in  the  attempt  to  im- 
press upon  them  some  architectural  character. 
Many  have  excellent  qualities,  but  the  best  are 
those  which  are  not  designed  with  an  architectural 
"  order,"  but  are  simple  and  direct  in  their  dispo- 
sition. 

This  element  of  quiet  and  unostentatious 
simplicity  is  slowly  gaining  in  popularity.  The 
beauty  of  the  later  "  Renaissance  work"  in  Great 
Britain,  to  which  the  ' '  Old  Colonial ' '  of  America 
is  allied,  possesses  that  charm,  and  the  attention 
which  it  has  lately  received  will  no  doubt  be  mani- 
fest in  a  more  dignified  restraint.  There  are 
many  able  and  distinguished  architects  who  de- 
plore existing  shortcomings,  and  who  are  doing 
much  to  remove  the  reproach  of  a  lack  of  indi- 
viduality in  their  art. 


At  present  the  architectural  student  spends 
his  five  years  in  Paris,  and  returns  more  or  less 
saturated  with  French  art,  affecting  French 
manners  and  the  accent  of  "l'Ecole  des  Beaux- 
Arts." 

What  is  necessary  is  that  he  should  regard 
his  studies  in  France  as  a  foundation  on  which 
he  can  safely  expand. 

Sir  Christopher  Wren  was  indebted  to  France, 
the  only  foreign  land  in  which  he  studied,  for 
much  that  he  learned.  There  he  met  Bernini 
and  saw  the  Louvre,  but  he  did  not  imitate 
French  or  Italian  methods. 

It  has  been  determined  to  erect  an  American 
National  Institute  in  Paris.  This  Institution 
will  doubtless  exercise  a  wise  control  over  the 
students'  work,  and  the  fact  that  a  Frenchman  is 
to  carry  out  the  new  University  Buildings  is  no 
disadvantage.  M.  Benard  is  an  able  man,  whose 
work  is  of  a  pure  and  refined  type,  and  his  influ- 
ence will  be  beneficial  to  the  art  of  the  country, 
and  in  a  centre  where  it  will  prove  fruitful. 

John  Belcher,  A.R.A. 
20  Hanover  Square,  London,  W. 


ACTION  OF  THE  THIRTY-THIRD  CONVENTION  OF  THE  AMERICAN 

INSTITUTE  OF  ARCHITECTS 


IN  his  annual  address  the  President  referred  to 
this  competition  as  follows:  "Among  the 
competitions  of  the  year  which  have  been 
managed  in  a  manner  creditable  to  the  projectors, 
the  contestants  and  the  judges,  by  far  the  most 
conspicuous  and  memorable  is  that  for  the  laying 
out  of  the  buildings  and  grounds  of  the  Univer- 
sity of  California,  under  the  '  Phoebe  Hearst 
Architectural  Plan.'  Though  the  highest  award 
in  this  international  competition  fell  to  a  French 
architect,  the  brilliant  part  borne  especially  by 
some  of  the  younger  American  contestants  is  a 
cause  of  congratulation.  I  should  like  to  see 
the  Institute,  by  formal  resolution,  recognize  our 
indebtedness,  not  only  to  the  munificent  and 
public-spirited  woman  through  whom  this  im- 
portant architectural  event  was  made  possible, 
but  to  the  Managing  Committee  for  furnishing 
an  example  so  conspicuous  of  a  fairly-conducted 
competition  on  a  great  scale,  and  for  the  courage 
and  intelligence  with  which  they  have  conceived 
a  scheme  of  architecture  which,  in  extent  and 
importance,  has  not  been  exceeded,  if  it  has  been 
equalled,  in  modern  times." 

yfi  ^  ^c  y^.  tfc  >?c 

"In  regard  to  the  fourth  subject  of  the  ad- 
dress— the  University  of  California  competition — 
your  committee  is  of  the  opinion  that  nothing 
but  praise  is  due  to  the  University  authorities 
for  the  far-sighted  way  in  which  the  future  build- 


ing operations  at  Berkeley  have  been  conceived. 
We  admire  Mrs.  Hearst  for  the  liberality  of  mind 
she  has  displayed  in  making  possible  in  a  pecu- 
niary way  the  first  steps  of  this  great  undertak- 
ing ;  we  congratulate  those  in  charge  of  the  com- 
petition that  no  shadow  of  unfairness  rests  upon 
their  conduct,  and  we  most  cordially  welcome 
M.  Benard  to  the  ranks  of  American  practitioners, 
and  rejoice  that  a  substantial  recognition  of  his 
genius,  which  was  by  circumstances  denied  to 
him  as  the  author  of  the  design  of  the  beautiful 
portico  of  the  Fine  Arts  Building  at  Chicago, 
should  have  come  to  him  from  this  country. 

"At  the  same  time,  the  Institute  wishes  to 
state,  in  the  clearest  terms,  its  conviction  that 
the  form  of  competition  employed  in  this  case 
was  an  improper  form  of  competition,  and  one 
to  be  generally  reprobated.  Unlimited  compe- 
titions are  disadvantageous,  both  to  the  profes- 
sion and  to  those  who  institute  them.  They  are 
disadvantageous  to  the  profession,  because  they 
seek  to  get  more  than  is  paid  for,  and  thus  en- 
courage the  lowest  form  of  commercialism — i.  e., 
gambling — among  the  5'ounger  men  of  the  pro- 
fession. They  are  disadvantageous  to  the  pro- 
moters, because  unlimited  competitions  in  effect 
exclude  the  majority  of  the  leaders  of  the  profes- 
sion from  participation  in  the  service  of  the  pro- 
moters."— From  the  Proceedings  of  Thirty-third 
Annual  Convention. 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


59 


THE  REQUIREMENTS  OF  THE  UNIVERSITY  AND  A  LIST  OF  THE  PRIZE- 
WINNERS IN  THE  FIRST  COMPETITION 


The  requirements  of  the  University  were  set 
forth  in  the  program  as  follows  : 

' '  The  general  scheme  will  comprise  : 

"  (i)  Provision  for  the  general  and  collective 
purposes  common  to  all  the  departments,  as 
follows  : 

"  Administration,  University  library,  Uni- 
versity museum,  auditoriums,  military  establish- 
ment, gymnasia,  printing  establishment,  habi- 
tation, club  houses,  infirmary,  approach  and 
communication. 

"(2)  Buildings  for  all  things  pertaining  to 
the  general  service  of  the  several  departments, 
such  as  central  power,  heat  and  light  station, 
postal,  telephone  and  telegraph  systems,  etc. 

"(3)  The  departments  of  instruction,  so  far 
contemplated,  number  fifteen,  and  the  buildings 
for  their  accommodation  differ  much  as  to  their 
relative  size  and  importance. 

' '  These  departments  are  as  follows  : 

"A.    HIGHER  HISTORICAL  AND  LITERARY 
INSTRUCTION. 

"(1)  Department  of  Philosophy  and  Peda- 
gogy. 

"  (2)  Department  of  Jurisprudence. 

"(3)  Department  of  History  and  Political 
Science. 

"(4)  Department  of  Ancient  and  Modern 
Languages. 

"B.    HIGHER  SCIENTIFIC   INSTRUCTION. 

"(5)  Department  of  Mathematics. 
"(6)  "  "    Physics. 

"(7)  "  "    Astronomy. 

"(8)  "  "    Chemistry. 

"(9)  "  "    Natural      History     (Zo- 

ology, Botany,  Geology  and  Mineralogy). 

"TECHNICAL  AND  APPLIED  INSTRUCTION. 

"  (10)  Department  of  Fine  Arts. 
"(11)  "  Agriculture. 

"(12)  "  Mechanical     Engineer- 

ing. 

"(13) 
"(14) 

"(15) 
ical  Analysis. 

' '  All  are  to  be  so  connected  as  to  insure  easy 
communication,  both  open  and  covered,  between 


"  Civil  Engineering. 

"  Mining. 

"  Draughting  and  Graph- 


the  groups  or  buildings,  and  to  contribute  to  the 
stately  aspect  of  the  whole." 

A  detailed  account  was  given  of  the  composi- 
tion of  each  group,  with  estimates  of  the  number 
of  students  to  be  provided  for,  and  other  indica- 
tions as  to  size  and  capacity. 

In  accordance  with  the  provisions  of  the  pro- 
gram, 105  plans  were  received  by  the  United 
States  Consul-General  at  Antwerp  before  July 
1,  1898.  On  September  30th  the  jury  met  at  Ant- 
werp in  the  Royal  Museum  of  Fine  Arts,  where 
the  competitive  plans  had  been  framed  and 
prepared  for  the  jury's  inspection.  M.  Pascal 
was  elected  President,  and  Mr.  Wallot  Vice-Presi- 
dent, of  the  jury.  The  jury  continued  in  session 
until  the  evening  of  October  4th.  By  a  process 
of  successive  eliminations  the  jury  finally  awarded 
prizes  to  eleven  plans.  Upon  this  final  vote,  it 
was  found  that  four  additional  plans  had  received 
one  vote  each.  These,  by  the  desire  of  Mrs. 
Hearst,  were  also  rewarded. 

The  following  are  the  names  of  the  authors  of 
the  eleven  premiated  plans,  who  were  entitled  to 
admission  to  the  final  competition  : 

Messieurs  Barbaud  et  Bauhain. 

Monsieur  E.  Benard. 

Herr  Professor  F.  Bluntschli. 

Messrs.  D.  Despradelles  &  Stephen  Codman. 

Herr  Rudolph  Dick. 

Mr.  J.  H.  Freedlander. 

Messieurs  G.  Heraud  et  W.  C.  Eichmuller. 

Messrs.  Howard  &  Cauldwell. 

Messrs.  Howells,  Stokes  &  Hornbostel. 

Messrs.  Lord,  Hewlett  &  Hull. 

Mr.  Whitney  Warren. 

The  following  are  the  names  of  the  four  au- 
thors mentioned  above  : 

Messieurs  Joanny  Bernard  et  Robert. 

Monsieur  Charles  des  Anges. 

Mr.  Ernest  Flagg. 

Herr  Fred  Skjold  Neckelmann. 

By  the  terms  of  the  Program,  it  was  pro- 
vided that  only  the  authors  of  the  plans  accepted 
at  the  Antwerp  Competition  should  be  entitled  to 
compete  for  the  final  prizes.  It  was  also  provided 
that  the  authors  of  the  plans  premiated  in  the 
first  competition  should  be  invited,  free  of  ex- 
pense to  themselves,  to  visit  the  site  of  the  Uni- 
versity and  study  the  problem  on  the  ground. 
Authors  of  nine  of  the  premiated  plans  accepted 
this  invitation. 


I 


tig     £5  S 

5*82,2  & 

t^    O    h    U  *J 

S  S§  S|  « 

>S  ft.s  -?  i-.  o 


5oo|^ 


*  a)  u  c  S 

*  «  0.2  2     ►> 

a  cd  ib  *;.a    •  V, 

-a  a  o  o-a  m-o 

<5  s  ■—  s  *-'  u  a 

■h  2  M  »7  «  2  5 
0  ^  5  a  bi>«  <a  ■§• 

i  0,1-^  V  u  "^ 
rt  O  «  0-2  H  a  -a 

5  Mo  a  «~£ 
u  «.a  S  Otj  ^7 
la^&Is^' 
|'S  o  j*  .-s^Ji-o 
^So^t'.a  *S! 

i!Hi! 

oj  cjx^  at>5^> 

2-o'g-  aa:  -0 
's'o  a      ^  ^      Si 


£  a; 

■e.5 

.ti  ■a 


.si* 

a  w 
"OS 


•^  r-     4;     (U 

a 'g.|tS  .5 

.0.0  4j  OJp 

,  r-     l- 

^  OJ  ^~   ft , 

a  £  n  ft9 
■3  S2  «  ft 

.h  o  bccB  P< 
■".c  S  ^  «J 

£    8&S 

o  «  8  "S 
*"»  "^  ») 

So  u  ""S 

11*23 


.2  s 


a;  <u  rt  '^  tu 

iH2cl 

bt^£.a-a  u<*-  a 

.S  S'g  >.s-s-/| 

o«j.2tl""1'SJS 
bis  a  J-.2-1  a  5  H 

>-  bcfta^£  a 
l*"oi^j-.'-;o'''i' 

5  &■««§««§ 

"?'°airtaJs2t/3 

■S-ftO^.S^  <! 

.&s«  §««■■§= 

So  Si**afl  Wo 

■^  «  cs  m     u  sa 

bjo^.2  2  ^  &i  ™  u 
aK  a---  <u  a^ 

h     ft  a  cj  fto 

>£  o^  o^jC  °  £ 
Ph+j      ?h<!  b  ^II 


DC 

< 

Q* 

< 

2 

z    m 
CL    a: 

D 

J    H 
CC    o 


(h 


A  Ad. 


<->  a 

Q  £ 

<  2 

[_  -w 


O 


>  | 

>  c 

o  S 

CO  *j 

0- 


If) 

< 

2 

>- 

O 

O 


2   i> 


<  £ 

Q 


00 


^ 

X 

o 

o 

z 

2 

o 

2 
5 

H 
W 
O 

m 

o 

2 

o 

O 

X 

.. 

<*) 

£ 

w 

UJ 

Ui 

> 

o 

H 

to 

fll 

_ 

> 

l/J 

1 

H 

u 

o 

£ 

(xJ 

o 

a. 

X 

t/3 

<n 

Lt 

a: 

(11 

o 

m 


-.Ssji-o*    B 

■a^  «^  ^S     s 

Nllfi  I 
■g  2  g  a  „3  * 

5  Ji  o  g  -  ^  1 
£  .*  o  -.  ^  a      "> 

">  o!  «  &  3  ft|:!  " 
«J3  >Tj  a.~  3  ^ 
£   ■_£  "        <u  i-   . 


ffi  3  ~ 


">._  3 <*-  u  3  ^ 


3  CO  (U  0!        CO  _ 

T°'o«>,M«lrH.e  7 

T-   XT3   t-  ,     t-»   3 


ppssr    ---'_ 


*J1 


f 


-  ;    i 


fw,-,fc  ■■■" 


>! 


' 


«k  it  '7     <  • 


V 


' 


£ 

o 

>- 

£ 

u 

2 

J 

w 

(- 

00 

o 

m 

2 

a; 

o 

X 

.8 

z 

oo 

< 

IrJ 

O 

00 

J 

oo~ 

< 

_J 

en 

to 

UJ 

£ 

2 

o 

UJ 

X 

O 

CO 

OS 

W 

CO 

w 

s 

o 

«"5 

o 
If* 


•  FINAL- 

INTFPN/ITIOVAI  -^OMPET'TIOK' 

•    foP-thf  •  pf'EBE  HrA°c"T  ■ 

APCHITTTxfV  i    ni  ANFOP  tpC 

VNlVFP'lTY-OF.-CAllFORNI/ 


'^ 


2£ 

<j 

r^ 

«t  h-1 

£'.. 

£Z 

°Sss; 

or. 

s 

^P 

uJ  u. 

Li 

G~. 

go 

T  55  -5 

9 

ZJ 

S^ 

ii» 

e;< 

O 

•  2; 

*    Of 

o 

aj  ?~>* 

5£g 

£&  ££=# 

a.; 
>- 

1 

M/ 


MT 


•I,-   % 


ft  i 


m 


*WR* 


^v; 


,5        5 


55* 


%4» 


*&, 


W 

H 

t/l 

() 

11) 

H 

2 

f/1 

(K 

[rl 

U 

£ 

JL. 
=8 

O 

^ 

y; 

0 

^ 

o 

o  3 

1— 1  _i 

*| 

U    x 

k>     a; 

w 

^    s 

H 
O    <j 

a:  *■ 

CL    £ 
O 

<i> 


-sspfe 


;\ 


^ 


UJ 

H 

co 

o 

m 

2 

H 

a; 

& 

o 

D 

I 

O 

«3 

O 

CO 

^ 

>~ 

O 

a: 

< 

H 
00 

& 

00 

CQ 

_] 

W 

J 

£ 

o 

Ll 

X 

o 

CO 

a: 

> 

CO 
CO 

H 

2 

O 

UJ 

CJ 

0, 

*J 

[/] 

n 

& 

a 

UJ 

CL 

Ct 

o 

o 

o 

in 

■ 


EfeL=-    ^su 


2 

O 

H 

ill 

O 

U4 

2 

< 

[rl 

s 

> 

u 
o 

H 

o 

O 

£ 

UJ 

T 

U-, 

a. 

tn 

tu 

& 

H 
in 

UJ 

<*i 

0, 

(/! 

W 

j 

J 

< 

HI 

OS 

Q 

2 

< 
OS 

a. 

UJ 

O 

m 

UJ 
Q 

Q 

m 

K. 

in 

m 

UJ 

S 

U    W    y   QJ 

£  S  s  & 


•^  +j  +j  +j 
•aSo'H 

«ix  g  n 

0..-S       ° 
T5  ft      tu 

o  c  u    . 


;_'    s  o  s  js 


o  I- 

•J3  O 


SH-p 


-fc     ^  o 

S*  a! 


>,</>«  c 
—  bn     o 

ft°        £ 

^  i;  C 

O   d;   Co 


&  v     Ag* 


ft     ,a  o 


< 


< 

2      Q 

O    Q 
w 

w 
w 


3 


fife 


,-=v  ...  n 


$&LS^ 


-1U 


y 

£ 

o 

>- 

Ul 

~t 

> 

PJ 

z 

H 

O 

J 

UJ 

CL 

£ 

CO 

a 

a: 

j 

UJ 

D 

< 

CL 

o 

J 

«8 

< 

Q 

£ 

< 

UJ 

£ 

2 

O 

X 

UJ 

O 

w 

a: 

w 

w 

w 

2 

o 


-  '    O  0)  « 

id  ffl"43j3'" 

-  S*  §  " 

■e  0  «  i-  ex 

O  cy  en  Cy  m 
a,  aS:~V  U 

£  M  in  ."2  <C 

si  fit 

-°  ^js*  ••»■ 
Si-c-o  ga«, 

■Sstc-o." 
S  o  "is  .  ^ 

2     CO     Ph*0    rn  < 

M . sss &J 

—  uJ3  CS.S 

wj=  o  O^-O 

n  ™  O  a    •  B 

^  ^h  CO  T3  p  - 
k  Ofl  u   u  tc 

j$f.<2.2;3  d 

ft°  S'8  3o 
F      ™  X  t>  ecj 

b£cjrj)  ^  >  <u 
'in -2  -T3  >^2 
^      r,  o  w  « 

cy  OS  M-"  >> 
j-  CD  0  _,  c  2 

S5  cu.S*  4; 

."    =  •=    m  ~  •= 

-  cc  •*-'  t2  n  w 
to  .g  in  p.  b 


if 


» 


.L^  ~-i-    Wk' 


---ilk' 


da: 


?p  'gj:  rf>j 

Mv 

ip-Jlsi'f-^ 

t  '«•  ^*- 

LJifiicr-i-iLJ 

<  -  *T^I 

]kjj>2 

rtefigrrnq 

c:  i: 

i 


J*     •       •      • 


.   rfr—^-rTi 

,  ,  t 

PIH 

*  *  » 

:  I!  iir—spit!! 

■  ■    *  i 

:!Idr*    *i  !l 

•  •  «i-h-  3  •►!■ 

*•  •  1 

!*  '  *f  !! 

»      i 

4 ! « i.-n 

1+     H   i 

■  '•  •  i 

tlit-H 

Jit-HM  »  « 

» i 

I!!  :r?"3:        •  l 

^  '.i'.t'.  t'.t'.t.i  !t!t$*; 

»v      '                                         'ill 

D 


o 

o 

H 

°3 

Q 

Q 
OS 

n 

< 

<* 

O 

T 

ix, 

o 

(/) 

i 

to 

UJ 

< 

S 

F- 

1 

LxJ 

<\> 

U 

«•»■> 

M-* 

i-» 

a 

£2 

4-> 

I-> 

3 

O 

fe 

D 


cc 

o 

H 

Q 

D 

< 

UJ 

% 

U, 

Q 

O 

D 

2 

< 

O 

=3 

H 

Q 

n 

a: 

<. 
o 

Q 

X 

7, 

w 

< 

it 

t/i 

y, 

w 

o 

^ 

< 

> 

U 

«-> 

J 

& 

fil 

,£2 

2 

O 

o 

OS 

fe 

Ir, 

-J 

< 

H 

W 

Q 

"<e  ar 


!j  rv* 


r*- 


f   »Stn 


if    i;  u 


'«S!K*« 


y 

oi 

o 

>~ 

£ 

u 

z 

2 

^1 

<C 

D 

J 

X 

a. 

c*j 

j 

< 

W 

£ 

DJ 

W 

d  ample 
es  a  fine 
be.     Its 
tc.     The 
drangle, 
it  adapt- 
y  than  a 

2 

UJ 

X 
Q 

a: 
o 

O 

v  >  -a  u  ta  5  -o 
rf  ~  o  oj  ^  £  55 

t/i 

.S  g-Snrt  SP» 

w 
2 

bs,  and  also  ma 
i  on  a  high  plat 
the  public  as  it 
:aining  walls,  gr 
the  large  centi 
is  such  an  arrai 
her  an  interestir 

V3  TT-t     til  1=      Z>      „ 

=  ":«»     •a  ° 


as  «! 


M~ 


H  =  0  S  U 

o  ..  rt  ~fcE  s 'iS' 
£■£  ■-  a'-S  8^ 


s 

" 

_' 

<L> 

O 

£ 

g 

>. 

0. 

rt 

3 

z 

UJ 

z 

3J 

b£ 

s 

^ 

T^ 

;- 

p- 

.& 

<LJ 

uj 

s 

"3 

UJ 

£ 

O 

£ 

en 

0) 

— 

uj" 

i-. 

£ 

J 

oj 

j 

u 
o 

_o 

rt 

be 

5 

-r 

1 

<u 

fl 

> 
"3 

£ 

_^ 

o 

>> 

QJ 

-c 

^ 

P- 

^ 

5 

Li 

c 

U3 

~  °  >.  oJ  olC^'§ 

.SC    2      £    JS    -5    *      5 

£8oo°°      fc 

«*       ac       v.  E<+- 

S  H5  <U   rt   O  ~ 

--C'  U— ■  JX  £    ^' x   rt 

^u+js      a>>  E *t: 
^  2  *  °*o:5-£i 

SmSJ.SS'gSl 

-    rt  '^  rt  aj  ti  cu  o 
S  o  =  o.S-5  g 


■ 


? 


Si 


"IP  '  ' 


m 


¥ 


*  \  1,  % 


a: 

0 

>- 

£ 

w 

z 

J 

J 

D 

w 

X 

> 

<8 

p 

f- 

0 

W 

Ou 

£ 

CO 

w 

CK 

I 

W 

Q 

CL 

a 

0 

_1 

j 

< 

w 

cc 

a: 
w 

2 

2 

1 

0 

1 

O 

> 

^ 
£ 

p 

o 

>- 

o 

UJ 

£ 

Cu 

w 

t£ 

Z 

< 

J 

£ 

< 

>* 

£ 

W 

LU 

z 

Z 

X 

Ul 

£ 

o 

[  ffwud;  J   .,„„ 


;::::::q-;:    'TT--, 


I}!     r-T It:  -»«:•:::«  :!:::::!flt-: 

:    -1::  :::;:  :::::::;  i_  j 


.-l.l: 
: ;  r  i  : 
.1) — (: 


:iu      -J  I   _.j.  . 


a: 

o 

2 

>- 

< 

£ 

,  1 

w 

CU 

ii 

7^ 

J 

W 

<I 

u 

£ 

< 

UJ 

£ 

2 

>- 

UJ 

II) 

O 

X 

5s 

9 


~f3fl 

T 


sd 

UJ 

OJ 

> 

o 

H 

£s 

O 

w 

UJ 

2 

0- 

.. 

W 

a: 
ui 

a: 

D 

UJ 

2 

a< 

< 

Q 

< 

III 
111 

OS 

uj 

2  ~ 
UJ  ^ 
O    oi 


X. 
K 
O 

y 

2    =* 

*-    tu 

<    z 

_1      • 

n       £ 

Q 

_J      2 

a:  q 
z  £ 
o  x 


■&,  f 


*-  4      ■    £  ""'  -  ~    -if  A4K--., 


i 

o 

LL 

D 

N 

J 

•z, 

I 

< 

U 

in 

,  1 

h 

0- 

.  ) 

_J 

CQ 

< 

d' 

0! 
O 

/ 

W 

UJ 

W 

HI 

n 

u. 

o 

K 

0. 

05 

05 

W 

X 

a 


DJ 

> 

<: 

2 

(- 

Z 

o 

LlI 

UJ 

> 

cu 

y 

(/> 

o 

OS 

Q 

DJ 

X 

Uu 

0* 

J 

J 

O 

n 

< 

D 

OS 

a; 

W 

Qi 

2 

a; 

Lxj 

t: 

o 

< 

z 

2 

<  > 

a.   o 
5 

<  a. 

W       Q 

I 


y  m 


> 

< 

X 

h 

< 

O 

m 

UJ 

f- 

a. 

w 

w 

a: 

Q 
D 

w 

< 

cu 

m 

OS 

< 

j 

oa 

< 

w 

Oi 

a: 

Ix] 

2 

D 
W 

w 
1/1 

o 

w 

s 

1  lM1 


Li. '3.  C  :_i 


w,\ .  l  i;;;  ii  n^F-'-.r17-!-^ 


<: 


3, 


LJLirjn\  -    ', 

•pu   - 


< 

i 

D 

2 

< 

J 

i- 

LL 

Q 

n 

_l 

< 

< 

Lil 

< 

UJ 

m 

2 

w 

UJ 

us 

O 

m 

V) 

U) 

III 

s 

AVD1TQR1 

DETAIL 


v '  :; 


<* 


DETAIL    GROUND    PLAN    OF    ELEVATION 

MESSIEURS  G.  HERAUD  ET  W.  C.  EICHMULLER,  PARIS 


v/M'wrDC'-p/ 

of  CALIFORNIA 


.AUDITOR"  Pi 


OXTAIL 


DETAIL    FRONT    ELEVATION 

MESSIEURS  C.  HERAUD    ET   W.  C.  EICHMULLER.  PARIS 


i;  f;8 


'i      ' 


,m 


mw& 


ffi*-      ,4,  m~'T'i.ffiiilBiir,ii¥f 


e 


-K^ 


El— £^A    :',»,■,  !L__J— . 


y 


^8 


a: 

a; 

< 

o 

ct; 

>- 

DQ 

£ 

w 

j 

z 

Dl, 

J 

o 

D 

X 

2 

=8 

O 

H 

H 

H 

W 

O 

UJ 

CO 

I 

Q 

Q 

O 

< 

J 

W 

2 

O 

w 

H 

s 

< 

1 

> 

UJ 

J 

-^* 

w 

J-i 

J 

O 

< 

-t-< 

H 

'+-• 

U4 

£> 

Q 

e 


o 


■  m 


-'■' . 


■$m 


jS^W^'          '  9  i 

S^m'  ^1-  ,l"i:  * 

JESSs '         '■  ■  :- 

* ;                                 -   '  >^-  i 

~~rf8^>~         * 

~ 

—         ■-»•■.  ? 

i 

*-== 

;         -' 

if 


i 


D 

5 
o 

H 
Q 
D 

< 

It 

O 

o 


a: 
Q  a 
^    < 


< 

O 

< 
> 

Id 

_l 

E- 

2 

O 

< 

W 
Q 


90 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


FROM  THE  TRUSTEES'  REPORT 

"The  International  Competition  initiated  in 
1896  is  now  brought  to  a  close.  And  in  rendering 
this  report,  the  Trustees  desire  to  express  their 
deep  sense  of  appreciation  to  Mrs.  Hearst,  to  the 
jurors  and  to  the  competing  architects.  It  is 
through  the  generous,  cordial  and  constant  co- 
operation of  these — Mrs.  Hearst,  jurors  and  archi- 
tects— that  we  are  able  to  lay  before  the  world  the 
splendid  results  achieved. 

"The  object  of  the  competition  has  been  at- 
tained. A  beautiful,  artistic  realization  of  their 
desires  and  efforts  has  been  produced.  It  stands 
as  a  magnificent  tribute  of  devotion  on  the  part 
of  the  architects  of  many  countries  to  their  art. 

"  Plans  beautiful  in  themselves,  appropriate  to 
the  purpose  in  view  and  adapted  to  the  site  are 
before  us.  While  full  liberty  of  treatment  was 
given  to  the  genius  of  the  architects,  in  order  that 
they  might  not  be  hampered  by  any  narrow  con- 
ditions or  considerations,  their  own  judgment  and 
discrimination  have  so  regarded  the  natural  limita- 
tions of  space  and  cost  that  we  entertain  no  doubt 
of  the  feasibility  of  executing  the  plans  that  will 
be  presented  to  the  regents  for  approval.  For 
such  execution  there  will  not  be  required  any 
larger  expense  than  is  justified  by  the  great  pur- 
pose for  which  the  plan  is  designed,  and  the  noble 
site  whereon  the  buildings  are  to  be  reared. ' ' 

EXTRACTS  FROM  THE  JURY'S  REPORT 

"In  appropriating  the  amount  to  be  awarded 
to  each  competitor,  the  jury  have  taken  into  con- 
sideration the  great  superiority  of  the  design 
placed  first  over  the  others  submitted,  and  have 
decided  upon  the  following  combination  : 

First  prize $10,000 

Second  prize 4,000 


Third  prize $3,000 

Fourth  prize 2,000 

Fifth  prize 1,000 

"Upon  opening  the  letters  and  removing  the 
seals  covering  the  mottoes,  the  jury  found  that 
the  authors  of  the  relative  designs  were  as  fol- 
lows: 

"  First,  Monsieur  E.  Benard,  29  Boulevard 
Pereire,  Paris. 

"Second,  Messrs.  Howells,  Stokes  &  Horn- 
bostel,  46  Cedar  Street,  New  York. 

"Third,  Messrs.  D.  Despradelles  &  Stephen 
Codman,  6  Beacon  Street,  Boston,  Mass. 

"Fourth,  Messrs.  Howard  &  Cauldwell,  10 
and  12  East  Twenty-third  Street,  New  York. 

' '  Fifth,  Messrs.  L,ord,  Hewlett  &  Hull,  16  East 
Twenty-third  Street,  New  York. 

"  The  jury,  after  an  examination  of  the  refer- 
ences and  certificates  submitted  by  M.  Benard,  de- 
clare that  this  architect  offers  the  guarantees 
which  justify  his  being  entrusted  with  the  execu- 
tion of  the  work. 

"  It  is  a  matter  of  congratulation  to  the  mem- 
bers of  the  jury  that  they  are  able  to  record  the 
fact  of  their  practical  unanimity  in  all  the  de- 
cisions arrived  at ;  and  in  concluding  their 
report  they  desire  to  record  their  appreciation 
of  the  breadth  of  view  and  the  generosity  of 
Mrs.  Hearst  in  instituting  the  competition,  and 
of  the  care  and  intelligence  with  which  it  has 
been  carried  out  from  beginning  to  end,  which 
makes  it  a  model  for  similar  competitions  in  the 
future ;  and,  finally,  their  sense  of  the  honor 
conferred  upon  them  by  their  share  in  it. 

"J.  L.  Pascal, 
"John  Belcher, 
"Paul  W allot, 
"Walter  Cook, 
"J.  B.  Reinstein. 

"San  Francisco,  September  7,  1899." 


7 

~_| 

6aiP\V 

'  iji1, ilium  ' 

9&£i 

ilSOS 

fei-^ 

mjm 

1      ' 

^^~__: , 

ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


91 


COMMERCIAL   ARCHITECTURE 

BY  WM.  COPELAND  FURBER,  ARCHITECT,  M.  AM.  SOC.  C.  E. 


THE  architecture  of  commercial  structures 
is  a  problem  requiring  for  its  correct  solu- 
tion the  work  of  a  mind  free  from  the  fet- 
ters and  limitations  of  bygone  ages  and  condi- 
tions. Designers  who  think  only  in  "terms" 
of  traditional  architectural  expression  can  hardly 
hope  to  plan  properly  the  structures  required  for 
housing  the  processes  used  in  the  application  of 
science  to  the  manufacture  of  commercial  pro- 
ducts. 

In  the  design  of  all  structures  devoted  to 
commercial  purposes,  such  as  office  buildings, 
store  buildings,  factories,  power  houses,  etc.,  the 
reason  for  their  existence  should  not  be  forgotten. 
Office  buildings  are  erected  for  the  conveni- 
ence of  the  tenant,  and  for  the  corresponding 
convenience  of  the  public  using  them  ;  but  in 
order  that  the  investment  may  be  a  profitable 
one,  these  two  conditions  must  equate  with  a 
third  factor,  that  of  commercial  utility,  or  rev- 
enue-producing capacity.  When  these  funda- 
mental essentials  have  been  provided  for,  an 
earnest  and  intelligent  effort  should  be  made  to 
cover  these  necessities  with  constructional  grace, 
rather  than  attempt  to  cut  down  the  require- 
ments to  fit  any  architectural  "  ready-made 
clothes;"  and  herein  will  the  ability  of  the  de- 
signer manifest  itself,  for  ' '  necessity  has  ever  been 
the  mother  of  invention,"  and  then  again,  on  the 
other  hand,  we  have  the  scriptural  injunction 
against  "  putting  new  wine  into  old  bottles." 

Store  buildings  for  retail  dealers  require 
windows  for  display,  and  in  many  cases  wall 
space  for  advertising  purposes.  In  the  large 
retail  and  department  stores,  the  show  windows, 
for  the  display  of  goods,  should  be  the  dominant 
note  of  the  design.  The  piers  and  superstruc- 
ture should  not  be  so  treated  as  to  convey  the 
impression  that  the  large  windows  were  begrudg- 
ingly  put  in  by  the  architect,  only  on  the  impera- 
tive order  of  the  owner.  If  the  style  proposed 
to  be  used  does  not  lend  itself  readily  to  an 
' '  open ' '  treatment,  it  is  evident  that  the  style 
selected  is  not  a  fitting  one.  In  this  connection, 
the  idea  embodied  in  the  old  sayings  "  the  clothes 
were  made  for  the  man,  and  not  the  man  for  the 
clothes"  and  that  "the  body  is  more  than 
raiment"  might  be  borne  in  mind  and  has  a 
pertinent  application  to  commercial  architecture. 
Granting  the  use  of  signs  as  necessary  for 
certain  kinds  of  business,  it  becomes  the  duty  of 
the  architect  to  provide   for  them,  and  likewise 


his  privilege  to  educate  the  public  in  the  artistic 
use  of  signs.  Had  the  proper  use  of  signs  been 
considered  in  the  past,  our  streets  would  not  now 
be  disfigured  by  incongruous  and  unsightly  dis- 
plays of  all  varieties  of  ugliness,  our  city  ordin- 
ances would  not  have  to  forbid  overhanging 
signs,  nor  would  our  buildings  be  covered  up  with 
advertisements.  The  sign  is  a  legitimate  func- 
tion of  business  and  should  have  its  place  in  the 
design,  and  this  place  should  not  be  subordinated 
to  lesser  requirements.  The  artistic  evolution  of 
the  "poster  "  in  the  last  few  years  indicates  the 
possibility  of  the  combination  of  advertising  and 
art.  Can  not  the  architect  combine  utilitarian 
necessity  and  architectural  grace  ? 

Mill  buildings,  carpet  and  textile  manufac- 
turing establishments,  employing  many  individ- 
ual machines,  needing  ample  light  and  space, 
seem  to  have  almost  escaped  architectural  con- 
sideration in  most  of  our  cities,  and  the  attempts 
which  have  been  made  in  this  direction  have  not 
been  encouraging,  because  the  designer,  through 
ignorance  or  incapacity,  has  not  been  in  sympathy 
with  the  spirit  of  the  purpose  to  be  accomplished. 

Power  houses  and  factories  have  come  with 
the  end  of  the  century  in  answer  to  the  call  for 
the  economical  development  and  application  of 
power.  In  this  age  of  commercial  and  scientific 
activity,  the  manufacturing  plant  occupies  a 
larger  space  in  the  community  than  the  churches 
and  cathedrals  did  in  ages  gone  by,  and  the  hap- 
piness and  welfare  of  a  large  number  of  people 
are  dependent  on  its  successful  management. 
Therefore,  these  concentrations  of  power  and 
aggregations  of  industry  having  become  such  a 
factor  in  every -day  life,  they  should  receive  a 
corresponding  amount  of  attention,  and  while 
they  are  necessarily  engineering  structures,  it  is 
possible  to  design  them  in  such  a  manner  as  to 
solve  these  problems  of  engineering  and  architec- 
ture successfully  ;  meeting  in  the  fullest  sense 
the  demand  that  cannot  be  ignored,  yet  granting 
to  the  eye  and  the  imagination  some  measure  of 
beauty  and  interest,  which  will  raise  them  above 
the  commonplace. 

We  must  realize,  I  think,  that  the  architec- 
ture of  the  past  was  a  legitimate  artistic  expres- 
sion of  the  utilitarian  needs  of  that  time,  in 
order  to  understand  how  it  grew  and  eventually 
solidified  into  the  expressions  of  thought  which 
we  have  inherited  ;  yet  it  is  evident  also,  I  think, 
that  these  forms  were  not  drawn  at  random,  or  as 


*  kt 


M 


a; 
o 

H 
CO 

H 


J*:^- 


a: 

< 

W 

Q 

< 


^'E  II 


nreb- 


{Mb. 


>:^>pr- 


yp  'i^i. 


W  § 
J  o 
DQ    I 

CO 

< 

>< 
D 

< 
w 

CQ 

CO 

Q 

DJ 
J 
O 
O 
W 


(X 
ZD 
bJ 

or 

bJ 
E- 

o 

a. 


[£3 
CD 
< 

< 

b_ 


<C 

DC 
CD 


bJ 

< 
C_) 


o 

Z 
< 


K 

UJ 

_1 

J 

h 

Itl 

U 

CL 

f- 

H 

T 

X 

o 

o    « 

-      UJ 

a:  ^ 

o  d 

H 

(/I     2 

2 
EjJ 

H 

< 

W 
Q 


iC    / 


&T8' 


.5  a  >,<  a-z 


rt  2  u  a  -e  ^ 

S--.S  3  S-a 

S  fa  u  2-e  «i 

S   O  O  "n73 

-sf  ».«;« 

■4-  in  S  SB'" 
o  m        «       en     - 
°  J>_,2  }-  rt  Q 

■a -a  S'S-S-sW 
2  Sic -'5  I 

V,  -°  a  v  o  c.  (-. 

c^-as^s 

^  ,-£  «  +j  u  <*>  -S 
1-         n  rt  -m  d   i 

^  d  d*££  &  S 

<y  £  in  Ji  «  3  cd 

w  «£  °  ^ 
■«1 4J  u  ^-  ~ 

a^s-gs^ 

a  a  &  ^  <nt;•0 
o  S  fa  u  a  g 
„  o  >  Vi  ftu  „ 

r-  a  u  o  V-  OMO 

c  *,  3  <2  10 
a  a  Si  "ffi  "S    .^ 

rt  ot:  o ,rt  >»o 
■a_     °     « - 

c^  5£  a  <u« 

J3  fa  O  o  ° 

73  °  t-n-i  ^  a  a 
oj  £  m  H  m 


M. 


<S«3<2MSdln 

<  .c  H  «  en  to 


gg  15  3.8  ° 
FaS|^§" 


bfli 


teJ3 


O  rf  O 

S'.fi  a^£ 

to  2  -  5 -a  « 

<y  --  ra  p  cu  a^ 
^  ^  u  i—  t-i 
<u  u  O  be  bQ£ 

"£ a c- u 

■h  a;'-      gj: 

j3    .  a;  a  ^ 

a      =^:  c3_ 

S-a  -a°s  o 
a  k  t>-a  a  o 

a  a-    <u  ft0 

rt  bfl  rt  u  a;  x 

P>.S  W  ft-j-  be 
.„y  S  ib^  - 

S°a-g   .gS 

s"0  a  u  — 
=2Sa^^ 
i  ft'-t;'S^5 

^  m  C      -jj 

^5.t;5Srta 
d      ,H^iC'S 

S.S  ^^  w'S 
i;4""1  O  ^  x 

£  ID   >  «  O   O 

Sf'^agl 

S-a  o  a  a  'C 

m  a;  b  c*a  > 
o  **  2>a  >^ 

s_  a  p  >*  (u 
a-a     -^j^ 

"  >.°£«  to 


PJ 


«aot 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


95 


the  result  of  chance  or  caprice,  but  finally  reached 
their  present  shape  through  a  patient  attempt  to 
truthfully  portray  the  main  purpose  of  the  struc- 
ture and  its  construction,  in  a  way  which  ad- 
mitted that  beauty  also  was  an  end  to  be  attained. 

Having  inherited  certain  architectural  forms 
and  details,  which  by  common  consent  and 
acceptance  have  become  the  grammar  of  our  con- 
structive architecture,  it  is  proper  to  utilize  them, 
as  we  utilize  the  words  of  existing  languages,  to 
express  our  thoughts  and  purposes ;  but,  in  order 
that  our  expression  may  not  become  mere  dis- 
simulation or  worse,  they  must  be  used  truthfully. 

Classic  architecture  was  never  developed 
along  commercial  lines,  but,  from  the  legacy  the 
ancient    and   medieval    architects   have   left  us, 


there  is  little  doubt  that,  had  the  necessities  of 
our  to-da)'-  existed  for  them,  they  would  have 
met  the  conditions  as  squarely  and  courageously, 
and  then  complied  with  them  with  as  much 
grace  as  they  embodied  their  own  ideas  and 
needs,  in  a  "  perfect  union  of  spirit  and  matter." 

"  Ah,  to  build,  to  build, 
That's  the  noblest  art  of  all  the  arts. 
Painting  and  Sculpture  are  but  images — 
Are  merely  shadows  cast  by  outward  things 
On  stone  or  canvas,  having  in  themselves 
No  separate  existence.     Architecture, 
Existing  in  itself,  and  not  in  seeming 
A  something  it  is  not,  surpasses  them 
As  substance  shadow." 

Michael  Angelo, 
Longfellow. 


■  THE  SCIENCE  OF  CITIES  • 

TREATMENT  0FANAV1CABLE  RIVER 
•  THR0UCH  AN  INLAND  CITY- 


AFTER 


Jtfi  70  0"        •!>.      00/  o'  '25'G*-     -tVO'    ■     W>"  0"'  '       50© 


ill 

a .  1 


*       3    _  i      3        i 

\  I  \  I  \ 


jO-     55' Ci      -;»0-      iivff     -I?:-       W( 


II    I    - 


96 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


THE  TRAVELLING   FELLOWSHIP  IN  THE   COL- 
LEGE OF  ARCHITECTURE  OF  CORNELL 

UNIVERSITY 


BY  AN  ENTHUSIAST 


THE  patrons  of  the  Annual  may  be  interested 
to  learn  the  results  of  the  new  travelling 
fellowship  in  the  College  of  Architecture 
of  Cornell  University.  "Progress  before  prece- 
dent "  has  certainly  been  the  motto  of  the  mana- 
gers of  this  fellowship,  for  it  has  been  conducted 
upon  entirely  new  lines,  and  in  the  face  of  strong 
criticism  from  some  of  the  champions  of  the  ordi- 
nary method  of  conducting  such  fellowships. 
That  the  experiment  has  succeeded  is  another 
refutation  of  the  old  saying  that  there  is  nothing 
new  under  the  sun.  That  the  authors  and  the 
first  holder  of  the  prize  are  entirely  satisfied  with 
the  venture  is  certainly  encouraging  to  those  who 
would  adopt  for  their  professional  creed  the  motto 
mentioned  above. 

The  fellowship  consists  of  an  award  of  $2,000 
to  be  issued  biennially  to  the  winner  of  an  archi- 
tectural competition,  the  money  to  be  paid  in 
installments  during  two  years.  In  planning  the 
details  of  this  fellowship,  considerable  dissatis- 
faction was  felt  with  the  custom  of  travelling  and 
of  making  measured  drawings.  It  was  believed 
that  such  fellowships  or  scholarships  result  princi- 
pally in  the  production  of  fine  draughtsmen. 
The  documentary  value  of  such  measured  draw- 
ings was  considered  questionable,  since  nearly 
all  of  the  better  buildings  of  the  world  have  been 
measured  and  drawn  by  experts  in  the  employ  of 
the  European  governments  or  by  individuals 
working  in  their  own  interests.  That  these  re- 
sults are  within  the  reach  of  every  one  through 
books  and  photographs  is  sufficient  argument 
against  the  enforcement  of  this  kind  of  work  upon 
travelling  students.  In  ninety-nine  cases  out  of 
a  hundred  the  winners  of  travelling  scholarships 
are  in  need  of  training  in  architectural  compo- 
sition. With  this  in  mind  the  professors  of  archi- 
tecture at  Cornell  University  debated  between  the 
two  following  schemes,  viz.:  (1)  to  send  the 
winner  of  the  prize  immediately  to  Paris  with  the 
intention  of  entering  the  Ecole  des  Beaux-Arts, 
or  (2)  to   divide   the  two-year  period   into   two 


separate  periods  of  home  study  in  advanced  de- 
sign at  Cornell  and  two  separate  trips  to  Europe. 
The  second  of  these  plans  was  chosen,  chiefly 
because  of  the  difficulty  which  most  men  encoun- 
ter in  the  entrance  examinations  to  the  Ecole  des 
Beaux-Arts,  and  also  because  of  the  stimulus 
which  the  home  study  gives  to  the  student  who 
spends  an  entire  college  year  in  anticipation  of 
the  foreign  travel.  Certain  it  is  that  Mr.  Dole, 
the  first  holder,  spent  a  most  profitable  year  at 
the  College  of  Architecture,  from  October,  1898, 
to  June,  1899,  working  partly  on  undergraduate 
problems  and  partly  on  the  very  important  and 
imposing  composition  of  a  College  of  Fine  Arts 
for  Cornell  University,  which  appears  among 
these  pages.  Some  idea  of  the  industry,  fired  by 
enthusiasm,  which  pushed  these  drawings  to  a 
completion  may  be  gained  by  considering  the 
size  of  the  drawings.  The  elevation  measures 
15  feet  in  length  ;  the  plan  is  8  feet  by  10  feet, 
and  the  bird's-eye  perspective  is  over  7  feet  long. 

Mr.  Dole  sailed  in  June  for  Antwerp  and 
spent  four  delightful  months  in  Great  Britain, 
Holland,  Belgium,  Germany,  Austria  and  North- 
ern and  Central  France.  He  returned  to  the 
college  in  November,  and  is  now  at  work  on  a 
very  complete  set  of  drawings  for  an  Episcopal 
cathedral.  The  nature  of  this  problem  was  known 
by  him  before  he  sailed  for  Europe,  and  during 
his  travels  he  paid  particular  attention  to  cathe- 
dral architecture,  thus  joining  in  a  practical  way 
the  home  study  to  the  foreign  travel.  Next  Sep- 
tember Mr.  Dole  will  sail  for  Italy  direct,  with 
the  intention  of  spending  the  remainder  of  his 
fellowship  period  in  Southern  Europe  and  in 
Paris. 

The  second  competition  will  be  held  during 
the  coming  summer  months.  There  will  doubt- 
less be  a  keen  rivalry  among  the  candidates,  for 
the  fellowship  has  attracted  much  favorable  com- 
ment and  is  regarded  to-day  as  one  of  the  most 
attractive  opportunities  open  to  architectural 
students. 


■ 


w 


Cl 


iu.  :;  i_».™ 


C<0 


•P-  '  1 


-1" 


6 


hB* 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


99 


A  CODE  GOVERNING  COMPETITIONS 

BY  JULIUS  F.  HARDER 
Chairman  of  the  National  Committee  of   the  Architectural  League  of  America  upon  Code  Governing 

Competitions  in  Design 

The  following  paper  was  read  and  liberally  discussed  at  the  Cleveland  Convention.     All  interested  in  the  movement  should  address 
the  chairman,  91  Broadway,  New  York  City. 


M 


R.  Chairman  and  Gentlemen  : — Since 
this  convention  assembled  this  morning 
the  expressed  sentiments  upon  three  par- 
ticular things  have  repeated  themselves  with 
positiveness  and  persistence. 

(1)  There  is  a  sentiment  which  seeks  to  de- 
part from  architectural  isolation  and  desires  us 
to  rub  elbows  with  our  fellows  in  the  allied  arts. 
There  is  a  feeling  that  our  architectural  organi- 
zation should  be  expanded  to  a  degree  of  in- 
clusiveness  comprising  all  the  allied  arts — 
sculpture  and  painting,  workers  in  decorative 
glass,  metal,  mosaics  and  every  form  of  artistic 
workmanship  and  product  which  enters  into  the 
fine  art  of  building  beautifully — and  the  idea  of 
expansion  even  extends  to  including  reinforce- 
ment by  the  admission  of  lay  members  in  clubs 
to  certain  restricted  membership. 

(2)  There  is  a  strong  current  perceptible,  set- 
ting in  the  direction  of  establishing  the  practice 
of  architecture  as  a  business  upon  an  appropriate 
pedestal  of  respectability  and  responsibility  ;  to 
begin  the  work  of  establishing  professional  ethics 
and  providing  the  organization  for  control  and 
discipline  ;  to  rescue  our  practice  from  the  slough 
of  despondency  in  which  it  is  freely  admitted  to 
find  itself  and  to  make  a  line  of  markation  be- 
tween those  methods  which  are  considered  as 
proper  and  productive  of  wholesome  results  and 
those  others  which  are  generally  agreed  to  be 
improper  and  invariably  produce  bad  results. 

(3)  This  convention  appears  to  be  unani- 
mously of  the  opinion  that  architectural  organi- 
zations should  assert  themselves  in  their  own 
community  and  municipality  and  also  nationally, 
to  fulfil  their  obligations  to  society,  to  the  end 
of  securing  proper  consideration  from  an  archi- 
tectural point  of  view  for  public  works  of  art  and 
architecture  of  all  classes. 

It  is  with  all  these,  but  more  particularly  with 
the  second,  that  this  paper  deals,  and  its  conclu- 
sions are  founded  upon  them  as  a  premise. 

Before  entering  upon  the  debate  which  the 
presentation  of  this  code  governing  competitions 
in  design  will  undoubtedly  bring  forth,  it  might 
be  well  to  outline  for  a  moment  the  intentions  fol- 
lowed in  framing  the  code  now  before  you  and 
the  conditions  which  command  and  restrict  the 
subject. 


It  is  not  to  the  purpose  of  either  action  or 
non-action  to  discuss  whether  competitions  are 
good,  bad  or  indifferent  ;  whether  the  method 
of  competition  produces  better  works  of  art  or 
whether  it  is  the  only  means  by  which  wonder- 
ful hidden  talent  can  alone  strive  to  the  light 
of  day.  Neither  from  the  artistic,  ethical,  moral 
or  business  point  of  view  is  this  important. 

To  those,  however  (and  there  are  many),  who 
have  never  gotten  beyond  this  point,  and  to  those 
(who  are  also  many)  whose  constant  wail  it  is 
"that  competitions  are  unsatisfactory,"  is  offered 
the  consolation  that  the  establishment  of  a  code 
will  undoubtedly  have  the  effect  of  largely  reduc- 
ing the  number  of  competitions.  This  must  be 
apparent,  for,  when  promoters  indulging  the 
thought  of  getting  something  for  nothing  by 
means  of  a  competition  find  a  contract  staring 
them  in  the  face,  unnecessary  and  uncalled-for 
competitions  will  not  be  entered  upon  as  care- 
lessly as  is  the  case  at  present. 

Surely  the  opposition  to  the  establishment 
of  a  code  should  not  come  from  those  who  have 
given  up  all  hope  of  reform  as  to  methods.  Even 
the  effect  of  an  honest  attempt  to  be  in  harmony 
with  their  case-hardened  condition. 

It  does  not  seem  to  be,  therefore,  necessary 
to  discuss  here  at  all  the  question  as  to  whether  it 
is  a  fact  that  the  method  of  competition  in  design 
produces  better  or  the  best  results,  or  whether 
we  shall  indorse  the  method  and  to  what  extent. 
The  fact  remains,  and  this  we  cannot  escape, 
that  we  have  the  competition  with  us,  that  it 
bids  fair  to  remain  in  popular  favor  and  that 
the  place  which  it  holds  in  democratic  affec- 
tions extends  to  an  ever-widening  influence. 
We  may  regard  the  process  as  a  necessary  evil 
or  an  unnecessary  blessing  ;  still  it  is  here  and 
forms  a  proper  subject  to  be  dealt  with  and  regu- 
lated by  organizations  of  professional  men. 

When  we  look  about  us  and  observe  the  im- 
portant enterprises  which  are  at  this  moment 
made  subject  to  this  process  of  competition  in 
design  and  the  finished  works  which  will  of 
necessity  bear  the  impress  of  the  process,  for 
better  or  ill,  it  certainly  seems  as  though  this 
work  of  establishing  a  code  were  well  worth 
doing  and  worth  doing  well. 

It  is  all  very  well  to  ridicule  the  attempts  and 


100 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


failure  of  others  to  conduct  competitions  success- 
fully, but  when  the  responsibility  is  thrown  upon 
ourselves,  what  shall  we  do,  or  leave  undone,  to 
do  better  and  produce  fairer  results  ? 

Shall  our  committees  continue  to  construct  pro- 
grams which  prove  but  a  rope  of  sand  and  our  own 
expert  juries  return  verdicts  which  avoid  responsi- 
bility and  become  the  convenient  means  by  which 
the  issue  may  be  evaded,  thus  suffering  the  entire 
contest  to  which  we  have  lent  our  auspices  to  become 
a  protest  and  laughing-stock  in  the  community  ? 

It  is  for  ourselves,  then,  first  of  all,  that  we 
lay  down  a  guide  in  these  matters  at  once  reliable 
and  uniform  for  all  cases. 

It  is  for  this  reason,  also,  that  it  is  with  the 
process  itself  that  we  have  to  deal  rather  than 
with  merely  expressing  opinions  as  to  the  pros 
and  cons  of  any  particular  species  or  other  ques- 
tions extraneous  to  it. 

The  main  abuses  of  the  past  have  not  been 
that  there  was  no  professional  adviser  or  expert 
jury,  nor  that  the  remuneration  was  insufficient 
or  that  there  have  been  too  many  or  not  enough 
competitions  ;  the  difficulty  has  been  rather  that 
the  programs  did  not  provide  the  elements  of 
a  contract  and  that  they  have  been  faulty  in  other 
respects  ;  that  juries  and  experts,  however  com- 
petent to  judge  of  the  artistic  and  technical 
qualities  of  the  work  submitted  {largely  by  reason 
of  faulty  programs,  it  is  true),  failed  to  give  that 
unreserved  verdict  to  which  the  winners  are 
entitled. 

More  than  any  other,  perhaps,  the  specific 
abuse  which  the  proposed  code  operates  against  is 
the  one  that  the  final  award  is  generally  not  made 
upon  the  expressed  terms,  conditions  and  plain 
understanding  upon  which  competitors  are  in- 
vited to  enter.  Some  convenient  means  is  gene- 
rally found  to  repudiate  the  agreement  or  to 
evade  the  plain  issue. 

The  code  provides  means  that  if  there  be  a 
pretence  about  the  purpose  and  if  the  award  is 
to  be  made  upon  any  other  basis  than  merit 
alone,  the  pretence  shall  be  unmasked  at  the 
beginning  and  before  a  number  of  unsophisti- 
cated competitors  shall  have  been  robbed  of 
their  work.  The  code  further  provides  that  the 
award  shall  be  made  upon  the  basis  as  originally 
agreed  upon  without  alteration  or  deviation  by 
any  causes  whatsoever. 

There  is  nothing  contained  in  the  code  as 
presented  which  is  antagonistic  to,  or  in  conflict 
with,  any  action  already  taken  or  agreements 
reached  by  other  bodies.  While  the  essence  of 
previous  actions  has  been  to  discriminate  as  to 
when  there  should  be  competition  and  when 
not,  and  upon  the  amounts  of  remuneration, 
this   joint    committee  has  contented  itself  with 


formulating  a  process  by  means  of  which  the 
contest  itself  may  be  conducted  with  fairness, 
equity  and  justice  to  all  concerned. 

The  code  as  reported  is  simply  a  reduction  to 
definite  and  exact  terms  of  a  systematic  and  orderly 
process  of  contest,  and  while  it  does  not  concern  itself 
with  questions  of  remuneration  or  enforcement,  both 
of  these  provisions  can  be  made  applicable  to  it  when 
the  time  appears  ripe  for  their  enactment. 

There  are  certain  elements  of  contest  which 
must  first  of  all  be  agreed  upon  as  fair,  orderly 
and  essential. 

Certainly,  these  two  simple  propositions  are 
fundamental  to  all  contests,  whether  it  be  horse- 
racing  or  designing — that  the  competitors  shall 
meet  upon  equal  terms,  without  advantage  or 
favoritism,  and  that  the  judges  of  the  game  shall 
themselves  be  conceded  to  be  competent  in  the 
premises  and  disinterested. 

This  last  does  not  mean  necessarily  that  the 
jury  must  be  composed  exclusively  of  profes- 
sional artists,  and  by  naming  the  jury  in  the 
program  each  competitor  is  accorded  opportu- 
nity to  pass  upon  the  competency  of  the  jury  for 
himself.  This  is  a  greater  privilege  than  is 
accorded  even  in  courts  of  law. 

I  have  reached  the  positive  conclusion  that 
the  establishment  of  an  agreement  as  to  what 
constitutes  the  ethics  and  morals  of  competitions 
is  of  vastly  greater  importance,  of  more  far- 
reaching  influence  and  of  more  immediate  benefit 
than  any  consideration  of  the  business  or  legal 
aspects,  questions  of  discipline  or  enforcement  or 
amounts  of  remuneration  could  possibly  be. 

If  any  organization  feels  itself  strongly  enough 
organized  to  attempt  enforcement,  it  would  be- 
come a  simple  matter  to  resolve  that  its  members 
must  not  participate  in  competitions  held  under 
other  than  the  accepted  code  under  penalty  of 
suspension  or  expulsion  from  membership. 

It  has  seemed  to  the  committee,  however,  that 
if  the  code  is  good,  desirable  and  wholesome,  it 
will  enforce  itself;  if  it  proves  unnecessary  and 
undesirable  it  would  be  bad  policy  to  attempt 
enforcement.  In  either  event  provision  for  en- 
forcement seems  immaterial  at  the  present  time. 
Whatever  code  may  be  adopted,  it  must  be  simple 
enough  to  be  acceptable  to  all  the  various  bodies 
in  order  to  insure  concerted  action  even  to  the 
extent  of  identical  wording,  as  it  is  only  through 
concerted  action  that  it  can  be  shown  that  the 
profession  is  agreed  upon  some  one  thing,  by 
which  attention  can  be  commanded  and  a  reform 
obtained. 

I  want  to  state  right  here,  in  order  that  I  may 
be  fully  understood,  that  it  is  my  conviction  that 
on  the  whole  it  would  be  better  if  the  method  of 
direct  competition  were  taken  out  of  all  art  mat- 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


101 


ters.  The  impossibility  of  this  has  been,  how- 
ever, sufficiently  demonstrated. 

The  next  best  thing  would  logically  seem  to 
be  to  reduce  the  number  of  competitions  and  to 
lay  down  stringent  regulations  for  the  conduct  of 
those  which  must  be  and  will  be  held,  and  to 
supply,  if  it  be  a  physical  possibility,  the  organi- 
zation and  machinery  for  enforcement,  control 
and  discipline.  This  last  would  necessarily 
result  in  something  akin  to  tradesunionism,  with 
its  certain  advantages  on  the  one  hand  and  all  its 
familiar  unpleasant  and  disagreeable  features  on 
the  other.  Considered  from  the  artistic  stand- 
point it  would  be  abhorrent  and  impossible  to 
enter  upon  a  course  which  would  involve  the  last. 
Nor  would  it  become  necessary  to  do  so.  Every- 
thing which  is  desirable  can  be  realized  by  the 
adoption  of  milder  methods. 

It  is  true  that  some  may  feel  that,  as  a  solution 
of  all  the  difficulties  of  architectural  professional 
practice  that  can  possibly  be  thought  of,  the  code 
is  not  wholly  satisfactory.  Admitted.  It  is  con- 
tended that  nothing  is  good  for  anything  unless 
it  can  be  and  is  enforced.  That  is  a  difficulty, 
not  of  the  code,  but  of  lack  of  machinery  of  en- 
forcement and  control. 

You  will  agree  with  me,  also,  I  am  sure,  that 
in  order  to  be  in  a  position  to  satisfactorily  enforce 
something  we  must  first  become  agreed  as  to 
what  the  moral  basis  at  least  of  that  something 
should  be. 

It  is  certainly  not  asking  a  great  thing  of  the 
profession,  which  pretends  to  be  clamoring  for  a  re- 
form of  an  abuse  under  which  all  its  practitioners 
are  suffering,  that  it  should  commit  itself  morally 
to  so  innocent  and  harmless  a  matter  as  the  proposed 
code. 

It  cannot  possibly  do  any  harm  if  a  certain 
morale  shall  receive  recognition  and  standing. 
There  can  be  none  who  contend  that  it  may  be  hurt- 
ful. There  may  be  those  who  feel  that  it  would 
not  do  great  good,  but  there  are  many  who  think 
that  it  will  do  some  good.  These  last  may  be  wrong, 
and  if  this  should  prove  true,  even  then  their  efforts 
could  have  done  no  harm.  Let  the  step  be  a  small 
one,  it  is  a  forward  impulse  and  denotes  progress. 

The  public  at  large  is  desirous  of  being  fair, 
but  often  they  do  not  know  how  to  be  so.  They 
are  too  apt  to  look  upon  the  services  of  the  artist 
or  architect  simply  from  a  mercantile  standpoint. 
To  them  the  competition  is  simply  a  case  of  show- 
ing goods,  and  they  feel  at  liberty  to  accept  and 
reject  upon  any  basis  which  is  considered  to  be 
important  at  the  moment,  or  made  to  appear  so. 
The  original  basis  of  issue  of  every  competition 
is  that  of  merit,  pure  and  simple.  This  plain 
issue  is  too  often  side-tracked  by  unworthy  and 
improper  machinations,   in    the   period  between 


the  issue  of  the  program  and  the  day  of  final 
reward. 

The  present  purpose  is  to  secure,  if  possible, 
the  sympathetic  and  concerted  action  of  all  clubs 
in  this  direction.  At  the  time  when  our  joint 
committee  was  formed,  about  three  years  ago,  it 
was  suggested  that  it  should  embrace  delegates 
at  once  from  the  clubs  of  Cleveland,  Cincinnati, 
St.  Louis,  Chicago,  Boston  and  other  cities.  But 
it  was  thought  that,  on  account  of  the  necessity 
of  a  great  number  of  meetings  before  a  tangible 
result  was  arrived  at,  and  because  of  the  time 
and  cost  incurred  in  travelling  from  remote 
points,  the  formation  of  a  joint  committee  of 
this  scope  would  be  impractical. 

What  we  are  endeavoring  to  accomplish  now  is 
this  :  To  have  the  code  as  it  now  stands  in  its  en- 
tirety adopted  by  as  many  societies  as  possible,  and 
then,  after  about  two  years  of  experience  under  it, 
to  call  a  natio7ial  conference  of  delegates  from  all 
such  societies,  and  make  such  amendments  as  seem 
just  and  desirable. 

You  will-appreciate,  of  course,  that  this  code 
is  a  compromise  among  many  elements,  that  its 
creation  was  surrounded  by  many  practical  dif- 
ficulties, and  that,  when  considered  by  many  in- 
dividuals, many  ideas  as  to  changes  in  it  will  be 
presented  ;  it  must  be  remembered,  however,  that 
its  force  and  usefulness  will  be  in  proportion  to 
its  being  identical  in  all  architectural  bodies,  and 
that  whatever  merit  there  may  be  in  any  devia- 
tion from  it,  that  benefit  would  be  outweighed 
by  thus  weakening  the  strong  front  which 
absolute  identity  would  present  before  the 
public. 

It  will,  of  course,  be  apparent  to  you  upon 
examination  that  it  is  simply  an  establishment  of 
some  kind  of  recognized  ethics  of  competition, 
that  it  is  a  moral  force  and  intended  to  apply  at 
least  to  all  competitions  over  which  a  club  has 
control.  Its  general  adoption  would  correct  in  a 
measure  the  numerous  abuses  of  competitions, 
but  at  the  same  time  it  is  not  pretended  that  all 
the  difficulties  of  architectural  practice  can  be 
cured  by  it  alone. 

The  question  will  be  asked  :  What  good  will 
it  do  to  adopt  this  code  ?  The  answer  is  :  It  will 
accomplish  several  good  things  immediately  : 

(i)  It  enters  upon  the  road  to  reform  by 
taking  the  first  step  which  must  be  taken  to 
accomplish  anything. 

(2)  It  commits  the  profession  to  a  recognition 
of  certain  uniform  principles  of  ethics  relating  to 
the  subject. 

(3)  It  can  be  immediately  applied  to  such 
competitions,  both  private  and  public,  over  which 
clubs  have  control,  and  in  cases  where  the  execu- 
tive of  clubs  is  officially  consulted. 


102 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


(4)  It  establishes  a  standard  by  comparing 
which  with  an  issued  program  professional  men 
will  be  able  to  decide  whether  it  is  advisable  to 
enter  or  desist  from  a  proposed  competition,  and 
provides  the  reason  therefor. 


(5)  It  places  clubs  in  a  position  to  announce 
to  its  members  or  publicly  state  whether  it 
approves  or  disapproves  of  the  terms  and  con- 
ditions of  a  proposed  competition  and  to  state  rea- 
son therefor. 


GENERAL  CODE  GOVERNING  COMPETITIONS  IN  DESIGN 

RECOMMENDED  FOR  THE  ADOPTION  OF   ALL  ARCHITECTURAL  BODIES  BY  THE  FIRST 
CONVENTION  OF  THE  ARCHITECTURAL  LEAGUE  OF  AMERICA 

On  January  19,  1899,  the  Executive  Committee  of  the  Architectural  League  of  New  York  met  and  ratified  the  action  of  the  Joint 
Committee  on  Code,  held  April  5,  1898.  This  Joint  Committee  consists  of  John  De  Witt  Warner,  Chairman  ;  J.  F.  Harder,  Secretary.  The 
Architectural  League  of  New  York  was  represented  by  J.  F.  Harder,  F.  S.  Lamb,  A.  W.  Brunner.  The  National  Sculpture  Society, 
John  J.  Boyle,  Daniel  C.  French,  John  De  Witt  Warner.  The  National  Society  of  Mural  Painters,  C.  M.  Shean,  Herman  Schladermundt, 
C.  R.  Lamb,  and  the  Philadelphia  T-Square  Club  by  Frank  Miles  Day,  Walter  Cope,  T.  W.  Kellogg. 

This  Joint  Committee  is  the  outgrowth  of  a  series  of  meetings  and  actions  on  the  part  of  the  societies  represented,  extending  over  the 
period  of  the  past  two  years,  culminating  in  final  meetings  held  February  26  and  April  5,  1898,  at  which  amendments  referred  by  the  respec- 
tive associations  were  harmonized. 

Before  the  Cleveland  Convention  the  Joint  Committee,  in  submitting  the  following  general  Code,  added  to  it  as  part  of  their  report 
the  following  statement : 

(1)  It  is  the  sense  of  this  Committee  that  the  enforcement  of  this  Code  and  trials  or  penalties  relating  thereto  involves  questions  of  law 
on  the  one  hand  or  of  ethics  on  the  other,  neither  of  which  are  considered  as  properly  within  the  scope  of  this  General  Code. 

(2)  It  is  the  sense  of  this  Committee  that  the  question  of  rate  and  basis  of  remuneration  for  services  in  connection  with  Competitions 
further  than  general  insistence  upon  remuneration  to  each  to  whom  an  award  is  made  is  not  properly  within  the  scope  of  a  Code  on  Com- 
petitions, but  is  rather  an  item  of  the  broader  general  subject  of  Remuneration,  which  should  form  the  subject  of  independent  considera- 
tion and  adjustment. 


(0 


I.    DEFINITIONS 

A  COMPETITION  in  design  is  the  pro- 
cess by  which,  on  the  basis  of  merit,  from 
two   or   more  designs   proposed,    one   or 
more  are  selected. 

(2)  Competitions  may  be  either  "open"  or 
"  limited." 

(3)  An  ' '  open  ' '  competition  is  one  in  which 
any  person  may  be  a  competitor. 

(4)  A  "  limited"  competition  is  one  in  which 
each  competitor  is  especially  invited. 

(5)  A  competition  of  either  class  may  be 
either — 

(a)  "  Premiated  " — in  which  remuneration 
is  provided  only  for  those  to  whom  an  award  is 
made. 

(b)  "  Paid" — in  which  remuneration  is  pro- 
vided for  each  competitor. 

(6)  The  promoter  is  the  party  who  undertakes 
responsibility  for  fulfilment  of  the  competition  ac- 
cording to  its  terms,  and  shall  provide  for  proper 
and  substantial  remuneration  to  each  competitor 
to  whom  an  award  is  made. 

(7)  The  program  is  the  offer  made  by  the 
promoter,  and  includes  the  written  or  printed 
statement  of  the  terms  of  a  competition  on  the 
basis  of  which  proposals  are  to  be  made. 

(8)  A  competitor  is  one  who  in  acceptance  of 
such  offer  submits  a  proposal  in  accord  with  the 
terms  of  the  program. 

II.    THE  PROGRAM 

(9)  The  program  is  an  agreement,  the  terms 
of  which  must  be  carried  out  in  good  faith  by  all 
parties. 


(10)  The  terms    of   the   program   are    to    be 
concisely  stated  and  must  be  mandatory. 

(11)  The  program  shall — 

(a)  Be     headed    substantially     as     follows  : 
"Under  the  General  Code  Governing  Competi 
tions   in    Design   of    the   Architectural   L,eague 
of  America,    of    which    a    copy    is    subjoined, 


( Name  of  Promoter.) 

invites  competitive  proposals  upon  the  following 
program." 

(b)  Contain  a  definite  statement  as  to  pro- 
posed cost. 

{c )  Contain  a  definite  provision  as  to  anony- 
mity. 

(d)  Name  the  jury,  which  must  include 
experts  upon  the  subject  under  consideration. 

(e)  Fix  uniform  requirements  for  drawings, 
models,  or  other  forms   of  proposals. 

(/)  Fix  a  definite  time  and  place  for  re- 
ceipt of  drawings,  models,  or  other  forms  of 
proposals. 

(g)  Fix  the  nature  or  amount  of  the 
awards  or  prizes. 

(/* )  Fix  the  period  of  time  within  which 
decision  will  be  rendered. 

III.    DRAWINGS  OR  MODELS 

(12)  The  requirements  for  drawings,  models, 
or  other  means  adopted  for  illustrating  or  describ- 
ing the  proposals,  must  be  clearly  defined  in  the 
program,  including,  namely,  that  they  be  uniform 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


103 


as  to  character  of  rendering,  scale,  number  and 
size  of  separate  sheets  or  pieces,  and  such  other 
detail  as  may  be  necessary  in  the  peculiar  circum- 
stances of  each  case. 

(13)  The  requirements  for  drawings,  models, 
etc.,  must  be  of  the  simplest  nature,  adequate 
clearly  to  explain  the  design,  thus  reducing  to  a 
minimum  the  labor  and  materials  necessary  in 
their  preparation. 

IV.    THE  JURY 

(14)  All  competitions  are  adjudicated  by  the 
vote  of  a  jury,  including  disinterested  experts. 
If  the  subject  of  the  competition  be  such  that  its 
execution  requires  special  expert  knowledge, 
then,  if  permitted  by  the  program,  the  jury  may 
call  in  additional  disinterested  experts,  and  also 
the  promoter,  to  advise  with  them. 

(15)  The  order  of  procedure  of  the  jury  shall 
be  as  follows : 

(a)  Reading  the  program. 

(£)  Passing  upon  the  question  of  calling  in 
expert  advisers  or  the  promoter. 

(c)  Passing  upon  the  work  submitted,  with 
reference  to  conformance  with  the  conditions  of 
the  program.  The  jury  must  exclude  from  con- 
sideration proposals  violating  the  conditions  of 
the  program. 


(d)  Passing  upon  the  manner  of  arriving 
at  the  verdict. 

(e)  Deciding  upon  the  verdict. 

(/")  Writing  and  signing  the  verdict. 

(16)  The  jury  may  decide  whether  the  prime 
object  of  the  competition  is  to  select  a  design,  or 
whether  it  is  a  means  of  test,  having  for  its  object 
the  selection  of  an  artist. 

(17)  The  jury  must  make  the  awards  to  the 
competitors  as  stipulated  in  the  program. 

(18)  The  drawings,  models,  etc.,  are  not  to  be 
placed  on  exhibition  before  the  verdict  of  the 
jury  is  rendered,  and  except  when  otherwise  pro- 
vided in  the  program  shall  remain  the  property 
of  their  proposers. 

(19)  Voting  must  be  by  ballot,  but  procedure 
otherwise  shall  be  as  agreed  upon  by  the  jury. 

(20)  The  action  of  the  jury  shall  be  final. 

V.    BY-LAWS 

(21)  Any  subscribing  society  may  prescribe 
such  by-laws  additional  to  this  general  code  of 
competition  and  not  in  conflict  therewith  as  it 
may  see  fit ;  but  such  by-laws  are  to  be  included 
under  a  separate  head,  and  indicated  as  being  the 
by-laws  of  the  particular  society  prescribing 
them,  and  the  other  subscribing  societies  shall  be 
served  with  an  official  copy  of  such  by-laws. 


FIRST    PRIZE    DESIGN— SUN  DIAL    COMPETITION 

CHARLES  A.  LOPEZ,  SCULPTOR  BRITE  &  BACON,  ARCHITECTS 


104 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


LESSONS  FROM  THE  PARIS  EXHIBITION 

1900 

"  Magician  hands  through  long,  laborious  nights 
Have  made  these  princely  palaces  to  loom 
Whiter  than  are  the  city's  legion  lights, 

On  threads  unseen  stretched  out  across  the  gloom. 
Reared  in  an  hour,  for  one  brief  hour  to  reign, 

The  proud  pavilions  watchful  hold  in  fee 
A  world's  achievements,  where  the  stately  Seine 
Slides  slowly  past  her  bridges  to  the  sea." 

— Guy  Wetmore  Carry!,  in  Harper's  Weekly. 


WERE  it  not  for  the  widespread  and  pre- 
mature criticism  that  this  undertak- 
ing has  occasioned  among  architects  in 
this  country,  we  would  hesitate  to  discuss  the 
Paris  Exposition,  and  even  in  doing  so  we  would 
have  it  understood  that  this  tentative  mention  is 
merely  in  the  way  of  a  preface  to  more  careful 
discussions,  which  will  appear  later. 

In  a  brief  way,  we  would  call  attention  to  a 
few  masterful  thoughts,  to  the  solution  of  several 
gigantic  problems  and  to  the  heroic  treatment  of 
some  difficulties  that,  in  all  their  immensity,  have 
presented  themselves  for  the  first  time.  One  of 
the  greatest  of  all  problems  was,  and  throughout 
the  Exhibition  will  be,  the  facile  handling  of  the 
throngs  that  come  to  the  grounds.  Paris,  through 
all  ages,  has  been  a  city  where  visitors  and  for- 
eigners congregate.  Many  times  it  has  been 
called  upon  to  increase  its  powers  of  accommoda- 
tion, but,  in  this  instance,  the  Parisians  judi- 
ciously foresee  that  a  tidal  wave  of  humanity  is 
about  to  break  upon  them  such  as  they  never  ex- 
perienced in  all  their  years  of  entertainment.  It 
is,  therefore,  strange  that  the  Exhibition  grounds 
should  penetrate  further  into  the  heart  of  the  city 
than  ever  before,  but,  owing  to  this  fact,  the  re- 
sults of  the  Exhibition  of  1900  will  develop  and 
beautify  the  metropolis  as  no  exhibition  in  the 
past  has  ever  done,  and  the  harmony  of  perspec- 
tive that  will  be  obtained  in  uniting  the  light  and 
the  left  banks  of  the  Seine  by  the  new  "  Vois 
Triumphal — gloire  du  Siecle  "  and  a  new  bridge, 
which  will  stand  for  all  time  as  the  symbol  of  the 


Franco-Russian  alliance,  furnishes  a  great  ob- 
ject lesson  in  city-making. 

Were  it  not  that  the  purpose  of  this  paper  is 
to  discuss  the  buildings  of  more  ephemeral  char- 
acter, we  would  call  attention  to  the  impressive 
grandeur  of  the  two  palaces  of  art  which  will 
adorn  the  city  as  permanent  edifices,  and  to  other 
permanent  features  along  the  banks  of  the  Seine. 

Another  influence  upon  the  city,  as  a  whole, 
and  a  far  more  comprehensive  one  than  the  mere 
planning  of  that  quarter  to  be  occupied  by  the 
Exhibition,  is  the  development  of  the  new  metro- 
politan underground  railway.  Miles  of  enor- 
mous conduit  now  give  Paris  a  safe,  rapid  transit 
system  hidden  within  the  bowels  of  the  earth, 
and  yet  always  within  a  few  yards  of  the  busiest 
thoroughfares.  This  great  work  has  been  carried 
along  with  little  disturbance  to  the  surface  of  the 
streets.  Enormous  superstructures  have  had  to 
be  supported,  while  trees  and  monuments  have 
remained  undisturbed  as  the  work  progressed. 
The  whole  line  of  foreign  edifices  on  the  Street  of 
All  Nations,  rising,  as  it  were,  on  stilts,  is  built 
over  a  railroad. 

We  are  apt  to  think  of  such  work  as  a 
scientific  achievement  only,  but  the  visitor  who 
enters  the  subway,  at  no  matter  which  of  the 
new  stations,  will  be  surprised  at  the  addition 
of  these  approaches  to  an  already  model  thor- 
oughfare system  without  disturbing  the  sym- 
metry of  the  surface.  Its  advantages  lie  in  re- 
lieving congestion,  making  the  suburbs  accessible 
and  doubling  the  utility  of  the  old  thoroughfare. 


:.'..*k.- 


l& 


?.£'•'    '»' 


From  the  "Scientific  American 


3I'  a 


From  the  "Scientific  American  " 


fm\ 


•*%T'  <~'  lit-  'i'-WJW 


■a.. 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


107 


Generous  circulation,  openness  and  grandeur 
have  long  characterized  "  la  Ville  Lumiere,"  but 
it  has  remained  until  the  closing  year  of  the 
century  for  it  to  reach  a  dazzling  climax. 

We  may  well  preface  our  remarks  bjr  a  quota- 
tion from  an  article  written  by  Mr.  Russell  Stur- 
gis  some  years  ago.  He  said  :  "  The  incalculable 
advance  made  in  the  Paris  Exhibition  buildings 
of  1S78  and  1889  and  the  retrograde  effect  of 
the  Chicago  pseudo-Roman  colonnades  are  recog- 
nized by  many.  The  modern  spirit  is  in  the  art 
of  old  France  more  than  with  us." 

The    main   entrance   upon    the    Place    de    la 


Concorde  is  vast  and  spacious,  and,  at  the  same 
time,  wonderfully  compact  and  well  calculated 
to  meet  the  most  minute  turn-stile  requirements. 
It  forms  a  tripod,  such  as  the  world  has  never  yet 
seen,  and  its  color  effects  by  day  and  night  will 
be  very  novel.  M.  Binet,  the  architect,  has  here 
conceived  a  festival  effect  of  great  splendor,  and 
in  his  ornament  has  used  a  repousse  pattern 
which  suggests  Mr.  Louis  Sullivan's  original 
work,  though  this  is  worked  out  in  light  metal 
and  brilliant  glass. 

It  is  composed  of  three  immense  arches  each 
65  feet  wide,  opening  into  a  dome,  and  flanked 


4  * 


**><"% 


fcrrSS? 


1  _>*xmt 


&f* 


>■■■»* 


PLAN    OF    THE    APPROACH    TO    THE    ALEXANDRE    III    BRIDGE 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUA! 


—— • — *7---  '  \  "' 


From  V Illustration 

PLAN    OF   THE    MOST    MODERN    FOCAL    POINT    IN    THE    EXHIBITION 


by  ornamental  buttresses,  each  supporting  a  lofty 
decorated  minaret  160  feet  high.  The  vestibule 
covered  by  the  dome  occupies  over  6,000  superfi- 
cial feet,  and  is  surrounded  by  fifty-eight  entrance 
gates,  and  pay  boxes,  arranged  in  a  very  ingen- 
ious manner  so  as  to  allow  entrance  to  be  made 
under  and  above  each  pay  box  by  means  of 
slightly  rising  or  falling  slopes.  Thus,  this 
semi-circular  area,  over  which  float  the  flags  of  all 
nations,  is  made  to  do  double  duty,  and  the  only 
non-available  space  taken  up  by  these  radial 
entrances  is  that  occupied  by  the  slight  thickness 
of  the  dividing  partitions.  It  is  calculated  that 
a  crowd  of  sixty  thousand  visitors  may  very  com- 
fortably enter  through  the  entrances  in  an  hour, 
and  spread  out  in  a  fan-shaped  stream  on  the 
old  Cours  la  Reine,  now  rechristened  the  Quai 
de  la  Conference.  The  porte  monumental,  be  it 
remembered,  is  but  a  temporary  device,  and  may 
smack  too  much  of  "  l'art  moderne  "  both  in  its 
architectural  expression  and  in  its  statuary  above, 
below  and  in  the  "  Frisedu  Travail,"  yet  on  the 
whole  it  is  a  unique  and  masterful  creation. 

In  deciding  upon  the  most  monumental 
focal  points  to  terminate  the  vistas  within  the 
Exhibition  grounds,  the  committee  took  advan- 
tage of  the  dome  of  the  Invalides  as  one  and  the 
towers  of  the  Trocadero  offered  another  at  the 
end  of  the  Champs  de  Mars.  With  these  deter- 
mined, there  remained  still  another  great  vista, 
that  of  the  Grand  Court  of  the  Champs  de  Mars, 
to  be  terminated  with  something  which  should 
typify  the  age  in  an  entirely  novel  manner.  This 
was  accomplished  by  designing  an  electricity 
building,  masked  by  a  huge  fountain. 


The  colossal  Electricity  Building,  designed 
by  M.  Eugene  Henard,  and  the  electric  Chateau 
d'Eau,  designed  by  M.  Paulin,  together  represent 
a  collaboration  that  is  little  short  of  materialized 
fairyland.  They  are  on  the  admirable  site  of  the 
Dome  Central,  the  principal  architectural  feature 
of  the  1889  Exposition.  The  dew-drops  and 
jewels  of  "The  Midsummer  Night's  Dream" 
are  here  brought  into  the  reality  of  the  twen- 
tieth century.  Internal  lighting  and  external 
illumination,  combined  with  ever-moving  sheets 
of  water,  produce  a  spectacle  far  surpassing  the 
wildest  Oriental  dreams. 

A  serious  problem  presented  itself  in  the 
running  of  machinery  throughout  the  Exhibition. 
This  necessitated  a  force  no  less  than  1,200  horse- 
power. With  surprising  ingenuity,  hydraulic 
pressure  was  utilized,  so  the  same  water  that 
falls  in  graceful  and  illuminated  curves  as  an 
ornament  also  serves  the  Exhibition  in  a  most 
material  way.  The  water  is  pumped  from  the 
Seine  and  conducted  underground  to  its  various 
points  of  usefulness. 

The  glitter  of  lights  and  running  water,  the 
gushing  fountains  and  illuminated  basins,  the 
darker  grottoes  against  which  forms  of  nymphs 
stand  out  in  profile — all  these  present  such  a 
marvellous  picture  that  the  eye  is  attracted  to 
them  from  afar.  Instinctively  urged  in  that 
direction  and  unconsciously  following  the  broad 
winding  avenue,  the  visitor  is  gradually  ap- 
proaching the  higher  level,  but  all  the  while 
oblivious  to  it,  with  his  attention  centered  on  the 
wonder  and  beauty  of  the  dazzling  scene.  From 
the  open  arcade  of  adjoining   buildings  he  has 


.....  :     .'  j» 


M i    » 

\  ^9;- — 


H 

2 

D 

CO 

O 

t- 
(1 

u. 

w 

H 

>~ 

I 

f- 

u 

O 

< 

rr 

Q 

H 

if 

U 

7 

UJ 

"W 

J 

X 

UJ 

w 

Q 

s 

2 

< 

is' 

Q 

D 

2 

< 

<. 

UJ 

2 

Q 

_J 
D 

< 

D 

a. 

< 

? 

UJ 

H 

< 

X 

o 

110 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


From  the  Builder,  London 


PLASTER    CAST    OF    MODEL    OF    ELECTRIC    FOUNTAIN 


been  successfully  brought  up  to  the  second  ex- 
hibition floor  without  having  thought  of  stairs 
or  elevator.  It  has  all  been  brought  about  by 
himself,  for  he  has,  step  by  step,  sought  the 
best  vantage  ground,  the  best  position  from 
which  to  view  this  charming  glitter  of  electricity 
and  falling  water,  and  having  obtained  that  view, 
he  stands  just  where  the  architect  wants  him  to 


be.  Thus,  a  cascade,  over  ioo  feet  high,  forms 
one  of  the  great  objective  points  for  sightseers  by 
day  or  night. 

The  brilliant  and  scintillating  background 
symbolizes  the  great  power — electricity.  The 
new  forms,  in  metal  and  glass,  lit  by  innumer- 
able lights,  are  symbols  of  the  advances  of  its 
great  allies.     At  night,  as   one   approaches  any 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


1  I  1 


suburban  American  town  from  the  open  coun- 
try, he  sees  a  line  of  jewels  sparkling  on  its  hem; 
when  one  approaches  the  Paris  Exposition  this 
trivial  ornamentation  has  been  changed  to  a 
mass  of  shining  lacework,  composed  of  metal 
and  glass,  full  120  feet  above  the  ground.  At 
that  height  it  makes  day  of  the  darkest  evening, 
and  is  an  ever-changing  diadem  of  light  and 
color. 

As  M.  Alfred  Picard,  the  Commissioner- 
General  of  the  Exposition,  has  so  aptly  said  : 
"The  year  1900  not  only  coincides  with  the 
usual  cycle  of  eleven  years,  which  periodically 
brings  an  exhibition  round,  it  also  marks  the 
end  of  a  century  of  prodigious  scientific  and 
economic  growth,  and  it  opens  a  new  era  which 
will  perhaps  be  more  fruitful  still. ' ' 

In  conclusion,  one  must  remark  the  light- 
ness of  construction  possessed  by  all  the  build- 
ings and  never  so  satisfactorily  attained  in  any 
exposition  before.  There  are  great  stone  arches, 
ponderous    pillars,     and    airy    spans,    but   they 


harmonize.  All  form  a  unified  mass  that  in  all 
its  grandeur  seems  hospitable  and  cosmopolitan. 
There  are  marvels  in  stereotomy  and  metal- 
wonders  treated  most  frankly,  and  with  decora- 
tive taste.  Those  who  are  accustomed  to  con- 
ceal structural  iron  in  their  architecture  will  be 
convinced  and  enlightened  by  the  frank  use  of  it 
in  the  Exposition.  The  element  of  lightness  is 
by  no  means  foreign  to  the  romantic  spirit  of  the 
entire  Exposition.  It  is  all  primarily  a  decoration, 
a  passing  festival,  a  pageant.  Just  as  the  Pre- 
Raphaelites  attract  us  by  their  prominence  01 
ornament,  their  pleasing  of  the  senses  by  the 
real  treatment  of  the  romantic,  so  the  attractive 
and  decorative  buildings  of  the  Exposition  please 
us  in  their  open  avowal  of  their  lightness — their 
ephemeral  nature.  But  we  have  chosen  a  faulty 
comparison,  for  the  art  of  the  painter's  brush, 
though  often  symbolistic,  is  never  so  universal — 
so  free  from  personality  as  to  represent  the  prog- 
ress of  an  entire  world  as  does  the  collection  of 
buildings  we  term  the  Paris  Exposition. 


/     1      ft  \ 


«£ 


CENTRAL    FEATURE    OF    THE    MINING    BUILDING 


112 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


EXTRACTS  FROM  PAPERS  BY  H.  K.  BUSH- 
BROWN 


The  following,  reprinted  from  an  article  in  Municipal  Affairs,  and  from  his  address  at  the  Cleveland  Convention  of  the  A.  L.  A.,  by 
H.  K.  Bush-Brown,  a  well-known  sculptor,  and  the  Chairman  of  the  Committee  upon  Municipal  Monuments  of  the  Architectural  League  o'f 
New  York,  are  full  of  sound  suggestions.  As  a  whole,  his  article  outlines  a  systematic  way  to  embellish  the  city  of  New  York  with  a  view 
to  the  preservation  of  local  history,  and  is  a  businesslike  paper,  containing  many  good  ideas,  which  should  be  studied.  He  frankly  begins 
by  stating  "  that  the  suggestions  are  not  made  with  the  hope  of  avoiding  criticism,  but  for  the  purpose  of  stimulating  it,  so  that  a  consensus 
of  opinion  may  be  reached."  His  first  idea  is  to  divide  the  city  into  six  parts,  each  one  to  be  the  centre  of  one  of  six  historical  periods, 
which  have  marked  the  city's  growth  from  the  primitive  Dutch  New  Amsterdam  to  the  present  cosmopolitan  Greater  New  York. —  The 
Editor. 

u 


I 


SUPPOSE,"  he  says,  "never  in  the  history 
of  man  has  there  been  such  a  migration  of 
the  human  race  as  has  come  to  these  shores 
during  the  century  just  closing. 

"Almost  the  whole  of  this  influx  has  landed 
at  Battery  Park,  having  first  touched  this  conti- 
nent at  Castle  Garden.  People  of  all  countries 
coming  in  hordes  for  many  years  and  passing 
through  a  single  gate,  to  be  again  distributed 
over  the  continent,  attracted  by  the  freest  institu- 
tions of  self-government  and  the  great  chances 
offered  by  a  new  and  half-developed  country — a 
country  where  equality  of  man,  with  manhood 
suffrage,  is  the  corner-stone  of  the  govern- 
ment. 

" Here  probably  is  the  greatest  theme  that  was 
ever  presented  to  an  artist.  We  may  be  now  too 
near  to  see  its  grandeur,  its  picturesqueness  and 
poetic  beauty.  The  bard  will  surely  come  equal 
to  this  theme  and  the  artist  also.  It  may  require 
the  united  efforts  of  several  to  work  out  the  kind 
of  treatment  it  deserves  in  monumental  form. 

"  It  might  be  that  the  architect  of  the  Custom 
House  Building,  which  is  to  be  erected  on  the 
other  side  at  Battery  Park,  could  make  this  the 
theme  of  its  decoration.  There  is  no  other  build- 
ing so  appropriate  for  such  a  treatment,  and  this 
certainly  is  an  opportunity  that  will  not  occur 
again. 

' '  But,  as  I  have  said  before,  it  may  be  destined 
for  future  generations  to  work  out  this  theme,  and 
perhaps  they  can  do  it  the  better  when  we  are 
old  enough  as  a  nation  to  stand  on  our  own  feet 
and  worship  our  own  ideals." 

And  again,  in  another  place,  he  says  : 

"  Before  leaving  City  Hall  Park,  I  want  to 
speak  of  the  competition  instituted  last  year  for 
an  official  flagstaff  to  be  erected  here.  It  made 
one's  heart  sick  to  see  the  result  of  the  competi- 
tion, which  produced  eighteen  or  twenty  designs, 
all  in  the  rococo  style,  and  only  one  in  theme 
having  local  association  or  fitness  of  subject.  It 
purported  to  represent  the  uniting  of  the  five 
boroughs  into  one  city.  It  was  not  considered 
worthy  of  a  prize,  I  believe. 

"  We  have  here  a  subject,  both  local  and  na- 
tional in  its  importance,  that  is  unsurpassed  in 
the   annals   of  history,   and    yet  all   those  con- 


nected with  this  competition  seem  to  have  ig- 
nored or  forgotten  it.  Must  I  narrate  that  we 
had  in  New  York,  just  before  the  Revolution,  a 
band  of  patriots,  who  called  themselves  Sons  of 
Liberty,  and  who  kept  a  liberty  pole  erected  in 
City  Hall  Park  as  an  emblem  of  the  freedom  they 
were  determined  to  win  for  themselves  and  for  lis  ? 

"That  four  times  it  was  cut  down  by  the 
British  soldiers  and  as  many  times  re-erected  by 
these  bold  patriots?  That  in  the  scuffles  that 
surged  about  that  liberty  pole  the  first  blood  was 
shed  for  freedom  ? 

"That  the  patriots  finally  won,  and  the  pole 
remained,  while  the  English  soldier  kept  guard 
over  the  peace  of  the  city  ?  (It  was  an  ideal  that 
these  patriots  were  ready  to  live  for,  to  fight  for 
and  to  die  for.) 

"That  all  this  was  before  Lexington  and 
before  the  so-called  massacre  of  Boston  ? 

"May  I  ask  why  did  the  Mmiicipal  Art  Society 
neglect  this  picturesque  and  ideal  subject,  for  a 
theme,  when  instituting  the  competition,  and  why 
did  no  artist  take  it  for  his  motive  f 

"Alas,  I  fear  it  but  proves  we  are  as  yet  in 
our  artistic  swaddli?ig  clothes,  that  we  are  content 
to  live  on  the  artistic  pap  that  is  dispensed  in  the 
schools  of  Europe. 

"  Better  no  American  art  at  all  than  that  we 
should  have  such  degradation,  which  casts  aside 
our  own  national  ideals  and  substitutes  foreign 
motives  utterly  vapid.  It  was  not  this  spirit  that 
dominated  our  people  from  Bunker  Hill  to  York- 
town  ;  that  made  us  supreme  on  the  seas  in  1812  and 
181 4. ;  that  gave  us  heroes  at  Shiloh  and  Gettysburg, 
and,  finally,  has  added  Manila  and  Santiago. 

"  I  will  repeat  it,  better  no  American  art  at  all 
than  that  all  or  any  part  of  this  glorious  history, 
which  speaks  for  the  brotherhood  and  equality  of 
man,  should  be  cast  aside." 

FROM  CLEVELAND  CONVENTION 
ADDRESS 

We  have  cleared  a  continent  of  its  forests, 
perfected  the  use  of  steam  and  electricity,  built 
railroads  and  canals,  established  a  commerce  and 
a  navy,  and  with  it  all  have  builded  a  national 
character  of  a  higher  type  and  a  broader  grasp 
than  has  existed  before  in  the  history  of  man. 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


113 


Therefore  we  have  reason  to  be  proud  of  being 
Americans. 

There  is  nothing  to  which  we  have  put  our 
hand  and  our  heart,  our  intellect  and  our  will, 
that  has  not  succeeded.  Having  attained  the 
fruition  of  our  hopes  as  a  people  in  the  develop- 
ment of  material  things,  we  have  now  in  the  first 
time  in  our  history  both  the  wealth  and  the 
leisure,  and  I  am  glad  to  say  the  inclination,  to 
seek  some  appropriate  expression  of  all  these 
evidences  of  national  greatness  in  the  art  of  our 
people. 

I  have  had  proof  of  this  from  the  Atlantic  to 
the  Pacific,  and  I  am  glad  to  say  it  is  so  general, 
for  it  demonstrates  we  are  on  the  eve  of  a  great 
national  development  in  art. 

The  World's  Fair  of  Chicago  demonstrated 
to  our  people  the  possibilities  that  are  before  them , 
and  we  are  now  for  the  first  time  since  then  in  a 
position  to  take  advantage  of  them. 

Gentlemen  of  Cleveland,  you  are  to  be  con- 
gratulated that  you  are  ready  to  lead  these 
75,000,000  of  people  in  this  art  movement. 

You  have  here  great  problems  to  solve  in 
selecting  designs  for  and  placing  so  many  public 
buildings  all  at  one  time,  which  if  you  solve 
them  wisely  will  make  Cleveland  the  model  for 
the  rest  of  the  country,  and  may  create  a  standard 
that  all  other  cities  may  live  up  to.  It  is,  of 
course,  a  local  question,  but  in  the  influence  you 
may  exert  you  can  make  it  an  example  for  a 
nation.  I  am  sure  you  will  prove  yourselves 
equal  to  the  occasion,  as  Sons  of  Ohio  always 
have  done  in  peace  and  in  war.  And  you  do  not 
need  any  one  to  come  from  New  York  to  point 
you  the  way. 

You  ask  for  examples,  precedents  which  you 
may  follow  for  improving  the  city's  plan.  I 
answer  you  that  there  are  none,  for  I  believe  a 
perfectly  arranged  modern  city  does  not  exist — 
unless  it  be  Cleveland — because  the  conditions  of 
modern  civilization  are  so  entirely  different  from 
anything  that  has  been  before.  What  was  con- 
venient and  suitable  only  ten  years  ago  is  now 
impossible.  By  reason  of  this  we  must  be  eman- 
cipated from  the  traditions  and  customs  of  the 
past  and  devote  ourselves  to  solving  these  prob- 
lems on  their  own  merits  under  these  new  con- 
ditions as  they  exist  to-day  and  with  a  foresight, 
if  possible,  of  what  they  may  become  in  the  gene- 
rations to  follow. 

It  requires  the  imagination  of  a  poet  to  have  a 
conception  of  what  the  future  has  in  store  for  us. 
When  Jules  Verne  delighted  his  readers  with  his 
flights  of  fancy,  who  then  dreamed  that  such  or 
similar  things  could  be  realized  ?  And  now  when 
we  read  the  tales  of  the  Arabian  Nights  some  of 
the  keenness  of  delight  is  lost  to  us  because  their 


wonders   are   made   commonplace   by  our   daily 
familiarity  with  even  greater  marvels. 

Each  age  has  built  and  planned  for  itself  with 
a  vision  bounded  by  the  life  of  the  individual,  or 
at  most  that  of  the  succeeding  generation.  When 
our  ancestors  settled  the  Atlantic  Coast  their 
visions  of  the  future  were  based  on  their  knowl- 
edge of  their  past.  Europe  was  just  bursting 
the  bonds  of  the  feudal  system  which  had  created 
the  walled  cities  of  the  Middle  Ages.  These  were 
their  only  models  for  planning  new  towns,  and 
thej'  were  well  adapted  to  the  needs  of  the  new 
country  because  their  compactness  made  them 
easy  of  defence  against  the  Indians.  The  world 
moved  more  slowly  then,  but  each  generation 
gave  more  breadth  and  space  to  the  newly  added 
sections.  They  thought  and  said  that  they  had 
builded  for  all  time,  but  they  could  not  foresee 
the  marvellous  growth  and  wonderful  develop- 
ment of  our  time. 

The  radical  and  progressive  spirits  are  those 
who  migrate,  and  when  the  men  of  broad  ideas 
came  here  to  the  frontier  of  the  Western  Reserve 
to  struggle  with  Destiny  in  creating  a  new 
commonwealth,  and  when  they  saw  for  the  first 
time  the  grandeur  of  Niagara  Falls  and  the  great 
expanse  of  these  noble  lakes  and  breathed  the 
free  air  of  these  extensive  prairies,  they  were 
inspired  by  the  greatness  of  these  natural  phe- 
nomena to  cast  aside  the  traditions  of  the  past, 
and  so  they  wisely  made  the  streets  of  Cleveland 
three  times  wider  than  was  immediately  neces- 
sary. 

The  city  has  now  grown  up  to  the  expecta- 
tions of  its  founders  and  the  arteries  of  traffic 
are  already  comfortably  filled.  The  growth  of 
Chicago,  on  the  other  hand,  has  followed  so 
closely  on  the  footsteps  of  the  imagination  of  its 
founders  that  it  has  tripped  them  up  and  buried 
them  out  of  sight  as  having  no  forecast  of  the 
future. 

With  this  hasty  look  over  the  past  and  per- 
haps one  dim  vision  of  the  future,  we  may  well 
ask  in  the  vernacular  of  the  street,  "  Where  are 
we  at?"  and  I  will  add,  Whither  do  we  go? 
So  at  last  we  come  right  down  to  the  study  of 
the  vital  requirements  of  this  problem — how  to 
place  these  new  monumental  buildings  so  as  to 
attain  the  greatest  artistic  effect  and  furnish  at 
the  same  time  the  greatest  utility.  These  are 
not  antagonistic  requirements,  but  are  or  should 
be  correlated. 

As  I  have  said,  the  founders  of  Cleveland 
have  given  you  a  city  admirably  well  planned, 
and  it  is  now  for  you  to  prove  yourselves  worthy 
of  this  inheritance  and  equal  to  them  in  their 
forecast  of  future  needs  and  in  devotion  to  the 
highest  ideals. 


14 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


In  looking  this  problem  over  since  I  came,  I 
am  pleased  to  say  that  the  sentiment  seems  in 
favor  of  grouping  the  public  buildings.  I  can- 
not too  strongly  urge  the  adoption  of  this  course. 
It  was  a  similar  treatment  of  public  buildings 
that  made  Athens  the  wonder  of  the  ancient 
world,  and  it  was  followed  by  Rome,  Constanti- 
nople, Florence,  Pisa,  Venice,  Siena,  Milan  and 
Vienna — all  adopted  the  same  centralization. 
Paris,  London,  Berlin  and  Washington  have 
only  in  part  come  under  the  same  rule,  but  they 
serve  to  help  on  the  argument. 

I  learn  that  you  have  appointed  or  are  about 
to  form  a  Joint  Committee  from  the  Chamber  of 
Commerce  and  delegates  from  the  various  build- 
ing commissions.  There  is  no  doubt  they  will 
take  up  the  subject  in  a  thorough  manner  and 
with  a  patriotic  spirit  and  evolve  some  general 
plan  that  will  greatly  enhance  the  already  beauti- 
ful city  of  Cleveland. 

In  looking  over  the  suggestions  already  made, 
there  are  several  that  contemplate  opening  a 
space  from  Superior  Street  to  the  lake.  This 
principle  seems  desirable,  and  the  one  that  most 
appeals  to  me  is  that  which  extends  the  present 
park  or  square  to  the  lake  and  gives  a  magnifi- 
cent vista  both  ways  and  makes  this  the  official 
entrance  to  the  city.  It  is  already  the  centre, 
and  this  treatment  would  make  it  what  the  court 
of  honor  was  to  the  World's  Fair.  So  far  as  I 
know  there  is  no  other  city  which  has  so  grand 
an  approach  as  this  might  be  made. 

In  New  York  the  problem  we  have  endeavored 
to  solve  in  placing  the  new  public  buildings  is 
much  more  complex,  for  it  has  involved  the  re- 
construction of  the  city  street  plan  and  become 
part  of  the  need  of  new  broad  avenues  to  give 
access  to  the  entrance  to  one  or  more  proposed 
new  bridges  across  the  East  River  and  one  across 
the  Hudson.  The  narrowness  of  the  average 
New  York  street  in  the  lower  part  of  the  city  is 
the  despair  of  that  problem,  and  the  ubiquitous 
trolley  now  demands  such  space  that  the  only 
hope  for  man  on  earth  seems  to  require  it  buried 
out  of  sight.  Then  comes  the  disposal  of  the 
arrogant,  reckless,  irrepressible  bicyclist.  What 
can  we  do  with  him  ?  Bad  as  all  this  is  for  the 
New  York  problem,  it  is  simple  straightforward 
work  if  there  is  enough  civic  pride  to  work  with. 
The  average  New  Yorker  does  not  care  a  little 
bit  about  improving  the  city.  It  is  to  him  only 
a  place  in  which  to  make  money.  He  knows  he 
is  burdened  to  death  with  civic  taxes  already, 
and  when  you  talk  about  opening  new  streets 
through  property  the  ground  value  of  which 
alone  he  computes  by  the  square  foot,  he  knows 
you  are  clear  stark  mad. 

Now,  in  closing,  I  want  to  say  a  word  for  the 


commercial  value  of  art  or  the  investment  value 
of  artistic  improvements.  The  interest  on  the 
national  debt  of  Italy  is  $90,000,000  in  round 
numbers.  The  travelling  English  leave  them 
$30,000,000,  the  travelling  Americans  $30,000,000, 
and  the  travellers  of  other  countries  $30,000,000. 

And  why  do  they  go  there?  Almost  entirely 
because  of  the  arts  of  Italy,  for  there  is  little  else 
to  attract  so  many  people  as  to  pay  the  interest 
on  the  national  debt.  Take  the  same  facts  in 
detail.  Turin  was  once  the  capital  of  Italy  and 
was  rebuilt  in  modern  vulgar  magnificence.  Its 
life  depended  upon  its  being  the  capital.  That 
removed,  the  town  languished  ;  grass  grows  now 
in  the  streets,  and  when  an  unlucky  traveller 
finds  himself  in  Turin,  as  I  did  one  day,  his  only 
desire  is  for  a  train  to  take  him  hence. 

Following  Turin,  Florence  was  the  modern 
capital  of  Italy  and  from  thence  it  moved  to 
Rome,  but  Florence  suffered  little  by  the  loss,  for 
it  was  just  as  attractive  to  the  foreigners  who 
flock  there  for  long  and  short  visits.  This  is  be- 
cause Florence  is  a  very  gem  of  Renaissance  and 
ancient  art.  I  venture  to  say  that  if  you  will 
sum  up  the  cost  or  the  cash  value  of  every  work 
of  art  and  public  building  in  Florence  you  will 
find  that  the  foreigners  leave  them  annually  a 
handsome  interest  on  that  sum  so  invested,  if  I 
may  use  the  word. 

Turning  now  to  France,  we  find  she  has  great 
credit  for  generosity  in  extending  the  same  privi- 
leges to  foreigners  as  are  enjoyed  by  the  French 
in  the  art,  medical  and  scientific  schools,  except- 
ing, of  course,  the  Roman  scholarship.  When  I 
was  there  in  1888  there  were  250  American  art 
students  and  about  as  many  more  from  all  other 
countries.  These  500  students  expended  not  less 
than  $500  per  year  to  live  (and  that  is  a  low 
estimate),  which  amounts  to  $250,000  a  year. 
The  cost  of  maintaining  the  Ecole  des  Beaux- Arts, 
including  the  Envois  to  Rome,  was  that  year 
$91,640.  Call  it  $100,000  for  round  numbers, 
and  it  leaves  a  balance  of  $150,000.  I  am  sorry 
I  do  not  know  the  value  of  the  buildings,  but  as 
I  remember  them  I  should  say  that  $400,000 
would  be  a  generous  appraisement.  No  matter, 
$150,000  income  is  10  per  cent,  on  $1,500,000,  or 
5  per  cent,  on  $3,000,000.  In  plain  English, 
then,  France  educates  foreign  art  students  free  of 
cost,  but  in  so  doing  they  bring  to  France 
enough  money  annually  to  not  only  educate 
themselves,  but  the  French  boys  as  well,  and  leave 
a  handsome  surplus  besides.  It  maybe  said  that 
this  is  only  very  indirectly,  but  I  reply  that  it  is 
true  ;  yet  there  is  no  item  in  the  balance  of  trade 
to  offset  it.  They  buy  nothing  that  they  take  out 
of  France  other  than  their  education.  The 
French  produce   everything   they  sell  them,  so 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


1  15 


that  the  money  stays  there  as  part  of  the  income 
of  the  French  people,  jnst  as  the  $90,000,000 
does  that  travellers  leave  in  Italy  every  year. 

In  the  same  way  Switzerland,  which  has  a 
population  of  only  3,000,000,  about  that  of  New 
York  City  and  surroundings,  had  last  year  as 
guests  2,300,000  people.  These  foreigners  left 
them  about  $24,000,000  in  the  hotels  and  $6,000,- 
000  for  souvenirs.  This  income  is  due  principally 
to  their  good  roads,  and  next  to  the  good  hotels, 
which  make  the  natural  advantages  of  beautiful 
scenery  accessible  and  sought  for  by  all  the 
world.  This  yearly  income  of  $30,000,000  is 
nearly  three  times  the  national  debt,  which  is 
only  $u,ooo,oco,  and  one-half  of  the  national 
and  cantonal  debt  added,  which  is  $61,000,000. 

Several  years  ago  the  President  of  the  Ameri- 
can Line  told  me  that  during  the  four  months  of 
summer  of  that  year  it  was  estimated  that  our  trav- 
elling Americans  took  to  Europe $7 5, 000, 000 cash. 
A  recent  estimate  of  our  European  foreign  travel 
of  last  year  is  put  at  200,730  adults,  and  they 
are  estimated  to  have  spent  there  $125,000,000. 

The  interest  on  our  national  debt  is  $51,000,- 
000,  so  our  travellers  take  to  Europe  two  and  a 
half  times  the  interest  on  our  national  debt.  To 
offset  this  there  is  the  small  item  of  35,000 
tourists  in  this  country  from  Europe  who  bring 
us  a  credit  of  perhaps  $i7,oo.),ooo.  This  great 
European  travel  is  due  largely  to  the  arts  and 
monuments  of  Europe,  but  of  course  it  is  not 
right  to  attribute  all  of  it  to  this  cause  ;  yet  they 
are  the  things  that  the  travellers  and  students  go 


there  to  see  and  stud}-.  Napoleon  knew  the 
value  of  art,  for  wherever  his  victorious  armies 
went  they  gathered  up  the  art  treasures  and  took 
them  to  Paris,  and  in  the  peace  that  followed 
Waterloo  some  of  them  were  restored  to  their 
original  owners,  but  most  of  them  remain  in  the 
Louvre  as  the  greatest  collection  in  the  world. 

When  Paris  was  about  to  fall  into  the  hands 
of  the  Germans  in  1870,  it  was  the  great  treasure 
of  that  collection,  the  Venus  de  Milo,  that  was 
buried  in  the  courtyard,  where  only  the  trusted 
few  knew  of  its  resting  place. 

In  our  war  with  Spain,  we  humiliated  her  by 
taking  her  colonies,  but  fancy  her  state  of  mind 
if  we  had  also  demanded  the  contents  of  the 
Madrid  gallery.  Would  Spain  have  submitted 
to  this  disgrace  ? 

The  cost  of  the  Congressional  Library  build- 
ing was  $6,032,000,  but  only  about  $400,000  was 
expended  on'  the  artistic  decoration,  which  is  7 
per  cent.  Am  I  not  safe  in  saying  that  90  per 
cent,  of  the  interest  for  the  public  is  centered  in 
these  decorations  which  cost  only  7  per  cent,  of 
the  total  ? 

So,  in  considering  the  plans  and  the  placing 
of  your  public  buildings,  bear  these  facts  in  mind 
and  be  assured  that  a  wise,  yet  to  some  minds  a 
lavish,  expenditure  of  money  for  these  monu- 
mental buildings  is  the  best-paying  investment 
for  every  citizen  of  Cleveland.  Your  children 
and  grandchildren  will  bless  you  for  demonstrat- 
ing that  the  best  is  none  too  good  when  creating 
the  ideals  of  a  noble  and  liberty-loving  people. 


DECORATIVE  SPANDREL  ON 
THE  CONDICT  BUILDING 

NEW  YORK 


LOUIS  H.  SULLIVAN  AND 
LYNDON  P.  SMITH 

ASSOCIATE  ARCHITECTS 


INDIAN    CHIEF— CORNING    FOUNTAIN,    HARTFORD,    CONN. 

I.  MASSEY  RHIND,  SC. 


FIGHTING    INDIAN— CORNING    FOUNTAIN,    HARTFORD,    CONN. 

J.  MASSEY  RHIND,  SC. 


IN  America,  startling  innovations  have  become 
so  characteristically  the  order  of  the  day 
that  their  novelty  usually  departs  before  all 
the  results  are  accomplished.  We  have  become 
so  used  to  a  constant  anticipation  of  the  next 
thing  that  its  arrival  seems  merely  a  matter  of 
course.  Not  so  with  the  more  vital  movements 
toward  the  improvement  of  civilization.  Though 
we  may  lose  for  a  moment  the  remembrance  of 
the  first  gleam  of  a  new  light,  its  effect,  whether 
for  good  or  bad,  remains  on  the  retina  of  the 
mind  long  after  the  primal  cause  has  been  re- 
moved. It  sinks  into  the  nature  of  our  being, 
and  resolves  itself  into  an  instinctive  impulse  in 
a  better  direction. 

The  memory  of  the  Cleveland  Convention 
has  not  faded  from  the  minds  of  those  who  at- 
tended. In  all  probability  it  has  been  forgotten 
by  some  who  saw  it  announced  and  praised  so 
frequently  last  June,  but  its  results,  its  influ- 
ences, its  accomplishments  affected  the  profes- 
sion, and  demonstrated  to  the  public  the  archi- 
tect's desire  to  work  along  practical  lines  for  the 
improvement  of  his  locality.  What  the  Conven- 
tion meant  to  those  who  were  there  will  be 
sufficiently  evidenced  by  the  attendance  at  the 
approaching  convention  in  Chicago. 

The  Cleveland  Convention  was  called  in  re- 
sponse to  a  general  desire  on  the  part  of  progres- 
sive architectural  clubs  to  profit  by  the  experi- 
ence of  other  architectural  clubs,  to  co-ordinate 
the  work  of  the  many  and  secure  the  benefits  of 
co-operation.  That  the  results  far  exceeded  the 
causes  is  beyond  question,  but  the  causes  them- 
selves were  great. 

In  December,  1898,  the  St.  Louis  Architec- 
tural Club  centered  attention  in  the  need  of 
co-operation  between  the  scattered  exhibition 
committees,  and,  upon  this  suggestion,  the  Chi- 
cago architectural  clubs  issued  a  call  for  a  con- 
vention   at    Cleveland.     Ninety-seven    delegates 


responded,  and  registered  as  representatives  of 
the  Architectural  League  and  the  Society  of 
Beaux  Arts  Architects,  of  New  York,  the  archi- 
tectural clubs  of  Chicago,  Philadelphia,  St.  Louis, 
Boston,  Cleveland,  Detroit,  Pittsburg  and  To- 
ronto, and  the  Illinois,  Pittsburg  and  Cleveland 
Chapters  of  the  American  Institute  of  Architects. 

The  welcome  of  the  city  was  offered  the 
Convention  by  Mr.  Albert  E.  Skeel,  President 
Cleveland  Architectural  Club,  and  was  re- 
sponded to  by  Mr.  J.  C.  Llewellyn,  President 
Chicago  Architectural  Club,  who  was  elected 
Chairman  of  the  Convention  ;  Mr.  N.  Max 
Dunning,  of  Chicago,  was  made  Secretary. 
"Club  Organization  and  Management"  was 
the  first  paper  on  the  program,  and  was  well 
presented  by  Mr.  Adin  B.  Lacey,  President  of 
the  T-Square  Club,  Philadelphia.  He  spoke  of 
its  formation,  dues,  requirements  for  admission, 
attendance,  prizes,  decisions  and  scholarships, 
relations  to  the  city  and  to  architectural  schools, 
and  finally  its  successful  growth  under  the  man- 
agement of  an  executive  committee.  Then  were 
given  reviews  of  work  in  architectural  clubs  of 
other  cities,  with  discussion  upon  the  subject  by 
the  entire  Convention. 

"The  Annual  Exhibition"  was  the  title  of 
the  next  paper,  by  Mr.  Henry  W.  Tomlinson, 
of  Chicago.  The  points  suggested  were  the  im- 
portance of  the  yearly  exhibition  as  a  record  of 
the  year's  work,  the  needed  elements  of  dignity 
and  excellence,  attention  to  needs  of  the  imme- 
diate vicinity,  publicity  by  press  and  by  invita- 
tion, technicalities  of  packing  exhibits,  and  the 
publication  of  a  catalogue.  Discussion  followed, 
which  resulted  in  the  appointment  of  a  commit- 
tee to  arrange  a  schedule  of  consecutive  exhi- 
bitions. 

Mr.  Julius  F.  Harder,  of  New  York,  read  a 
paper  advocating  ' '  A  Code  to  Govern  Competi- 
tions in  Design,"  and  the  form  drawn  up  by  the 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


119 


joint  committee  of  the  Architectural  League  of 
New  York  and  the  T-Square  Club  of  Philadel- 
phia, and  approved  by  these  organizations  over  a 
year  ago,  was  accepted  by  the  Convention  and 
recommended  to  the  consideration  of  the  several 
clubs.  This  ended  the  business  of  the  morning, 
and  the  afternoon  was  spent  in  tally-ho  drives 
through  the  city  parks  as  guests  of  the  Cleveland 
Club. 

Mr.  Bush-Brown's  lecture  at  the  Chamber  of 
Commerce  on  the  "  Grouping  of  Public  Build- 
ings ' '  occupied  the  evening. 

"You  ask  for  examples,  precedents  which 
you  may  follow  for  improving  the  city's  plan. 
I  answer  you  that  there  are  none,  for  I  believe  a 
perfectly  arranged  modern  city  does  not  exist — 
unless  it  be  Cleveland — because  the  conditions  of 
modern  civilization  are  so  entirely  different  from 
anything  that  has  been  before.  What  was  con- 
venient and  suitable  only  ten  years  ago  is  now 
impossible.  By  reason  of  this  we  must  be 
emancipated  from  the  traditions  and  customs  of 
the  past  and  devote  ourselves  to  solving  these 
problems  on  their  own  merits  under  these  new 
conditions  as  they  exist  to-day  and  with  a  fore- 
sight, if  possible,  of  what  they  may  become  in 
the  generations  to  follow. 

' '  It  requires  the  imagination  of  a  poet  to 
have  a  conception  of  what  the  future  has  in  store 
for  us.  When  Jules  Verne  delighted  his  readers 
with  his  flights  of  fancy,  who  then  dreamed  that 
such  or  similar  things  could  be  realized  ?  And 
now  when  we  read  the  Tales  of  the  Arabian 
Nights  some  of  the  keenness  of  delight  is  lost  to 
us  because  their  wonders  are  made  commonplace 
by  our  daily  familiarity  with  even  greater  mar- 
vels." 

Such  were  characteristic  paragraphs  of  this 
pertinent  lecture.  Statistics  were  not  wanting 
to  prove  the  utility  of  grouping  a  city's  public 
buildings.  The  material  value  of  art  was  demon- 
strated by  numerous  examples,  and  Mr.  Bush- 
Brown's  deductions  were  that ' '  a  wise,  yet  to  some 
minds  a  lavish,  expenditure  of  money  for  these 
monumental  buildings  is  the  best-paying  invest- 
ment for  every  citizen." 

'  The  Architectural  Society  and  its  Progres- 
sive Influence  ' '  was  the  first  paper  of  the  follow- 
ing day.  The  speaker  dwelt  upon  the  necessity 
to  advance  ' '  American  architecture  as  opposed  to 
architecture  in  America, ' '  as  Mr.  Ernest  Flagg  has 
so  well  put  it.  He  called  attention  to  the  desire 
of  the  people  for  an  architecture  that  ' '  reflects 
their  own  lives  and  local  achievements,  ...  an 
indigenous  architecture  having  its  corner-stone 
laid  down  deep  in  the  popular  heart.  For,"  he 
went  on  to  prove,  ' '  there  is  a  neglected  factor  in 
our  architecture  which  must  be  cultivated  before 


architecture  in  the  United  States  can  mean  much 
to  our  people." 

' '  A  well-defined  ideal ' '  was  held  to  be  a 
necessary  element  of  either  the  architectural  club 
or  a  federation  of  societies.  It  was  the  expressed 
belief  of  the  speaker  that  a  stand  should  be  made 
against  "obsolete  affections  in  architectural  de- 
sign," and  that  the  Architectural  Society  has  the 
opportunity  to  bring  about  the  remedy.  The 
discussion  that  followed  emphasized  the  speaker's 
point,  as  did  also  the  "  Modern  Phase  of  Architec- 
ture," a  paper  by  Mr.  Louis  H.  Sullivan,  read  by 
the  Secretary  of  the  Convention.  Expressions  ol 
regret  at  inability  to  be  present  at  the  Convention 
were  received  from  numerous  practising  architects, 
professors  and  draughtsmen,  scattered  over  the 
whole  country. 

In  the  afternoon,  Mr.  Peter  B.  Wright,  Secre- 
tary of  the  Illinois  State  Board  of  Examining 
Architects,  read  a  paper  on  "The  Operation  ot 
the  Illinois  License  Law."  This  set  forth  the 
manner  of  examining  applicants,  the  success  ot 
the  License  Law  to  the  present  date,  and  its  bene- 
ficial effect  on  the  profession  and  the  security  of 
buildings.  Discussion  developed  several  more 
points  regarding  the  punishment  of  offenders,  and 
with  resolutions  of  thanks  to  the  Convention  offi- 
cers, the  Cleveland  Associated  Press  and  the 
Cleveland  Architectural  Club,  the  Convention 
closed  its  business  session. 

The  following  extracts  from  some  of  the  let- 
ters and  papers  presented  at  the  congress  will  be 
of  interest,  as  they  express  a  prevailing  sentiment 
among  the  delegates  which  the  committee  felt  it 
necessary  to  embody  as  one  of  the  objects  of  the 
organization  in  the  constitution  which  was  after- 
ward unanimously  adopted,  viz. ,  Article  II  : 

' '  To  encourage  an  indigenous  and  inventive 
architecture,  and  to  lead  architectural  thought  to 
modern  sources  of  inspiration." 

Louis  H.  Sullivan  (Chicago): 

"  The  Cleveland  meeting  of  the  architectural 
clubs  of  the  country  will  mark,  I  believe,  the  aus- 
picious opening  of  a  new  era  in  the  growth  of 
architectural  thought  "...  (published  in 
full  elsewhere). 

Mr.  Edwin  Henri  Oliver  (New  Orleans): 

"  Why  is  it,  then,  that  we  are  so  fond  of  mas- 
querading in  the  cast-off  garments  of  the  past, 
and  care  so  little  for  creating  an  architecture  that 
is  natural  to  ourselves  ? 

If  the  office  of  the  architect  is  hospitable  to 
modern  influences,  there  must  be  a  revolution. 
The  result  of  this  revolution  will  constitute  the 
style  of  the  twentieth  century. 

"It  is  pathetic  to  pass  over  the  South  and 
see  towns  of  twenty  thousand  or  more  energetic, 
hospitable  and  enterprising  people  with  houses 


120 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


and  other  private  and  public  buildings  built  in 
what  is  miscalled  the  "  modern  style,"  in  distinc- 
tion from  the  Colonial,  but  not  one  of  these  will  be 
found  to  be  really  good,  grammatically  constructed 
or  conceived  in  a  spirit  of  subordination  to  any 
type  of  art.  They  are  carelessly  compounded  of 
exotic  and  heterogeneous  elements,  and  so  far  as 
their  decorative  or  architectural  character  is  con- 
cerned, there  is  no  expression  of  climatic  or  other 
natural  conditions  in  them. 

"  The  architecture  of  the  South  at  the  present 
time  is  anything  else  than  indigenous.  Most  of 
the  buildings  recently  built  in  the  Sunny  South 
are  modelled  after  those  of  the  Northern  cities, 
with  a  lack  of  fitness  that  is  surprising.  The 
undisciplined  invention  of  architectural  forms 
which  is  so  general  produces  many  travesties  of 
art ;  and  the  fact  that  none  of  the  experiments  at 
style  give  such  permanent  satisfaction  as  to  cause 
a  continuance,  but  that  they  are  succeeded  by  new 
experiments  of  illiterate  fancy — these  things  seem 
to  indicate  a  general  desire  for  a  more  orderly 
system  of  design  that  will  be  in  touch  with  the 
climatic  and  social  conditions  of  the  people  ;  a 
style  that  is  broad  and  generous,  plain  and  tem- 
perate, a  style  that  may  in  all  truth  and  lightness 
of  heart  be  called  Southern." 

Dwight  Heald  Perkins,  of  Chicago  : 

"Without  discredit  to  the  expressions  of  peo- 
ple of  other  times,  let  us  draw  our  inspiration  from 
the  common  people  whom  Abraham  Lincoln 
could  trust,  from  the  things  that  live  around  us, 
and  let  this  expression  develop  and  evolve  in  the 
best  way  possible  and  we  will  be  all  right. ' ' 

This  from  Elmer  Grey,  of  Milwaukee  : 

"  Thought  is  what  we  want,  on  every  piece 
of  work,  however  humble.  Thought,  the  idea 
that  what  is  worth  doing  at  all  is  worth  doing 
well.  In  every  commission  that  arises,  however 
unpretentious,  that  question  asked,  '  Do  our 
scholastic  principles  hold  here  ?  or  even  do  those 
methods  which  are  ours  by  right  of  growth  apply  ?' 

"What,  from  a  man's  point  of  view,  from 
the  standpoint  of  culture,  refinement,  large  sanity 
and  every-day  common  sense,  ought  to  be  the 
treatment  of  each  individual  opportunity  offered 
us  ?  And  in  asking  that  question,  can  we  be  un- 
affected, can  we  be  sane,  can  we  be  thoroughly 
unbiased,  when  ever  in  danger  of  having  crop 
up  before  us,  presumptuously  it  seems  to  me,  that 
ever- recurring  word  '  style  ?  '  Rather,  is  not 
what  we  want  greater  insistence  upon  those 
patient  methods,  honored  by  time's  approval, 
which  have  ever  and  will  ever  make  for  style  ?  " 

This  from  Claud  Fayette  Bragdon,  of  Roches- 
ter, N.  Y.  : 


"Our  contemporary  architecture,  in  so  far 
as  we  may  be  said  to  have  any,  shows  a  lack  of 
forethought,  and  a  poverty  of  the  creative  imagi- 
native faculty. 

"  What  are  Karnak,  the  Parthenon,  and 
Saint  Peter's,  Rome,  but  the  day  dreams  of  a 
nation  or  of  an  individual  built  in  stone  ?  If  we 
have  ceased  to  build  beautifully  it  is  simply  be- 
cause we  have  ceased  to  dream  beautiful  dreams." 

George  R.  Dean  (Chicago)  : 

"I  believe  in  evolution,  and  I  believe  that 
our  architecture  is  going  through  an  evolution. 
In  speaking  of  the  advancement  of  any  one  man, 
it  seems  to  me  we  have  just  as  much  right  to  use 
what  he  has  found  out  as  we  have  to  go  back  to 
ancient  times  and  use  what  they  found  out.  It 
seems  to  me  if  we  have  no  inspiration  of  our  own, 
if  we  will  take  our  inspiration  from  the  best 
things  done  at  the  present  time,  and  always  put 
what  little  mind  we  have  at  that  and  increase  it 
a  little,  then  the  next  man  will  take  that  and  in- 
crease it  a  little  more ;  you  will  soon  develop  a 
good  style. ' ' 

The  evening  was  spent  at  the  rooms  of  the 
Century  Club,  situated  on  the  fifteenth  floor  of  the 
New  England  Building,  where  a  reception  and  ban- 
quet was  tendered  the  delegates.  Mr.  Herbert  B. 
Briggs,  of  Cleveland,  acted  as  toastmaster,  and 
called  for  the  following  toasts  :  "  Welcome,"  by 
Mr.  Benjamin  S.  Hubbell,  of  Cleveland,  re- 
sponse being  made  by  the  new  president ;  ' '  What 
We  Gain  by  Concerted  Movement,"  Mr.  William 
B.  Ittner,  of  St.  Louis;  "Reciprocity  between 
Architectural  Clubs  and  Architectural  Publica- 
tions," Mr.  Irving  T.  Guild,  of  Boston  ;  "The 
Architectural  School  from  an  Architect's  Stand- 
point," Mr.  George  R.  Dean,  of  Chicago. 

Such  is  a  brief  summary  of  the  events  of  the 
Cleveland  Convention.  It  conveys  only  a  partial 
impression  of  the  deep-rooted  principles  that 
made  this  body  of  men  unite  and  decide  to  con- 
tinue as  a  united  body.  When  the  Convention 
was  called,  little  expectation  existed  of  the  archi- 
tects and  draughtsmen  there  gathered  ever  form- 
ing themselves  into  the  Architectural  League  of 
America.  But  so  many  wrongs  were  discovered 
that  needed  righting  and  so  many  opportunities 
were  offered  to  establish  the  right  before  the 
wrong  crept  in,  that  the  Convention  took  "the 
flood  of  destinies  "  at  its  ebb.  The  Architectural 
League  of  America  is  now  a  national  organiza- 
tion, with  a  definite  purpose.  The  energy  and 
vigor  that  characterized  the  Cleveland  Conven- 
tion will  exist  in  just  as  large  a  measure  at  the 
Chicago  Convention,  and  will  keep  alive  the 
spirit  of  the  organization  through  future  years. 


^iteon^rejr 


IfrpHuorR 


&U  'JWt  reA^ortoiHiitti  w 


T 


*HIS  is  written  of 
the  work  of  a  man 
yet  young  who, 
although  a  Philadelphian  by  descent,  was  born  in 
Florence  and  passed  his  boyhood  there.  The  sug- 
gestions of  her  past  greatness  seem  to  have 
infused  in  him  a  romanticism  of  her  own,  for  he 
looks  at  manjr  things  in  the  old  way  ;  he  is  a  poet, 
a  dreamer  of  dreams,  quoting  forgotten  ballads 
and  quaint  madrigals.  Devoted  to  the  fine  arts, 
his  recreation  is  in  sketching  and  painting,  and 
his  leisure  given  to  reading  and  the  company  of 
artists.  He  is  a  polished  Bohemian,  a  man  of  the 
world  ;  a  charming  after-dinner  companion  who 
can  sing  Italian  opera  or  describe  the  quiet  life 
with  an  exquisite  charm.  In  his  manner  he  is 
thoughtful  and  reserved,  and  really  known  only  to 
his  intimates,  though  there  is  a  personal  magnet- 
ism about  him,  so  that  those  who  work  under  him 
are  ever  loyal  to  him.  He  is  a  willing  critic  and 
has  influenced,  unawares,  the  group  of  architects 
who  are  his  contemporaries.  These  are  the  men 
who  founded  the  T-Square  Club  some  fifteen  years 
ago  for  the  betterment  of  local  architecture,  and  in 
influence  and  in  interest  he  was  not  the  least 
among  them.  To  enter  into  the  spirit  of  his  work 
it  is  necessary  to  go  back  to  the  times  when 
such  a  thing  as  Art  was  unheard  of  in  the  sense 
in  which  we  use  it. 

In  the  years  long  gone  by,  when  the  Dark 
Ages  were  slowly  yielding  to  the  influence  of 
the  medieval  learning,  when  men  were  still  sim- 
ple-minded and  open  in  the  expression  of  what 
they  felt,  there  existed  certain  priories  and  abbeys 
where,  sheltered  from  the  world  without,  men 
passed  their  lives  in  peaceful  reveries,  uplifted  by 
the  majesty  and  beauty  of  what  their  predeces- 
sors had  left  them.  The  dignity  of  the  cloisters 
and  cathedral  churches  breathed  into  their  uncon- 


scious minds  the  instinct 
of  knowing  what  is  good 
and  right  in  art ;  the  in- 
stinct whose  rare  manifestation  to-day  is  called 
"taste,"  or,  by  the  painters,  "sympathy"  and 
"feeling."  It  is  not  knowledge,  but,  being  in- 
tuitive, it  is  deeper  than  knowledge ;  guiding  in 
unfamiliar  and  untrodden  fields  of  work,  where 
knowledge,  which  is  akin  to  remembrance  and 
made  up  of  learning  and  experience,  must  fail. 
The  instinct  is  creative  and  imaginative  ;  it  leads 
as  surely  in  great  things  as  in  little,  and  in  little 
things  as  in  great ;  without  it  nothing  noble  and 
lasting  can  be  conceived,  and  with  its  guidance 
anything  made,  be  it  high  or  humble,  is  beautiful 
and  fitted  to  its  purpose. 

So  when  these  men  worked  together  in  the 
shade  of  the  cloisters,  their  illuminations  and 
their  lettering  were  naturally  beautiful,  for  they 
did  merely  as  suggested  by  this  imagining  in- 
stinct, which  in  its  nature  was  good  and  could 
not  be  wrong.  In  all  their  work  they  were  led 
by  it  in  trivial  things,  such  as  the  shaping  of 
their  cowls  ;  but  perhaps  it  was  shown  greatest  of 
all  when,  under  the  lead  of  some  building  bishop 
or  prior,  they  put  aside  their  vellum  to  work  in 
graystone.  They  did  their  best,  and  their  work 
lives  to-day  to  the  wonder  and  the  shame  of  men 
who  study  it  long  and  earnestly,  then  go  hope- 
lessly away  knowing  that,  though  all  knowledge 
be  theirs,  still  something  is  lacking,  and  this  is 
the  instinct. 

In  these  days  of  business  distractions  and 
mercenary  surroundings  it  is  a  rare  gift  and  dif- 
ficult to  develop  even  though  one  be  born  with  it, 
for  lack  of  beauty  starves  it  and  hideous  things 
are  agonizing  to  it.  The  unworthy  around  must 
be  forgotten  and  the  good  only  studied.  The 
difficulties  of   this    are    evident.     Architectural 


V 


WILSON    EYRE,    JR. 


124 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


ml 


Sfe 


learning  may  be  attained 
and  it  exists  in  plenty, 
but  a  scholar,  after  all, 
is  nothing  more  than  a 
skilful  copyist.     He  may 
know  all  the  conventions 
and  may  be  so  ingenious 
that  he  can  answer  archi- 
tectural problems  never 
before  heard  of;  he  may 
be  original  and  know  the 
power  of  combinations, 
but  unless  the    instinct 
guide  him   his   work  is 
dry  and  lifeless.     Doubt- 
less scholarship  prevents 
him  from    doing  things 
unsuited   to    their    use, 
and,  moreover,  his  work 
"  may  be  dignified,  coher- 
i     ent    and    organic,     and 


ill' 


may  uc  >ai&"— — >  ■ 

ent    and    organic,     and  admire  and  praiSe  it; 

may  candidly  express  its  P^^^^fessed  even  to  himself,  his 
but  at  the  same  time  deep  wrinn him,  ^  ^^  of  architecture, 

soul  aches,  for  sue h  work  is     sp  ritrng-  ^  ^  the  imagi- 

of  much  use  in  its  place,  for  its  firmness  a  ^  ^  sdf.sufficien  , 

TZ^^^^^^  ^  needless,  and  this  charlatan, 
•*£:££  f  &  and  ithas  ^any  decree,  th^an^  shall  the 
spirit  of  a  library  be  expressed     to^j  ^   ^  ^.^ 

hPall,    a  school   and  the  like  untd  the  ™£  architecture  must  dis- 

Restrained  by  these  set  rules   fresh  and  SP°  and  tiresome,  will 

appear  and  a  self-laudatory  «^™^£™nt  EngHsh  Palladianism  in 
replace  it  as  self-satisfied  as  the  driest  de  ^  ^  they 

"the  Grand  Manner,"  whose^deS^S  and  posterity  that  architecture  was 
were  enabled  "to  convince      ^  £f  ^  in  the  eighteenth 

brought  to  as  great  a  point  of  P^  ™  *  *  and  Romans,> 

eentury  as  ever  it  was  known  to  be  among _  and  accordi  gly  lts 

So  at  this  time  the  guid *gjnst£c  -t    and  freedom  there  is  pro- 

I    presence  should  be  acknowled ged      I o*b  P       Y  ^  and  wildness  on 

faction  against  the  rigidity  *^*%%£  buildings  of  the  past  are  inspir- 
!!    the  other,  for  its  example  is  m spinng  a  >**  £  ^  {nQnenceA  by  an 

1     ing.     Therefore  here  is  reproduced  thewji  problems  of 

bJtinct  such  as  actuated  the  men  ^^J  ^  ^  M   , 

S    the  present.     It  is  *«  **/^ ' \  differs  from  the  general  work  of 
purity  to  the  work  of  Wilson  **«■  nality  and  character.     The 

?o-day  in  that  it  is  a  distinct  expre  sion  of  a person tj    ^  ^^  to  ^ 
science  of  design  is  quite  fs«b^na^uXut  it  there  is  a  rare  refinement 
i     detriment  of  his  work  ;  but  «stead   thro^gbou t  ^  ^.^  every. 

I     and  ingenuous  "^^J^    owTtohts  ornament,  his  sketches,  his 
;!  I    thing  from  his  greatest  ar ^tecture  dovm  to  arrangement  and  the 

lettering,  the  borders  of  his  drawing^  and  e       ^  ^  ^  ^  .^.^  for 
placing  of  their  titles  on  the :  paper,      l  everything  without  exception 

if  it  be  in  a  man's  nature  it  must  show  y  ^  .f  it 

down  to  the  least  unimportant  deta L     Kcan  ^  ^  ^      The  full 

at  all  it  must  be  part  of  a  man  himse f'  ^c      g  and  he  is  conscious  of 

F£^^%^^ of  himself  when  he  save * 


*££» 


•    .'ft  if 


1  If^jjiSjiMj 


*t-  *•' 


MB 

■•'■?tr~- 


I    t-    ir  -  H 


is***? 


•^  ^ 

,..-:l  .*/ 


DRAWN  FROM  IMAGINATION 


DRAWN  FROM  NATURE 

SKETCHES    IN    PHILADELPHIA    AND    PISA 


126 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


to  a  client,  for  it  is  beyond  most  men's  comprehension  and  he  is  duly  appreciated 
by  few  but  the  architects  themselves.  His  aspiration  is  not  to  make  a  stir  in  the 
world,  but  to  do  what  he  does  worthily.  Recently  a  Western  exhibition  committee 
wrote  to  him,  asking  if  he  would  send  them  "  some  of  his  most  important  work." 
He  replied  that  to  him  important  work  was  "  artistic  work  ;  "  but  their  idea  of  it 
was   "  large  work,"  and  he  had  none  to  send  them  at  the  time. 

Everything  pertaining  to  his  buildings  is  well  considered  and  studied,  for,  besides 
all  of  his  preliminary  sketches  for  the  working  drawings,  most  of  his  decorative 
detail  is  made  personally  and  not  through  draughtsmen.  It  is  rather  the  intrinsic 
interest  of  a  thing  that  appeals  to  him  and  not  so  much  its  consequence.  Notice 
these  two  panels  and  his  drawings  for  leaded  glass.  In  their  originality  they  show 
his  interest  in  what  he  did  and  also  the  power  of  his  doing.  It  seems  a  sacrilege  to 
turn  them  over  to  the  interpretation  of  a  tradesman  ;  but  the  finished  work  retains 
somewhat  of  the  original  spirit,  so  the  care  is  not  altogether  in  vain.  He  works 
as  the  old  painters  worked  who  found  it  not  beneath  them  to  make  woodcuts  or 
hammer  metal  ornaments.  Notwithstanding  the  ease  with  which  these  details  are 
drawn,  there  is  concentrated  thought  in  the  designing,  but  the  thought  is  led  by 
the  intuition  and  not  by  the  reason. 

The  preliminary  sketches  of  his  buildings  show  his  deepest  thought.  Though 
the  drawings  themselves  are  so  hastily  made,  they  represent  tracing  after  tracing 
through  hours  spent  in  study  of  the  architectural  composition.  He  is  a  believer  in 
thorough  study  and  urges  it  as  one  of  the  requisites  of  all  good  things,  scorning  the 
happy-go-lucky  even  in  "picturesque"  architecture,  as  the  following  quotation 
shows.     In'an  article  on  a  recent  sketching  trip  through  England,  referring  to  their 

"long  rambling  farmhouses 
and  country  houses  of  the 
modest  kind,"  he  writes: 
' '  There  is  much  to  be  gained 
froni  studying  these  for  use  in 
our  own  domestic  architecture. 
Their  average  work  is  so  much 
less  pretentious,  so  much  more 
homelike  than  ours  ;  their  sur- 
roundings are  studied  so  care- 
fully, the  garden  forming  as 
much  a  part  of  the  house  as 
the  roof,  and  great  pains  being 
taken  that  the  garden-wall 
hedges,  terraces,  the  little  tea 
houses,  in  fact,  all  the  immedi- 
ate surroundings  should  form 
a  harmonious  effect."  And 
later  he  writes  of  the  "com- 
pleteness and  fitness  of  the 
country  houses  and  the  farm- 
houses and  of  their  surround- 
ings, their  'flocks  of  gables,' 
the  grouping  and  composition 
which  through  the  most  care- 
ful study  arrives  at  the  entire- 
ly unstudied  and  haphazard 
effect." 

Again,  he  mentions  "the 
impression  produced  that  the 
building  belongs  to  the  spot 
upon  which  it  is  built  and 
to  no  other.  This  is  what 
makes   the    English    domestic 


Mi?€ 


>- 

Q 
D 

H 

>- 

< 


< 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 




129 


work  better,  to  my  mind,  than  any  I  have  seen." 
That  suggests  something  in  his  own  work  per- 
haps most  admirable  of  all  its  qualities.  His 
buildings  fit  their  particular  places  as  if  they 
had  been  there  from  the  beginning.  The  earth 
seems  to  acknowledge  their  presence  in  little 
formal  gardens  fitted  with  shrubbery  and  straight 
walks,  and  in  groups  of  trees  protecting  them 
from  the  north  wind.  As  Wilson  Eyre  designs 
he  is  in  imagination  out  in  the  open  air  and 
where  the  building  is  to  be  as  truly  as  the  old 
monkish  and  Gothic  builders  stood  by  their  own 
cathedrals.  The  place  inspires  him  as  theirs  did 
them,  and  for  this  reason  his  work  is  spontaneous 
and  delightful  to  see.  The  little  sketchings  of 
men,  of  trees,  grass  or  birds,  or  of  distant  hills 
show  the  whereabouts  of  his  thoughts,  and  by 
these  little  notes  he  keeps  his  mind  intent  upon 
the  surroundings  of  his  future  work.  What  at 
first  glance  may  seem  irrelevant  is  really  the 
evidence  of  his  strong  sympathy  for  the  locality. 


These  sketchings  are  on  the  earliest  pre- 
liminaty  scribbles.  They  set  a  key  for  his 
thoughts  and  his  design  is  planned  in  harmony. 
The  drawings  are  records  of  these  thoughts 
and  they  show  the  spirit  of  the  future  building. 
Notice  how  one  house  fits  with  the  long  hori- 
zontal lines  of  the  sea  and  the  sand ;  how 
another  is  as  distinctly  in  keeping  with  the  rocks 
and  the  deep  pine  woods  about  it.  Then  notice 
the  old  man,  long-robed  and  bent,  in  the  garden 
by  the  hospital.  His  figure  typifies  the  calm  and 
quiet  dignity  of  the  hospital  itself.  There  is  no 
wonder  that  the  surroundings  and  the  figures 
shown  are  relevant  ;  for  the  buildings  are  more 
drawn  from  them  than  they  are  from  the  build- 
ings. 

These  keynotes  are  not  given  up  until  the 
very  last.  The  working  drawings  were  traced 
from  those  of  the  panelled  interiors  ;  only,  of 
course,  the  draughtsman  omitted  the  woman  by 
the  mantel,  the  maid  in    the   doorway  and   the 


130 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


vases  and  jugs  about ;  the  specifications  and 
future  directions  took  care  of  the  paint  and  the 
wall-paper.  Often  he  goes  thoroughly  into 
these  details,  even  to  determining  the  exact  posi- 
tion, size  and  color  of  the  vases  on  the  mantels 
or  bookcases,  and  somehow  the  owners  place 
them  as  he  directs,  and  keep  them  there. 

As  has  been  said,  the  preliminary  sketches 
here  published  are  records  of  his  study  on  the 
problems.     They  are  typical  of  his  usual  work, 


None  of  these  are  accessories.  They  were  studied 
together  from  the  beginning,  and  are  part  of  the 
scheme  itself. 

Such  a  way  of  working  makes  possible  in  his 
buildings  their  soft  color  in  harmony  with  their 
surroundings,  and  their  contrasts  of  texture  ;  in 
these  two  qualities  lies  much  of  the  charm  of  his 
work.  His  color  is  almost  invariably  good.  It 
is  useless  to  say  much  on  this  subject,  of  such 
primary  and  nevertheless  unrecognized  import- 
ance in  architecture,  for  colors  are  impossible  to 
describe  and  unfortunately  reproductions  cannot 
show  them.  Suffice  it  to  say  that  his  preference 
is  rather  for  depth  and  quietness  than  for  brilliant 
contrasts.  External  painted  color- decoration  he 
rarely  uses,  but  an  exception,  and  a  successful 
one,  is  the  Turkish  Baths  building  on  Walnut 
Street,  where  the  pinky-brown  sandstone  is 
touched    with    gilding,    echoed    in    the    gilded 


not  so  much  show  drawings  for  others  as  they 
are  for  his  own  guidance  in  making  the  working 
drawings.  Besides  the  architecture  of  the  build- 
ings, see  how  much  is  shown  in  these  sketches  for 
country  houses  in  the  following  pages;  the  paths 
and  terraces,  the  distribution  and  massing  of  the 
foliage,  the  walls  and  gateways,  with  their 
accents  ;  the  materials  of  construction,  with  their 
colors  and  their  textures  in  contrast  with  those 
of"  the  grass  and  foliage  and  the  depth  of  the  air. 


"Bvildh'tigfor 


132 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


window-frames.  As  to  his  textures,  though^he 
uses  every-day  materials,  his  range  seems  bound- 
less, for  he  widens  his  brick -joints  as  he  pleases, 
(as  in  the  Borie  Bank),  he  uses  moulded  bricks 
projecting  in  little  points  (as  in  the  band  under 
the  cornice  of  the  hospital),  or  with  ends  moulded 
into  little  checker  squares  ;  bricks  laid  diagonally 
or  in  diapers  and  different  patterns ;  shingles  in 


various  shapes  and  laid  in  various  manners  (as 
in  the  little  chicken-house  below),  or  two  and 
three  deep  with  butts  together  to  give  great  pro- 
jection and  in  this  way  roughness  (as  in  the 
house  in  the  woods),  and  many  other  combina- 
tions and  arrangements,  so  that  with  the  simplest 
materials  he  can  produce  the  effect  of  texture  he 
wishes.  Limestone  gives  him  many,  as  in  his 
peculiar  rustications  or  in  the  light  and  shade  of 
his  broad  carved  ribbons.  As  every  drawing 
shows,  texture  has  an  absorbing  interest  for  him. 
It  is  difficult  to  write  of  the  architectural 
"  style  "  of  his  buildings,  for  they  are  so  strong  a 
reflection  of  his  personality  that  their  resem- 
blance to  any  historic  style  is  quite  secondary. 
At  times  the  influence  of  the  early  Tuscan  and 
Lombard  can  be  detected  ;  sometimes  the  roof- 
composition  of  the  Normandy  farmhouses  ;  but 
principally,  and  especially  in  his  later  domestic 
work,   the  English  Renaissance  is  most  promi- 


.     •-,      K 


IW- 


1  . 


5  'H^ 


y-     -^^  ^^ 


sm 


■ 

I 


J 


SIX      • 
if  A.JDrexel 

B 

(■/■(ton  TTyri 


HOUSE    AND    STABLE    AT    LANSDOWNE,    PA. 


136 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


■A 


1 VC  C  ttsrwrtJ^  >&i&-S~oeter( 


nent,  still  with  an  Italian  character  in  the  decora- 
tions. His  buildings  show  everywhere  his  ideal- 
ism and  his  innate  gentility  and  refinement  and 
his  unerring  instinct  in  matters  of  art.  Some- 
times there  is  a  deep  melancholy  about  them,  but 
never  an  approach  to  coarseness  or  vulgarity. 
However,  it  must  be  acknowledged  that  his  work 
is  not  always  practical  and  suited  to  its  uses,  and 
sometimes  it  seems  rather  affected  ;  for  instance, 
in  his  occasional  use  of  half- timber  or  in  his 
terminating  a  city  facade  with  a  wooden  Italian 
cornice  or  a  steep  gable  when  there  is  of  necessity 
a  flat  roof  behind  it.  Then  at  times  it  seems 
medieval  and  altogether   anachronistic  and  inex- 


5Kdcl)o0jfroDf 

for 

yVlRTVlAxJjLYy 

?oS).Drortd5f. 
pbHrt 


ALTERNATIVE    PRELIMINARY    SKETCHES 


ALTERATION    TO    AN    OLD    HOUSE 


.38 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


pressive  of  the  age — a  modern  coat  and  hat  seem 
quite  out  of  place  nearby.  These  faults,  though, 
are  confined  almost  entirely  to  his  earlier 
buildings.  His  work  naturally  classifies  itself 
into  two  divisions— the  early,  from  the  beginning 
of  his  practice  in  1880  until  about  eight  or  ten 
years  ago,  and  the  later,  from  that  time  until 
now.  The  late  work  is  broader,  richer,  mel- 
lower ;  it  has  a  simplicity,  a  boldness  and  a  vigor 
which  the  earlier  lacks.  This  is,  on  the  contrary, 
more  delicate — sometimes  even  finical  and  effemi- 
nate with  all  its  grace  and  purity  ;  an  architec- 
ture of  fine  cut  limestone  mouldings,  of  brown 
pressed  brick  and  exquisite  terra-cotta  modelling  ; 
of  pebble-dash  and  occasional  plaster  decoration  ; 
of  quaint  doorways  and  tiny  oriels. 

This  early  work  was  undeniably  beautiful, 
but  it  was  prone  to  two  faults  ;  it  was  apt  to  be 
unsubstantial  and  absurdly  small  in  scale.  A 
certain  one  of  these  early  houses,  which  was 
situated  on  a  narrow  city  lot  in  Philadelphia, 
and  which  had  two  little  oriels  on  the  second 
story,  served  as  a  mark  for  the  good-humored 
ridicule  of  a  magazine  writer.  He  represented 
Pater  Familias  contentedly  seated  in  his  arm- 
chair, smoking  and  reading  his  Sunday  paper, 
while  one  of  his  feet  rested  comfortably  on  the 


sill  of  each  of  the  oriels  !  This  was  no  exagger- 
ation as  to  scale,  and  it  was  partly  the  diminu- 
tiveness  which  left  his  early  work  open  to  criti- 
cisms of  affectation  and  artificiality.  In  the  same 
house,  between  the  aforesaid  oriels,  was  a  certain 
plaster  bambino.  He  was  evidently  discontented 
with  his  position  in  life,  for  he  would  periodically 
come  tumbling  out  of  it,  not  all  at  once,  but  by  in- 
stallments, an  arm  or  leg  at  a  time,  to  the  utter 
dismay  and  astonishment  of  honest  folk  passing 
beneath.  The  remaining  parts  of  him  were 
pathetic,  but  the  owners  did  not  look  at  it  that 
way.  It  became  a  standing  joke  about  the  house  ; 
but  finally  the  bambino  must  have  been  gathered 
to  his  fathers,  for  now  only  a  fragment  of  ribbon 
and  a  scar  on  the  wall  remain  to  tell  the  tale. 
However,  these  are  but  the  shortcomings  of 
his  early  work,  and  they  give  an  unfair  idea  of  it. 
In  reality  its  better  qualities  had  a  strong  influ- 
ence on  the  local  architecture  of  the  time  in  the 
direction  of  refinement  and  careful  and  sparing 
use  of  ornament.  Its  tendency  was  towards 
rather  pictorial  composition  and  its  general  effect 
is  of  irregularity  and  sudden  variation,  but  with 
a  perfect  placing  and  proportion  of  the  parts  so 
that  there  is  a  quiet  and  restfulness  through  it 
all.  There  is  a  certain  Gothic  character  in  the 
contrast  of  the  broad,  simple  wall-spaces  to  the 
concentration  of  the  carving.  Taken  as  a  whole, 
it  shows  the  strength  and  clearness  of  his  instinct  ; 
for  despising  every  convention  and  trusting  to  his 
own  originality,  he  produced  work  which  was  dis- 
tinctly good  and  successful  in  the  main.  The 
schemes  of  some  of  his  compositions  seem  irra- 
tional, yet,  when  built,  they  are  not  discordant. 
In  the  twin  doorways  notice  the  great  square 
windows  coming  so  close  to  the  pointed  arches, 
yet  not  unpleasantly,  despite  their  size.  Then 
notice  the  other  doorway  on  the  same  street  ; 
there  are  several  totally  different  elements,  yet 
without  confusion.  In  the  Turkish  Baths  door-' 
way  he  has  deliberately  piled  one  arch  above 
another,  and,  throughout  all  of  his  old  work, 
there  exist  these  strange  freaks,   although  they 


ENTRANCE    TO    THE    HARRISON    PAINT    WORKS 


LOWER    STORY    OF    A    CITY    HOUSE 


FULL-SIZE    DETAIL    DRAWINGS 


n 


M 


■ 


DESIGN    FOR    A    PIANO    AND    FULL-SIZE    DETAIL    DRAWINGS    FOR    THE    MASK    AND 

WIG    CLUB 


f^— 


ki;tc  f  e 


T 


,  o>< 


J*hJ.   -  ^°77rrzE/YTTi  9r. 

"Phi  la. 

\  \  1 1  sum   r  .  Y"R  E.  J"FV 


I  i 


m 


ffS 


' 


is*      'f     $ 


GO 

O 

J 

2 

111 

Q 

£ 

h 

iTl 

< 

CC 

l/l 

III 

u 

Q 

>- 

tti 

£ 

' 

< 
2 

Ul 

—■ 

Iil 

S 

y, 

_l 

o 

|T| 

J 

QJ 

£ 

cu 


J 


u 


m 


Q 

UJ 

H 

=»      Hi 

O    v. 
UJ     >- 

X    w 
uj    5 


UJ 

X 

H 


46 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


ftps 


'§Bt 


■■■! 


are  so    refined  that    their   capriciousness  is  for- 
gotten. 

Now  this  early  work  is  of  most  interest,  not 
for  itself  alone,  but  because  it  made  possible  the 
greater  work  which  was  to  follow.  In  the  early, 
he  developed  and  learned  to  trust  his  instinctive 
judgment,  so  in  his  later,  broader  years,  he  might 
take  what  he  wished  from  the  classics  and  yet 
was  free  to  overthrow  precedent  when  it  tempted 
him  to  do  otherwise  than  he  desired.  Through 
his  experiments  he  had  seen  the  true  inwardness 
of  styles,  and  why  things  harmonized  and  went 
together,  so  he  was  unrestrained  by  their  historic 
limitations  and  could  combine  them  and  do  with 
them  what  seemed  to  him  fitting.  Notice,  in  the 
following  garden  houses,  how  Jacobean  gables  and 
Pompeiian  columns  are  combined,  and  Italian  gate- 


ways, and  yet  how  they  are  all  in  harmony  with 
each  other  and  not  discordant  with  the  modern 
glass  greenhouses.  Then  this  interior  ;  it  seems 
at  first  as  Georgian  or  Colonial,  but  such  an  en- 
tablature was  simple  and  dignified,  and  the  un- 
usualness  is  forgotten.  As  an  example  of  his 
unrestraint    in    composition,    look  at   the  long, 


. 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


narrow  window  in  the  front  of  the  Borie  Bank. 
Precedent  and  training  would  say  it  were  entirely 
unsuited  to  the  place  and  would  clash  violently 
with  the  windows  at  the  side  ;  but  somehow  it 
seems  right  as  it  is.  This  freedom  is  inspiriting, 
and  shows  that  architecture  is  not  a  dead  art 
after  all  ;  that  without  affectation  a  man  can 
give  to  what  he  does  his  personality,  so  that  the 
same  spirit  is  throughout  his  work,  and  it  is 
different  from  that  done  in  past  times. 

The  buildings  with  which  Wilson  Eyre  is 
perhaps  the  most  successful,  and  those  with  which 
his  name  is  everywhere  associated,  are  his 
country  houses.  They  are  long  and  rather  low, 
sometimes  with  the  simplicity  of  our  own   old 


Pennsylvania  farmhouses,  or  the  first  of  New 
England,  but  generally  with  an  English  charac- 
ter, after  all,  not  far  different.  In  planning  they 
are  interesting  in  the  way  they  are  adapted  to 
their  sites  and  to  the  compositions  desired,  and 
in  their  freedom  from  undue  conventionality. 
Axes  are  never  forced,  but  considered  only  where 
they  occur  naturally  ;  on  the  other  hand,  his 
plans  are  seldom  confused,  and  in  his  later  work 
particularly  have  a  certain  symmetry  and  balance 
quite  their  own.  Both  the  main  part  and  the 
wings  are  narrow,  and  so  open  to  the  air  and  sun- 
shine, for  the  square,  compact  type  of  house  he 


/   ^fisi^^ 

'  *         S*^^^ 

^ '  •  BFA 

niffli^ 

nir^H 

SSg      ,.-  H 

Hsa-:;i v  -W" 

Efff-  "  -   :  -    I^H 

slPiil^pwg*g^'1'*tr*ffll 

SJjj^.--               .^^p^ji 

BlBbtt»^._ 

<       K     '            •                                 ',--''           "          l 

Q 

UJ 

D 

Q 

H 

H 

CO 

W 

M 

>~ 

UJ 

£ 

U 

< 

IY 

z 

s 

J 

iii 

a: 

2 

O 

Du 

< 


I 


zr    .*»    — 


^     3 


4 


:     1  > 


W 


2 

Q 

< 

o 

w 

q    . 

CO    u 

CjJ  H 
>    W 

a:  a 

Q 
<      W- 

u  £ 
CO    w 

D  z 
O  ° 
X    d 

CC 
H 
Z 
D 
O 
U 


-■  v    -     o 


EXTERIOR    AND    INTERIOR    OF    THE    BORIE    BANK,    PHILADELPHIA 


H 
O 

Q 


W 


H    w 
>- 

Q     « 

<    w 

-J 

Ul    ? 

CO 
D 

O 
X 


1)  \ 

I     ,  "         Tjowsc  •  Gfrovncta 

-i     '    /i  al'MR-'ChLMULES:]  '  BOR1E 

\$|i5s  [enVjitttown-pVyil 


\\  llSOl  I    K\Ti'  |i ■• 

•  ,"\»?ri  IITECT: 

•  927  C  I  ies1  urt  Street* 

•  piiiladetnUioc 


A   PERSPECTIVE    EFFECT   PROJECTED    FROM   AN   ORDINARY   PLAN 


< 
> 

to 


O     H 
O 

W 

H 


H 

a:  < 

>     h 

—     < 

2    o 

w 


< 

CO 
O 

w 
o 

IT) 

o 


a: 

w 

x 

H 

Du 
O 

2 

O 

H 
O 
UJ 

en 

(- 

CO 

a: 


CO    " 


u 
z 

< 

DC 
H 
Z 

a 
cc 

D 
O 

°    S 

X 

CL 

UJ 
Q 
< 

X 
CL 

H 
< 

Q 


UJ 
O 
2 

UJ 

o 

w 

O 


D 
UJ 
CO 
D 


UJ 
UJ    ^ 

o  a: 

H 
2 

W 


Wes/  Side  PJc/y  E 


Yitt  Mu5tvhf  of  Science  and  Art 


136 


T^ttrtH  ftj</cj    Oat^    L     Sr 


Shcet  Ao  133 

Toll  Jii.e  o-fS/tee-t  /io-  J-?<J~ 


REDUCED    FROM    A    FULL-SIZE    DETAIL    DRAWING 
BY    WILSON    EYRE,    JR. 


V 


/-M 


lUowv- 


o 


H 


*    nr 

**.$&1, 


-**> 


V 

1 

m 

is 

Dd 

rvi 

i 

-) 

. 

'  I 

2 

>- 

"' 

t£ 

w 

H 

2 

[L, 

O 
CO 

2 

£ 

O 

>- 

•     •  , 

o 

OQ 

' 

i 

Q 
III 

o 

Z 

' 

z 

o 

V) 

•"" 

2 

Q 

lead 


Q 


If) 

a: 

o 

cc 

ir 

UJ 

-) 

H 

z 

IK 

*~ ' 

>- 

tu 

o 

7 

£ 

O 

H 

_1 

f% 

Pi 
O 

>■ 

m 

u_ 

z. 

* 

Ul 

< 

III 

tx 

1 — 1 

a 

u 

D 

H 

C/) 

I?     V 


■ 


SKETCH    OF    THE    INTERIOR    OF    A    COUNTRY    HOUSE 
AT    JENKINTOWN,    PA. 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


rather  avoids.  The  entrance  and  garden  fronts 
are  never  intruded  upon  by  the  kitchen  wing  and 
offices.  As  to  the  porches,  their  management  is 
often  quite  original  ;  for  instance,  in  the  house 
on  Long  Island,  a  narrow  porch  projects  far  out 
from  the  end  of  the  building  along  the  sea,  so 
that  the  summer  winds  can  blow  through  it  un- 
hindered. 


In  the  external  composition  the  roofs  are  of 
great  importance,  and  their  character  largely 
gives  the  individuality  to  his  houses.  In  his  later 
work  the  roof  is  generally  gabled,  and  as  far 
as  practicable  kept  unbroken  by  dormers.  The 
long  roof  over  the  main  part  always  predominates 
over  the  lower  roofs  of  the  wings  which  butt 
against  it  somewhere  below  the  ridge,  for  he  has 
a  theory  that  two  ridges  should  never  intersect 
on  the  same  level.  The  roofs  of  the  porches, 
lean-tos  and  outbuildings  (and  there  are  many  of 
them)  are  relied  upon  to  lead  the  attention  un- 
consciously down  from  the  higher  roofs  to  the 
terraces  and  gardens,  and  perhaps  therein  lies 
much  of  the  homeliness  and  peace  of  his  compo- 
sitions. Then  something  of  the  quiet  seems  in 
the  windows  placed  far  apart,  leaving  broad  wall- 
space  between.  He  reasons  that  this  is  quite 
practical,  for  since  heavy  curtains  are  generally 
used,  if  there  are  many  windows,  fewer  windows 
without  them  are  just  as  serviceable.  The  light 
and  air  are  as  free,  and  they  are  architecturally 
better.  It  is  characteristic  of  his  country  houses 
that  they  compose  well,  viewed  from  any  direction. 
There  is  no  false  straining  after  an  effect,  and 
they  honestly  express  what  they  are.  As  the 
roofs  are  simple  and  straightforward,  and  never 
falsified  with  decks,  they  would  even  stand  the 
test  of  being  seen  from  above — after  all,  a  true 
test  of  honest  composition,  but  unfortunately 
many  country  houses  could  not  undergo  it. 


163 
1 


r-    * 


His  gardens — for  his  study  does  not  stop  with 
the  house,  but  extends  to  the  terraces  and  gar- 
dens— like  most  of  his  country  houses,  have  a 
quaint  English  formalism,  not  overartificial,  and 
never  with  the  mechanical  formalism  of  the 
French  gardens,  for  which  he  has  a  contempt. 


•fe  /*?/ 


fad  Mvitvnof5otNct  and  A 

Hilj.r,   fur,  Jr.  ) 


Three  Me  lb,s 

Sheet Ao  \55 


These  reproductions  show  the  charm  of  their 
privacy  and  seclusion.  Some  time  ago,  writing 
of  gardening,  he  said:  "It  appears  as  if  the 
English  influence  were  gaining  ground  rapidly 
in  our  country  ;  and  it  seems  to  me  far  more 
suitable  than  the  Italian  influence,  which  is  too 
southern  in  its  nature  to  suit  either  our  national 
temperament  or  climate."  As  to  the  other  sur- 
roundings and  the  placing  of  the  house,  in  the 


164 


ARCHITECTURAL   ANNUAL 


114 


article  just  quoted,  he  said  :  "  We  are  approach- 
ing the  English  methods  every  day,  and  we  are 
not  as  anxious  to  see  and  be  seen  .  .  .  We 
are  beginning  to  feel  that  if  we  want  beauty  com- 
bined with  privacy  we  must  hedge  ourselves  to 
a  certain  extent  and  beautify  our  immediate 
surroundings.  Beyond  these,  again,  we  have 
glimpses  of  the  extended  view,  the  beauty  of 
which  is,  perhaps,  enhanced  by  not  being  quite 
so  evident.  Besides,  we  often  tire  of  an  extended 
view,  and  come  to  care  for  our  garden  more  and 
more  ;  this  latter  has  its  limit,  and,  with  its  high 
hedge  or  wall  surrounding  it,  gives  the  feeling  of 
protection  and  retirement." 


The  place  where  Wilson  Eyre  works  has  a 
character  of  its  own.  A  doorway  from  some 
Colonial  house  serves  as  the  entrance,  and  when 
it  is  passed  the  business  building  is  forgotten  in 
the  drawings  and  casts  and  photographs  about. 
His  office  is  not  large,  nor  does  he  wish  it  to  be 
so.  He  desires  to  have  only  as  much  work  as  he 
can  personally  design  and  study  over  to  his  satis- 
faction, for  he  regards  architecture  more  as  an  art 
than  as  a  money-making  business.  He  generally 
gives  the  work  his  own  superintendence,  often 
deciding  details  and  questions  of  color  during  the 
actual  building.  In  this  connection  there  are  a 
few  absurd  stories  told  of  him,  such  as  that  of 
painting  the  porch  columns  of  a  certain  country 
house.  This  story  is  doubtless  entirely  fiction  from 
beginning  to  end,  but  none  the  less  ludicrous  for 
that.     It  appears  that  one  morning  the  painter 


came  to  him  to  get  directions  for  the  color.  He 
was  told  to  use  his  own  judgment,  and  put  on 
different  shades,  which  he  considered  suitable, 
until  Wilson  Eyre  himself  could  come  out  and 
select  the  one  he  wished,  for  he  intended  to  come 
out  that  afternoon.  So  the  painter  departed.  In 
the  office  the  matter  was  overlooked  entirely,  and 
several  days  passed.  Meanwhile  the  painter  was 
doing  his  best.  Presently  a  letter  arrived  from 
the  horrified  owner  bearing  the  news  that  the 
eleven  columns  of  his  porch  were  now  eleven 
different  colors,  and  imploring  some  one  to  come 
out  and  choose  ! 

In  the  office,  five  or  six  draughtsmen  do  the 


\    .■*$£ 


mechanical  part  and  Wilson  Eyre  does  the  design- 
ing. For  instance,  they  block  out  in  red  ink  the 
floor  levels  of  a  proposed  building,  and  the  gen- 
eral outline  which  the  trial  plan  necessitates  ; 
then  they  tack  it  on  an  upright  board  or  a  flat 
table,  which  are  both  in  his  private  office,  and 
there  he  works  and  studies  over  it  with  charcoal 
and  brush  and  color,  rubbing  out  and  changing 
until  the  design  suits  him.  He  generally  studies 
a  building  in  perspective  also — perspectives  en- 
tirely drawn  by  eye,  for  he  has  the  faculty  of  getting 
his  drawing  directly  and  accurately  without  the 
need  of  mathematical^  located  vanishing  points. 
Finally,  when  he  is  satisfied  with  his  work,  he 
traces  it  or  transfers  it  to  another  sheet,  and  this 
is  the  drawing  we  see.  He  is  not  overparticular 
about  the  colors  he  uses.  "  Palette-dirt "  is  wel- 
comed and  he  is  indifferent  whether  the  water  in 


•- :  ■'■'.■-■  ■■'  J 


m 


■ 


•  -■ .  * 


j&ifr*  :il 


OPPOSITE    SIDES    OF    A    CHIMNEY    IN    A    RESIDENCE    AT    CHESTNUT    HILL,    PHILADELPHIA 


BASIN    IN    THE    MUSEUM    COURT 

LION'S    HEAD    MODELLED    BY   WILSON    EYRE,  JR. 


DESIGN    FOR    A    SEMI-SUBURBAN    HOUSE 

WILSON  EYRE,  JR.,  DES.  ET  DEL. 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


16^5 


his  old  beer  mug  is  clean  or  dirty  with  paint  ;  but 
somehow  his  drawings  are  seldom  muddy.  As  to 
color  permanence  in  his  renderings  or  sketches  he 
cares  not  at  all,  for  he  considers  them  only  tem- 
porary things.  The  building  itself  is  the  reality, 
and  the  drawing  merely  a  passing  memorandum 
of  what  it  is  or  will  be. 

Although  he  is  first  of  all  an  architect,  and 
architecture  his  real  life-work  "and  his  best 
achievements  there,  -still  he  is  widely  known  for 
these  renderings  and  sketches  and  imaginary 
compositions.  There  is  no  need  of  describing  his 
technique  in  pen-and-ink,  in  coute  crayon  and  in 
water-color,  for  it  is  well  known  and  he  who 
wishes  can  see  it  for  himself.  Suffice  it  to  point 
out  one  quality  in  all  his  drawings — his  restraint 
in  the  selection  of  what  to  show.  It  is  character- 
istic of  Wilson  Eyre  that  he  selects  only  the  few 
qualities  of  the  subject  wherein  is  the  chief  inter- 
est, and  rather  develops  and  idealizes  them,  see- 
ing them  in  his  own  peculiar  way.  His  sketch- 
ing is  to  some  purpose,  too,  for  the  characters 
that  he  admires  in  other  buildings — never  the 
details,  be  it  understood — find  their  way  into  his 
own. 


His  decorative  detail  he  designs  himself, 
often  modelling  it  also,  and  it  is  always  origi- 
nal. The  inlaid  marble  mosaics  of  the  Archaeo- 
logical Museum  are  his,  and  these  various  flat 
carvings  and  newel  figures  and  finials.  They 
are  the  actual  full-size  working  details.  Orna- 
mental detail  is  of  great  interest  to  him,  and 
he  intends  writing  on  the  subject.  Certainly 
no  one  understands  it  better.  In  these  repro- 
ductions the  Gothic  crispness  of  his  work  is 
evident,  and  throughout  it  shows  the  decora- 
tive construction  which  underlies  all  design  and 
is  a  striving  for  a  main  effect  and  a  subordination 
of  lesser  things  to  it.     It  is  interesting  to  try  to 


Free  Mvsevnfof Sozhce  and  Art 


Whan    Eyre  Jr_ 
Cope    CJJc^ttrtSsan 


^,/ec  Aj 


VV^J"  r    Sl\DE      B  t-  oG 


3HEET  /Vo  (£7 


REDUCED  FROM  A  FULL-SIZE  DETAIL  DRAWING  OF  THE  MARBLE  AND  BRICK  PATTERNS  IN  THE  WALLS  OF  THE  MUSEUM 

OF  SCIENCE  AND  ART 


"EAlTRAAJCr.  TO  10  J 

c?o  xz^  Street. 


1 


BEFORE    AND    AFTER 


-~5»s*i""'"         „.  ■- s^- 


B--5~"3»sTO  ..,32=—=- 


FRONT   ELEVATION   OF  THE  CITY  TRUST  BUILDING,  PHILADELPHIA 

WILSON  EYRE,  JR.,  DES.  ET  DEL. 


Sfc^v 


V- 


;■' e^t^  »*~ k-    ».    ' 


■ 


tefe;  i^> 


?  /       Jr 


r  / 


52!  #  te?i  #*ar&il»^'« 


<' 


— JfiPFr 

"- 


J 

w 

CO 

D 

O 

X 

H 

_1 

Z 

Q 

DJ 

H 

£ 

< 

Q 

Q- 

< 

a: 

Z 

a: 

< 

>- 

ui 

£ 

2 

o 

O 

w 

Ll 

J 

£ 

X 

o 

f- 

LxJ 

y 

CO 

■i  ■]  m 


IN    THE    MUSEUM    COURT 


PERSPECTIVE    STUDY    OF    A    FORMAL  'GARDEN 

WILSON  EYRE,  JR.,  DES.  ET  DEL, 


DESIGN    FOR    A    CITY    HOUSE 

WILSON  EYRE,  JR.,  DES.  ET  DEL, 


co 

H 

H 

UJ 

CO 

D 

X 

() 

< 

CO 

CO 

< 

Ui 

S 

uJ 

& 

2 

>- 

2 

,  1 

O 

< 

w 

H 

5 

(J- 

>- 

CO 

ra 

O 

2 

X 

£ 

< 

< 

Q 

cc 

o 

U, 

o 

CO 
Q 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


175 


analyze  this  in  the  drawings  here.  Notice  the 
reversed  "S"  in  the  finial  figures;  it  starts  in 
the  lion's  drooping  head  and  the  swing  of  its 
mane  and  follows  down  its  curled-up  tail,  ending 
in  the  curve  of  its  haunches  ;  at  the  same  time 
there  is  the  vertical  strength  which  its  architec- 
tural position  demands.  Somewhat  similar  in 
this  are  the  two  hooded  heads.  Then  see  the 
great  swinging  circle  of  the  dog  and  the  simple 
curves  of  the  stooping  figures  for  the  Mask  and 
Wig  Club  piano. 

This  swing  of  line  is  in  the  Academy  Cata- 
logue cover  and  in  this  advertising  page — more 
subtile,  but  there  nevertheless. 

Now  these  two  drawings  are  of  the  best  in 
black-and-white  decoration,  and  in  them  is  addi- 
tional proof  of  the  strong  instinctive  art  in  Wil- 
son Eyre's  nature,  through  which  his  work  is 
spontaneous  and  living,  never  repeating,  ever 
changing,    ever    developing,    and    ever    with    a 


\. 


'*> 


i 


C  _Si  i 


Jr. 


CO 

o 

2 

< 
OS 
Q 

►J 

< 

W 

Q 

W 
N 

CO    fc 

i     ~> 

1    w 

D    >- 

2 
«~      O 

O    d 
QL    £ 

Q 
td 
O 
D 
Q 
W 

a: 


T 


- 


AN    INTERIOR    ELEVATION 

WILSON  EYRE,  JR.,  DES.  ET  DEL. 


i& 


- 


PRELIMINARY    DESIGN    FOR    A    COMMERCIAL    BUILDING 

WILSON  EYRE,  JR.,  DES.  ET  DEL. 


PROPOSED    DESIGN    FOR    A    COTTAGE    AT    KINGSTON,    N.    Y. 

WILSON  EYRE,  JR.,  DES.  ET  DEL. 


SECTION  THROUGH  A  PROPOSED  ALTERATION  TO  THE  OLD  WILSTACH   MANSION,  PHILA. 

WILSON  EYRE.  JR  .  DES.   ET  DEL. 


West  5ide. 


SKETCHES   FOR  A  BAY  WINDOW   IN  A  CITY   HOUSE 

WILSON  EYRE,  JR.    DES.  ET  DEL.     ' 


111 


>ff 


i  'i 


DESIGN    FOR   A   CITY    HOUSE 

WILSON  EYRE,  JR..  DES.  ET  DEL. 


K 


/ 


•<-— v 


--.*& 


I 


£ 


hi 


*■ JjiK 


rr 


Pi  wmi  i"nnii)iuwun.jni 


-i 


H 


__H    ■!.'.  —  .■     *!.. 


'  fc.   ft 


Sbs 


3E  4 


DU 


en 


1 


A 


•.-»^WflWW 


TWO    INTERIOR    DESIGNS 

WILSON  EYRE,  JR. 


184 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


freshness  and  variety.  We  have  followed  it 
through  its  earlier  stages  and  its  late,  through 
its  greater  compositions  and  its  details,  through 
its  failures  and  successes  in  reaching  the  ideal 
of  architecture  ;  but,  no  matter  what  its  faults, 
it  is  never  commonplace  and  tamely  copying  of 
other  work,  but  it  trusts  in  its  instinctive  inner 
guidance.     Instinctive  art  is  progressive  ;  scien- 


tific art  is  decadent.     That  is  the  difference,  and 
all  praise  be  to  the  former. 

This  qualit}',  it  seems,  will  last  throughout 
his  work.  What  has  been  promises  greater 
things  in  the  future,  but,  after  all,  the  future  is 
unknown.  The  years  must  deal  gentty  with  his 
present  buildings,  mellowing  and  enriching  them 
with  age,  but  the  things  to  come  are  hidden. 


POSTER    DESIGNS    BY  WILSON    EYRE,  JR. 


BENJAMIN    FRANKLIN 

JOHN  J.  BOYLE,  SCULPTOR 


" PETER    STUYVESANT  " 
EXCHANGE    COURT    BUILDING,    BROADWAY,    NEW    YORK    CITY 

J.  MASSEY  RHIND.  SC. 


" HENRY    HUDSON " 
EXCHANGE    COURT    BUILDING,    BROADWAY,    NEW    YORK    CITY 

J.  MASSEY  RHIND.  SC. 


Q 


co 

o 

< 

2 

< 

< 
>- 
UJ 

Q 
< 


UJ 

X 

Qi 
O 

co 
2 

O 

lo 

UJ 
Q 


O    h 

<    x 


<  < 
>  o 

<  5 

z  s! 

CO  w 

■  z 

U) 


UJ 


f^    tn     (U    (U  T1     '^ 


"«03 

.as  oii 
5  u"^.  *j  a  o  rt  O. 

►* 'en  I**  O  H  ^  w  •*-• 

^  "^   ^rt  0*u  ~ 

;I« .£>£ •*-  £ ^_ 

■"  Ss-s£  .OS'S 
s^i    ;— •?  9.2U 

So  5  5P«  b'C  5 

a  »)  ?  513  .  <u  £ 

wK§2j5&j£ 

. 2  o 3  3  S  mo 
£  So-s-S^  a  m 
S2.<o«^2 
£C£&^.2" 

"S-sJUlS 

^^r^'3-si 

ofe  b  2  °  ?b.S; 
.2.*£g<,ga™ 

o  a  s  s  "O  tug 

■S  <i  2  §  io-s  a  v* 
2-  a  £•£  « 
S  "J  22  «■«    * 

«j5  u  2  °  C  S1" 
<-  2  ^  a  =  MJ=  >. 

«  a  r 


O  a  a  rt  o  cd^.r- 

rt|S.i^-2'2 
2;  £  .5  ■5  £  5  5 


5  ° 


'nited  States  -N/SwL^/vdf 


Pi  wW 


.X 


It    r  'v 

;4< = (■ 


" 

£ 


r;T     « 


+-H        r-f-;----rr:--;-f-T 


:  : 


? 


t-i. 

VJ-: 


bnnrnj-ron.  .J 


'  fea   * 

r*^       * 

;:."j  • 

"fc>H        | 

jTS 

l 

^V 

;  *sr  p 

^ 

M 


m 


00 

_1 
O 
IX 
< 
Z 

z 

< 

< 

UJ 
Q 

< 

< 


< 
> 


CO 


uj 

H 

U. 
O 

UJ 
> 

H 

o 

UJ 
CL 
CO 

a: 

UJ 

0- 

UJ 
>- 

UJ 

CO 

Q 

a: 

DC 

Q 
Z 
< 

z 
< 

a. 


4,  »V      CS  1    ^ 


-^SSs*^ 


0 


BIRD'S-EYE    PERSPECTIVE    OF    THE    DESIGN    FOR    THE    NEW 





BUILDINGS    OF    THE    NEW    U.    S.    NAVAL    ACADEMY    AT    ANNAPOLIS,    MD. 

ERNEST  FLAGG    ARCHITECT 


*■ 


Bin  E.     En:.      BLl      — r^l 


&-•   Eth     ©1:     BE, 


& 


_»•  <-f  -'  .  ,    ;«&, 


< 
> 

< 


CO 


o 
z 

Q 

D 
DQ 

CO 

< 
D 
O 

CO 

W 
Q 

So 

O  oo    o 


Oh  U 

< 


Si  8 

,.  <  s 

X       .    U. 
O    >-      H 

„    ^    W 

Oii]    z 

x  <  u 

H  O 
< 
2 

O 

H 
O 
W 
CO 

Q 
2 

< 


< 
J 

5 

Q 

o 

2 

g 
> 


■NAVAL  ACADEMY- 

•ANNAPOLIS  •  MARYLAND- 


•TRANSVERSE- SECTDN  •  ON -.LINE  ■  A"B'- 


SPANDREL    OF    "COURAGE" 
SMITH    MEMORIAL    ARCH,    PHILADELPHIA,    PA. 

J.  MASSEY  RHIND,  SC. 


SPANDREL    OF    "  HEROISM  " 
SMITH    MEMORIAL    ARCH,    PHILADELPHIA,    PA. 

J.  MASSEY  RHIND,  SC. 


INDIAN    AND    BUFFALO 

H.    K.  BUSH-BROWN,  SCULPTOR 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


197 


*■**$-* 


t 


Outer  Harbor. 


Jetty. 


Open- Sea. 


Bein< 


"THE  SCIENCE  OF  CITIES" 

PART    I 
TRANSPORTATION   ARCHITECTURE 

the  first  of  a  series  of   papers,  rewritten  by  Daniel  M.   Karcher,  from  the  report  of   the  Fourth    Holder  of   the 
Travelling  Scholarship  in  Architecture  of  the  University  of  Pennsylvania. 


BEFORE  entering  upon  a  discussion  of  trans- 
portation architecture,  and  the  present  rela- 
tion of  science  to  railway  architecture,  it  is 
important  to  point  out  the  causes  which  lead  to 
these  classifications,  as  well  as  to  show  conclu- 
sively that,  in  solving  these  problems,  it  is  im- 
possible to  divorce  science  from  architecture. 

Terminals,  way  stations,  freight  depots  and 
the  like  are  united  by  rails  and  wires,  and  thus 
become  an  integral  part  of  the  railway  system. 
Each  architectural  unit  is  made  scientifically  in- 
terdependent, but  all  combine  to  make  a  greater 
unit  which  embraces  them  all.  Just  as  in  feudal 
days  the  city  gates  were  bound  together  by  a 
city  wall,  and  were  thus  made  architecturally 
dependent  upon  each  other,  so  all  divisions  of 
transportation  architecture  are  united  by  their 
mutual  needs. 

By  their  great  increase  in  speed  and  extent 
of  the  system,  railways  are  constantly  present- 
ing new  and  varied  problems  to  the  architect  for 
solution.  It  is  only  by  studying  these  in  the 
scientific  light  of  the  day  that  he  can  hope  to 
keep  pace  with  the  advances  of  mechanical  trac- 
tion, and  thus  be  able  to  provide  for  travel  that 
now  extends  over  the  globe. 

When  transportation  was  in  its  earliest  stages 
of  development  the  factor  of  geographical  advan- 
tages or  disadvantages  determined  everything. 
Indeed,  in  the  present  day  it  is  still  an  import- 
ant factor,    but  it  is  by  no  means  so  necessary 


as  it  was  formerly.  Although  Boston  and  Phila- 
delphia each  possess  admirable  natural  harbors, 
the  shipping  trade  of  those  towns  is  gradually 
being  diverted  to  other  ports,  where  deeper 
harbors  and  more  modern  facilities  for  transfer- 
ring passengers  and  cargoes  are  provided.  While 
geographical  conditions  offer  superior  advantages 
to  transportation  systems,  and  while  industrial 
enterprises  cluster  where  both  conditions  are 
supplied,  the  commercial  supremacy  of  the  modern 
city  is  more  vitally  dependent  upon  its  transporta- 
tion facilities.  As  instance  of  this  truth,  Chicago 
and  St.  L,ouis  border  upon  important  internal 
waterways  and  remain  the  natural  railroad  centres 
of  the  United  States  ;  New  York,  San  Francisco 
and  New  Orleans,  though  situated  at  the  natural 
doorways  of  commerce,  would  enjoy  their  commer- 
cial supremacy  no  longer  if  better  facilities  were 
offered  in  rival  ports. 

Just  as  shipping  men  are  quick  to  avail 
themselves  of  better  advantages  in  neighboring 
ports,  so  do  the  local  railways  adapt  themselves 
to  such  changes  and  respond  to  the  new  demands 
thus  made  upon  their  resources.  To  demonstrate 
how  little  the  actual  centre  of  metropolitan  life 
affects  the  location  of  a  great  terminus,  one  need 
only  recall  the  present  location  of  great  trans- 
atlantic steamship  docks  in  the  slums  of  Hobo- 
ken,  N.  J.  But  the  modern  public,  whose  travel- 
ling is  cosmopolitan,  who  "learn  to  travel"  as 
well  as  "travel  to  learn,"  are  beginning  to  de- 


198 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


mand  closer  and  better  communication  between 
transport  systems  of  all  kinds.  Those  shipping 
centres  which  offer  a  higher  efficiency  of  service 
will  gain  a  corresponding  permanence  as  the 
transferring  points  in  this  cosmopolitan  circula- 
tion. Rise  and  fall  of  tides,  currents,  exposure 
and  general  topography  are,  of  course,  determin- 
ing features,  but  where  land  and  water  traffic  are 
made  dependent  upon  one  another  the  accumula- 
tion of  travellers  will  always  be  evident. 

To  accomplish  this  the  engineer  and  the 
architect  must  be  intimately  associated  in  the 
work.  Bach  have  their  individual  powers,  but 
neither  can  perform  the  task  alone.  Even 
though  the  engineers  of  Boston  in  the  con- 
struction of  the  new  South  Central  Railroad 
Station  achieved  what  is  creditable  from  their 
standpoint,  from  the  architectural  point  of  view 
the  results  are  worthless.  The  Utopian  end  of 
both  these  professions  will  only  be  realized  when 
concerted  action  has  been  made  the  requirement 
in  all  such  projects.  Greed  and  self-pride  should 
not  deter  us  from  viewing  the  matter  in  its 
sociological  light.  The  vital  consideration  should 
be,  is  the  present  course  of  action  most  beneficial 
to  the  community  at  large  ?  It  is  in  such  a  light 
that  we  shall  endeavor  to  consider  the  subject  of 
transportation  ;  we  shall  seek  to  determine  what 
its  present  needs  are,  and  what  will  best  suit 
those  needs. 

RAILWAY  STATIONS 

The  problem  to  be  solved  is  facility  of  circu- 
lation, and  an  arrangement  of  the  two  tendencies 
concentration  and  distribution.  These  two  ten- 
dencies are  at  present  working  side  by  side,  and 
must  be  brought  into  some  relation  before  the 
city  can  assume  a  unified  nature.  In  the  under- 
ground system  of  Boston,  and  in  the  overhead 
urban  system  of  New  York,  we  have  illustrated 
the  extensive  distribution  of  stations,  which  in 
Paris  has  reached  its  highest  development  in 
making  frequent  corner  shops  the  station  of  an 
underground  system.  Of  course,  our  own  trolley 
system  is,  and  the  perfected  auto-vehicle  soon  will 
be,  a  commonplace  example  of  the  tendency 
of  distribution,  but  the  underground  and  over- 
head railways,  by  removing  the  tracks  from  the 
street  surface,  have  reached  a  higher  stage  of 
progress.  On  the  other  hand  is  the  tendency  of 
concentration,  illustrated  by  the  centering  of  all 
suburban  and  continental  railroads  in  one  large 
depot.  When  one  considers  the  vast  scope  of  all 
these  systems,  the  space  covered  by  the  concen- 
trated railroads,  the  immense  population  carried  by 
both  systems,  and  the  successful  placing  of  stations 
where  distribution  is  necessary,  the  exigencies 
of  present-day  life  can  in  a  way  be  appreciated. 


But  with  all  this  an  obligation  is  placed 
upon  the  railroads  to  accommodate  such  travel 
with  perfect  circulation.  There  must  be  no  con- 
gestion of  passengers  at  the  distributed  stations, 
and  there  must  be  no  inconvenience  to  conti- 
nental passengers  on  account  of  suburban  travel. 

Where  continental  and  urban  systems  are 
all  concentrated,  as  in  the  new  Dresden  Station, 
the  problem  has  been  made  even  more  com- 
plex, and  has  been  solved  by  placing  the  urban 
underground,  and  the  interstate  or  continental 
tracks  overhead.  Thus  the  extent  of  travel 
appears  even  more  stupendous  when  we  take 
into  consideration  an  elevated  system  exempli- 
fying the  tendency  of  concentration,  a  surface 
system  (street  cars,  etc.),  the  tendency  of  distri- 
bution, and  an  underground  system,  again  illus- 
trating the  principle  of  concentration  as  applied 
to  suburban  travel. 

To  be  a  pessimist  in  modern  days  is  to  be 
antiquated  and  absurdly  old-fashioned.  Our 
ancestors  were  contented  to  jog  along  on  terra 
firma  in  "  a  one-hoss  chaise"  or  some  convey- 
ance which,  if  it  even  rebelled  at  all,  would  not 
be  apt  to  give  the  rider  much  inconvenience  in 
falling.  To-day,  we  have  left  these  fundamental 
problems  of  one  dimension,  have  even  passed  those 
of  the  second  and  third,  and,  if  such  a  thing  is 
possible,  have  accomplished  the  task  of  master- 
ing the  fourth  dimension  of  travel.  In  what 
other  terms  can  we  express  it,  when  travel  is 
going  on  upon  the  surface  ;  trains  are  burrowing 
their  way  through  dark  underground  passages, 
with  probably  another  underground  system 
above  or  beneath  them  ;  elevated  roads  are 
stretching  out  like  good-natured  octupi  to  grasp 
every  town  and  city  of  the  nation  ;  and,  floor 
upon  floor,  lofty  office  buildings  are  providing 
twenty  or  thirty  working  planes  above  the  surface 
of  the  ground?  Travel,  like  everything  else  of 
the  modern  day,  has  entered  the  age  ' '  without 
fear  and  without  reproach  ;"  we  are  safer  to-day 
in  the  subterranean  mole-hills  of  the  underground 
railway,  or,  as  the  country  boy  dreamt,  sliding 
down  the  banisters  of  a  sky-scraper  and  going  up 
again  in  the  elevator,  than  our  ancestors  were  in 
the  historic  "  one-hoss  chaise." 

The  brick  gateway  that  spans  the  canal  at 
Sneek,  in  Holland,  is  of  ample  size  and  height 
to  accommodate  all  the  canal-boat  travel  that 
passes  beneath  it.  It  is  symbolistic,  but  not  of 
material  advantage  or  use  in  the  traffic.  Its 
meagre  dimensions  signify  no  more  than  its  needs. 
Comparing  this  with  the  pillars  at  the  port  of 
Bordeaux,  we  instinctive^  feel  the  change  of 
atmosphere,  the  change  of  transportation  facili- 
ties from  canal  boat  to  sailing  vessel.  But  the 
sailing  vessel  and  the  symbolistic  pillars  of  Bor- 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


199 


deaux  are  not  in  the  van  of  progress.  Instead 
of  a  schooner  sailing  bnt  three  or  four  knots  an 
hour,  we  are  dealing  with  floating  cities  that 
cross  the  ocean  in  five  days.  How  do  we  of  the 
present  day  suit  ourselves  to  such  travel  ?  Con- 
sidering this  traffic  from  a  sociological  standpoint, 
how  near  are  the  municipalities  to  the  ideals  ? 
We  have  not  followed  the  very  commendable 
tendency  of  the  Dutch  canal  arch  or  the  French 
pillars  ;  we  are,  if  anything,  behind  the  possi- 
bilities and  opportunities  that  are  at  our  doors. 


front,  where  two  surfaces  are  utilized  for  traffic. 
The  needs  of  commerce  and  the  railroad  facili- 
ties are  carried  on  along  the  shore,  while  a  higher 
terrace  is  used  for  the  broad  boulevard.  In  the 
illustration,  the  steamers  and  vessels  of  all  kinds 
unload  their  cargoes  and  passengers  on  a  plane 
which  would  correspond  to  the  present  level  of 
the  streets  along  the  river  front  — usually  a  decline 
from  other  street  levels.  On  this  plane  are  laid 
the  railroad  tracks  needed  for  transfer  of  the 
vessel's  goods  or  passengers  ;  with  these  tracks 


WATER    GATE,    ENTRANCE    TO    THE    CANAL    AT    SNEEK,    HOLLAND 


Instead  of  alighting  from  a  railway  train  in 
the  city  of  New  York,  travelling  from  the  ter- 
minal through  the  worst  part  of  the  town,  cross- 
ing the  river  in  a  musty  ferryboat,  and  rumbling 
over  an  ill-paved  slum  section  of  Hoboken  to  the 
Transatlantic  Steamship  piers,  is  there  not  some 
"American  "  way  of  being  transferred  from  point 
to  point,  or  of  bringing  down  the  distance  be- 
tween steamship  and  train  to  terms  of  linear  feet 
in  place  of  city  blocks  ?  The  plan  shown  on  page 
201  should  effectually  solve  the  problem.  It  is 
the  development  of  the  plan  of  the  city's  water 


the  underground  railway  system  connects.  On 
the  higher  plane,  forming  an  objective  point  at 
the  end  of  the  city  street,  stands  the  impressive 
customs  building,  and  towering  above  it  are 
American  office  buildings,  without  light  wells, 
but  constructed  in  long  towering  strips  so  as  to 
briDg  about  thorough  ventilation  in  the  buildings 
themselves  and  across  the  city  as  well.  These, 
then,  replace  the  monumental  pillars  of  Marseilles 
but  beside  their  symbolistic  position  are  materi- 
ally useful — representing  the  true  activity  of 
American  commercial  life. 


200 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


It  is  particularly  important  that  the  railroad 
station  have  in  its  construction  some  such  signifi- 
cance. Just  as  the  lofty  building  suggests  "  busi- 
ness, multiplied  by  so  many  stories,"  so  the 
railroad  station  should  carry  the  thought  of  an 
official  municipal  entrance  to  the  mind  of  the 
traveller  or  resident.  Many  American  terminals 
fail  in  this  particular.  The  depot  has  replaced 
the  gate  of  the  feudal  walled  city  and  the  tri- 
umphal arch.  For  this  reason  it  should  be  placed 
at  a  focal  point,  where,  if  possible,  a  number  of 
streets  converge.     The  stranger   glancing  down 


tural  design  preserved  and  so  well  merged  into 
the  railway  system  itself. 

The  accompanying  illustrations  demonstrate 
the  plan,  purpose  and  general  disposition  of  sev- 
eral of  its  departments.  One  is  struck  with  the 
frankness  and  simplicity  of  the  entire  design,  and 
we  further  note  that  the  central  feature  of  the 
bold  arch  seems  to  form  the  modern  city  portal 
through  which  traffic  has  a  grand  clear  sweep. 
Notwithstanding  these  architectural  advantages, 
perhaps  surpassed  by  no  other  design,  the  fact 
that  the  station  is  planned  for  a  surface  railway 


HARBOR  ENTRANCE  OF  THE  CITY  OF  BORDEAUX,  FRANCE 


any  of  these  radial  streets  should  be  able  to  see  it 
in  the  distance  and  by  its  general  character  be 
convinced  that  it  is  his  objective  point. 

The  modern  train-shed,  with  acres  under 
glass,  makes  such  an  ideal  all  the  more 
possible. 

The  new  station  at  Frankfort-on-the-Main 
was  considered,  at  the  time  of  its  construction, 
the  best  railway  terminal  in  Europe.  Although 
larger  terminals  existed  in  other  cities  and  some 
were  planned  to  handle  a  greater  volume  of  traffic 
with  equal  ease,  in  no  case  was  unity  of  architec- 


condemns  it  as  a  model  terminal.  With  its  high 
span,  the  facade  fulfils  the  requirements  spoken  of 
above,  by  impressing  the  observer  that  the  build- 
ing before  him  is  the  city's  gateway.  Being  light 
by  night  or  day,  this  immense  arch  draws  the  eye 
toward  it. 

The  necessity  for  easy  circulation  is  not  very 
successfully  met  by  American  terminals.  Con- 
tinual arrivals  and  departures  must  be  accom- 
modated, and  each  be  kept  to  itself.  Arguing 
from  the  simple  tendencies  of  every-day  life,  the 
difficulty  may  be  solved  by  requiring  the  traffic 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


201 


to  be  divided  to  the  right  and  left,  no  matter  how 
large  or  small  it  ma}'  be.  Especially  is  this 
needed  in  busy  American  life.  Even  abroad, 
where  the  business  man,  with  all  the  rest,  calmly 
saunters  along  the  street,  such  a  method  is  car- 
ried out.  In  America,  where  the  saunterer  is  the 
exception  to  the  rule,  it  is  even  more  necessary. 
All  the  advanced  continental  terminals  have  it 
well  understood  where  incoming  passengers  are 
to  arrive  and  where  outgoing  passengers  are  to 
depart,  and  it  is  always  the  same  simple  rule. 

To  bring    this    about,  the  railroad  company 
should  be  compelled  to  donate  surrounding  por- 


The  Grand  Central  Passenger  Station  is  no 
novelty;  it  probably  represents  one  of  the  first 
steps  made  toward  concentration.  Depots  of  this 
class  include  many  whose  tracks  are  still  on  the 
surface.  At  Dresden,  as  already  stated,  an  ideal 
arrangement  is  present  in  the  use  of  both  elevated 
and  depressed  tracks,  thus  allowing  the  surface 
travel  to  be  independent  and  unhampered  by  out- 
side railway  traffic.  To  bring  such  surface  travel 
directly  in  contact  with  train  service,  in  many 
instances  carriage-ways,  having  access  to  the 
street,  are  carried  either  up  or  down  to  reach  the 
level  upon  which  trains  enter  the  terminal.    This 


-r 


L h 


1 ,5  I 


:>fc 


>%j 


ft,    'C? 


- 


B< 


SUGGESTION    FOR    THE    WATER-FRONT    OF   AN    AMERICAN    CITY 


tions  of  ground  to  the  city  in  return  for  the  privi- 
lege to  bridge  cross-streets.  This  is  assuredly  no 
more  than  the  taxpayer  has  a  right  to  expect  and 
demand.  The  modern  railroad  makes  compara- 
tively few  concessions,  but  obtains  its  privileges 
through  the  city's  representatives,  not  through 
the  taxpayer.  If  such  portions  of  land  could  be 
obtained,  they  might  be  devoted  to  courts  that 
would  surround  the  station  and  offer  space  for  the 
accommodation  of  congested  traffic.  Arrange- 
ments could  be  made  by  which  a  driveway  would 
circle  these  courts  on  each  side  of  the  station,  and 
thus  cabs  would  be  ready  to  receive  the  arriving  or 
departing  travellers. 


eliminates  the  inconvenience  which  is  now  present 
of  making  all  passengers  use  the  stairs  or  elevator 
of  the  station. 

The  latest  development  is  reached  in  a 
combination  station,  such  as  the  Boston  South 
Central.  Here  the  trolley  system  which  covers 
the  city  and  gathers  in  its  passengers  from  many 
points  continues  its  tracks,  in  a  loop,  through 
the  railroad  station  ;  thus  enabling  the  traveller 
to  leave  the  car  under  the  same  cover  his 
train  departs  from.  Local  street  transit  and  rail- 
road travel  have  in  this  way  been  brought  under 
one  roof.  This  is  the  solution  of  the  problem  we 
started  with.     The  tendency  of  concentration  has 


202 


ARCHITECTURAL   ANNUAL 


been  considered  in  the  centralized  station  ;  the 
tendency  toward  distribution  has  been  answered 
in  the  system  which  has  collected  from  different 
sources  and  united  in  the  combination  depot.  Such 
combinations  have  led  ultimately  to  more  compre- 
hensive railroad  architecture.  In  continental 
centres  one  may  observe  depots  placed  upon  com- 
manding sites  with  auxiliary  buildings  grouped 
around  them.  The  latter  are  used  for  adminis- 
trative purposes,  while  the  grounds  surrounding 


them  are  useful  as  means  of  egress  and  access. 
Such  a  grouping  of  railroad  buildings  is  an  ex- 
cellent move.  A  station  that  possesses  a  terminal 
hotel,  shops  and  department  buildings  is. a  utili- 
tarian perfection  of  arrangement  that  may  go  far 
toward  enhancing  the  city's  beauty  and  realizes 
one  of  the  highest  ideals  of  sociology. 

But  the  United  States,  ever  in  the  van  ol 
progress,  has  still  another  element  to  add  to  the 
problem.     With  the  vast  amount  of  office  work 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


203 


and  clerkly  needs,  the  lofty  building  is  con- 
structed as  the  head  house  of  the  terminal.  To 
use  this  high  structure — so  necessary  to  Ameri- 


can demands — and  still  retain  the  characteristic 
appearance  of  a  railroad  terminal  is  a  problem 
still  unsolved  in  practical  architecture,  but  there 


2 

< 

(X 

m 
u 

ui 
2 

a 
o 

o 
o 

H 
< 

2 

O 

H 
< 
H 
CO 


X 
H 


>- 

2 

< 

OC 

o 


w 

2 

o 
o 
-J 
o 
o 


o 

< 
H 
CO 

< 


< 


W 


UJ 

I 

H 


JJCJL.    j+- 

• 

E_:  J__ 

t* 

■_.*.?£! 

i  tt- . El.    .  v~ 

;  tt__«__..:-:ji 

■  B...E-  ml 

H_   E.. 

|  EL  LJfe 

• 

!  K:    EL 

? 

i  IL...1_.    -  -■ 
.; .B_.il       :   J 

i  BL..  EL.        -:' 
!  IL.C 

;  i_..t. 

IB*  1 
-  n 

•  B_.lt         It, 

i 

Sfcfl 

o 


H 

V) 

>- 

< 

£ 

_, 

,  1 

ixj 

in 

<. 
C_. 

IK 
< 
_a 

J 

2 
2 

< 

O 

2 

(J 

•— « 

>- 

-> 

111 

rK 

Q 

u. 

HI 
7 

H 

O 

(/) 

<: 

w 

u 

Ct_ 

o 

Lt. 

2 

O 

co 

UJ 

Q 

From  T-Square  Club  Catalogue 

PLAN    OF   A   TERMINAL    RAILWAY   STATION 

DESIGNED  BY  DONN  BARBER 


i 


21 


*  ZJ  j  V 

i§V    b'w     at.  1 


;; 


itM 


$m 


m 


'      If 

■It  : 


tt**m* 


i3 

•1 


-  .s 


lT~" 


wft* 


1  :,-: 


OS 

m 

UJ 

o 

H 

a, 

>~ 

to 

< 

as 

£ 

< 

J 

< 

< 

a 

OQ 

W 

2 

UJ 

n 

Q 
O 

o 
o 

UJ 

M|ufcltliiit"'-L- 


ijall  i — m 

l,  I  Mini iiihl 


m 


IV: 


Mill: 


w 

£K 

< 

0- 

2 

O 

f- 

< 

H 

h- 

o 

m 

UJ 

H 

< 

O 

(V, 

£ 

< 

j\ 

X 

•—1 

D 

< 

o 

OS 

< 

J 

CO 

K 

7, 

O 

< 

( i 

UJ 

> 

OS 

S 

o 

£ 

UJ 

2 

UJ 

X 

H 

o 
f- 

< 

CO 

< 

-J 
< 

a: 

2 

< 
CO 

< 


< 
o 

2 

o 

O 

>- 
H 

U 

UJ 
X 

H 
o 

UJ 
O 

< 

H 
2 

UJ 

< 

o 
o 


o 

2 

O 


O 

< 
H 

>- 

< 

< 
DC 


BOSTON    SUBWAY    STATIONS 

CHAS.  BRIGAM,  ARCHITECT 


From  the  Attieticaii  At  chile 


DEPOT  AT  SEATTLE,  WASHINGTON 

CASS  GILBERT.  ARCHITECT 


Facade.    Late,f\ale 


:  k.  na  u  ui  pjvh  m: 


N°  13      Maiv  E    i 


DESIGN    FOR   AN    ELEVATED    RAILWAY    STATION 

BY  M.  MARC  EMERY 


INTERIOR    OF    THE    TRAIN    SHEDS    OF    THE    FRANKFORT    RAILWAY    STATION 

ENTIRELY    OF    METAL   AND    GLASS 


i 


THE    NEW   SOUTHERN    CENTRAL    TERMINAL    STATION,    BOSTON 

SHEPLEY,  RUTAN  &  COOLIDGE,  ARCHITECTS 


212 


ARCHITECTURAL   ANNUAL 


is  no  reason  why  all  the  other  ideas  may  not  be 
combined.  If  the  lofty  building  can  be  used 
with  continental  improvements  such  as  are 
realized  at  Frankfort-on-Main  and  at  Dresden, 
a  railroad  terminal  will  be  constructed  whose 
concentration  and  utility  will  be  unmatched. 

The  matter  of  track  plan  and  arrangement 
of  train  floor  has  been  given  much  consider- 
ation abroad.     The  short  cars  used    enable  the 


ELEVATED  TERMINAL 


railroads  to  use  turn- tables  and  cross  overs 
for  switching  purposes  in  a  way  which  we  can 
hardly  employ  with  our  long  coaches.  There,  it 
is  possible  to  switch  the  small  compartment  cars 
with  great  rapidity  and  a  whole  train  may  be 
turned  inside  the  depot — on  the  train  floor  or 
carried  down  to  another  floor  by  elevator. 

The  hydraulic  equipment  which   is  used    in 
the   Gare   St.    Lazare,    in    Paris,    is   worthy    of 


study.  Indeed,  it  requires  some  study  before 
such  a  clever  plan  can  be  understood.  To  judge 
by  appearances,  the  track  is  too  close  to  the 
station  platform  to  allow  an  engine  to  turn 
entirely  around,  but  it  is  accomplished.  The 
track  upon  which  the  engine  stands  after  it  has 
entered  the  station  is  part  of  a  turn-table  which 
extends  beneath  the  station  platform.  By 
hydraulic  pressure,  but  apparently  by  touch- 
ing a  button,  the  entire  turn-table  is  moved 
from  the  platform  and  thus  sufficient  room  is 
obtained  to  turn  the  engine  or  pass  it  to  another 
track.  Time  is  saved  and  time  is  continually 
being  saved  by  such  improvements.  Mark 
Twain's  remark  that  in  one  European  country 
"he  travelled  a  short  distance  by  rail,  thereby 
losing  much  time,"  will  not  remain  true  long  if 
our  foreign  friends  are  so  active  in  improvements 
as  at  present. 

Even  the  minor  improvements  distributed 
throughout  a  great  "Railroad  Station  Group" 
are  characteristic,  and,  if  carefully  considered, 
will  add  much  to  the  comfort  and  convenience 
of  the  public.  The  time  will  come  when,  just  as 
the  many-storied  office  building  represents  con- 
centrated financial  or  commercial  interests,  so  the 
grouped  or  lofty  terminal  building  will  represent 
the  railroad  among  the  many  municipal  units. 
Concentration  is  now  the  spirit  of  the  age.  When 
trades  first  began,  the  store  in  the  little  provincial 
town  was  the  market  place  for  everything  pur- 
chasable. With  the  growth  of  the  town,  each 
trade  and  each  industry  separated  itself  from 
those  to  which  it  had  been  tied  and  worked  in- 
dependently. The  town  is  now  a  municipal^, 
and  the  same  principles  of  concentration  and 
distribution  have  been  working  out  the  develop- 
ment of  trusts  and  department  stores.  There 
now  stands  out  a  city,  called  a  unit,  but  made 
up  of  many  other  diverse  units.  The  Railway 
Station  will  stand  out  as  the  representative  of 
one  of  those  units  before  the  people  when  it  has 
placed  itself  in  the  right  light  before  the  people. 
To  obtain  the  public  regard,  more  attention  must 
be  given  to  the  accommodation  of  traffic,  the 
more  effectual  spacing,  the  careful  arrangement 
of  train-floors  to  suit  different  systems,  and  also 
to  the  aesthetic  significance  and  appearance  of 
the  building.  The  people  must  realize  that  the 
railway  system  is  an  artery  of  the  municipality 
to  which  they  belong  as  another  part,  and,  though 
we  would  not  counsel  municipal  ownership  or  any 
socialistic  scheme,  the  relation  of  the  Railroad  to 
the  rights  of  the  public  by  railroad  bridges,  via- 
ducts and  subways  is  an  important  consideration, 
but  that  must  be  what  Kipling  and  many  others 
have  called  "  another  story." 


\4-  Immm 


mmm  m 


- "!fifn     rrrrftrrffi 


f- 
z    g 


a: 
o 


o 


I 
o 

<    < 

10     O 


O  H 

<  i 

O  o 

~  IB 


J*  ,J1  3  « 


CO 

D 


Jo      u 
X  <u  ^  2 

aJ'SS  0 


a  a 


v 


=  ™  0.= 

.^  ^  *-•  t/3  <L< 

-^  a;  r*^o 

O     W   "*"'   *J  r^ 

■71  c  r  ^  "1 


— t*-    >   £   O 

2  «  L  5  *" 

■  -  o  ^     ■" 

-  u  i.  i  ; 

•2  §  w~  = 

5  E  £  s  J 
gS     ?« 

°  >-    •  ^u 

pi  0-s  a  p. 
h  f  tc—  o 

5?  .«S^ 
.S  "  >-s  - 

•c  £  •■=  =  = 

—  -  •-  -3  O 

2     'U     'J     rt  '— » 
■°"    ^VS 

^■-  H  *—  ^ 
Stf  8bo§ 

«>  «•=.=  " 


From  the  Inland  Architect 


A    MONUMENTAL    OFFICE    BUILDING— THE    PABST    BUILDING,   MILWAUKEE 

S.  S.  BEMAN,  ARCHITECT 


CONDICT   BUILDING 
NEW  YORK 

PRESS   COMMENTS 

"This  building  is  the  nearest  approach 
yet  made  in  New  York  to  solving  the 
problem  of  the  sky-scraper." — "The  Sky- 
scraper up  to  Date."  Montgomery 
Schuyler,  Architectural  Record,  .March 
31,  1899. 

"This  is  the  architectural  treatment 
of  the  future  metal  building  of  our  cities 
in  the  form  which  it  must  pass  through 
if  it  is  to  reach  any  serious  architectural 
success." — "Good  Things  in  Modern 
Architecture."— Russell Sturgis,  Aichi- 
tectural  Record,  September  30,  1898. 

"  It  affords  a  very  original  and  a  very 
expressive  solution  of  the  problem  of  the 
sky-scraper."— .V.  Y.  Real  Estate  Record 
and  Guide,  October  15,  1898. 

"  It  is  one  of  the  most  successful  build- 
ings in  the  city." — N.  Y.  Times,  January 
8,  1899. 

"One  of  the  most  interesting  build- 
ings in  the  city  is  the  building  on  the 
north  side  of  Bleecker  Street,  opposite 
Crosby  Street." — N.  Y.  Evening  Post, 
September  24,  189S. 


A    STRAIGHTFORWARD    DESIGN    FOR    AN    OFFICE    BUILDING 

LOUIS  H.  SULLIVAN  AND  LYNDON  P.  SMITH,  ASSOCIATED  ARCHITECTS 


Hrtbur  Spa^b  Brooke 

Born,  Hugust  21,  1876 
©let),  Januarv?  22,  1900 

From  the  "Class  Poem  of  '97,"  written  and  illustrated  by  Arthur  Spayd  Brooke 

"  Other  men  will  take  our  places,  do  the  things  that  we  have  done, 
Overmatch  our  little  prowess,  wear  the  honors  we  have  won, 

For  our  little  life  has  passed  like  fairy  spell. 
Ever,  ever  are  we  parted. 
And  we  leave  thee  heavy-hearted  ; 

With  one  glance  intense  and  longing,  bid  the  old  sweet  life  farewell." 


THE  world  will  never  hear  now  of  Arthur 
Spayd  Brooke.  Had  he  lived,  those  of 
us  who  knew  and  loved  him  believe  it 
would  have  been  otherwise.  There  was  in  him 
such  a  happy  mingling  of  rare  mental  gifts 
with  nobility,  manliness  and  sensitiveness  to 
beauty  that  we  are  justified  in  this  friendly 
faith.  It  befell,  however,  as  often  happens, 
that  his  efforts  were  not  to  ripen  into  the  fullest 
achievement,  as  the  world  understands  these 
matters. 

A  life  which  covers  at  the 
most  something  less  than 
twenty-five  years  must  of 
necessity  be  significant  of 
promise,  rather  than  fulfil- 
ment, and  its  interests  and 
successes  outside  of  home  are 
centered  in  the  life  of  school 
and  college.  At  least  it  was 
so  with  him,  and  the  most 
valuable  record  of  him  must 
come  chiefly  from  the  memo- 
ries of  classmates  and 
teachers.  The  union  of  char- 
acter, energy  and  talent 
marks  the  true  leaders  of 
men.  Among  them  our  friend 
early  took  his  place,  and  in 
each  new  field  of  endeavor  it 
was  accorded  to  him  without 
a  question. 

One  of  his  oldest  friends  says  of  him  :  "In 
his  earliest  boyhood  his  tastes  differed  from 
those  of  the  ordinary  schoolboy.  He  was 
social,  cheerful  and  happy  in  disposition,  but 
he  found  more  pleasure  in  books  than  in  rough 
sports.  From  the  very  beginning  of  his  school 
life  there  was  no  second  place  for  him,  the  first 
was  always  conceded  and  his  title  to  it  was 
never  challenged." 

In  his  college  life  it  was  much  the  same. 
There    his    foremost    interests    were    always 


divided  between  architecture  and  literature, 
but  it  is  characteristic  of  his  universal  curi- 
osity and  energy  that  whatever  the  subject  of 
the  hour,  that  he  pursued  with  the  abandon  of 
an  enthusiast.  His  professor  of  chemistry  said 
he  studied  that  subject  as  though  it  were  to  be 
his  life-work.  And  so  it  was  in  all  his  studies. 
The  presence  in  the  classroom  of  such  vitaliz- 
ing power  enriched  and  stimulated  the  efforts 
of  all,  whether  pupils  or  masters.  Although 
he  was  preparing  for  his 
chosen  profession  of  archi- 
tecture, each  year  of  his  col- 
lege life  was  marked  by  the 
highest  honors  and  prizes 
in  English  composition,  and 
it  was  perhaps  significant 
that  it  was  as  a  writer  and 
illustrator  of  the  leading  ar- 
ticle of  the  July  (1899) 
number  of  the  Architectural 
Review  that  his  name  was 
first  brought  to  the  notice 
of  the  architects  of  the  coun- 
try, for  all  his  acquire- 
ments, study,  observation 
and  force  were  brought  to  a 
focus  by  an  irresistible  pas- 
sion for  artistic  expression. 
He  labored  with  the  untiring 
patience  and  love  of  the  true 
artist  to  perfect  his  sense  of  form  in  the  two 
arts,  and  grew  more  and  more  determined 
that  each  should  play  an  important  part  in  his 
life. 

To  his  fellow-students,  as  well  as  to  his 
companions  in  the  T-Square  Club,  his  wonder- 
ful force  and  energy  seemed  even  more  remark- 
able than  his  aptitude  and  gifts. 

Of  his  personal  character  all  say  the  same. 
His  was  a  life  of  singular  purity  and  sweetness. 
The  embodiment  of  virility  and  manliness,  he 
followed  the  high  ideals  of  a  deep  poetic  nature. 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


217 


The  trying  first  years  of  professional  life  were 
nearly  over  and  he  was  beginning  to  realize 
a  foretaste  of  the  success,  as  a  writer  and 
architect,  that  he  had  been  striving  for,  when 
he  died.     A  cruelly  short  life  !     And  how  bewil- 


dered and  bitter  we  are  left  !  Surely  we  must 
believe  that  somewhere  that  stream  of  energy  is 
pouring  itself  out,  with  all  the  verve  and  spirit 
we  know  so  well,  in  the  behalf  of  eternal  beauty 
and  goodness. 


PROPOSED    BRIDGE    IN 


FRONT    OF   THE    MOST    COSTLY    CITY    HALL 
IN    THE    WORLD 


This  illustration,  needless  to  say,  is  not  presented  as  an  example  of  civic  embellishment,  nor  is  it  published  as  a  rebuke  to  corporate 
greed,  but  merely  as  an  every-day  illustration  of  increasing  congestion  and  growing  structural  entanglements  in  American  cities.  So  long 
as  invaluable  franchises  are  granted  to  money-making  corporations  without  intelligent  forethought  being  exercised  to  protect  public 
interest,  this  state  of  affairs  must  continue.  The  citizens  of  Philadelphia  should  congratulate  themselves  that  the  Pennsylvania  Railroad 
Company  contemplates  only  the  erection  of  a  foot-bridge  across  Market  Street  directh'  in  front  of  the  Public  Buildings,  for  their  present 
station  already  bridges  one  public  thoroughfare  with  a  lofty  office  building,  in  which  tier  upon  tier  of  private  offices  rise  up  a  barrier  to  the 
natural  ventilation  of  the  street.  The  modesty  of  the  railway  company  in  not  applying  for  permission  to  bridge  Market  Street  as  well  with 
a  like  structure,  entirely  shutting  off  the  view  of  the  Public  Buildings,  is  as  much  a  surprise  to  us  as  it  is  of  advantage  to  the  general 
welfare.     There  is  no  better  office  building  site  in  the  Quaker  City. 


THE    MOLIERE    FOUNTAIN,    PARIS 

Showing  how  a  costly  improvement   is   introduced   into   an    obscure  quarter  to  establish  a  new  street  alignment,   to  embellish 
the  neighborhood,  and  to  assist  in  enhancing  the  valuation  of  private  property. 


..'■ 


U     ' 


p  o  <• 

■ 


220 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


CITY   BRIDGES 

AS  ACCESSORIES  TO  CIVIC  EMBELLISHMENT 


YEAR  by  year  the  area  within  city  limits 
occupied  by  buildings  becomes  denser  and 
denser.  Encroachments  upon  the  public 
thoroughfare  and  parks  should  be  carefully 
avoided,  for  the  city  needs  every  inch  of  air- 
space. As  dwellings  and  office  buildings  gradu- 
ally grow  nearer  together,  available  monument 
sites  grow  less  and  less  frequent.  In  choosing  a 
suitable  location  no  little  difficulty  is  experienced, 
for  the  canyon-like  streets 
prevent  all  attempts  toward 
imposing  or  dignified  design. 
Frequently  it  amounts  to  a 
deliberate  choice  between 
trees,  verdure,  flowers,  and 
the  architectural  embellish- 
ment. No  one  can  question 
the  value  of  the  former  in 
crowded  urban  life. 

There  are  places,  how- 
ever, where  this  choice  is 
not  necessary  and  where 
ample  space  is  present  upon 
which  to  exercise  the  inge- 
nuity and  thought  of  the 
architect.  Especially  are 
bridges  susceptible  to  such 
embellishment,  and  they  are, 
of  course,  incapable  of  sup- 
porting the  growth  of  trees 
and  bushes.  The  centre  of  a 
bridge  can  very  frequently 
be  seen  from  the  distance  of 
a  mile  either  up  or  down 
stream  ;  any  monumental 
treatment  of  it  is  likely  to 
be  effective  and  impressive. 
Likewise  may  the  approaches 
be  so  constructed  as  to  offer 
opportunity  for  the  use  of 
statuary.  Bridges  are  now 
being  used  to  answer  so  many  different  demands 
of  city  life  that  just  occasions  for  municipal 
adornment  by  this  means  are  becoming  mani- 
fold. Were  it  not  for  the  smoke  of  the  locomo- 
tive, any  suggestions  on  this  score  might  equally 
apply  to  bridges  over  depressed  railway  lines. 
However  vain  it  may  be  to  look  into  the  future, 
it  is  altogether  probable  that  the  forthcoming 
century  may  remove  such  a  trivial  difficulty. 

Bridges,  treated  with  some  idea  toward  defi- 
nite embellishment,  may  serve  to  recall  the  his- 


tory of  a  city  more  readily  than  do  its  buildings. 
Each  is  the  product  of  a  certain  age,  and  by  its 
sincere  lines  tells  its  own  story.  Consider  what 
history  exists  in  a  series  of  bridges,  whether 
ranged  in  order  of  construction  or  not,  as  they 
present  to  the  river  voyager  whose  boat  threads 
them,  one  by  one. 

In  the  city  of  Paris  this  is  strikingly  illus- 
trated along  the  Seine.  From  the  narrow, 
ponderous  bridge  of  five 
stone  arches  one  turns  to 
a  more  comely  structure  of 
three  stone  arches,  then  to 
the  iron  bridges  rising  from 
stone  piers  in  three  spans, 
then  to  the  graceful  canti- 
lever; Pont  Mirabeau,  with 
its  bronze  statuary,  and  fin- 
ally to  the  single  span  steel 
structure  that  in  modern 
clean-cut  lines  springs  from 
shore  to  shore.  Meanwhile 
the  voyager  has  not  neglected 
to  notice  the  double-storied 
Auteuil  Viaduct  shown  on 
another  page. 

By  such  means  may 
bridges  silently  tell  the  story 
of  civilization  as  it  has  pro- 
gressed from  primer  to  well- 
conned  lesson.  Just  as  in 
other  projects,  so  here  it  is 
necessary  that  the  architect 
and  engineer  co-operate  har- 
moniously if  results  are  to 
be  obtained  creditable  to 
both.  Therefore  it  is  grati- 
fying to  note  that,  during 
the  year  just  passed,  a  com 
petition  was  instituted  in 
which  this  ideal  was  appar- 
ently realized.  In  planning  a  memorial  bridge,  to 
cross  the  Potomac  at  Washington,  four  engineers 
were  invited  to  compete,  and  each  was  required 
to  select  an  architect  who  would  prepare  the 
plans  with  him.  Truly,  we  are  beginning  to 
"arrive." 

As  we  go  to  press,  an  article  has  just  appeared 
in  the  May  number  of  the  Century  Magazine,  by 
Montgomery  Schuyler,  entitled  'Art  in  Modern 
Bridges,"  which  every  student  of  municipal  im- 
provements should  read. 


MONUMENT    SITES 

A  bridge  in  Berlin  upon  which  statuary  is  displayed  to  advantage,  it  being  strongly  contrasted  against  a  background  of  foliage  and  often 

clearly  reflected  in  the  water  below. 


THE    FRIEDRICHBRUCKE,    BERLIN 


From   The  Architect,  London 

PROPOSED    VICTOR    EMMANUEL    MEMORIAL    BRIDGE,    ROME 

DESIGNED    BY  DANIEL  BRADE,   F.R.I.B.A. 


THE    TOWER    BRIDGE    (BASCULE    BRIDGE),    LONDON 

A  modern  engineering  problem,  worthy  of  better  architectural  treatment.  A  lost  opportunity  to  symbolize  the  commercial  centre  of 
the  world.  Instead  of  considering  the  universal  commerce  of  the  British  Empire,  radiating,  as  it  does,  from  this  spot  on  the  Thames,  the 
designer  has  taken  his  inspiration  from  the  historic  Tower  of  London,  and  has  produced  an  anachronism  in  which  the  first  principles  of 
structural  support  have  been  ignored. 


THE    AUTEUIL    VIADUCT,    PARIS 

ELEVATED   RAILROAD   IN   CENTRE   OF   DRIVEWAY 


PYLON     OF    THE    ALEXANDER    III    BRIDGE, 
PARIS 


from  the  American  Architect 

ST.    LOUIS    ARCHITECTURAL  CLUB 
COMPETITION 

ENTRANCE  TO  A  BRIDCE— BY  OSCAR  ENDERS 


&  a  a  r> 

^  b'C  S 

rt  bv  c  c 

n^u-  rT*o 
o.5>>S 


l»  O  >-•  J3 

,2   O   U-w 


h  c  «  s 

0J--  ~  ■" 

uSCe 

<D  tf  s  :^ 

ri  to  a  & 

C   3   0   " 

=  ^« 

"*     0     -     S 

^  o  "  a; 
■"  —  a  i — , 


ills'"  '5  n 


a;  =  ~   J. 


§K3& 

§<i'x 
.d-w^ci 


CD 
CD 
CO 


226 


ARCHITECTURAL   ANNUAL 


It  is  a  long  time  since  we  have  read  any  semi- 
technical  article  of  equal  interest  and  importance. 

Although  he  begins  by  saying  that  "The 
bridges  of  the  world  which  are  acknowledged  to 
be  among  the  masterpieces  of  the  world's  archi- 
tecture belong  to  the  pre-engineering  era,"  he 
recognizes  engineering  as  the  essential  element 
in  modern  bridge-building,  and  goes  on  to  prove 
that  the  most  natural  engineering  feats  are  the 
most  graceful,  and  that  in  France,  where  they 
sometimes  reduce  metal  trusses  to  works  of  art, 
"a  professor  of  architecture  is  attached  to  the 
national  department  of  engineering,  with  results 
that  ma}'  be  judged  by  a  comparison  of  the  Pont 
Mirabeau  with  the  best  of  our  own  in  the  same 
kind."  He  speaks  of  bridge-building  com- 
panies dealing  out  scientific  constructions  in 
assorted  sizes,  and  speaks  of  the  American  en- 
gineer's fine  contempt  for  art  as  follows  :  "One 
such  has  declared  in  public  that  a  bridge,  being 
merely    a    'tool    of    transportation,'    is    to    be 


EXTRACT  FROM  THE  BOOK  OF  THE 
CHICAGO   EXHIBITION,  1900 


I 


D WIGHT  HEALD  PERKINS,  EDITOR 

»»  IN  addition  to  its  self-appointed  task  along 
municipal  lines,  the  Architectural  Club,  in 
connection  with  the  Architectural  League 
of  America,  stands  for  the  new  thought  in  art 
and  design. 

"It  stands  for  art  which  is  fundamental,  in 
which  form  follows  and  expresses  function — 
which  aims  to  'solve  problems  of  utility  in 
terms  of  beauty,'  and  which,  while  revering  the 
past,  yet  places  principle  before  precedent. 

"It  has  taken  special  pleasure  in  observing 
the  progress  of  the  new  spirit,  as  manifested  in 
recent  work  in  this  country." 

"It  is  with  peculiar  gratification  that  the 
Chicago  Architectural  Club  takes  this  oppor- 
tunity to  recognize  its  affiliation  with  the  other 
architectural  societies  of  the  United  States 
and  Canada  in  the  Architectural  League  of 
America.  The  effort  which  this  club  put  forth 
in  undertaking  to  call  a  meeting  of  delegates 
from  the  various  architectural  clubs  to  be  held  in 
Cleveland  last  June  has  been  more  than  repaid 
by  the  added  interest  which  has  been  manifested 
in  club  affairs.  As  a  further  result  of  that  meet- 
ing, an  increased  inspiration  has  been  felt  for 
greater  efforts  in  the  study  of  civic  problems,  as 
witnessed  by  the  discussion  of  the  lake  front 
problem,  the  grouping  of  public  buildings  around 
a  municipal  court,  the  extension  of  the  park  sys- 
tem to  include  the  Calumet  region,  the  Desplaines 


judged,  like  any  other  tool,  by  its  efficiency, 
without  reference  to  its  appearance,  without 
reference  to  art." 

In  referring  to  an  old  design  for  the  proposed 
memorial  bridge  over  the  Potomac  at  Washing- 
ton, Mr.  Schuyler  says  :  "Another  bascule  bridge, 
which  as  yet  exists  only  on  paper,  is  worthy  of 
note  as  the  only  extensive  bridge  in  this  country 
which  has  been  monumentally  conceived."  Here 
we  must  differ  with  him,  as  we  know  of  two  others 
— one  to  span  the  Charles  from  Boston  to  Cam- 
bridge, and  the  other  several  competitive  designs 
for  the  same  problem  he  refers  to.  Granting  all 
he  has  to  say  about  the  fitness  of  the  latter  as  an 
example  of  constructive  art,  we  feel  that  the 
medieval  castle-on-the-Rhine  effect  is  a  bit  of 
picturesque  affectation,  which  does  not  clearly 
interpret  either  local,  national  or  contemporaneous 
conditions.  But,  then,  Mr.  Schuyler's  article  is 
not  upon  architectural  expression.  It  deals  with 
broader  problems. 


River  Valley,  and  the  Skokie  Marsh,  and  the 
establishment  of  small  parks  and  playgrounds 
in  the  congested  districts. 

"The  Code  Governing  Competitions,  recom- 
mended by  the  Architectural  League  of  America, 
and  also  adopted  by  the  Architectural  League  of 
New  York,  the  National  Sculptors'  Society,  the 
Society  of  Mural  Painters,  the  T-Square  Club  of 
Philadelphia,  the  Pittsburg  Architectural  Club, 
and  several  others,  has  been  adopted  by  the 
Chicago  Architectural  Club,  and  is  recommended 
to  all  those  who,  believing  that  the  best  results 
may  be  obtained  by  competitions,  wish  to  conduct 
them  on  a  basis  of  mutual  understanding  that 
shall  be  honest  and  fair  to  all  parties.  To  any 
society  or  individual  needing  assistance  in  formu- 
lating a  competition  program,  this  club  freely 
tenders  its  assistance  and  good  offices. 

"  We  believe  that  there  is  much  to  be  gained 
through  conference  with  fellow-workers.  We 
anticipate  for  the  Architectural  League  of  America 
an  increased  influence  for  the  development  of  an 
appreciation  of  honest  and  intelligently  conceived 
architecture. 

"To  the  next  convention  of  the  League, 
which  will  be  held  in  Chicago,  June  7,  8  and  9, 
1900,  the  Chicago  Architectural  Club  most  cor- 
dially invites  its  confreres  of  the  League,  as  well 
as  all  other  societies  having  affiliated  interests. 

"  To  the  various  members  of  the  Architectural 
League  of  America  who  have  assisted  in  the  col- 
lection and  forwarding  of  works  in  other  cities 
for  our  exhibition  we  extend  our  thanks,  with 
the  assurance  that  their  efforts  cu  our  behalf  are 
appreciated,  and  will  be  gladly  reciprocated." 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


227 


A  CHAIN  OF  BEACON  MONUMENTS  TO  MARK 

BISMARCK'S  BIRTHDAY 


A  GREAT  CONCEPTION  ABLY  INTERPRETED 


STLTDENTS  of  the  various  universities  in 
German}-  recently  decided  to  celebrate  the 
anniversary  of  Bismarck's  birth  in  a  notable 
fashion  on  April  i,  1900,  and  a  program  has  now 
been  arranged  in  accordance  with  which  pillars 
or  monuments  in  honor  of  Bismarck  will  be 
erected  in  many  German  cities,  and  on  the  morn- 
ing of  April  1st  flames  will  burst  forth  from  them 
and  will  continue  to  burn  during:  the  day. 


From  Berliner  Atchitektuncelt 

PREMIATED    DESIGN 

HERR  KREISS,  ARCHITECT 

The  first  step  in  this  direction  was  taken  a  few 
days  ago,  when  several  leading  professors  met  at 
Eisenach  for  the  purpose  of  deciding  on  the  form 
of  the  proposed  monuments.  Among  those  pres- 
ent were  Herr  Ende,  President  of  the  Berlin 
Academy  of  Arts  ;  Andreas  Meyer,  of  Hamburg  ; 
Herr  Schaefer,  of  Carlsruhe ;  Professor  Von 
Thiersch,  of  Munich,  and  Herr  Wallot,  of 
Dresden.  The  leading  architects  of  Germany 
had  been  invited  to  compete,  and  the  result  was 
that  320  designs  were  submitted. 


Of  these  ten  were  finally  selected,  and  valu- 
able prizes  were  awarded  to  the  architects  who 
had  submitted  them.  The  three  designs  which 
were  esteemed  to  be  the  best  were  submitted  by 
W.  Kreiss,  an  architect  of  Dresden,  who  dis- 
tinguished himself  a  few  years  ago  by  winning 
the  first  prize  for  his  design  of  the  famous  battle 
memorial  at  Leipsic,  and  who  also  won  during 
the  present  year  the  national  prize  awarded  to 
architects  by  the  Prussian  Government. 

One  of  his  designs  of  a  Bismarck  monument 
is  notable  for  its  strength  and  simplicity.  We 
see  a  massive  square  structure,  flanked  by  four 
pillars,  and  with  a  hollow  opening  at  the  top, 
through  which  the  flames  are  to  burst.  In  this 
hollow  opening  is  a  large  metal  brazier,  which  is 
designed  to  hold  the  coal  and  other  fuel,   and 


228 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


within  the  structure  is  a  staircase  leading  up  to 
the  brazier.  The  rear  and  sides  of  the  monument 
are  of  smooth  stone  and  are  devoid  of  ornament, 
but  on  the  front  are  several  sculptural  deco- 
rations. 

This  design  is  generally  admitted  to  be  the 
best,  and  the  numerous  monuments  which  it  is 
proposed  to  erect  in  honor  of  Bismarck  will  be 
fashioned  after  it.  These  will  be  placed  on  the 
highest  points  near  the  various  cities  and 
towns,  and  they  will  vary  in  size  according  to  the 


wealth  of  the  cities  and  the  height  of  the  eleva- 
tions. 

One  hundred  and  seventy-four  cities  and 
towns  have  already  arranged  to  erect  a  Bismarck 
monument,  and  in  each  place  a  committee  has 
been  appointed  to  select  the  most  suitable  spot 
for  their  erection.  The  plan  is  to  have  the  fires 
in  the  various  monuments  lighted  simultaneously 
on  April  ist,  and  thus  it  is  believed  that  there  will 
be  a  regular  chain  of  beacon  lights  from  one  end 
of  Germany  to  the  other. — From  N.  Y.  Herald. 


EXTRACT  FROM  THE  T-SQUARE 
CLUB  CATALOGUE,  1900 

DAVID  KNICKERBACKER  BOYD,  EDITOR 


T 


ii  r  [~^HE  T- Square  Club  keenly  appreciates 
the  advantages  to  be  derived  from  mem- 
bership in  the  Architectural  League  of 
America,  and  welcomes  most  heartily  the  sponta- 
neous rapprochement  it  has  brought  about. 

"  The  broader  sense  of  professional  fellowship 
and  responsibility  stimulated  by  the  interchange 
of  ideas  among  the  members  of  diverse  archi- 
tectural bodies  in  itself  promises  much,  while  the 
holding  of  a  referendum  or  national  convention 
gives  opportunity  for  the  free  discussion  of  per- 
tinent topics,  the  enunciating  of  ideals,  and  at 
the  same  time  furnishes  a  court  of  appeal  particu- 
larly welcome  to  the  profession  in  this  State  which 
has  thrice  vainly  endeavored  to  have  the  Penn- 
sylvania State  Capitol  competition  scandal  fear- 
lessly investigated. 

"The  basis  of  organization  of  the  newly- 
formed  League,  as  we  understand  it,  is  simply 
local  self  government.  A  number  of  independent 
societies  from  time  to  time  come  together  for  con- 
sultation. Each  unit  retains  its  individuality, 
and  is  under  no  obligation  to  the  central  body. 
In  other  words,  the  organization  is  voluntary  and 
not  binding,  and  may  assert  itself  under  many 
different  conditions.  Its  make-up  may  totally 
change  from  year  to  year,  and,  in  fact,  a  society 
represented  at  one  convention  may  even  change 
in  name,  purpose  and  membership  without  alter- 
ing its  standing  in  the  League,  provided  it  still  has 
the  advancement  of  American  architecture  at 
heart. 


'  The  code  governing  competitions  recom- 
mended by  the  Architectural  League  of  America, 
and  already  adopted  by  the  Architectural  League 


of  New  York,  the  National  Sculpture  Society, 
the  Society  of  Mural  Painters  and  the  Chicago 
Architectural  Club,  has  been  ratified  by  the  T- 
Square  Club.  Its  adoption  is  urged  by  the  other 
clubs  of  the  country,  believing  that  it  furnishes  a 
standard  for  the  client,  a  basis  for  mutual  under- 
standing in  the  profession,  and  that  it  will  have 
an  influence  in  producing  a  morale  that  does  not 
now  exist. 


"  The  T-Square  Club  framed  resolutions  early 
in  the  year  requesting  the  Honorable  Secretary 
of  the  Treasury,  in  the  exercise  of  his  discretion, 
as  provided  in  the  Tarsney  Act,  to  select  local 
architects  to  enter  into  competition  for  certain 
public  buildings  in  various  cities  and  towns  of 
Pennsylvania. 

"  These  resolutions  were  forwarded  to  the  in- 
fluential architectural  societies  of  the  country, 
and  were  by  many  of  them  indorsed  in  further 
resolutions  to  the  Secretary  of  the  Treasury,  and 
the  prospects  for  the  successful  operation  of  the 
Tarsney  Act  in  these  and  other  localities  are  con- 
sidered excellent. 


"  On  Wednesday,  October  18,  1899,  the  officers 
and  trustees  of  the  Free  Library  of  Philadelphia 
tendered  a  reception  to  the  T-Square  Club  at  the 
Pepper  Memorial  Hall,  for  the  purpose  of  there 
introducing  to  the  profession  the  Architectural 
Library,  which  is  already  ample  and  contains 
many  valuable  and  unique  works. 

"  The  aid  of  the  Club  has  been  especially  re- 
quested in  the  selection  of  new  works,  and  it  wel- 
comes the  formation  of  this  collection,  because 
its  practical  value  and  its  liberal  administration, 
as  already  demonstrated,  will  render  it  of  genuine 
service  to  the  profession  and  a  means  of  advanc- 
ing architectural  standards." 


PROPOSED    COLLEGE    DRINKING    FOUNTAIN 

ALEXANDER  STIRLING  CALDER,  SCULPTOR 


t/5 
< 

a 
z 

UJ 


os 

o 

2 

-< 

CO 

W 

D 
O 
H 

< 

a. 


a 

LU 

H 

a 

< 

©■ 

r 
u 
z 

UJ 

a 

u. 
UJ 
E 
6- 

f- 
O 
Z 

H 

UJ 
H 

<o 


C/3 
O 

z 

u 


< 

y; 
o 
o 
a: 
m 

> 

o 

Q 
2 

UQ 

UJ 

X 
H 

a; 

o 


z 

2  > 

CO 
Z 

< 

Z 
< 
> 

>- 
CO 

z 
z 

w 

0- 

w 

X 
H 


<; 

Oh 

N 

H 

H 

2 

O 

U 

f- 

o 

T. 

o 

O 

m. 

H 

< 

< 

& 

UJ 

UJ 

0 

VI 

m 

r> 

S 

o 

D 

u: 

X 

(- 

>~ 

UJ 

& 

u 

H 

tz 

2 

D 

o 

X 

O 

O 

ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


233 


STREET   PAGEANTRY 

A  NEW  FIELD  FOR  THE  ARCHITECT  AND  SCULPTOR 


THE  return  of  our  victorious  troops  was  the 
occasion  of  numerous  festival  displays,  tem- 
porary in  character,  but  imposing  while 
they  lasted.  Their  greatest  benefit  is  not  in  the 
spread-eagle  demonstration  they  fostered,  but  in 
the  incentive  they  are  likely  to  give  to  civic 
adornment.  To  commemorate  the  deeds  of  great 
men  or  armies  the  monumental  stone  and  bronze 
have  the  most  suitable  character,  but  for  tempo- 
rary displays  less  durable  material  may  be 
employed.  However,  there  is  no  necessity  to 
bring  together  an  entirely  new  collection  of  deco- 
rations for  each  event,  and  many  cities  of  Conti- 
nental Europe  are  prepared  for  such  demonstra- 
tions without  a  new  expense  being  involved  each 
year. 

A  staid  and  unruffled  career  has  characterized 
the  history  of  the  United  States  for  the  past 
thirty  years.  Little  cause  existed  for  decoration 
outside  of  military  parades  at  irregular  intervals. 
In  this  particular  the  country  has  differed 
from  European  States  which  are  accustomed  to 


deck  themselves  in  carnival  attire  at  expected 
periods.  Our  cities  have  made  few  attempts 
toward  unified  or  definitely  planned  decoration 
beyond  a  discordant  display  of  hastily  collected 
materials.  Up  to  within  a  year  or  two,  di  essing  of 
buildings  and  streets  has  nearly  invariably  been 
due  to  individual  initiative. 

On  the  other  hand,  many  foreign  cities  own 
separate  paraphernalia  for  such  occasions — hun- 
dreds of  uniformly  painted  Venetian  masts,  hun- 
dreds of  shields  and  other  emblems,  and  complete 
outfits  for  illumination.  These  are  owned  by  the 
municipality  and  are  held  in  readiness  for  any 
festival,  whether  civic  or  military. 

Using  Paris  as  an  instance,  that  city  owns 
thousands  of  feet  of  perforated  gas-pipe,  stored 
away  in  the  cellars  of  public  buildings  through- 
out the  districts.  These  are  brought  out  when 
needed,  and  laid  along  cornices  or  arched  in  mid- 
air. The  sections  of  pipe  have  been  made  to  fit 
a  particular  position,  and,  when  lighted,  outline 
public  structures  in  lines  of  waving  lights.     The 


FESTIVAL  DECORATIONS,  CHICAGO,    1899 


FESTIVAL    ARCH,    CHICAGO.     1! 


"AVENUE    OF    FAME"— G.    A.    R.    ENCAMPMENT,    PHILADELPHIA,    1899 

FRANK  FURNESS,  ARCHITECT 


THE    "COURT    OF    HONOR"— PEACE    JUBILEE,    PHILADELPHIA,     I! 

JOSEPH  M.   HUSTON,  ARCHITECT 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


235 


THE  "AVENUE  OF  FAME" 


ILLUMINATED— G.  A.   R.   ENCAMPMENT,   PHILADELPHIA 

FRANK  FURNESS.  ARCHITECT 


Venetian  masts  are  erected  along  miles  of  thoi  ough- 
fares  and  festooned  from  pole  to  pole.  Myriads 
of  electric  lights  hang  in  graceful  loops  from  these 
masts  and  illumine  the  gayly-colored  banners  and 
standards. 

Upon  special  occasions  new  products  are 
brought  forth.  Probably  a  potentate  is  to  be 
given  the  freedom  of  the  city — a  survival  of  the 
custom  in  feudal  walled  towns — and  in  front  of 
the  modern  gateway,  the  railroad  station,  a  great 
crimson  canopy,  ornamented  with  gold,  will  be 
erected.     The  avenue  will  be  richly  carpeted  and 


walled  with  festive  decorations  ;  or,  if  a  public 
funeral  is  to  take  place,  the  ceremonies  are  appro- 
priately surrounded  with  sombre  street  pageantry. 
Along  the  line  of  march  is  erected  a  series  of 
dignified  and  solemn  altars,  draped  in  jet  black 
and  cold  silver,  emblazoned  with  the  crest  or  ini- 
tials of  the  deceased.  Above  each  rests  a  tripod, 
in  which  a  sulphurous  flame  burns. 

Should  the  event  be  a  public  address  or  the 
review  of  a  parade,  stands  are  erected  on  a  p1an 
more  monumental  than  we  know  of— even  on  a 
colossal  scale  in  some  instances.     Great  colored 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


237 


awnings  and  beautifully  enriched  draperies  carry  out  the  tran- 
sient and  temporary  nature  of  the  event,  while  the  splendor  of 
the  surroundings  impresses  the  guest  with  the  efforts  made  to 
honor  him. 

Local  and  timely  symbolism  exists  in  these  displays  ;  and 
because  of  the  rapid  strides  our  own  country  has  made  politically 
and  socially,  we  should  find  interest  in  the  new  ideas  expressed 
here. 

Our  first  efforts  in  this  direction  have  been  characterized  by 
sham  architecture. 

The  "  Uewey  Arch,"  that  tangible  evidence  of  enthusiasm  bjr 
the  National  Sculpture  Society,  although  the  best  object-lesson  we 
have  yet  had,  was  an  example  of  this  sort  in  which  the  cart  was 
placed  before  the  horse.  It  was  an  architectural  problem  without 
the  architect.  Its  sculpture  was  architectural  sculpture  through- 
out, and  granting  that  it  was  good  sculpture,  modern  and  appro- 
priate in  theme,  the  composition  as  a  whole  lacked  unity  and  that 
vitality  of  theme  which  the  occasion  demanded.  It  was  timid, 
archaeological  and  faulty  in  design,  though  beautiful  to  look  upon. 
The  absence  of  unity,  the  confused  effect  of  the  terminal  cluttered 
columns,  the  ill-proportioned  pedestals  were  faults  scaicely  over- 
come by  the  intermediate  twin  columns  with  their  floating  figures 
of  victory.  Here  alone  was  the  spirit  of  the  occasion  shown  with 
originality  in  both  architecture  and  sculpture. 

Perhaps  the  most  monumental  park  entrance  in  the  country 
is  the  spacious  plaza  embellished  with  architectural  accessories 
in  the  city  of  Brooklyn.  Its  novel  adjunct  is  of  continual  in- 
terest to  the  citizens.  An  electric  illuminated  fountain  is  so 
situated  as  to  permit  an  unobstructed  view  by  10,000  or  15,000 
people.  Its  mechanism  is  artfully  concealed  beneath  the  surface 
in  a  basin  120  feet  in  diameter,  located  in  the  centre  of  the  plaza. 
When  in  operation  the  fountain  illuminates  and  purifies  the  air  on 
hot,  dry  evenings,  and  greatly  enhances  the  view  by  adding  color 
and  life  to  the  already  beautiful  surroundings.  F.  W.  Darling- 
ton, of  Philadelphia,  is  the  designer  and  builder. 

His  experience  includes  the  erection  of  fountains  of  like 
nature  on  both  sides  of  the  Atlantic,  and  he  informs  us  that  many 
park  commissioners  are  now  considering  the  advisability  of  intro- 
ducing fountains  of  a  like  nature  in  their  respective  cities. 

The  following  from  the  Mail  and  Express,  a  New  York  daily, 
gives  a  vivid  idea  of  this  new  and  harmless  type  of  illumination  : 
"The  new  electric  fountain,  near  the  arch  in  Prospect  Park, 
Brooklyn,   attracts   large  crowds   nightly,  and   although   it  has 
been  in  operation  for  two  weeks,  custom  does  not  seem  to  stale 
its  infinite  variety.     The  dazzling  brilliancy  of  the  lights,    the 
quickness  with  which  the  colors  are  changed  and  the  beautiful 
rainbow   effects   which   the    skilful   operator   in    charge   of    the 
electric  buttons  manages  to  obtain  are  magnets  which  draw  spec- 
tators from  near  and  far.     On  the  opening  night  fully  ioo,coo 
people  watched  the   display.     As  soon  as  there  is  sufficient  dark- 
ness there  is  a  sound  of  rushing  water,  and  a  great  white  column 
rises  into  the  air.     About  it  are  started  other  and  smaller  columns 
of  water,  falling  towards  the  centre.     After  a  few  moments  under  the  white  light  the  colors  are 
changed,  and  brilliant  reds,  blues  and  greens  chase  each  other  through  the  falling  spray,  and,  inter- 
mingling, form  a  panorama  which  is  the  delight  of  all  the  residents  of  Brooklyn. 

'  The  man  who  operates  the  lights  stands  in  an  underground  chamber,  directly  beneath  the  centre 
of  the  fountain.  Before  him  is  a  long  board,  in  which  is  set  a  number  of  electric  push  buttons, 
colored  to  indicate  the  colored  glasses  controlled  by  each.     There  are  nearly  2,000  jets  to  the  fountain, 


ELECTRIC   FOUNTAIN   DISPLAYS 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


239 


PROSPECT   PARK   PLAZA 

BROOKLYN.  N.  Y. 


and  it  is  estimated  that  it  requires  100,000  gallons 
of  water  an  hour  to  operate  it  when  all  the  jets 
are  being  used." 

The  special  lesson  of  the  Brooklyn  fountain, 
however,  comes  not  so  much  from  the  aesthetic 
side  as  from  the  political  and  economic.  Its  com- 
plete cost  was  less  than  S30,ooo.  It  is  the  prop- 
erty of  the  city,  although  operated  by  the  local 
street  railway.  By  such  means  does  private  initia- 
tive furnish  the  adornment  of  a  city  for  purposes 
of  its  own  commercial  gain.  In  this  case  exists  a 
principle  of  continuous  rotation,  which,  if  more  fre- 
quently applied,  would  eliminate  the  opposition  to 
municipal  embellishment  on  account  of  its  expense. 


G.  A.  R.  ENCAMPMENT,  PHILADELPHIA 

FRANK  FURNESS.  ARCHITECT 


CENTENNIAL    ARCH,    CLEVELAND,    0. 


FESTIVAL    DECORATIONS,    CHICAGO,    1899 


THE    DIAMOND    JUBILEE,    LONDON,    '97 

DRAWN  BY  T.  RAFFLES  DAVISON 


If  our  temporary  street  pageantry  has  been 
forced  and  affected,  it  must  not  be  forgotten  that 
in  some  cases  these  creations  in  staff  have  been 
connected  with  festoons  and  rows  of  lights  and 
streamers  of  bunting  in  a  truly  festive  way. 
Falsely  constructed  columns  have  been  so  effec- 
tually wreathed  in  real  laurel  that  the  columns 
seemed  quite  reasonably  real.  All  the  while  our 
architects  have  been  working  toward  something 
of  permanence,  and  such  efforts, though  frequently 
roundabout,  are  commendable  as  object-lessons. 
The  work  has  been  done  with  what  materials 
were  at  hand. 

There  is  much  to  contend  against  in  the  pres- 
ent political  state  of  our  municipalities.  Where 
lavishness  exists  it  is  rarely  outside  the  council- 
manic  chambers,  or  less  tangible  material,  the 
swollen  salary  of  underworked  officials.  First 
of  all,  our  people  must  settle  down  to  conscien- 
tious government  and  then  will  recognize  the 
value  of  permanent  decorative  land-marks.  Until 
then  they  have  little  need  of  "  stage  property  " 
decorations  which  are  brought  out  with  persistent 
regularity  to  decorate  thoroughfares,  and  add  to 
the  influences  of  environment  so  prominent  in 
all  festival  events. 

The  fact  that  we  are  beginning  to  think  of 
unity  of  effect,  that  architects  are  now  employed 
in  the  planning  of  decorations  for  such  occasions, 
and  that  the  people  generally  are  giving  evidence 
of  their  appreciation  of  such  work  is  significant 
presage  of  deeper  desires  toward  the  city  beau- 
tiful. 


G.    A.    R.    ENCAMPMENT,    1 

JOHN  J.  BOYLE,  SC. 


-■Section  »x  Ccjvtrp  ZvLvg 


' 


m 


~m~ 


^ji^r^^ 


-  f  SCAl-E   BlACKAfl    OF   FtlOPIT   Et-EUWMCM    &    SECTiONS 

HesroPica   Fb«  T>ic  Misses  Stone  

— td*t_wLJ?L^m*-¥sm  -^-William  •  emerson 

•  BORING  •  &  •  T1LT0N    SSSi&'SS 
.  J2 .  BROADWAY  •-  NEW  •  YORK  . 
BMIOI-™     Nn./Io  osaun  mr     W    E ■ 


iBf 


Sn^~ — * 

iiu-'t  rtiT(_"  Tiki 

"-■'     1}      ■"'.■    Pl-11,1.     .*   El—At. 

A  rr  h  it  £^4-^5lXTI<W    ONLgrT^JBg ■ 


AN    AMERICAN     BASEMENT    HOUSE 

WILLIAM  EMERSON,  ARCHITECT    AND  BORING  &  TILTON.  CONSULTING  ARCHITECTS 


242 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


THE  PILLORY 


THE  PENNSYLVANIA  STATE  CAPITOL  SCANDAL 

LETTERS  FROM  THE  MINUTES  OF    AN    EXECUTIVE    COMMITTEE   MEETING   OF   THE   ARCHI- 
TECTURAL LEAGUE  OF  AMERICA 


Philadelphia,  October  14,  1899. 
Henry  Van  Brunt,  Esq.,  President  of  the  Ameri- 
can Institute  of  Architects,  Kansas  City,  Mo. 
My  Dear.  Sir  : — At  the  instance  of  several 
members  of  the  Architectural  League  of  America, 
I  am  writing  to  try  and  ascertain  whether  action 
upon  the  Pennsylvania  State  Capitol  scandal  will 
be  taken  at  the  forthcoming  reunion  of  the 
American  Institute  of  Architects. 

Personally,  I  consider  this  a  grave  case  of  na- 
tional importance,  and  while  neither  the  officers 
of  the  League  nor  myself  desire  to  infringe  upon 
the   province  of  the  Institute,  I    feel  that  in  the 
interests  of  professional    practice   and   common 
honesty  either  the   American  Institute  of  Archi- 
tects or  the  Architectural    League   of   America 
should  make  the  second  competition  for  the  Penn- 
sylvania State  Capitol  building  a  test  case. 
Joint  action,  of  course,  would  be  best. 
The  profession  has  reached  a  point  where  so 
many  high-handed  unprofessional  and  even  dis- 
honorable actions  have  occurred  (apparently  with- 
out prejudice  to  the  standing  of  the  perpetrators) 
that  the  younger  men  are  beginning  to  ask  them- 
selves whether  honesty  is  really  the  best  policy. 
Therefore,  my  dear  sir,  my  colleagues  and  my- 
self await  your  reply  with  much  interest. 
Faithfully  yours, 
(Signed)  Albert  Keesey, 

Pres.  A.  L.  A. 


Kansas  City,  Mo.,  October  16,  1899. 
Albert  Kelsey,  Esq.,  President  of  the  Architectural 

League  of  America. 

Dear  Sir  : — The  subject  referred  to  in  your 
letter  of  the  14th  inst.  was  somewhat  fully  set 
forth  in  the  Report  of  the  Board  of  Directors  of 
the  American  Institute  of  Architects  at  the  last 
convention,  but  I  think  no  action  was  taken  on  it. 

I  quite  agree  with  you  that  a  scandal  so  con- 
spicuous and  so  demoralizing  to  the  dignity  and 
honor  of  our  profession  should  not  be  permitted 
to  pass  without  some  form  of  indignant  rebuke. 
I  shall  take  occasion,  at  the  meeting  of  the  Board 
of  Directors  which  precedes  the  next  annual 
convention  in  November,  to  bring  before  it  once 
more  this  matter  of  the  second  competition  for  the 
Pennsylvania  State  Capitol  building,  together 
with  your  suggestions. 

Meanwhile,  if  any  course  of  action  bas  been 
undertaken,  I  shall  ask  the  Secretary  of  the  Insti- 
tute to  communicate  it  to  you.  I  think  it  very 
likely  that  I  shall  refer  to  this  question  in  the 
annual  address,  unless  the  Board  may  think 
proper  before  then  to  include  some  proposition 
in  their  own  report. 

I  am  in  hearty  sympathy  with  your  own  sug- 
gestions on  this  matter. 

Yours  truly, 
(Signed)  Henry  Van  Brunt, 

Pres.  A.  I.  A. 


RESULT 

FROM  THE  OFFICIAL  PROCEEDINGS  OF  THE  THIRTY-THIRD  ANNUAL  CONVENTION  OF  THE 

AMERICAN  INSTITUTE  OF  ARCHITECTS 

' '  President  Van  Brunt :  The  Report  of  the  Judiciary  Committee  will  be  read  by  Mr.  Alfred  Stone, 
one  of  the  committee,  in  the  absence  of  the  chairman  of  the  committee,  Mr.  Tost. 

"  Mr.  Stone  :  The  Judiciary  Committee  have  to  report  upon  the  several  matters  which  have  been 
delegated  to  it  by  the  Board  of  Directors,  and  which  have  formerly  been  considered  by  the  Board  of 
Directors.     Our  report  is  as  follows  : 

"  REPORT   OF  JUDICIARY    COMMITTEE. 

"  The  members  of  the  Judiciary  Committee  here  present  beg  leave  to  report  that  in  the  case  of  the 
Philadelphia  Chapter  versus  Henry  Ives  Cobb  they  were  not  individually  aware  of  the  status  of  the 
case  and  of  the  desire  for  urgency  until  the  last  week  in  October  of  the  current  year ;  that,  as  stated 
in  the  report  of  the  committee  to  the  Board  of  Directors,  there  was  no  evidence  that  Mr.  Cobb  had 
received  notice  of  the  meeting  held  in  New  York,  November  4th  inst.,  and  that  since  then  a  commu- 
nication from  Mr.  Cobb  had  been  received  stating  that  the  notice  of  the  meeting  which  had  been  sent 
to  him  did  not  reach  him  at  Washington  until  after  the  hour  at  which  the  meeting  was  called,  but 
that  his  presence  at  the  convention  has  made  an  interview  with  him  possible. 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


243 


"  Your  committee  finds  that  Mr.  Cobb's  statement  of  the  case  is  such  as  to  convince  it  that  in  jus- 
tice to  both  the  Philadelphia  Chapter  and  to  Mr.  Cobb,  and  in  order  that  the  Institute  may 
not  take  any  false  step,  it  cannot  sufficiently  investigate  the  case  so  as  to  report  at  this 
time,  and  therefore  respectfully  requests  that  further  time  be  given  it  to  consider  the  case 
and  make  up  a  report  of  its  findings. 

"Alfred  stone, 
"Levi  T.  Scofield." 


TWO  YEARS  PREVIOUS  TO  THE  TIME   THE  ABOVE  REPORT  WAS  RENDERED 
THE  FOLLOWING  ACTION  HAD  BEEN  TAKEN 

As  a  public  declaration  of  the  Club's  standing,  and  of  professional  ethics,  the  T- Square  Club  passed 

th:  following  resolutions  and  had  them  published  in  the  leading  architectural  journals 

of  the  United  States  and  in  the  Philadelphia  Daily  Fress. 


Philadelphia,  September  9,  1897. 

Hon.  Daniel  H.  Hastings,  Chairman  of  the  Capitol 
Building  Commission,  Executive  Department, 
Harrisburg,  Pa. 

Dear  Sir:— Kindly  present  the  following 
preamble  and  resolutions  to  the  Capitol  Building 
Commission  as  the  expression  of  opinion  of  the 
T-Square  Club  : 

Whereas, &  Co.,  of  Philadelphia, 

and & ,  of  New  York  Cily, 

having  taken  part  in  the  competition  for  the  new 
Capitol  Buildings  at  Harrisburg,  and  knowing 
and  believing  that  their  designs  are  not  among 
the  eight  selected  by  the  Board  of  Experts,  have 
appeared  before  the  Commission  through  their 
attorneys,  and  have  urged  the  Commission  to  set 
aside  the  explicit  terms  of  the  program  and  to 
declare  the  competition  void, 

Now,  therefore,  be  it  resolved,  That  such  con- 
duct is  eminently  disgraceful,  that  it  is  grossly 
unjust  to  the  other  competitors  and  damaging  to 
the  profession  at  large,  and  that,  if  successful,  it 
would  deprive  the  public  of  the  best  results  of 
the  competition. 

And  be  it  further  resolved,  That  we  hereby 
commend  the  action  of  the  Commissioners  in 
formulating  most  admirable  rules  for  the  conduct 
of  the  competition,  and  we  respectfully  point  out 
that  the  only  legal  and  honorable  termination  of 
the  competition  lies  in  appointing  the  author  of 
one  of  the  eight  designs  chosen  by  the  experts 
as  architect  of  the  Capitol. 
(Signed) 
George  Bispham  Page, 

Secretary  T-Square  Club. 

September  17,  1897. 

The  following  resolutions  were  adopted  by 
the  T-Square  Club  at  a  meeting  of  the  Executive 
Committee  held  to-day  : 

Whereas,  A  majority  of  the  State  Capitol 
Commission  has  violated  its  agreement  with  com- 
peting architects  ;  has  treated  its  able  and  con- 


scientious expert  adviser,  Prof.  Warren  P.  Laird, 
with  contempt  ;  has  discredited,  not  only  him, 
but  the  other  members  of  the  expert  jury,  Mr. 
Carrere  aud  Mr.  Cook,  and  has  made  statements 
to  justify  its  dishonorable  action,  which  state- 
ments are  denounced  as  unfair  and  untrue,  both 
by  the  jury  and  by  the  Governor,  as  head  of  the 
Commission,  now,  therefore,  be  it 

Resolved,  By  the  T-Square  Club,  that  the  said 
majority  of  the  Commission,  in  violating  their 
agreement  with  competing  architects,  and  in  dis- 
regarding the  recommendations  of  their  own  ex- 
perts and  the  warnings  of  the  Governor,  have 
proved  themselves  unfit  to  be  trusted,  and  should 
be  impeached. 

Resolved,  That  the  T-Square  Club  denounces 
and  repudiates  any  member  of  the  profession  of 
architecture  who  has  lent  or  shall  lend  himself  to 
the  dishonorable  action  of  the  Commission. 

Resolved,  That  the  published  statements  of 
Senator  McCarrell,  justifying  the  repudiation  of 
the  contract  and  of  the  experts'  report,  are  mis- 
leading and  false,  for  the  following  reasons  : 

(1)  The  terms  of  the  program  were  mandatory 
as  to  the  areas  of  the  rooms  required — advisory 
only  as  to  the  total  cubic  contents  of  the  build- 
ing, and  silent  on  the  subject  of  materials  or 
finish  intended,  the  competition  being  expressly 
framed  to  select  an  architect  on  the  basis  of  quali- 
fications demonstrated  by  the  designs. 

(2)  The  economy  of  any  design  being  deter- 
mined by  three  factors — size,  simplicity  of  con- 
struction and  materials — it  is  evident  that  a 
design  of  a  given  size  would  vary  in  cost  ac- 
cording to  the  materials  used.  From  Senator 
McCarrell's  published  quotations  from  the  ex- 
perts' report,  it  is  plain  that  the  designs  recom- 
mended could,  in  the  judgment  of  the  experts, 
be  built  within  the  appropriation. 

Resolved,  That  the  architectural  profession 
and  the  citizens  of  this  commonwealth  are  warned 
that  the  evident  intention  of  a  majority  of  the 
Commission  to  select  an  architect  without  refer 


244 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


ence  to  the  terms  of  the  contract  they  have  made 
is  a  public  scandal  which  calls  for  immediate 
correction. 

Resolved,  That  this  Club  pledges  itself  to  the 
distinguished  and  honorable  Board  of  Experts 
to  uphold  them  and  the  reputable  element  in 
the  profession   in  their   protest   against  the  dis- 


graceful action  of  the  majority  of  the  Commis- 
sion. 

(Signed)        Horace  H.  Burrelx, 

Secretary  pro  tern. 
David  Knickerbacker  Boyd, 

President. 


RESULT 

Upon  November  4,  1897,  a  letter  was  written  by  the  Secretary  to  a  member  of  the  Club,  enclosing 
the  above  resolutions,  stating  that  the  Executive  Committee  had  learned  that  he  had  submitted  draw- 
ings in  the  second  competition  for  the  Pennsylvania  State  Capitol  Building,  and  that  he  was  therefore 
requested  to  resign  from  the  T-Square  Club.     In  reply,  he  requested  a  hearing,  which  was  granted. 

After  hearing  his  explanations,  on  November  13,  1897,  the  Secretary  again  wrote,  stating  that 
the  Executive  Committee  had  carefully  considered  the  matter,  and  regretted  that  it  could  see  no 
reason  for  reconsidering  its  action. 


ELECTRIC    FOUNTAIN    WATER    DISPLAYS 

DESIGNED  BY  FRED.  W.  DARLINGTON 


w. 


Niir-^j   ii'i.'iii     imniii  tii-i!"      ram 


1wr.u,i.,,jnOT 


' fif 


""".' "i"i»i»» 


.- 


nw^pB — .      ■—  ^  '  ■  !■  ti    f  [  * — -r   -  ■    I  '  "  "  ■—    [  I'  I.  ■     i  ■ 

;:irpplM!«"]f pip  p 


I>r*viaaO    t'o   3 


•BC^VUNO  GREEN  ELEVATION 


Y-S'CVSTOM  HOVSE  -NEW  YORK 


From  the  Inland  Architect 


PREMIATED   DESIGN 

CASS  GILBERT,   ARCHITECT 


■HI  §855  I 

!tt!fl  jfflSaSSa  |  SMI!   ;:Jt:l!  jajUUlUUU  !l!!!l«  IJlll!!  huffillUIISl  ')«!!: 


pnlMit^aa 


*1 


■:T^.i.r  'f 


1,       ite 


Wit- 


-  B0WE2N  G  -  Q  RS^S?*  - "  .T-/A—  OH  - 


/■">o/«  2&£  Inland  Aickitect 

FRONT    ELEVATIONS   OF    DESIGNS   SUBMITTED    IN    THE    NEW  YORK  CUSTOM    HOUSE 

COMPETITION 

CARRERE  &  HASTINGS.  ARCHITECTS 


246 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


THE  DEWEY  ARCH 


THE  Dewey  Arch  and  its  accessories  give  am- 
ple evidence  of  the  value  of  organized  art. 
The  present  age  is  one  of  centralization,  of 
organized  efforts  in  every  sphere  of  life.  In  this 
instance  great  things  were  achieved  by  the  com- 
bined forces  of  New  York's  sculptors— things 
that  could  never  have  been  accomplished  if  these 
men  had  done  their  work  as  individuals. 

All  praise  is  due  the  National  Sculptors'  So- 
ciety, for  it  has  created  a  masterpiece  in  its  own 
field  of  art  that  will  live  in  the  memory  of  a 
whole  nation.  The  men  who  gave  time,  money — 
and  some  of  them — their  lives,  to  such  a  work 
deserve  the  commendation  of  all.  Both  young 
and  old,  masters  and  pupils  worked  with  heroic 
effort  to  produce  a  fit  tribute  to  the  man  whom 
the  nation  loved.     The  subject  was  indeed  inspir- 


ing, but  much  more  than  inspiration  was  needed 
to  carry  these  brave  men  through  such  a  colossal 
project. 

This  production  of  masterful  sculpture  will 
stand  as  one  of  the  greatest  object  lessons  in  civic 
adornment.  In  the  hurry  of  our  American  life 
we  forget  the  opportunities  that  lie  open  to  us  in 
the  beautifying  of  our  environments.  It  is  here 
that  we  lose  the  poetry  of  our  existence ;  we 
glance  around  us  and  our  worried  brains  find  no 
rest ;  our  eyes,  wearied  by  continual  scanning  of 
bills  and  briefs,  find  no  change  when  directed 
toward  the  outer  world  with  its  office-building, 
and  office-building,  and  office  building  next  to 
that.  The  Dewey  Arch  has  awakened  us  to  a 
realization  of  our  need  for  this  adornment,  and 
the  street  pageantries  of  Philadelphia  during  its 


"Peace  Jubilee"  and  its  "  G.  A.  R.  Encamp- 
ment "  have  called  forth  the  same  desires.  Chi- 
cago is  not  far  behind,  for  its  festival  pageantry 
was  quite  an  eligible  decoration  of  that  very 
businesslike  city 

That  The  National  Sculpture  Society  per- 
formed great  work  is  unquestioned,  and  criti- 
cisms upon  the  sculpture  of  the  Arch  and  its 
approaches  would  be  ungrateful,  unworthy  and 
condemnable.  But  criticism  of  their  work  from 
an  architectural  standpoint  as  to  the  architectu- 
ral treatment  of  their  subject  cannot  be  withheld. 
Mr.  Charles  Rollinson  Lamb,  one  of  the  first  pro- 
moters of  the  scheme,  and  the  designer  of  the 
arch,  is  an  artist,  rather  than  an  architect,  and 
is  therefore  all  the  more  to  be  congratulated  upon 
an  architectural  ability  far  above  that  of  the  aver- 
age regular  practitioner  in  the  profession  itself. 
As  a  whole,  the  composition  strikes  a  real  note 
of  grandeur,  faulty,  perhaps,  in  its  architectural 
significance,  but  nevertheless  grand  in  the  am- 
bitious and  striking  effect  of  the  entire  structure. 

In  the  Christmas  number  of  Scribner' s,  Mr. 
Russell  Sturgis  viewed  the  subject  in  the  light 
of  its  achievements  in  sculpture.  We,  in  our 
turn,  contend  that  it  was  an  architectural  com- 
position. Scarcely  a  single  part  of  the  work  can 
be  considered  complete  in  itself,  and  every  part 
is  dependent  upon  the  architectural  structure. 
We  therefore  consider  ourselves  amply  justified 
in  treating  it  as  architectural  sculpture. 

We  fully  agree  with  Mr.  Sturgis  when  he 
says:  "Infinite  credit  is  due  to  the  bold  men 
who  knew  their  own  and  their  comrades'  power 
and  devotion,  and  who  dared  undertake  such  a 
piece  of  associated  sculpture,  to  be  completed  in 
two  months.  They  brought  forth  something 
which  the  city — which  of  all  great  cities  is  sup- 
posed to  have  the  least  civic  pride — may  boast 
of  for  many  a  year  to  come." 

We  can  readily  understand  the  pride  of  the 
Sculptors'  Society  in  their  desire  to  accomplish 
the  entire  task  without  the  assistance  of  any  one 
outside  their  body.  Such  enthusiasm  and  enter- 
prise cannot  be  praised  too  highly,  but  in  review- 
ing the  result  we  must  judge  it  for  what  it  is. 
Those  who  will  view  it  in  the  future,  if  it  is 
preserved  in  more  durable  form,  will  not  have  at 
hand  the  information  that  the  Sculptors'  Society 
accomplished  the  work  alone.  They  will  criticise 
and  pass  judgment  upon  the  arch  according  to 
the  true  measures  of  art  regardless  of  the  history 
of  its  production. 

Judging   the   arch   and  its   approaches   from 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


247 


this  standpoint  it  is  amateurish  and  archa'ological 
in  its  composition.  First  of  all,  the  suitability 
of  the  arch  to  its  site  has  been  apparently 
left  entirely  out  of  the  question  ;  it  fits  badly 
and  does  not  adapt  itself  to  the  system  of  the 
thoroughfares.  Beside  the  general  planning  of 
the  arch  being  at  fault,  criticism  must  attach  to 
the  placing  of  Mr.  J.  Q  A.  Ward's  impressive 
group,  "  Victory  on  the  vSea."  This  faced  down 
Broadway  and  the  parade  approached  it  from  the 
rear.  The  Admiral's  reviewing  stand  being 
placed  behind  the  arch,  not  only  prevented  the 
Hero  of  Manila  from  passing  under  the  tribute 
raised  in  his  honor,  but  also  compelled  him  to 
review  the  troops  from  behind  it  ! 

When  we  consider  the  appropriateness  of  the 
sculpture  to  the  theme,  the  inappropriate  archi- 
tecture  strikes   us  more  forcibly.     The   modern 


spirit  of  all  the  groups,  the  latest  rapid  fire  guns, 
the  homely  every-day  people  of  "Peace,"  the 
portrait  statues  of  American  admirals,  gave  to 
the  scene  a  symbol  of  contemporary  life  and  a 
record  of  our  history.  The  anchors,  cordage  and 
things  nautical  gave  it  almost  the  salty  odor  of 
the  farther  seas.  Victory  and  Peace  on  the  sea 
seemed  to  breathe  in  the  almost  animate  figures 
of  everj-  group. 

How  much  better  would  it  have  been  to  have 
had  no  unharmonious  note  in  the  work  !  Had 
the  architecture  spoken  of  contemporary  matters 
in  just  as  effective  a  way  as  the  sculpture  did, 
nothing  would  have  been  lacking  in  the  master- 
piece. To  copy  the  Arch  of  Titus  showed  most 
apparent  timidity  and  indecision.  What  had  an 
antique  architectural  structure  to  do  with  a 
modern  American  triumph  ?     Granting  that  the 


ACCESSORIES    TO    THE    "DEWEY"    ARCH,    NEW    YORK,    1899 


248 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


Porte  Saint  Denis  and  the  Arc  de  Triomphe  are 
modelled  upon  Roman  prototypes,  they  are  very 
unlike  the  originals,  but  even  these  examples 
should  not  alter  our  attitude  toward  the  present 
requirements. 

In  the  accessories  do  we  especially  miss  the 
architect.  While  the  twin  columns  represent  a 
good  thought,  they  were  poorly  detailed  and  set 
upon  pedestals  so  inorganic  that  the  stability  ap- 
pears a  rather  precarious  matter.  They  evidence 
an  ignorance  of  the  basic  laws  of  creative  archi- 
tecture, although  it  is  in  them  only  that  architec- 
ture and  sculpture  have  been  worked  out  with  har- 
monious originality.  The  cluster  of  three  columns 
at  both  ends  of  the  avenue  spoiled  the  symmetry 
of  the  design  and  showed  a  perfect  helplessness. 
They  appeared  a  very  primitive  attempt  upon  the 
designer's  part  at  dignity,  but  upon  deeper  study 
their  significance  descended  to  nothing  more 
than  an  endeavor  to  make  a  proper  corner  to  the 
design. 

Probably  the  worst  error  of  all  was  in  build- 
ing up  the  statuary  upon  the  pedestals  and 
foundations  of  these  triple  columns.  The 
sculptors  resorted  to  almost  heroic  means  in  the 
draping  of  a  cloth  or  the  posing  of  a  figure  to 


hide  the  defects  of  architecture  beneath,  but  the 
lack  of  unity  and  good  proportion  was  still  most 
apparent.  Mr.  Russell  Sturgis  believes:  "Not 
only  where  a  sculptor  was  deceived  or  mistaken 
as  to  the  depth  of  the  pedestal  top,  or  broad 
shelf  upon  which  his  group  was  to  stand — not 
only  in  such  a  case  as  that,  but  in  almost  every 
instance  the  shortcomings  of  the  groups  have  been 
most  marked  in  this,  that  they  are  not  as  grace- 
fully, not  as  nobly,  not  as  amply  disposed  as  the 
artist  of  each  could  have  disposed  them  with 
more  time  and  thought."  However  much 
"time  and  thought"  entered  into  the  quality  of 
the  sculpture  it  is  not  for  us  to  judge,  but  the 
faults  of  architecture  were  most  certainly  not  the 
faults  of  haste,  but  were  directly  traceable  to 
lack  of  training — the  inability  to  see  a  thing  in 
its  entirety  and  to  treat  it  as  such  from  beginning 
to  end. 

The  master  mind  was  lacking.  Although, 
as  we  have  said,  the  average  architect  in  New 
York  City  would  have  done  no  better,  there 
are  two  or  three  men  there  who  would  have 
grasped  the  scheme  in  its  entirety  just  as  each 
sculptor  grasped  the  necessities  of  the  group 
assigned  him.     Such  men  would  have  designed 


THE    "DEWEY"    ARCH    AND    ACCESSORIES,    NEW    YORK,     1899 


:  -A--  . 


250 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


a  unit,  a  group  of  architectural  masses  more 
in  scale  with  the  site  and  more  in  harmony  with 
the  occasion.  Then  the  architecture  might 
have  possessed  the  spirit  of  the  new  navy, 
the  spirit  of  modern  thought  and  progress  and 
the  arch  would  have  had  just  cause  to  demand 
its  place  as  a  monument  of  our  dawning  as 
New  America. 

The  opportunity  is  even  now  at  hand  to  cor- 
rect the  errors  that  now  exist  in  the  architectural 
features  of  the  arch.  If  money  is  raised  to  per- 
petuate it,  let  us  hope  that  the  architecture  may 
be  made  as  effective,  as  impressive  and  as  signifi- 
cant as  the  best  group  of  sculptured  art  in  its 
composition. 

A  SUGGESTION  FROM  "  THE  AMERICAN 
ARCHITECT  » 

"  New  York  owes  to  a  distinguished  engineer, 
Mr.  Alfred  B.  Boiler,  one  of  the  best  suggestions 
that  have  yet  been  made  in  regard  to  the  placing 
of  monuments.  Lamenting,  as  every  one  must, 
the  insignificant  and  unworthy  situations  of 
nearly  all  the  monuments  in  New  York,  he  pro- 
poses that,  in  the  designing  of  the  bridges  and 
viaducts  which  are  rapidly  multiplying  around 
the  city,  provision  should  be  made  for  monumen- 
tal ornaments.  He  calls  attention  to  the  new 
Alexander  III  Bridge,  in  Paris,  which,  beautiful 
and  impressive  as  it  is,  might  have  been  made 
far  more  so  if  it  had  been  possible  to  give  it 
ampler  space,  and  says,  most  truly,  that  the  wide 


rivers,  the  distant  views  and  the  general  grandeur 
of  scale  of  the  scenery  around  New  York  lend 
themselves  in  an  extraordinary  degree  to  the  pro- 
duction of  imposing  artistic  effects.  Most  of  our 
readers  have  probably  many  times  been  impressed 
with  the  quiet,  almost  melancholy,  beauty  of  the 
High  Bridge,  whose  very  simplicity,  combined 
with  its  landscape  surroundings,  makes  it  one  of 
the  most  charming  objects  that  New  York  has  to 
show  ;  and  it  is  easy  to  imagine  how,  for  in- 
stance, the  Grant  Monument,  in  a  very  different 
form,  might  have  been  arranged  in  connection 
with  this,  or  some  more  carefully  designed  via- 
duct, so  as  to  retain  the  advantage  of  the  land- 
scape setting,  and  in  connection  with  it  to  pro- 
duce an  effect  unequalled  by  that  of  any  other 
monument  in  the  world.  Of  course,  it  would  take 
consummate  talent  to  design  a  monument  which 
would  harmonize  with  such  a  setting,  but  talent 
in  such  matters  is  now  more  easily  found  here 
than  a  favorable  opportunity  for  its  exercise ; 
and  if  such  sites  can  be  arranged,  there  will  be 
no  difficulty  in  procuring  designs  worthy  of  them. 
Mr.  Boiler  proposes  that,  before  the  sad  mistake 
is  committed  of  erecting  the  Dewey  Arch  in  per- 
manent form  in  the  middle  of  a  crowded  street, 
under  the  shadow  of  a  row  of  enormous  hotels, 
an  attempt  shall  be  made  to  combine  it  with  one 
of  the  many  bridges  and  viaducts  which  are  now 
contemplated  in  the  upper  part  of  the  city,  and 
in  connection  with  which  it  would  have  a  dignity 
which  it  could  never  have  in  Madison  Square." 


7 

j 

MnmtfB 

i 

ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


251 


THE  MARQUISE 


CONSTRUCTION  in  metal  and  glass  has 
been  so  largely  confined  to  purely  utilita- 
rian purposes  in  the  United  States  that 
its  art  possibilities  have  been  sadly  neglected. 
However,  it  has  a  future. 

The  marquise,  to  a  certain  extent,  takes  the 
place  of  a  porch  roof.  Coming,  as  it  does,  at 
conspicuous  places  on  a  building,  it  therefore 
requires  a  finished  and  artistic  treatment. 

In  the  first  place,  a  marquise,  properly  con- 
sidered, is  an  integral  part  of  the  architectural 
design,    and,    consequently,    provision    must   be 


THE  SOUTH    CENTRAL    STATION,   BOSTON 

made  for  its  reception  when  the  walls  that 
receive  and  support  it  are  designed.  If  it  is  to 
be  on  a  commercial  building,  it  demands  a  com- 
mercial treatment,  and  if  an  architect  makes  use 
of  his  opportunities  he  will  design  it  in  a  way 
suitable  to  the  display  of  signs  and  sub-signs  at 
the  most  advantageous  points.  When  well 
studied  in  conjunction  with  show  windows  it 
gives  an  unusually  good  opportunity  for  illumina- 
tion, and  the  interior  display  will  attract  people 


from  along  the  sidewalk,  either  because  of  incle- 
ment weather  or  on  account  of  the  sparkling  glass 
and  electricity. 

The  marquise  ceases  to  be  a  marquise  when 
perpendicular  supports  are  used,  but  it  can  ex- 
tend outward  almost  any  distance,  provided  it  is 
elevated  in  proportion.  Notwithstanding  this, 
it  should  never  overhang  the  sidewalk  curb  of  a 
regular  city  thoroughfare,  for  it  can  be  readily 
seen  that  such  a  projection  would  greatly  inter- 
fere with  the  harmony  of  perspective  looking 
down  the  street.  But,  in  the  case  of  a  public 
building  the  usefulness  of  the  marquise  is  gone 
unless  the  carriage  drive  turns  under  it,  and  this 
is  generally  possible,  for  these  structures  usually 
stand  back  from  the  regular  street  alignment, 
and  the  advantages  of  the  marquise  can  be 
gained  without  intercepting  the  view. 


The  best  marquises  are  the  lightest,  that  is, 
considered  from  a  structural  standpoint,  and  it 
must  be  so  constructed  that  the  minimum  ob- 
scuring of  daylight  occurs.  The  ideal  marquise, 
then,  would  be  entirely  of  plate  glass.  An  ap- 
pearance of  lightness  is  gained  by  tipping  it  up 
so  as  to  drain  back  to  the  building.  Such  mar- 
quises are  usually  the  simplest  and  best.  In  per- 
spective they  conform  well  with  the  architecture, 
and,  considered  practically,  they  are  the  easiest 
to  drain.  In  Boston  the  use  of  this  very  essen- 
tial feature  on  the  new  South  Central  Station 


X 

Q 
< 

X 
0- 


o 

CO 

2 

< 


X 

o 
< 

H 
CO 

J 


Q 
_J 
O 

w 

X 
H 

O 
H 

W 

o 

2 

< 

2 

UJ 


2 


From  Le  Figaro  Illiistre 


A    RESTAURANT    IN    THE    BOIS    DE    BOULOGNE,    PARIS 


Front  La  Construction  Modernt 


y%y.  <%<imi 


TYPE    OF    MARQUISE    OVER    THE    ENTRANCES    OF   A    DEPARTMENT    STORE,    PARIS 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


255 


gives  the  general  effect  a  particularly  heavy  char- 
acter. The  interiors  are  much  darkened,  because 
the  roof  slopes  down  from  the  building,  besides, 
the  relation  of  the  marquise  to  the  wall  is  but  a 
clumsy  adjustment. 

Over  private  doorways  the  marquise  is  fre- 
quently used  to  replace  a  porte  cochere,  especially 
where  light  is  required.  Here  the  art  element  and 
aesthetic  features  bave  greater  scope. 

Wrought-iron  forms  of  beauty  should  be  de- 
signed, and  a  decorative  ensemble  should  be 
striven  for.  Not  only  is  the  result  sure  to  be 
imposing  and  effective,  but,  in  the  case  of  a  costly 
mansion,  it  may  become  one  of  the  principal 
features  of  the  facade.  This  holds  true  in  coun- 
try residences  as  well  as  in  city  houses,  providing 
the}-  are  formally  treated. 

The  arcaded  streets  of  Paris  and  other  conti- 
nental cities  give  pedestrians  a  cohered  walk  at  a 
great  sacrifice  of  light  and  ventilation  to  the  lower 
stories,  to  say  nothing  of  the  contracting  of  the 
breathing  space  between  opposite  buildings.  But 
the  occasional  marquise,  that  extends  a  block  or 
two,  offers  as  good  shelter  without  the  discom- 
forts of  the  arcade,  and  maintains  a  respectable 
width  between  opposite  structures,  and  a  proper 


relation  between  public  and  private  vested  inter- 
ests. 

Allied  to  the  marquise  is  the  glassed-in  porch. 
These  are  particularly  effective  in  the  country, 
where  large  sheets  of  plate  glass  extend  from 
floor  to  ceiling  in  light  metal  frames  with  but  a 
railing  or  a  little  tracery  above  to  intercept  the 
view.  This  serves  to  remind  one  that  he  is  not 
out-of-doors.  Sun-parlors  are  made  particularly 
cheerful  by  the  use  of  this  modified  marquise, 
and  conservatories  may  even  add  to  the  natural 
beaut}-  within  them  by  light  treatment  of  the 
iron  and  glass  used  in  their  construction. 

But — the  marquise  is  our  subject.  It  may  be 
made  to  conform  to  any  shape  or  position,  and, 
when  understand ingly  used,  bent  glass  and  grace- 
fully curved  metal  and  possibly  a  sculptured  metal 
cornice  together  produce  a  buoyant  effect  not  to 
be  obtained  with  other  mediums  or  in  other  forms 
of  construction.  As  practical  devices  alone  they 
are  invaluable,  and,  as  architectural  accessories, 
they  may  be  made  truly  modern  adjuncts  of 
beauty,  expressing  the  individual  tastes  of  the 
owner  or  corporation  that  uses  them.  In  this 
way  they  are  peculiarly  successful  from  both  a 
utilitarian  and  an  aesthetic  standpoint. 


256 


ARCHITECTURAL   ANNUAL 


THE  FIFTH  INTERNATIONAL   CONGRESS 

OF  ARCHITECTS 

TO  BE   HELD  IN   PARIS    FROM   JULY   29th    TO    AUGUST  4th,  INCLUSIVE,  1900 


AN  event  of  no  little  importance  in  the  Paris 
Exposition  will  be  an  International  Con- 
gress of  Architects,  a  continuation  of  the 
movement  so  worthily  carried  on  by  the  Fourth 
International  Congress  held  at  Brussels  in  1897. 
In  the  latter,  Mr.  George  O.  Totten,  of  Wash- 
ington, and  Mr.  W.  L.  B.  Jenney,  of  Chicago, 
were  appointed  Vice-Presidents  to  represent  the 
United  States  in  the  present  Congress.  A 
committee  of  prominent  French  architects  are 
in  charge  of  the  arrangements,  and  the  entire 
Congress  is  under  government  auspices.  The 
work  has  been  so  systematically  divided  that 
a  successful  convention  is  the  most  natural 
sequence.  A  committee  composed  of  Presidents 
d '  lionneur  and  artists,  both  native  and  foreign, 
will  act  as  patrons. 

The  by-laws,  prescribed  by  the  French 
Government,  fix  the  date  of  meeting  from 
July  29th  to  the  evening  of  August  4th, 
1900.  The  minimum  assessment  of  contribut- 
ing members  has  been  determined  upon  as 
100  francs,  and  of  membres  adherents  or 
visiting  delegates,  55  francs.  By  the  rules 
of  the  convention,  any  architect  is  eligible  who 
notifies  M.  Lucas  of  his  intentions  to  attend  and 
who  registers  as  a  visiting  member. 

Governments  and  societies  have  been  asked  to 
enroll  themselves  among  the  number  of  con- 
tributing and  nominal  members,  and  to  send  a 
delegate  to  the  Congress  as  their  representative. 

Many  questions  have  been  entered  on  the 
program,  all  of  which  should  present  an 
interest  internationally.     Among  them  are: 

(1)  The  Artistic  Side  of  Works  of  Architec- 
ture, this  question  being  continued  on  the 
program  from  the  Fourth  Congress  of  1897. 

(2)  Education  in  Architecture  (higher 
studies  and  professional  training),  this  question 
being  continued  from  the  Paris  Congress  of  1889 
and  the  Brussels  Congress  of  1897. 

(3)  The  Workingman's  Dwelling-house  in  All 
Countries,  by  request  of  the  British  architects. 

An  exhibition  of  original  drawings  by 
architects,  visits  to  monuments  and  points  of 
architectural  interest,  a  musical  evening  and 
a  banquet  will  be  features  of  the  Congress. 
Contributing  or  subscribing  members  will  be 
entitled  to  a  Personal  Card  and  Badge  of  the 
Congress  as  well  as  to  all  the  publications 
(collections   of   preparatory    documents,    verbal 


discussions  and  full  reports),  which  will  be 
published  by  the  Government,  or  the  Bureau, 
and  by  the  Committee.  Such  cards,  badges  and 
publications  will  be  presented  to  presidents  of 
honor  and  to  delegates  of  foreign  governments. 
The  Bureau  of  the  Congress  is  preparing  the 
first  collection  of  documents  and  these  will  be 
distributed  in  the  early  summer.  It  will  contain 
the  proceedings  of  the  commission  to  organize 
this  Congress,  a  list  of  the  members  of  the 
Committee  of  Patronage,  the  Congress  By-Laws, 
in  full,  and  a  partial  list  of  contributing  and 
subscribing  members. 

M.  Alfred  Normand,  Membre  dTnstitut,  is 
President  of  the  Bureau  of  the  Organization 
Committee,  and  M.  Maurice  Poupinel  is  General 
Secretary.  M.  Charles  Lucas,  23,  Rue  de  Dun- 
kerque,  is  in  charge  of  the  foreign  relations  of 
the  Congress. 

Such  an  International  Congress  of  Architects 
will  be  an  attractive  feature  of  the  series  of 
great  conventions  in  Paris  during  the  Exposi- 
tion. In  many  of  the  professions  this  is  the  first 
step  toward  an  international  meeting,  but  the 
architects  are  able  to  call  this  their  Fifth  Con- 
gress. That  it  will  be  an  assembly  of  the  sincere 
and  conscientious  members  of  the  architectural 
profession  is  well  assured  by  the  character  of 
previous  international  conventions,  especially  by 
the  Congress  of  1897. 

An  editorial  in  The  Brickbuilder,  some  years 
ago,  in  speaking  of  the  Fourth  International  Con- 
gress of  Architects  that  had  been  recently  held 
in  Brussels,  said,  in  conclusion:  "Aside  from 
the  business  transacted,  the  one  thing  which 
was  most  worthy  of  note  was  the  individual 
character  of  the  distinguished  delegates  and 
the  high  personal  esteem  in  which  they  were 
held.  There  were  present  not  only  architects, 
but  statesmen,  three  members  of  the  Institute 
of  France,  one  deputy,  one  member  of  the  Italian 
parliament  and  several  French  representatives, 
besides  others  in  political  and  municipal  affairs 
from  many  countries.  That  Leopold,  King  ot 
the  Belgians,  should  have  come  up  from  Ostend 
especially  to  open  the  congress  is  sufficient 
proof  of  the  high  esteem  in  which  our  profession 
is  held  in  foreign  countries. 

"It  is  to  be  hoped,"  the  editorial  went  on  to 
say,  "that  the  next  congress  of  architects, 
which    is   to   be    held    in    connection  with   the 


^ 


ARCHITECTURAL   ANNUAL 


257 


International  Exhibition  in  Paris  in  1900,  may 
be  more  fully  attended  by  our  countrymen. 
The  architectural  efforts  of  America  are  hardly 
appreciated  at  all  in  Europe  outside  of  England. 

"While  our  architecture  has  not  the  past  to 
boast  of,  which  is  so  valuable  a  factor  in  European 
art,  our  progress  during  the  past  two  decades  has 
been  along  lines  of  which  we  have  every  reason 
to  be  proud,  and  in  an  international  congress 
of  this  description  our  delegates  ought  to  be 
able  to  both  give  and  receive." 

Such  a  comment  is  just  as  applicable  to  the 
approaching  Congress  of  1900,  for  some  of  our 
eminent  architects  are  every  bit  as  able  "to 
receive"  as  they  were  when  The  Brickbuilder' s 
editorial  was  written.     There  are  many  lessons 


to  learn,  and  not  least  among  them  the  dignity 
of  a  congress  itself.  Abroad,  the  profession  is 
held  in  such  esteem  that  the  king  of  the  country 
in  which  the  Congress  of  1897  met  officially 
opened  the  proceedings  in  person.  In  such  an 
august  assembly  some  American  architects,  from 
acquaintance  with  national  conventions  at  home, 
may  feel  somewhat  ill  at  ease.  An  international 
convention  is  organized  as  an  opportunity  for 
dignified  discussion  and  for  serious  consideration 
of  architectural  problems,  instead  of  for  vain- 
glorious boastings  and  a  promiscuous  exchange 
of  compliments.  It  is  safe  to  predict  that  no 
excursions  at  the  expense  of  manufacturing 
companies  will  be  accepted,  nor  will  punch  be 
quaffed  from  miniature  sample  bath-tubs. 


Fiom  Berliner  Architeklutwelt 

COMPOSITION  BY  OTTO  REITH 


From  Berliner  Architekturwelt 

COMPOSITION  BY  OTTO  REITH 


258 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


A  PAPER  BY  EDWIN   HENRI   OLIVER,  OF  NEW 

ORLEANS 


READ  AT  THE  CLEVELAND  CONVENTION 


ONE  who  takes  a  broad  view  of  the  prac- 
tice of  architecture  in  our  country  will 
see  that  there  are  at  least  four  distinct 
fields  of  labor,  the  boundaries  of  which  are  irrev- 
ocably fixed  by  nature  ;  and  all  of  these  regions 
are  clearly  distinguished  by  variations  of  climate 
and  other  conditions.  I  refer  to  the  East,  the 
West,  the  North  and  the  South.  We  have  been 
recently  informed  by  the  politicians  that  we  are 
now  a  united  county,  and  that  there  is  no  North 
and  no  South.  Our  geography,  however,  flatly 
denies  these  statements. 

The  development  of  "  a  national  indigenous 
style"  appears  to  be  extremely  difficult  in  a 
country  that  sweeps  over  such  vast  expanses  and 
which  is  naturally  divided  into  distinct  regions, 
inhabited  by  a  heterogeneous  people  having  no 
traditions,  and  who  are  destined  to  develop  strong 
provincialisms  under  the  perpetual  influence  of 
climate  and  local  traditions  that  time  will  create. 

A  style,  to  be  indigenous  and  natural  under 
such  conditions,  must  necessarily  be  provincial  to 
be  fit  and  proper  for  the  particular  region  in 
which  it  is  developed  ;  thus  we  will  have  at  least 
four  natural  styles  in  our  country,  all  having 
more  or  less  resemblance  to  each  other,  which 
general  resemblance  we  may  call  national.  Thus 
far,  very  little  progress  has  been  made  in  the 
development  of  style.  The  architectural  jour- 
nals, books  and  photographs  have  been  the  agents 
to  feed  us  on  the  dry  bones  of  the  past.  A  great 
interest  taken  in  this  subject  during  the  present 
year  is  an  indication  of  unrest  and  dissatisfaction 
with  present  methods  ;  and  this  general  dissatis- 
faction will  the  more  easily  permit  of  the  free 
development  of  natural  styles. 

It  is  strange,  but  nevertheless  true,  that  the 
differences  in  climate  are  expressed  in  the  archi- 
tecture of  the  European  countries  to-day.  The 
mechanical  methods  of  building,  as  well  as  the 
refinements  of  style  maintained  in  the  rural  dis- 
tricts of  France,  Germany,  Italy,  Spain,  etc., 
differ  from  those  of  five  centuries  ago  only  in 
proportion  to  the  advance  of  civilization  in  gen- 
eral ;  and  they  differ  contemporaneously  one  from 
another  as  much  now  as  they  did  in  the  Middle 
Ages.  Even  the  great  cities  which  are  planted 
along  the  great  highways  of  the  world  and  which 
are  subject  to  the  greatest  cosmopolitan  influ- 
ences remain  almost  as  distinct  in  their  architec- 
tural characters  as  they  were  when  they  were  the 


strongholds  of  liberty  against  the  feudal  system. 
The  common  and  distinctive  architectural  forms 
in  these  older  communities  of  the  world  are  the 
result  of  established  customs  and  ancient  tradi- 
tions, which  have  their  rools  not  only  in  the 
characteristics  of  politics,  race  and  religion,  but 
in  the  very  climate  and  soil  of  the  country  which 
have  shaped  the  popular  sentiments  of  the  people, 
as  well  as  produced  the  materials  for  building, 
and  through  these  have  dictated  the  forms  by 
which  they  are  most  readily  adapted  to  meet  the 
wants  of  mankind. 

Why  is  it,  then,  that  we  are  so  fond  of 
masquerading  in  the  cast-off  garments  of  the  pnst 
and  care  so  little  for  creating  an  architecture  that 
is  natural  to  ourselves  ?  To  my  mind,  there  are 
two  or  three  reasons  quite  clear.  In  the  first 
place,  we  rely  too  much  on  academic  formulas, 
formulas  that  were  made  many  centuries  ago  by 
other  races  and  under  conditions  that  were  alto- 
gether unlike  those  under  which  we  live.  There 
seems  to  be  a  sort  of  continuous  conflict  be- 
tween the  discipline  of  the  schools  and  the  prac- 
tical requirements  of  the  day.  If  the  prejudices 
of  the  architectural  colleges  are  permitted  to  pre- 
vail, a  correct  and  scholarly  array  of  classic 
contours  and  measures  will  be  faithfully  repro- 
duced, and  there  will  be  an  undesirable  same- 
ness in  the  architecture  of  all  the  climatic  zones 
of  the  country  at  the  expense  of  practical  re- 
quirements and  the  natural  love  of  variety.  If, 
on  the  other  hand,  the  practical  requirements 
are  provided  for  in  a  natural  and  common-sense 
way,  there  is  likely  to  be  a  palpable  offence 
against  some  of  the  most  venerable  forms  of 
design.  But  there  is  a  conflict  still  more  ap- 
parent and  still  more  incessant  between  those 
formulas  and  the  methods  of  structure  imposed 
upon  building  by  the  application  of  modern 
science  to  all  its  details.  The  progress  of 
mechanical  invention  is  so  rapid  and  constant 
that  it  is  almost  impossible  for  the  architect  to 
keep  abreast  of  it  with  this  work.  These  me- 
chanical inventions  for  all  classes  of  buildings 
are  at  perpetual  warfare  with  the  principles  of 
Vitruvius,  which  guided  our  forefathers.  If 
the  office  of  the  architect  is  hospitable  to  these 
modern  influences,  there  must  be  a  revolution. 
The  result  of  this  revolution  will  constitute  the 
style  of  the  twentieth  century. 

It  is  pathetic  to  pass  over  the  South  and  see 


ARCHITECTURAL   ANNUAL 


259 


towns  of  20,000  or  more  energetic,  hospitable 
and  enterprising  people  with  houses  and  other 
private  and  public  buildings  built  in  what  is 
miscalled  the  "  modern  style  "  in  distinction  from 
the  Colonial,  but  not  one  of  these  will  be  found 
to  be  really  good,  grammatically  constructed  or 
conceived  in  a  spirit  of  subordination  to  any  type 
of  art.  They  are  carelessly  compounded  of 
exotic  and  heterogeneous  elements,  and  so  far  as 
their  decorative  or  architectural  character  is  con- 
cerned, there  is  no  expression  of  climatic  or  other 
natural  conditions  in  them. 

The  architecture  of  the  South  at  the  present 
time  is  anything  else  than  indigenous.  Most  of 
the  buildings  recently  built  in  the  Sunn}'  South 
are  modelled  after  those  of  the  Northern  cities 
with  a  lack  of  fitness  that  is  surprising.  The 
undisciplined  invention  of  architectural  forms 
which  is  so  general,  produces  many  travesties  of 
art,  and  the  fact  that  none  of  the  experiments  at 
style  give  such  permanent  satisfaction  as  to  cause 
a  continuance,  but  that  they  are  succeeded  by 
new  experiments  of  illiterate  fancy  —  these 
things  seem  to   indicate   a  general   desire   for   a 


more  orderly  system  of  design  that  will  be 
in  touch  with  the  climatic  and  social  condi- 
tions of  the  people  ;  a  style  that  is  broad  and 
generous,  plain  and  temperate,  a  style  that  may 
in  all  truth  and  lightness  of  heart  be  called 
Southern. 

There  is  not  a  more  excellent  opportunity  to 
develop  a  natural  and  indigenous  style  to-day 
than  in  the  city  of  New  Orleans.  Having  cli- 
matic conditions  that  make  it  unique  among  all 
other  American  cities,  and,  indeed,  among  all  of 
the  European  cities,  with  the  possible  exception 
of  The  Hague  and  Venice;  having,  of  all  the  large 
cities,  the  largest  proportion  of  Latin  descendants 
from  the  art-loving  nations  of  France,  Italy  and 
Spain,  and  being  the  nearest  and  the  most  in 
touch  with  the  great  Latin  countries  of  Mexico 
and  South  America— these  are  conditions  that 
will  affect  our  architecture  to  a  great  extent,  as  it 
has  previously  done,  if  not  create  in  time,  a  dis- 
tinct style  of  its  own.  But  the  architects  of  the 
South  should  not  set  themselves  against  these 
natural  conditions  if  they  desire  to  create  an 
architecture  that  is  natural. 


260 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


SOME  LESSONS  FROM  THE  UNITED  STATES 

REPRINTED  FROM  "THE  BUILDER  "—LONDON,  NOVEMBER  4,  1899 


WE  have  in  these  columns  frequently 
pointed  out  that  the  pessimistic  fore- 
bodings of  the  commercial  downfall  of 
England  were  absurd,  because  unless  there  is 
an  actual  deterioration  in  a  people  commercial 
or  any  other  kind  of  decay  is  impossible.  There 
may  be  overconfidence,  too  great  an  inapprecia- 
tion  of  the  movements  of  society  in  other  coun- 
tries, but  these  arise  to  a  certain  extent  from  a 
feeling  of  power. 

Whether,  however,  it  is  sufficiently  realized 
in  this  country  how  keen  is  the  determination  of 
Americans  to  obtain  commercial  business  outside 
their  own  borders,  and  to  compete  with  England 
in  all  the  markets  of  the  world,  may  be  doubted. 
Such  competition  must  necessarily  become  keener 
year  by  year,  for  though  in  the  United  States 
the  population  increases,  yet  manufactories  and 
works  of  all  sorts  equally  increase,  and  thus  the 
internal  competition  causes  a  desire  to  move  with 
the  markets  outside  the  United  States. 

In  one  particular,  also,  America  has  a  great 
natural  advantage  over  England,  namely,  in  the 
gre*at  extent  of  itswaterways.  Large  and  power- 
ful streams  are  to  be  found  in  all  parts  of  the  con- 
tinent and  more  and  more  water  is  being  har- 
nessed and  made  to  do  industrial  work.  The 
Niagara  Falls,  the  strongest  water  power  in  the 
world,  are  already,  without  any  perceptible 
diminution  of  their  forces,  the  motive  power  of 
important  works.  Further  to  the  west  the  dif- 
ference in  level  between  Lakes  Superior  and 
Huron  causes  the  rapids  of  Sault  Ste.  Marie. 
This  fall  of  water  is  now  also  being  utilized. 
The  largest  pulp  mills  in  the  world  are  in  suc- 
cessful operation  on  what  a  few  years  ago  was  a 
barren  island,  and  other  undertakings,  for  the 
manufacture  of  ferro-nickel,  will  presently  be 
working  on  the  same  spot.  These  are  but  two 
instances  out  of  many. 

There  is  yet  another  point  to  be  borne  in 
mind.  The  American  is  a  great  traveller.  His 
mind  is  keen  and  receptive.  When  he  goes  out- 
side of  America  his  intellect  is  ever  on  the  alert. 
He  may  go  ostensibly  on  pleasure,  but  he  has  an 
eye  to  business.  Moreover,  the  ease  and  com- 
fort of  the  ocean  communication  between  Europe 
and  America  are  such  that  the  American  business 
man  thinks  little  or  nothing  of  running  across  to 
Europe  for  a  short  time.  Many  Americans  are 
thus   as  well  acquainted  with   European  wants 


and  European  methods  of  work  and  business  as 
ourselves.  But  the  Englishman  does  not  make 
himself,  as  a  rule,  equally  well  acquainted  with 
what  is  going  on  in  America.  Nor  does  the 
American  confine  his  excursions  to  Europe  ;  he 
will  pass  over  into  Mexico,  make  a  trip  to  Japan 
or  China,  not  with  the  same  every-day  air  as 
when  he  crosses  to  Europe,  but  still  in  the  ordi- 
nary way  of  business.  The  American  is  thus 
rapidly  becoming  the  widest-minded  judge  of  the 
commercial  needs  of  the  world.  Distances  in 
the  United  States  are  so  great  that  movement  in 
Europe  is  mere  child's  play,  and  hence  he  roams 
over  the  Continent  watching  the  business  methods 
of  every  country.  If  a  practical  moral  be  drawn 
from  this  it  is  that  English  manufacturers  and 
men  of  business  need  to  develop  "commercial 
travelling."  They  must  not  only  seek  business, 
but  become  acquainted  with  the  needs  of  buyers 
the  world  over. 

Perhaps,  however,  the  most  striking  lesson 
which  can  be  learnt  from  the  United  States  at 
the  present  time  is  the  efficiency  of  the  educational 
system.  It  has  been  necessary  many  times  to  re- 
peat in  these  columns,  when  referring  to  the 
question  of  technical  education,  that  the  basis  of 
any  such  latter  system  is  a  good  general  educa- 
tion. In  the  United  States  technical  education 
is  far  in  advance  of  this  country.  The  chief  col- 
lege for  its  teaching,  the  Massachusetts  Institute 
of  Technology,  at  Boston,  has  over  1,000  students, 
and  turns  out  every  year  a  number  of  young 
men  of  the  highest  qualifications  and  training — 
all  bent  on  making  their  mark  and  their  way  in 
life.  In  addition,  there  are  technical  departments 
at  different  colleges  and  universities,  so  that  the 
general  technical  education  of  the  United  States 
is  far  ahead  of  that  in  England.  But  this  high 
standard  could  never  have  been  reached  had  it 
not  been  for  the  universal  and  admirable  general 
education  which  every  one  enjoys  without  much 
cost  to  parents.  It  is  the  common  education  of 
the  United  States  which  makes  it  a  country  of 
real  equality  from  a  social  point  of  view,  and 
enables  ability  to  come  to  the  top.  It  is  this 
universal  system  which  enables  technical  educa- 
tion to  be  carrjed  on  as  it  is.  There  is  a  natural 
gradation  from  the  school  system  to  the  college 
system — in  some  instances  to  classical  studies,  in 
others  to  technical  studies.  Technical  education 
is  not  the  unsystematic,  almost  despised,  business 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


261 


it  is  in  this  country.  It  is  recognized  as  a  neces- 
sity in  the  United  States — as  a  part  of  the  higher 
education  of  the  country  for  a  certain  section  of 
the  youth  of  the  nation. 

Moreover,  when  we  note  the  effect  of  the 
general  education  of  the  country  as  a  prepara- 
tion for  technical  education,  it  must  never  be  for- 
gotten that,  supplementary  to  all  kinds  of  educa- 
tion, there  is  the  free  library  system,  which 
places  within  the  reach  of  every  man,  however 
poor,  the  power,  by  his  own  reading,  of  improv- 
ing his  earlier  education  and  of  becoming 
acquainted  with  the  intellectual  movement  of 
the  world.  Nor  can  the  value  of  a  system  of 
free  libraries  as  part  of  the  ordinary  equipment 
of  a  community,  in  regard  to  the  occupation  of 
the  leisure  hours  of  artisans,  clerks  and  every 
workingman,  be  overestimated.  How  wide- 
spread is  this  system  in  the  United  States  is  not 
realized  in  this  country,  nor  can  we  here  enter 
into  details.  One  illustration  may,  however,  be 
given.  In  the  State  of  Massachusetts  there  are 
687  free  secular  libraries,  and  only  seven  towns 
in  that  State  are  without  these  institutions. 
These  towns  are  going  back,  and  they  represent 
only  one-half  of  1  per  cent,  of  the  population. 
In  other  words,  the  entire  population  of  the 
State  of  Massachusetts,  to  the  extent  of  99 )  2  per 
cent.,  has  a  library  within  its  reach. 

It  is  easy,  when  the  extent  and  completeness 
of  the  American  system  of  technical  education 
is  noted,  to  see  how  so  much  mechanical  ingen- 
uity is  diffused  over  the  United  States.  At  pres- 
ent there  is  abundant  occupation  for  all  this 
trained  intellect  ;  for,  populous  as  are  the  United 
States,  the  country  is  so  immense  that  the  mechan- 
ical work  which  has  still  to  be  done  is  equally 
extensive.  As  population  increases,  the  pioneer 
system  of  railways,  for  example,  has  to  be  super- 
seded by  a  completer  system,  by  better  permanent 
ways,  stronger  bridges ;  branches  have  to  be 
built  and  stations  erected.  The  railways  of  the 
United  States  alone  can,  therefore,  absorb  any 
amount  of  skilled  work.  Nevertheless,  English 
manufacturers  and  others  must  reckon  with  this 
factor  of  a  highly-trained,  numerous  and  ener- 
getic class  of  men,  the  results  of  whose  labor  and 
ingenuity  may  affect  us  in  our  own  and  in  foreign 
markets. 

There  is  yet  another  point  which  the  English 
manufacturer  would  do  well  to  bear  in  mind. 
There  is  no  probability  whatever  of  the  Protec- 
tionist tariff  being  substantially  altered.  Changes 
may  be  made,  duties  may  and  possibly  will  be 
lowered  from  time  to  time  ;  but,  by  the  admis- 
sion even  of  those  who  are  not  benighted  protec- 


tionists, the  raising  of  revenue  by  means  of 
numerous  and  even  high  duties  is  not  disliked  by 
the  people  ;  and  what  is  more  important,  no  sub- 
stitute for  such  duties  can  apparently  be  found. 
The  Federal  Constitution  of  the  United  States 
makes  it  more  difficult  than  in  England  to  devise 
systems  of  taxation.  The  income  tax,  which  in 
this  country  is  so  easy  a  method  of  raising  rev- 
enue, is  impossible.  Hence,  apart  altogether 
from  any  question  of  protecting  native  indus- 
tries by  means  of  duties,  it  appears  unlikely  that 
any  substantial  change  in  the  tariff  will  be  made. 
Consequently,  the  English  manufacturer  will  not 
compete  on  equal  terms  in  the  American  market, 
and  is  never  likely  to  have  the  chance,  and  must 
make  his  plans  accordingly. 

If,  leaving  these  larger  considerations,  we 
turn  to  some  matters  of  every-day  interest,  there 
are  several  in  regard  to  which  we  in  England 
may  well  take  some  lessons.  First  and  foremost 
is  the  development  of  the  system  of  electric  light- 
ing, which  may  now  be  said  to  be  universal — 
every  town,  great  or  small,  is  lit  by  electricity. 
The  American,  though  in  his  own  house  he  has 
a  liking  for  shade,  yet  wishes  to  have  his  streets 
and  stations  as  light  as  he  can  make  them  during 
the  hours  of  darkness.  Hence  he  has  adopted 
electric  light  everywhere.  Equally  also  he 
wishes  to  communicate,  whether  for  business  or 
other  purposes,  as  quickly  as  possible.  Hence 
telephones  are  used  so  widely  and  so  constantly 
as  to  have  become  a  necessary  factor  in  daily 
life.  The  convenience,  the  saving  of  time  and 
money  which  an  efficient  and  universal  tele- 
phonic system  brings  about  cannot  be  realized 
until  it  is  seen  in  operation.  Again,  the  system 
of  tramcars,  worked  in  rapid  succession  and  at  a 
cheap  rate,  and  very  widely,  has  made  personal 
communication  easy  and  rapid  to  a  degree  which 
also  cannot  well  be  understood  without  a  trial. 
Life  to  large  numbers  of  workers  is  rendered 
more  bearable  by  the  ability  to  pass  quickly  and 
without  fatigue  from  place  to  place.  Equally 
there  are  points  upon  which  adverse  criticism  may 
be  brought  to  bear,  but  these  are  very  largely 
necessarily  caused  by  natural  or  artificial  condi- 
tions. The  frequency  of  level  crossings  and  the 
unprotected  state  of  the  railway  tracks  arise  from 
the  greatness  of  distances  ;  bad  roads,  because 
rural  population  is  sparse  and  the  traffic  on  them 
is  slight  and,  to  a  large  degree,  purely  agricul- 
tural. As  soon  as  the  necessity  for  a  good  road 
arises  it  is  made.  In  the  United  States  there  is  a 
community  still  markedly  in  a  stage  of  national 
youth,  from  which,  however,  it  is  well  that  older 
countries  should  learn  what  they  can. 


THE  DIRECTORY 


OF  THE 


Architectural  Annual 

A  CONDENSED  REPORT   OF  THE   WORK  OF   THE  LEADING 

ARCHITECTURAL  SOCIETIES  AND  SCHOOLS 

OF  THE  COUNTRY 

BOOK  REVIEWS  AND  INDEX  TO  ARCHITECTURAL  PERIODICALS 


•« 


THE  AMERICAN  SCHOOL  OF  ARCHITECTURE  IN  ROME 

CHARLES  F.  McKIM,  President.  THEODORE  N.  ELY,  Vice-President. 

SAMUEL  A.  B.  ABBOTT,  Director. 

H.  SIDDONS  MOWBRAY,  Secretary  and  Treasurer,  66   West   Eleventh  Street,  New   York,  or 

Villa  dell' Aurora,   Rome. 

The  project  of  the  formation  of  The  American  School  of  Architecture  in  Rome  dates  from  the 
spring  of  1894.  On  June  12th  of  the  same  year,  a  meeting  was  held  at  the  Century  Club,  in  New 
York,  at  which  it  was  decided  to  found  an  institution  which  in  the  course  of  time  should  be  the  equal 
of  the  foreign  academies  in  Rome,  though  at  first  somewhat  different  in  scope.  The  management 
is  in  charge  of  a  permanent  committee  of  men  of  high  ability  in  architecture  and  the  allied  arts. 

To  the  holders  of  Travelling  Scholarships,  to  those  who  have  acquitted  themselves  with  distinc- 
tion in  the  competitions  for  these  scholarships  and  to  members  of  the  Ecole  des  Beaux-Arts  of  at 
least  three  years'  standing,  it  offers  opportunities  for  the  completion  of  their  professional  training 
in  special  lines  of  study  which  can  be  pursued  elsewhere  only  under  great  disadvantages.  In 
addition,  there  is  the  "  Roman  Scholarship"  of  the  value  of  $1,500,  offered  first  in  1895,  the  com- 
petition for  which  is  open  to  graduates  of  architectural  schools  throughout  the  country,  and  to 
members  of  the  Ecole  des  Beaux- Arts  of  two  years'  standing,  less  than  thirty  years  of  age. 

It  is  believed  that  the  foundation  of  the  school  in  Rome  has  marked  a  distinct  advance  in  the 
history  of  architectural  education  in  this  country,  and  will  tend  to  bring  about  more  and  more 
co-operation  between  the  different  schools,  to  continue  the  work  of  which  is  its  chief  aim. 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


263 


UNIVERSITY    OF    CALIFORNIA 

Berkeley,  Cal. 

B.  R.  MAYBECK,  Instructor. 

The  University  of  California  has  not  yet  officially  recognized  the  course  in  architecture,  but  the 
facilities  are  all  at  hand,  and  one  student  is  ready  to  take  up  the  course  when  regularly  defined. 
The  Hearst  Library  and  photographs  form  its  principal  endowments,  the  former  consisting  of  600 
volumes.     There  is  no  charge  for  tuition. 

COLUMBIA    UNIVERSITY 

New   York    City 

SCHOOL  OF  ARCHITECTURE 

Officers  of  Instruction. 


WILLIAM   R.  WARE,  LL.D., 

Professor  of  Architecture. 
ALFRED    D.   F.  HAMLIN,  A.M., 

Adjunct  Professor  of  Architecture. 
FRANK  DEMPSTER  SHERMAN,  Ph.B. 

Adjunct  Professor  of  Architecture. 
M.  K.  KRESS,  A.M  , 

Curator  and  Lecturer  in  Architecture. 


CHAS.  A.  HARRIMAN, 

Instructor  in  Architectural  Drawing. 
CHAS.  P.  WARREN,  A.M., 

Tutor  in  Architectural  Construction. 
WILLIAM   T.  PARTRIDGE, 

Lecturer  in  Architectural  Design. 
HENRY   F.  HORNBOSTEL,  Ph.B., 

Assistant  in  Architectural  Design. 


GRENVILLE  T.  SNELLING,  S.B., 

Instructor  in  Architectural  Engineering. 

The  school  was  founded  in  1881  through  the  generosity  of  Mr.  F.  A.  Schermerhorn,  under  the  direc- 
tion of  Professor  W.  R.  Ware.  It  now  has  sixty  regular  students  and  seventeen  specials.  The  four- 
year  course  deals  with  history,  drawing  and  design,  architectural  engineering,  specifications,  reading  and 
writing  in  the  first  three  years,  while  the  last  year  is  devoted  to  independent  work  along  post-gradu- 
ate lines.  The  University  courses  are  offered  to  graduates  of  the  four-year  course  and  represent 
advanced  study  in  history  and  design,  or  construction  and  practice.  Special  courses  are  given  to 
applicants  who  have  had  three  or  four  years'  practical  experience  as  draughtsmen  in  offices.  They 
are  required  to  pass  an  examination  in  architectural  drawing,  including  the  five  orders,  and  are 
received  for  periods  of  two  months  at  a  time. 

Three  travelling  scholarships  were  established  in  1890.  These  prizes  are  awarded  in  alternate  years 
and  are  open  only  to  graduates  under  thirty  years  of  age.  In  addition  to  these,  every  fourth  year, 
beginning  in  1902,  there  will  be  awarded  a  travelling  scholarship  valued  at  $1,000.  The  equipment 
of  the  school  consists  of  books  and  photographs  given  by  Mr.  F.  A.  Schermerhorn  ;  a  classified 
library  of  prints  and  plates  ;  the  Avery  Architectural  Library  of  about  15,000  volumes  ;  a  museum 
of  building  stones,  tools  and  materials,  and  a  large  collection  of  lantern  slides. 

The  cost  of  tuition  in  the  four-year  course  is  $200  a  year.  The  fee  for  special  students  is  $30  for 
each  period  of  two  months.  This  entitles  them  to  the  instruction  given  in  the  draughting  rooms 
and  four  hours  a  week  of  recitations  or  lectures.  An  additional  fee  of  $5  is  requirtd  for  every 
additional  hour  ;  but  in  no  case  will  the  fees  exceed  $50  for  the  two  months. 


THE    COLUMBIAN    UNIVERSITY 

Washington,  D.  C. 

DEPARTMENT   OF  ARCHITECTURE 

The  Corps  of  Instruction. 


JOS.  C.  HORNBLOWER,  Ph.B., 
Professor  of  Architecture. 

THOS.  J.  D.  FULLER,  B.S., 

Assistant  Professor  of  Architecture. 


THEODORE  F.  LAIST,  B.S., 

Associate     Professor     of    Architecture,     in 
Charge  of  Department. 


264  ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 

Architects  Assisting  the  Corps  of  Instruction  for  the  Year  1899-1900. 

WALTER  G.  PETER.  EDWARD  W.  DONN,  Jr.,  B.S. 

EDWARD  A.  CRANE.  FRANCIS  B.  WHEATON. 

OSCAR  J.  VOGT,  Instructor  in  Architectural  Drawing. 

At  the  beginning  of  this  year  the  Department  of  Architecture  was  reorganized  and  is  now  estab- 
lished on  a  firm  footing. 

There  is  a  regular  four  years'  course    leading  to  the  degree  of  Bachelor  of  Science,  as  well  as  a 

special  course  open  to  those  whose  previous  education  is  such  that  they  can,  in  the  opinion  of  the 

professor  in  charge,  pursue  the  course  to  advantage.     No  entrance  examination  is  required  of  special 

students,  but  a  certain  degree  of  proficiency  in  drawing  and  the  rudiments  of  architecture  is  expected. 

A  series  of  lectures  is  given  annually  by  eminent  practising  architects. 

The  annual  tuition  fees  are,  for  special  course  in  architecture,  $40.00,  and  for  the  regular  course, 
$100.00. 

An}'  other  information  may  be  had  by  referring  to  the  University  Catalogue,  or  to 

THEO.  F.  LAIST, 
Associate  Professor  in  Charge  of 
Department  of  A  rchitecture . 

CORNELL   UNIVERSITY 

Ithaca,  N.  Y. 

College  of  Architecture. 

In  1870  a  department  of  architecture  was  organized,  which  in  1896  was  changed  to  a  college  of 
architecture.  The  principal  difference  between  the  college  and  the  department  consists  in  the  rela- 
tions between  the  professors  and  instructors  of  architecture,  and  the  administrative  work  of  the 
institution.  Under  the  old  system  the  details  of  the  department  were  submitted  to  the  university 
faculty  for  discussion.  Under  the  new  system  the  faculty  of  architecture  has  practically  entire  charge 
of  the  affairs  of  the  college. 

The  faculty  of  architecture  consists  of  the  following  : 
ALEXANDER  BUEL  TROWBRIDGE,  OLAF  M.  BRAUNER, 

Professor  in  Charge  of  the  College  of  Archi-  Assistant  Professor  in  Charge  of  Drawing  and 

tecture.  Modelling,  and  Lecturer  on  the  History  of 

CLARENCE  A.  MARTIN,  Art. 

Assistant  Professor   in  Charge   of  Construe-     ALBERT  C.  PHELPS, 

tion.  Instructor  in  Charge  of  History  of  Architec- 

JOHN  V.  VAN  PELT,  ture. 

Assistant  Professor  in  Charge  of  Design. 

Regular  students  are  admitted  to  a  four-year  course  leading  to  a  degree.  Special  students  are 
admitted  to  a  two-year  course  not  leading  to  a  degree,  but  for  which  a  certificate  is  given. 

The  general  aim  is  to  give  students  a  thorough  foundation  in  the  theory  of  construction  and 
design  in  architecture,  supplementing  this  with  such  subordinate  subjects  as  will  help  toward  the 
symmetrical  development  of  an  architect.  Mathematics,  graphics,  mechanics,  history  of  architecture 
and  of  art,  free-hand  drawing  from  the  antique,  drawing  from  life,  decorative  work,  and  many 
other  minor  subjects  make  up  the  curriculum. 

There  are  two  architectural  fellowships  at  Cornell,  one  of  the  value  of  $500  for  one  year,  and 
open  to  graduates  of  any  approved  school  of  architecture  in  the  world  ;  and  the  other  of  the  value  of 
$2,000  for  two  years,  and  open  only  to  Cornell  graduates.  The  first  is  a  resident  fellowship  ;  the 
second  is  a  travelling  fellowship.  Onty  one  competition  has  been  held  for  the  travelling  fellowship  to 
date.  The  winner,  Mr.  W.  H.  Dole,  spent  the  year  1898-99  at  Cornell  studying  advanced  problems 
in  design.  In  the  summer  of  '99  he  travelled  in  Europe,  seeing  quite  thoroughly  the  British  Isles, 
Holland,  Belgium  and  a  large  part  of  France.  Mr.  Dole  is  at  present  (February,  1900)  working  in 
advanced  design  at  the  college,  and  next  fall  will  sail  for  Italy.  His  second  European  trip  will 
comprise  Italy,  Greece,  Southern  France  and  an  extended  stay  in  Paris.  So  far,  the  scheme,  which 
was  a  frank  experiment,  has  been  entirely  successful.  The  holder  of  the  fellowship  has  used  his 
time  to  the  best  advantage  by  means  of  this  combination  of  travel  and  of  home  study.     His  first  trip 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


265 


to  Europe  was  novel,  instructive  and  inspiring.  The  second  trip  will  be  for  him  a  lasting  stimulus, 
rendered  doubly  strong  and  certain  by  his  familiarity  with  the  monuments  of  architecture  through 
his  home  study  at  Cornell,  and  by  the  experience  gained  on  his  first  trip. 

During  the  past  year  the  College  of  Architecture  has  been  presented  with  two  memorial  medals 
and  a  memorial  collection  of  photographs.  One  medal  was  given  by  the  father  and  sisters  of  Charles 
Goodwin  Sands,  a  graduate  of  the  department  of  architecture  in  1890,  who  died  a  few  years  ago. 
The  other  medal  and  the  photographs  are  in  memory  of  Clifton  Beckwith  Brown,  of  the  class  of 
1900,  who  was  killed  during  the  battle  of  Santiago.  The  medals,  so-called,  are  in  the  form  of  dies. 
At  the  date  of  writing  the  Sands'  medal  is  being  modelled  by  Charles  Grafly,  of  Philadelphia,  and 
the  Brown  medal  by  Professor  Olaf  M.  Brauner,  of  the  architectural  faculty. 

The  equipment  of  the  college  is  worth  mentioning.  It  possesses  a  very  good  working  library,  a 
museum  of  models  and  architectural  casts,  and  a  collection  of  about  1,500  photographs.  Any 
graduate  of  the  college  may  secure  blue-prints  of  the  large  collection  for  a  comparatively  small  sum. 
Reference  to  these  has  been  invaluable  to  the  students  in  the  past. 

A  means  of  practical  education  and  opportunity  for  contact  with  contemporary  progress  is 
furnished  in  the  spring  trip.  It  is  an  inexpensive  method  by  which  the  students  may  obtain  the 
best  idea  of  the  world's  activities  beyond  the  theory  of  the  classroom. 

The  progressive  and  enlightened  policy  upon  which  the  Cornell  course  is  run  commends  itself  to 
those  who  look  for  an  intimate  relation  of  practice,  theory  and  other  evidences  of  vitality  in  a  college 
course.  One  evidence  of  this  progressiveness  is  seen  in  the  fact  that  the  College  of  Architecture  is 
the  official  headquarters  of  the  Central  New  York  chapter  of  the  American  Institute  of  Architects. 
Annual  meetings  are  held,  which  are  of  the  nature  of  conventions.  These  meetings  comprise  some 
business  and  much  pleasure,  generally  ending  in  a  banquet.  The  recent  graduates  of  the  college 
and  other  promising  young  men  of  Central  New  York  who  are  engaged  in  the  profession  of  archi- 
tecture are  taken  into  this  chapter  as  junior  members. 

Another  evidence  lies  in  the  custom  of  the  faculty  to  invite  men  of  active  practice  to  visit  Ithaca 
and  give  lectures  or  informal  talks  upon  subjects  of  peculiar  interest  to  themselves.  In  these  ways 
does  the  college  keep  in  touch  with  the  active  side  of  the  profession,  as  well  as  by  contributing  each 
year  to  the  exhibitions  of  architectural  drawings  held  in  the  different  cities. 

The  official  publication  of  the  college  is  the  "Annual,"  an  illustrated  book,  giving  the  courses, 
aims  and  some  of  the  student  work.  It  also  speaks  for  this  spirit  of  activity  and  vitality  that 
characterizes  the  course.  The  last  issue,  especially,  in  careful  editing,  in  artistic  arrangement  and 
in  attention  to  the  latest  attainments  in  book-making,  has  a  general  tone  that  is  far  in  advance  of 
the  other  college  publications. 

The  fact  that  Mr.  John  V.  Van  Pelt,  Assistant  Professor  in  Design,  was  in  1895  one  0I"  tne  nrst 
three  Americans  to  obtain  the  diploma  of  the  French  Government  speaks  for  the  superior  quality 
of  the  teaching  force  that  Cornell  has  drawn  to  her  Architectural  School. 

The  ultimate  aim  of  the  College  is  to  develop  into  an  institution  where  art  of  all  kinds  will  be 
fostered  and  taught.  The  primary  reason  for  this  aim  is  to  make  the  training  of  the  architect  more 
liberal,  more  rounded,  by  the  presence  of  the  sister  arts.  It  is  felt  that  architectural  students  should 
be  placed  in  an  atmosphere  filled  with  art  thought,  art  talk  and  art  work.  More  than  this,  the 
architect  to-day  must  know  something  of  mural  painting  and  sculpture,  and  should  be  readily  able 
to  distinguish  the  good  from  the  bad.  If  this  reason  seems  a  selfish  regard  for  architects,  it  must 
not  be  forgotten  that  painters  and  sculptors  also  need  a  thorough  understanding  of  the  general  laws 
which  govern  architectural  composition  and  architectural  scale.  If,  then,  the  professions  or  arts  are 
interdependent,  the  ideal  plan  for  the  development  of  any  one  of  the  arts  is  in  an  institution  where 
the  others  are  taught. 

The  tuition  for  regular  and  special  students  is  $125  per  year,  payable  in  three  payments. 


UNIVERSITY  OF  ILLINOIS 

Urbana,  111. 


N.  CLIFFORD  RICKER,  M.Arch., 

Professor  in  Charge. 
CYRUS  D.  McLANE,  B.S., 

Assistant  Professor  of  Architecture. 


JAMES  M.   WHITE,  B.S., 

Associate  Professor  of  Architecture. 
SETH  J.  TEMPLE,  Ph.B., 

Assistant  Professor  of  Architecture. 


266  ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 

The  department  of  architecture  was  opened  in  1873.  About  fifty-four  regular  students  in  archi- 
tecture and  architectural  engineering  and  eight  special  students  are  in  the  school.  There  are  two 
general  courses,  one  in  architecture  representing  a  training  in  mathematics,  construction  of  all  kinds, 
office  work  and  methods,  history  of  architecture,  perspective  drawing  and  design  ;  the  other  in  archi- 
tectural engineering,  giving  instruction  in  higher  mathematics,  bridges  and  bridge  design.  The 
department  is  provided  with  gifts,  working  drawings,  specimens  of  building  materials,  casts,  brick 
and  mosaic  panels.  Graduates  of  this  course  are  not  required  to  take  examinations  in  architectural 
construction,  strength  of  material  and  sanitation,  which  are  required  of  all  other  applicants  for  license 
to  practice  architecture  in  Illinois.  Papers  by  graduates  and  students  are  published  in  the  Tcchno- 
graph,  an  annual  of  the  College  of  Engineering.  The  aim  of  the  course  is  to  fit  its  students  for  able 
assistants,  good  builders  and  safe  architects.  This  has  evidently  been  accomplished  in  not  a  few 
instances,  for  9  per  cent,  of  the  licensed  architects  of  Illinois  are  graduates  or  former  students  of  the 
department ;  others  are  engaged  in  every  Western  State  and  Territory,  and  even  in  Japan. 

Two  free  scholarships  are  offered  to  all  University  students  from  each  county  in  the  State.  Eight 
fellowships  of  $300  each  are  offered  to  University  graduates,  and  are  open  to  architectural  students, 
as  well  as  the  others. 

University  fees  are  $24  per  year  ;  the  average  cost  is  $250  to  $300  per  year. 


THE  INTERNATIONAL  CORRESPONDENCE  SCHOOL 

Scranton,  Pa. 

DEPARTMENT  OF  ARCHITECTURE 

Since  its  inception,  separate  schools  have  been  formed,  which  specialize  in  certain  lines  of  work 
more  or  less  intimately  connected  with  the  architectural  profession.  As  a  result,  the  International 
Correspondence  Schools  now  furnish  instruction  in  building  design,  construction  and  equipment 
through  six  distinct  schools. 

WM.  SCOTT-COLLINS,  Architect,  MAURICE  M.  SLOAN,  Architectural  Engineer, 

Principal.  Assistant  Principal. 

Address,  The  International  Correspondence  School,  Wyoming  Avenue,  Scranton,  Pa. 

The  schools  are  represented  in  Science  and  Industry,  published  monthly  by  the  Colliery  Engineer 
Company,  proprietors  of  the  schools.  Messrs.  Collins  and  Thomson  are  associate  editors,  and  the 
other  principals  contribute  regularly.     Subscription,  $1  per  year  in  advance  ;  single  copies,  10  cents. 

The  School  of  Architecture  of  the  International  Correspondence  Schools  was  founded  in  the  spring 
of  1894,  its  ultimate  aim  being  to  raise  the  standard  of  the  artisan  and  teach  the  younger  members 
of  the  profession  the  technical  details  of  each  department  of  the  building  trades. 

The  principal  of  each  school  is  assisted  in  the  work  of  instruction  by  his  special  corps  of  trained 
examiners  and  instructors.  Following  is  a  list  of  the  various  courses  of  instruction  and  the  scope 
and  cost  of  the  complete  architectural  course. 

It  is  intended  for  architects,  draughtsmen,  contractors  and  builders,  carpenters,  masons,  bricklayers 
and  other  artisans,  and  all  others  desirous  of  qualifying  themselves  to  design  and  construct  buildings. 
The  student  who  completes  this  course  will  be  able  to  design,  prepare  working  drawings  and  specifi- 
cations for  building  operations,  calculate  quantities,  estimate  costs  and  will  have  a  thorough  knowl- 
edge of  iron  and  steel  construction. 

Prices. — Cash,  $60.00,  or  $68.00,  $73.00  and  $78.00,  in  monthly  payments  of  $5.00,  $3.00  and  $2.00, 
respectively. 

Architectural  Drawing  and  Design  Course. 

This  is  intended  for  carpenters,  contractors,  architectural  draughtsmen  and  all  who  wish  to  learn 
architectural  drawing,  history  and  design. 

Prices. — $40.00,  $45.00,  $50.00  or  $55.00,  according  to  plan  of  payment. 

The  graduate  of  one  of  these  courses  is  not  necessarily  a  fully  educated  man,  but  he  knows  more 
about  that  part  of  his  business  which  cannot  be  "picked  up"  from  experience  than  his  fellow- 
workers.  He  has  a  more  practical  education,  for  his  purpose,  self-advancement,  than  could  be 
obtained  in  any  resident  school,  because  he  has  learned  nothing  he  could  not  immediately  use,  and, 
by  combining  education  and  work,  has  made  each  of  double  value. 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL  267 

The  need  of  such  men  is  so  great  that  the  schools  have  found  favor  with  many  members  of  the 
architectural  profession  who  are  acquainted  with  the  work  they  have  undertaken  and  the  results 
accomplished.  And  not  a  few  practising  architects  have  taken  advantage  of  this  opportunity  to 
review  former  studies  and  increase  their  knowledge  of  modern  architectural  engineering  and  recent 
developments  in  the  various  building  trades. 

The  results  accomplished  by  the  schools  demonstrate  that  correspondence  education,  with  a 
persevering  student  at  one  end  of  the  line  and  a  broad-minded  and  experienced  management  at  the 
other,  is  productive  of  large  practical  results.  The  courses  are  not  intended  as  substitutes  for  college 
or  resident  technical  school  courses,  but  represent  the  night  work  of  advanced  artisans  ambitiously 
inclined.  They  furnish  to  artisans  and  practical  workers  in  the  various  divisions  of  the  architectural 
profession  specialized  education  in  the  scientific  principles  underlying  their  work  and  their  practical 
application.  As  the  courses  begin  with  arithmetic,  the  only  qualification  required  of  the  student  is 
the  ability  to  read  and  write  English  and  persevering  application  to  study. 

The  Correspondence  School  of  Architecture  occupies  a  unique  position.  It  is  not  scholastic  in 
character,  but  exists  for  the  ambitious,  thoughtful  artisan  who,  while  pursuing  his  daily  work,  may 
in  outside  hours  become  proficient  in  matters  he  cannot  acquire  by  experience.  It  must  not  be 
placed  beside  college  and  technical  courses,  but  is  so  different  in  character,  deals  with  such  a  different 
class  of  workers,  and  reaches  so  many  more  students  that  it  occupies  its  own  peculiar  field.  Some 
men  who  have  obtained  a  broad  architectural  education  use  the  course  to  perfect  themselves  in 
technical  details.  The  books  are  supplemented  by  diagrams  and  illustrations  that  make  the  courses 
both  lucid  and  thorough.  The  keynote  of  all  is  that  the  isolated  student,  put  upon  his  own 
resources,  may  reach  a  high  standing  by  individual  work. 

The  fact  that  the  total  number  of  students  and  graduates  in  all  the  schools  operating  under  the 
title  of  the  International  Correspondence  Schools  is  at  this  writing  over  150,000,  and  that  thus  far 
the  total  enrollment  has  doubled  each  year,  indicates  a  future  growth  for  the  new  system  of  educa- 
tion that  will  be  one  of  the  marvels  of  the  twentieth  century. 


TULANE  UNIVERSITY  OF  LOUISIANA 

New  Orleans 

ART   DEPARTMENT 

WILLIAM  WOODWARD,  Professor  of  Architecture. 

The  course  in  architecture  was  founded  in  1894  '<  the  number  of  students  in  attendance  is  five, 
pursuing  either  the  four-year  course  in  architectural  engineering  or  the  special  courses.  The  depart- 
ment is  provided  with  plans  and  specimens  of  materials.  About  150  free  scholarships  are  available 
throughout  Louisiana,  admitting  to  architectural  as  well  as  other  courses.  Tuition  in  the  regular 
course  is  one  hundred  and  five  ($105)  dollars  per  year  ;  for  special  courses  it  is  proportionately  less. 


McGILL  UNIVERSITY 

Montreal,  Canada 

ARCHITECTURAL  COURSE 

S.  HENBEST  CAPPER,  M.A.  (Edin.),  H.  F.  ARMSTRONG, 

A.R.I.B.A.,  R.C.A.,  Assistant  Professor  of  Free-hand  Drawing, 

MacDonald  Professor  of  Architecture,  in  charge.  Drawing  and  Geometry. 

The  architectural  course  was  founded  in  1896,  and  since  that  time  twelve  students  have  been  in 
attendance,  three  have  graduated  and  five  are  still  in  the  course.  The  plan  of  the  course  covers  four 
years. 

Endowments  cover  the  salary  of  a  professor  and  an  annual  income  for  the  extension  of  equip- 
ment. Gifts  have  supplied  the  department  with  casts,  library,  photographs,  slides,  models,  lanterns 
and  diagrams. 


268  ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 

To  legally  practice  in  the  Province  of  Quebec  an  architect  must  be  a  duly  qualified  member  of 
the  Provincial  Association  of  Architects,  admission  to  which  is  by  examination.  Graduates  of 
McGill  University  are  not  required  to  pass  the  matriculation  examinations  for  this,  and  are  entitled 
to  present  themselves  for  the  qualifying  examinations  after  one  year's  study  under  a  practising  archi- 
tect, in  place  of  four  years'  office  work  required  of  non-graduates. 

The  cost  of  the  course  is  one  hundred  and  fifty-five  ($155.00)  dollars  a  year. 


HARVARD  UNIVERSITY 

Cambridge,  Mass. 

DEPARTMENT  OF  ARCHITECTURE 

HERBERT  LANGFORD  WARREN,  GEORGE  FREDERICK  NEWTON, 

Professor  of  Architecture  (in  charge  of  the  Instructor  in  Drawing  and  Design. 

Department).  ANDREW  GARBUTT, 

DENHAM  WALDO  ROSS,  Ph.D.,  Instructor  in  Modelling. 

Lecturer  on  the  Theory  of  Design.  LOUIS  JEROME  JOHNSON,  A.B.,  C.E., 

WALTER  DANA  SWAN,  Statics,    Structural   Design,    Masonry    Con- 
Assistant  in  Architecture.  struction. 

CHARLES  HERBERT  MOORE,  A.M.,  Professor  of  Art  and  Director  of  the  Fogg  Art  Museum. 

As  recently  as  1894  was  r^e  department  of  architecture  founded  at  Harvard,  and  at  the  present 
time  it  has  twenty-eight  regular  and  seventeen  special  students,  besides  four  students  in  landscape 
gardening. 

In  connection  with  the  department,  a  four-year  course  in  landscape  architecture  has  just  been 
established. 

The  department  possesses  a  library  of  between  300  and  400  volumes,  which  has  been  carefully 
selected  to  meet  the  wants  of  students,  besides  several  thousand  photographs  and  a  collection  of 
drawings  and  casts. 

The  University  Library  has  a  very  complete  collection  of  books  on  architecture  and  the  fine  arts. 

The  Fogg  Art  Museum,  beside  its  collection  of  casts,  Greek  vases,  engravings,  etc.,  has  a  collection 
of  over  27,000  photographs,  a  large  proportion  of  which  are  of  architectural  subjects. 

The  University  has  received  for  the  department  the  following  gifts  and  endowments  : 

Under  the  will  of  the  late  Arthur  Rotch,  of  Boston,  $25,000. 

From  donors  who  are  for  the  present  anonymous,  $100,000,  for  a  building  for  the  department  of 
architecture,  and  a  further  sum  of  $100,000  for  its  endowment. 

Plans  for  this  building  are  now  nearing  completion  by  Messrs.  McKim,  Mead  &  White,  and  it 
promises  to  be  most  complete  in  all  its  arrangements. 

The  Board  of  Overseers  of  Harvard  University  has  appointed  as  its  committee  to  visit  the  depart- 
ment Mr.  R.  S.  Peabody,  A.M.  (of  the  firm  of  Peabody  &  Stearns),  Mr.  A.  W.  Longfellow,  Jr., 
A.B.,  Mr.  Ed.  M.  Wheelwright,  A.B.  (of  the  firm  of  Wheelwright  &  Haven),  Mr.  R.  Clifton 
Sturgis,  A.B. 

These  gentlemen  have  aided  the  instructors  in  the  department  in  the  conduct  of  advanced 
problems  in  design. 

Prof.  H.  L.  Warren  is  Chairman  of  the  Committee  on  Education  of  the  American  Institute  of 
Architects. 

The  President  and  Fellows  of  Harvard  College  established  in  1899  the  Austin  Fellowship  in 
Architecture,  with  an  income  of  $r,ooo,  tenable  for  one  year,  setting  apart  for  the  purpose  a  portion 
of  the  income  of  the  fund  received  by  the  University  under  the  will  of  the  late  Edward  Austin. 

The  Fellowship  is  open  for  competition  to  those  who  of  their  own  means  are  not  able  to  bear 
the  expense  of  a  year's  study  abroad.  Candidates  must  be  Bachelors  of  Science  in  Architecture 
of  Harvard  University,  of  not  more  than  three  years'  standing  at  the  commencement  next  pre- 
ceding the  examination  for  the  Fellowship  and  must  have  taken  the  degree  with  distinction. 

The  cost  of  tuition  is  $150  per  year.  Several  scholarships,  varying  in  value  from  $150  to 
$225  each,  are  available  in  the  Lawrence  Scientific  School,  of  which  the  architectural  courses  are 
one  department,  for  the  aid  of  students  of  high  merit. 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL  269 

MASSACHUSETTS  INSTITUTE  OF  TECHNOLOGY 

Boston,  Mass. 

COURSE   IN   ARCHITECTURE 

FRANCIS   \V.  CHANDLER,  HARRY  W.  GARDNER,  S.B., 

Professor  of  Architecture  and  in  Charge  of  the  Instructor  in  Architecture. 

Department.  ALICE   G.  LORING, 

DESIRE   DESPRADELLE,  Assistant  in  Architecture. 

Rotch  Professor  of  Architectural  Design.  TRUMAN   H.   BARTLETT, 

ELEAZER   B.  HOMER,  S.B.,  Teacher  of  Modelling. 

Associate  Professor  of  Architecture.  DAVID  A.  GREGG, 

WILLIAM    H.  LAWRENCE,  S.B.,  Teacher  of  Pen-and-ink  Drawing. 

Assistant  Professor  of  Architecture.  C.  HOWARD   WALKER, 

CHARLES    L.  ADAMS,  Teacher  of  the  History  of  Ornament. 

Instructor  in  Free-hand  Drawing.  SAMUEL   W.   MEAD, 

W.  FELTON   BROWN,  Teacher  of  Architectural  Design. 

Instructor  in  Free-hand  Drawing.  ROSS   TURNER, 

Teacher  of  Water-Color. 
The  option  of  Landscape  Architecture  is  in  charge  of 

GUY   LOWELL,  A.B.,  S.B.,  Grad.  Ecole  des  Beaux- Arts. 

The  Massachusetts  Institute  of  Technology  founded  a  course  in  architecture  in  1S65.  The 
students  number  120. 

An  endowment  fund  of  about  two  million  ($2,000,000)  dollars  exists  for  all  departments  and  a 
special  fund  of  thirty  thousand  ($30,000)  dollars  is  for  Course  IV,  Architecture. 

Regular  visits  are  made  to  the  Institute  by  the  Boston  Society  of  Architects.  Mr.  R.  S.  Peabody, 
President  of  the  American  Institute  of  Architects,  is  a  member  of  the  corporation  of  the  M.  I.  T. , 
and  is  chairman  of  the  visiting  jury  of  this  year.  The  Technology  Quarterly  is  the  organ  that 
represents  architectural  interests  at  the  Institute.  Options,  or  electives,  in  architectural  engineering 
and  landscape  architecture  have  recently  been  added  to  the  course.  Harvard  and  the  Institute 
are  the  only  schools  that  teach  this  latter  branch  of  study,  and  it  has  great  promise.  A  conception 
of  symmetry,  a  knowledge  of  fine  art  generally,  a  keen  perception  of  a  client's  tastes  and  a  strong 
imaginative  faculty  are  requisites  of  a  landscape  gardener,  no  matter  how  much  college  or  institute 
work  he  may  pass  through.  There  is  a  danger  of  such  a  course  becoming  too  mechanical  and 
scientific — too  forgetful  of  the  aesthetic  side  of  the  problem,  but  the  matter  is  in  good  hands. 

One  hundred  and  seventy-five  students  have  been  graduated  from  the  architectural  department  of 
the  Institute.  Between  500  and  600  have  taken  professional  positions,  but  have  not  graduated.  The 
tuition  is  $200. 

UNIVERSITY  OF  THE  STATE  OF  MISSOURI 

Columbia,  Mo. 

DEPARTMENT  OF  ARCHITECTURE 

THOMAS  NOLAN,  Ph.B.,  C.  W.  MARX, 

Professor  in  Charge.  Professor  of  Mechanics  of  Architecture. 

HARRY  T.  CORY,  T.  J.  RODHOUSE, 

Professor  Sanitary  Engineering  of  Buildings.  Instructor    in    Descriptive     Geometry    and 

Drawing. 

The  chair  in  architecture  established  in  1899  at  the  University  of  Missouri  was  the  first  to  be 
established  west  of  the  Mississippi  River,  and  is  the  only  one  beside  that  of  Illinois  west  of  the 
Alleghanies.  Thirteen  students  are  now  enrolled  in  the  course.  The  four-year  course  is  modelled 
according  to  the  strongest  methods  of  the  Eastern  colleges  and  furnishes  a  thorough  training  in 
Architectural  Drawing  and  Design.  The  library  is  small,  but  carefully  selected.  Photographs,  plates, 
lantern  slides  and  architectural  casts  add  to  the  equipment.  Tuition  is  free,  the  only  charge  being 
a  library  fee  of  $5.00  for  each  year,  and  laboratory  deposits  to  cover  the  costs  of  materials  used  by 
students. 


270  ARCHITECTURAL   ANNUAL 

UNIVERSITY  OF  PENNSYLVANIA 

Philadelphia,  Pa. 

COURSES  IN  ARCHITECTURE 

WARREN  POWERS  LAIRD,  CHARLES  E.  DANA, 

Professor  in  Charge.  Water- Color. 

HERBERT  E.  EVERETT,  FRANK    EDSON    PERKINS,    S.B.,    Arch'te 

Interior  Decoration.  Diplome  du  Gov't  Francais, 

GEORGE  WALTER  DAWSON,  Design. 

Drawing.  FRANK  ALLISON  HAYS, 
LEWIS  FREDERICK  PILCHER, Ph. B.  in  Arch.,         Pen-and-ink  Rendering. 

Architectural  History.  FREDERICK  M.  MANN,  C.E.,M.S., 

HUGER  ELLIOTT,  Theory  and   Practice  of  Construction. 

Architecture. 

Lecturers. 

WALTER  COPE,  FRANK  MILES  DAY,  B.S., 

Architect.  Architect. 

EDGAR  V.  SEELER,  AMOS  J.   BOYDEN,   S.B., 

Architect.  Architect. 

The  School  of  Architecture  was  founded  at  the  University  of  Pennsylvania  in  1890,  and  has  shared 
in  the  phenomenal  growth  of  the  institution.  There  have  entered  this  year  thirty  eight  students  in 
the  regular  courses,  and  twenty-nine  in  both  special  courses,  a  total  of  sixty-seven.  The  four-year 
course  provides  a  thorough  architectural  training  ;  the  two-year  special  course  is  intended  for  archi- 
tectural draughtsmen  who,  desiring  to  supply  deficiencies  in  technical  training,  are  unable  to  give  the 
time  necessary  to  the  completion  of  the  four-year  course  ;  and  the  three-year  course  in  Interior  Decora- 
tion fits  its  students  for  the  intelligent  designing  of  all  those  objects  of  industrial  art  that  pertain  to 
an  artistic  interior. 

The  courses  are  so  arranged  as  to  present  architecture  as  an  art,  which,  while  inseparable  from 
sound  construction  and  obedience  to  utility,  yet  lies  above  and  beyond  these  attributes  in  the  field  of 
the  fine  arts  proper.  The  most  important  division  of  the  professional  work  of  the  course  pertains, 
therefore,  to  Design  ;  and  to  this  subject,  in  its  various  phases,  the  relatively  largest  portion  of  the 
student's  time  is  devoted  throughout  the  four  years  of  his  course.  Supporting  this  line  of  study  and 
broadening  the  general  view  of  the  student  are  the  History  courses.  These  continue  through  four 
years,  covering  exhaustively  the  field  of  architecture,  and  giving  concise  treatment  to  that  of  painting 
and  sculpture.  Careful  attention  is  given  to  subjects  comprehended  under  the  term  "  Architectural 
Engineering,  "  comprising  pure  and  applied  science,  the  nature  of  materials,  and  the  theory  and 
practice  of  construction  and  of  sanitation.  Draughtsmanship  receives  constant  attention  throughout 
the  course,  not  only  in  drawing  incident  to  the  Design  courses,  but  also  in  various  lines  of  instruction 
in  pure  drawing. 

The  purely  professional  work  of  the  course  thus  outlined  covers  some  three-fourths  of  the  time 
required  of  the  student,  the  remaining  portion  being  devoted  to  strictly  liberal  studies,  which  are 
confined  to  the  first  two  years. 

The  school  has  been  the  recipient  of  gifts,  largely  in  money,  sufficient  to  provide  it  with  a  work- 
ing library  of  about  500  volumes,  some  thousands  of  photographs,  and  a  collection  of  lantern  slides, 
casts  and  models,  drawings  and  engravings.  Prominent  practising  architects  of  Philadelphia  lecture 
before  the  school.  Professor  Laird  is  Vice-President  of  the  T-Square  Club,  which  organization  offers 
prize  free  memberships  to  the  two  students  doing  the  best  work  in  the  junior  year.  The  Year-Book 
of  the  school  of  architecture  is  issued  by  a  student  organization,  the  Architectural  Society,  and  com- 
pares quite  favorably  with  periodicals  published  by  the  faculties  of  other  colleges.  The  merit  of  these 
courses  is  sufficiently  proven  by  the  fact  that,  within  ten  years  from  its  foundation,  the  school  stands 
among  those  considered  the  best  in  the  country. 

In  the  matter  of  free  scholarships  the  following  provisions  have  so  far  been  made  for  the  assist- 
ance of  students  unable  to  pay  the  full  tuition  fees.  The  scholarships  open  to  undergraduates  in 
the  college  may  be  divided  broadly  into  two  classes  :  first,  those  which  may  be  held  only  by  students 
from  certain  localities  ;  and  secondly,  those  which  are  general  in  their  application.  The  first  consist 
of  the  Penn  Scholarships  (two  in  number),  which  are  filled  by  the  Governor  of  the  State  ;  the  Pub- 
lic  School  Prize   Scholarships    (fifty   in   number),   which  are  awarded   in    any  department  of  the 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL  271 

University,  upon  the  recommendation  of  the  Board  of  Education,  to  graduates  of  the  public  schools 
of  the  city  of  Philadelphia  ;  and  the  Pennsylvania  Public  High  School  Scholarships  (five  in  number), 
which  are  open  to  graduates  of  public  high  schools  in  Pennsylvania  on /side  of  Philadelphia.  The 
scholarships  open  to  students  in  general  are  the  Baird  Scholarship,  which  provides  free  tuition  for 
one  student  ;  the  Simon  Muhr  Scholarships,  which  provide  free  tuition  for  three  students;  and 
sixteen  scholarships  awarded  each  year,  eight  to  candidates  for  scholarships  in  the  School  of  Arts, 
and  eight  for  the  Towne  Scientific  School.  The  total  amount  of  free  tuition  given  by  the  college 
during  1897-98  is  represented  by  the   sum  of  $27,973.60. 

Those  wishing  to  make  application  for  scholarships  should  address  Dr.  Josiah  H.  Penniman,  Dean 
of  the  college,  or  Professor  Edgar  F.  Smith,  Chairman  of  the  Faculty  Committee  on  Scholarships. 

Any  student  in  the  School  of  Architecture,  of  one  full  year's  standing,  is  eligible  to  the  competi- 
tion for  the  John  Stewardson  Memorial  Scholarship  in  Architecture, being  of  the  value  $1,000.00;  the 
winner  being  required  to  spend  a  year  in  travel  and  study  abroad.  Graduates  of  the  four  year 
course  are  exempt  from  the  preliminary  examinations,  and  students  holding  certificates  of  the  two- 
year  special  course  are  required  to  pass  preliminary  examinations  in  French  only. 

Admission  to  the  four-year  course  requires  a  knowledge  of  English,  History,  Mathematics  and 
French  or  German  (see  catalogue).  The  degree  of  B.S.  in  architecture  is  given  at  the  end  of  the 
senior  year.  Admission  to  the  three-year  course  in  Interior  Decoration  is  granted,  without 
distinction  of  sex,  under  certain  entrance  conditions,  to  persons  not  less  than  eighteen  years  of 
age,  to  whom  a  certificate  of  proficiency  is  granted  at  the  end  of  the  course.  Admission  to  the 
special  two-year  course  is  granted  to  draughtsmen  of  not  less  than  two  years'  experience  in  office 
wor<c,  who  may  present  evidences  of  general  educational  fitness,  an  entrance  examination  in  free- 
hand drawing  being  required. 

The  work  of  this  course  is  purely  professional  from  beginning  to  end.  College  graduates,  holding 
diplomas  that  cover  an  equivalent  of  the  academic  work  of  the  four-year  course,  may  obtain  the 
degree  of  B.S.  in  architecture  at  the  end  of  this  course. 

The  tuition  fee  for  the  four-year  and  two-year  course  is  one  hundred  and  fifty  ($150.00)  dollars 
per  annum  ;  for  the  course  in  Interior  Decoration  it  is  fifty  ($50)  dollars  per  annum. 


SYRACUSE  UNIVERSITY 

Syracuse,  N.  Y. 

DEPARTMENT  OF  ARCHITECTURE 

EDWIN  H.  GAGGIN,  B.Arch.,  FREDERICK  W.  REVELS,  B.Arch., 

Professor  of  Architecture,  in  charge  of  De-  Instructor   in    Perspective   and    Descriptive 

partment  of  Architecture.  Geometry. 

T.  WALKER  GAGGIN,  B.Arch.,  CARL  T.  HAWLEY,  B.P., 

Instructor  in  Architecture.  Instructor  in  Free-hand  and  Life  Drawing. 

WILLIAM  E.  TAYLOR,  Ph.M.,  Instructor  in  Pure  Mathematics. 

The  course  in  architecture  of  the  College  of  Fine  Arts  of  Syracuse  University  was  founded  in 
1873,  and  now  has  twenty-four  regular  students  and  five  special  students. 

The  regular  course  leading  up  to  the  degree  of  Bachelor  of  Architecture  requires  four  years  to 
complete.  The  aim  in  the  work  is  to  give  the  student  a  fundamental  knowledge  of  all  those  subjects 
that  will  be  of  value  to  him  in  practising  his  profession.  While  it  is  aimed  to  make  him  a  specialist 
as  an  architect,  it  is  so  done  as  to  give  him  a  general  education  so  far  as  time  will  permit.  The 
student  is  allowed  and  encouraged  to  become  as  dependent  upon  himself  in  his  work  as  possible,  so 
long  as  what  he  does  is  thoroughly  in  accord  with  the  principles  of  reasonable  and  artistic  design. 
Problems  are  given  such  as  would  be  encountered  in  the  office  of  a  first-class  architect,  so  that  the 
student  is  fitted  for  practical,  everj--day  life. 

The  two-year  course  in  architecture  is  intended  for  those  persons  who  have  not  had  the  prepara- 
tory work  necessary  to  enter  the  regular  four-year  course.  A  certificate,  but  no  degree,  is  given  for 
the  completion  of  the  two-year  course. 

An  exhibition  of  work  produced  by  the  students  during  the  year  is  held  during  commencement 
week  each  spring,  to  which  the  public  is  invited.  The  work  of  the  department  is  described  in  the 
"  University  Annual,"  which  is  published  each  spring. 


272 


ARCHITECTURAL   ANNUAL 


All  of  the  graduates  of  the  department  are  doing  successful  work  in  the  profession,  as  are  others 
who  left  college  before  completing  their  course.  The  instructors  in  architecture  are  practical  men. 
The  University  has  expended  during  the  past  four  years  over  $650,000  upon  new  buildings,  and  this 
work  has  always  been  open  to  the  inspection  and  study  of  students  in  the  department. 

During  the  past  year  there  has  been  established  a  fellowship,  giving  one  year's  free  tuition  for 
post-graduate  work,  to  be  awarded  to  the  most  capable  student  of  the  graduating  class  each  year. 
The  University  has  scholarships  that  it  gives  to  needy  and  deserving  students.  Absolutely  no 
restrictions  are  made  as  to  whom  the  scholarships  shall  be  given,  except  that  the  student  must  be 
needy,  and  worthy,  and  be  pursuing  a  regular  course.  The  cost  of  tuition  is  $135  per  year.  A 
matriculation  fee  of  $5  is  required  upon  registration  at  beginning  of  course.  The  cost  of  gradua- 
tion fee  and  diploma  is  $20. 


DOORWAY,    ST.    PAULO.    SEVILLA 

DRAWN   BY   ADOLFO  CARLOS   MUNOZ 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL  273 

THE  AMERICAN  INSTITUTE  OF  ARCHITECTS 

FOUNDED    1857 
PERMANENT  NATIONAL  HEADQUARTERS,  "THE  OCTAGON,"  "WASHINGTON,  D.  C. 

Annual  conventions  are  held  in  different  cities,  the  rotation  being  so  arranged  that  beginning 
with  1900  every  other  convention  will  be  held  at  Washington. 

OFFICERS  FOR  1900 

ROBERT  S.   PEABODY,  President,  Boston,  Mass. 

W.  S.  EAMES,  First  Vice-President,  St.  Louis,  Mo. 

FRANK  MILES  DAY,  Second  Vice-President,  Philadelphia,  Pa. 

GLENN  BROWN,  Secretary  and  Treasurer,  Washington,  D.  C. 

EXECUTIVE  COMMITTEE 

ROBERT  S.   PEABODY  (ex-officio),  Boston,  Mass. 
.GLENN  BROWN '(ex-officio),  Washington,  D.  C. 
GEORGE  B.  POST,  New  York,  N.  Y. 
ALFRED  STONE,  Providence,  R.  I. 
ROBERT  W.  GIBSON,  New  York,  N.  Y. 

BOARD  OF  DIRECTORS 

FOR   ONE   YEAR. 

R.  W.  GIBSON,  54  Broad  Street,  New  York,  N.  Y. 

LEVI  T.  SCOFIELD,  338  Erie  Street,  Cleveland,  O. 

W.  M.  POINDEXTER,  806  Seventeenth  Street,  Washington,  D.  C. 

FOR   TWO   YEARS. 

GEORGE  B.   POST,  33  East  Seventeenth  Street,  New  York,  N.  Y. 
ARTHUR  G.  EVERETT,  62  Devonshire  Street,  Boston,  Mass. 
ALFRED  STONE,  49  Westminster  Street,  Providence,  R.  I. 

FOR  THREE  YEARS. 
HENRY  VAN  BRUNT,  1214-A  Main  Street,  Kansas  City,  Mo. 
JAMES  G.  HILL,  Corcoran  Building,  Washington,  D.  C. 
NORMAND  S.  PATTON,  115  Monroe  Street,  Chicago,  111. 

For  information  regarding  Standing  and  Special  Committees,  list  of  members,  business  transacted, 
convention  proceedings,  etc.,  see  literature  of  the  Society. 


CHAPTER  REPORTS,  SEPTEMBER  30,  1898,  TO  SEPTEMBER  30,  1899 
REPRINTED  FROM  PROCEEDINGS  OF  THE  THIRTY-THIRD  ANNUAL  CONVENTION 

NEW  YORK  CHAPTER.     1867 

WALTER   COOK,  President. 
CHARLES   I.    BERG,  Secretary,  10  West  Twenty-third  Street,  New  York. 

This  Chapter  has  held  five  regular  meetings  and  one  special  meeting,  with  an  average  attendance 
of  fifteen.  It  has  been  called  in  several  times  to  select  juries  and  to  suggest  methods  in  deciding 
public  competitions,  and  its  advice  has  been  followed. 

Practising  membership  eighty-seven,  eight  having  joined  during  the  year.  Forty-one  Institute 
members,  entitling  the  Chapter  to  six  delegates  in  the  Convention.  No  member  elected  to  the 
Institute  from  this  Chapter  during  the  year. 


274  ARCHITECTURAL   ANNUAL- 

PHILADELPHIA   CHAPTER.     1869 
WILSON   EYRE,  President. 
AMOS  J.   BOYDEN,  Secretary,  411  Walnut  Street,  Philadelphia. 

The  Chapter  has  held  one  meeting  in  the  past  year.  Attendance  not  given.  The  present  prac- 
tising membership  is  thirty  ;  one  member  has  been  elected  and  two  resigned.  Four  junior  members, 
two  of  whom  were  elected  in  the  last  year.  Nine  Institute  members,  entitling  the  Chapter  to  two 
delegates.     No  Institute  member  elected  during  past  year.     Twelve  applications  pending. 

ILLINOIS  CHAPTER.     1869 

S.  A.  TREAT,  President. 

GEORGE   BEAUMONT,  Secretary,  115  Dearborn  Street,  Chicago. 

Ten  meetings  have  been  held,  with  dinner  at  each.  Average  attendance  nine.  The  present 
practising  membership  is  fifty-four,  five  having  resigned  and  seven  lapsed  and  one  died  in  the  past 
year.  Present  honorary  members  are  three  ;  one  honorary  member  died  in  the  current  year.  Thirty- 
seven  Institute  members  entitles  the  Chapter  to  five  delegates  in  Convention.  No  new  Institute 
members  from  this  Chapter  in  the  past  year. 

BOSTON  CHAPTER.     1870 

E.  C.   CABOT,   Honorary  President.  C.  A.  CUMMINGS,   President. 

A.  G.  EVERETT,  Secretary,  62  Devonshire  Street,  Boston. 

Eight  regular  meetings  and  one  special  meeting  with  dinner  have  been  held  during  the  year,  with 
average  attendance  of  thirty. 

The  Chapter  has  had  under  consideration  the  Rotch  Travelling  Scholarship,  the  conduct  of  city 
architecture,  building  limits,  and  a  general  competitive  code.  Papers  have  been  read  by  R.  A.  Cram, 
on  the  Outline  of  Japanese  Architecture  ;  Sylvester  Baxter,  on  Renaissance  Architecture  in  Mexico; 
John  A.  Fox,  on  Professional  Practice  ;  C.  Howard  Walker,  on  Possibilities  for  Improvement  in 
Boston  ;  Theodore  A.  Skinner,  on  New  Buildings  for  the  University  of  Virginia.  The  present  mem- 
bership of  the  Chapter  is  sixty-seven  practising  members  ;  fifteen  associate  or  non-professional  mem- 
bers ;  thirty  juniors  and  eleven  honorary  members.  There  are  twenty-four  Institute  members, 
entitling  this  Chapter  to  four  delegates  to  the  Convention.  No  new  Institute  members  have  been 
received  from  this  Chapter  during  the  year. 

CINCINNATI  CHAPTER.     1870 

A.  O.  ELZNER,  President. 

HARRY    HAKE,  Secretary,  Lincoln  Iron  Building,  Cincinnati. 

This  Chapter  has  held  twelve  regular  meetings  with  dinner,  with  an  average  attendance  of  twelve 
at  each  meeting.  The  Society  has  discussed  the  consideration  of  Plate  Glass  Works,  Painting 
Specifications,  the  adoption  of  the  New  Constitution  ;  has  made  excursions  to  the  Bullitt  Electric 
Works  ;  outing  on  the  lagoon  ;  outing  on  the  Ohio  River  to  Coney  Island,  and  a  trip  to  Hamilton, 
Ohio,  Niles  Tool  Works.  Papers  have  been  read  on  Tile,  by  Carl  Lokenbach  ;  The  Development  of 
Church  Architecture,  by  A.  O.  Elzner ;  Lime  and  Cement,  by  E.  W.  Heyward.  The  present  mem- 
bership consists  of  sixteen  practising  members,  ten  associates,  and  one  junior.  Twelve  members  of 
the  American  Institute  of  Architects  belong  to  the  Chapter,  and  two  applications  are  pending  for 
Institute  membership  from  this  Chapter.  The  Chapter  is  entitled  to  three  delegates  in  the  Con- 
vention. 

RHODE  ISLAND  CHAPTER.     1875 

ALFRED   STONE,  President. 

EDWARD    I.  NICKERSON,  Secretary,  61  Westminster  Street,  Providence,  R.  I. 

This  Chapter  has  held  five  regular  meetings  during  the  year,  average  attendance  ten.  These 
meetings  were  all  accompanied  with  dinner.     The  following  papers  have  been  read  :  The  Homeric 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL  275 

Palace  of  Tiryas,  by  Norman  M.  Shaw  ;  Slides  of  the  work  of  various  architects,  with  running  com- 
ments, by  Edward  E.  Field  ;  Formal  Gardens,  by  Prescott  O.  Clark.  The  Chapter  has  had  under 
consideration  the  plans  for  the  layout  of  Exchange  Place.  The  present  membership  consists  of 
sixteen  practising  members,  two  juniors,  and  one  non-professional.  One  practising  member  has 
resigned  during  the  year.  This  Chapter  has  eleven  members  of  the  Institute,  and  is  entitled  to  three 
delegates  in  the  Convention  of  the  American  Institute  of  Architects.  No  members  have  been 
admitted  to  the  membership  of  this  Chapter  during  the  year.  No  application  for  membership  in  the 
Institute  has  been  received. 

SAN  FRANCISCO   CHAPTER.     1881 

SETH   BABSON,  President. 
MERRITT   G.   REID,  Secretary,  Claus  Spreckels  Building,  San  Francisco. 

This  Chapter  has  held  seven  regular  meetings  and  four  special  meetings  during  the  year.  This 
Chapter  has  discussed  the  Constitution  and  By-Laws,  a  State  license  for  architects,  competition  for 
hospitals,  arranged  a  program  and  entertained  the  jurors  of  the  Phoebe  Hearst  Competition  for  Plans 
for  the  University  of  California. 

The  Chapter  has  thirty-one  practising  members,  one  associate  member,  and  six  honorary  mem- 
bers. During  the  year  seven  practising  members  have  been  elected,  one  has  resigned,  one  lapsed, 
and  one  died.  This  Chapter  has  nine  Institute  members  and  is  therefore  entitled  to  two  delegates  in 
the  Convention  of  the  American  Institute  of  Architects.  Two  associates  have  been  elected  to  the 
Institute  during  the  year  from  this  Chapter,  and  one  member's  application  is  pending  from  this 
Chapter. 

INDIANAPOLIS  CHAPTER.     1887 

B.  VONNEGUT,  President. 

CLARENCE  MARTINDALE,  Secretary,  503  Indiana  Trust  Building,  Indianapolis. 

This  Chapter  has  held  no  meetings  during  the  past  year.  Has  fourteen  practising  members. 
Nine  of  the  members  of  this  Chapter  are  members  of  the  Institute,  therefore  this  Chapter  is 
entitled  to  two  delegates  to  the  Convention  of  the  American  Institute  of  Architects. 

WASHINGTON  CHAPTER.     1887 

JAMES  G.   HILL,   President.  T.  J.  D.  FULLER,  Secretary. 

This  Chapter  has  held  eight  regular  meetings  during  the  year  and  one  special  meeting,  with 
average  attendance  of  nine.  They  have  had  before  them  for  discussion  the  bill  for  the  Carnegie 
Library  Competition  and  a  paper  by  Mr.  Thomas  Wilson  on  "  The  Effect  of  Glass  on  Transmitted 
Light."  This  Chapter  at  present  has  twenty -seven  practising  members,  four  junior  members,  and 
one  honorary  member.  They  have  elected  two  practising  members  and  one  practising  member  has 
resigned  during  the  year.  This  Chapter  has  twenty-two  members  of  the  Institute,  and  is,  therefore, 
entitled  to  four  delegates  in  the  Convention.  Five  members  of  the  Chapter  have  become  associates  of 
the  Institute  during  the  year,  and  five  architects  have  joined  through  the  influence  of  this  Chapter 

MICHIGAN   CHAPTER.     1887 

HENRY  J.   MEIER,  President. 

FRANK  C.   BALDWIN,  Secretary,  1103  Union  Trust  Building,  Detroit. 

This  Chapter  has  held  six  regular  meetings,  with  dinner,  during  the  year,  also  one  special  meet- 
ing. Average  attendance  of  nine  at  the  meetings.  The  time  at  these  meetings  has  been  occupied 
in  discussion  on  "  Licensing  Architects  in  the  State  of  Michigan."  This  Chapter  has  eleven  practis- 
ing members,  three  associate  members,  and  two  honorary  members.  They  have  elected  and  rein- 
stated two  practising  members  ;  has  ten  members  of  the  Institute,  therefore  is  entitled  to  three 
delegates  to  the  Convention. 


276  ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 

GENERAL  NEW  YORK  SOCIETY  OF  ARCHITECTS.    1887 

JOSEPH  BLABY,  Vice-President,  Acting  President.  J.  H.  PIERCE,  Secretary. 

This  Society  has  held  one  meeting  during  the  year,  at  which  new  officers  were  elected.  On 
account  of  the  scattered  dwelling-places  of  the  members  of  this  Society  they  have  found  it  difficult 
to  meet.  It  has  seventeen  practising  members,  two  associate  members.  No  members  have  been 
elected,  and  none  resigned  or  lapsed  during  the  year.  Two  members  have  been  elected  associates 
of  the  Institute  during  the  year.  It  has  ten  Institute  members,  and  is,  therefore,  entitled  to  three 
delegates  in  the  Convention  of  the  American  Institute  of  Architects.  A  number  of  members  of  this 
Society  have  made  application  during  the  year  for  membership  in  the  Institute. 

BUFFALO  CHAPTER.     1890 

GEORGE  CAREY,  President. 

F.  A.  LOVERIN,  Secretary,  19  Court  Street,  Buffalo. 

This  Chapter  held  seven  regular  and  two  special  meetings  during  the  year,  with  an  average 
attendance  of  ten.  The  meetings  were  taken  up  by  general  discussions  ;  the  discussion  of  the 
Pan-American  Congress  at  Buffalo  ;  revising  the  By-Laws  ;  a  paper  on  Municipal  Art,  by  George 
Carey  ;  Norman  Architecture,  by  E.  A.  Kent ;  Architectural  Course  in  Cornell  University,  by  Prof. 
A.  C.  Trowbridge.  Several  of  the  meetings  during  the  year  were  attended  by  the  Buffalo  Society  of 
Artists,  the  Buffalo  Society  of  Engineers.  This  Chapter  has  twenty-five  practising  members,  having 
lost  during  the  year  one  by  resignation,  three  by  lapse  of  dues,  and  elected  one  new  member.  This 
Society  has  seven  members  who  are  members  of  the  American  Institute  of  Architects,  and  is,  there- 
fore, entitled  to  two  delegates  in  the  Convention.  No  members  have  entered  the  Institute  from  this 
Chapter. 

ST.  LOUIS  CHAPTER.     1890 

WILLIAM  B.  ITTNER,  President. 

LOUIS  MULLGARDT,  Secretary,  Commercial  Building,  St.  Louis,  Mo. 

This  Chapter  has  held  eleven  regular  meetings,  and  three  special  meetings  during  the  year,  with 
average  attendance  of  fifteen.  Discussions  have  taken  place  on  a  License  Law  for  Architects  ;  to 
forestall  the  disruption  of  the.  St.  Louis  Board  of  Underwriters  ;  the  Adoption  of  the  New  Constitu- 
tion and  By-Laws  ;  a  Code  of  Ethics,  and  the  following  papers  have  been  read  :  On  the  Best  Method 
in  Modern  Practice  in  Steam  and  Mechanical  Engineering,  by  Wm.  H.  Bryan  ;  Result  of  Tests  on 
Wood  Columns  and  Girders,  by  Prof.  J.  B.  Johnson  ;  Resolutions  on  the  death  of  George  Ingram 
Barnett,  William  Buckley  and  William  H.  Brown  ;  the  celebration  of  the  Louisiana  Purchase  Cen- 
tennial, by  Louis  Mullgardt.  This  Chapter  has  twenty-four  practising,  three  associate,  and  two 
junior  members.  During  the  year  there  have  been  an  election  of  two  practising  members,  the  death 
of  one  practising  member,  and  one  associate  member  has  been  carried  forward  into  the  practising  list. 
This  Chapter  has  twenty  two  members  who  are  members  of  the  American  Institute  of  Architects, 
therefore  would  be  entitled  to  four  delegates  in  the  Convention  of  the  American  Institute  of  Archi- 
tects.    Four  members  have  joined  the  Institute  from  this  Chapter  during  the  year. 

KANSAS  CITY  CHAPTER.     1890 

F.  B.   HAMILTON,  President. 

GEORGE  MATTHEWS,  Secretary,  415  Lyceum  Building,  Kansas  City,  Mo. 

This  Chapter  has  held  one  regular  meeting  and  three  special  meetings  during  the  year,  discussing 
the  licensing  of  architects,  the  reorganization  of  the  Chapter,  and  resolutions  on  the  death  of  Mr. 
W.  F.  Hackney.  This  Chapter  has  twenty-two  practising  members  ;  one  member  has  been  elected 
during  the  year  ;  one  has  lapsed,  and  one  died.  It  has  seven  Institute  members,  and  is  therefore 
entitled  to  two  delegates  in  the  Convention.  Five  members  have  been  elected  to  the  Institute  during 
the  year  from  this  Chapter  and  one  member  reinstated  on  the  rolls  of  the  Institute. 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL  277 

CLEVELAND   CHAPTER.     1890 

CHARLES  W.  HOPKINSON,  President. 

BENJAMIN  S.   HUBBELL,  Secretary,  New  England  Building,  Cleveland. 

This  Chapter  held  seven  meetings  during  the  year,  with  an  average  attendance  of  six,  together 
with  dinner  or  supper  at  each  meeting.  They  have  discussed  the  question  of  territories  of  Chapter 
jurisdiction  ;  papers  have  been  read  on  Competition,  by  A.  N.  Oviatt  and  Berres.  This  Chapter  has 
ten  practising  members,  one  having  been  elected  during  the  year.  The  Institute  membership  in  this 
Chapter  has  been  reduced  to  three  members. 

PITTSBURG   CHAPTER.     1891 

T.  D.  EVANS,  President. 

W.  J.  EAST,  Secretary,  232  Fifth  Avenue,  Pittsburg,  Pa. 

This  Chapter  has  held  nine  regular  and  three  special  meetings  during  the  year,  with  an  average 
attendance  of  seven  ;  an  occasional  dinner  has  been  given  at  the  meetings.  At  these  meetings  dis- 
cussions have  taken  place  relating  to  the  Architectural  Club  of  Pittsburg  joining  the  Chapter; 
amending  the  Constitution  and  By-Laws,  and  receiving  a  Charter  from  the  State,  and  entertaining 
the  Convention  of  the  American  Institute  of  Architects.  This  Chapter  has  twenty-two  practising 
members,  six  of  whom  have  joined  during  the  last  year.  This  Chapter  has  fifteen  members  who  are 
members  of  the  Institute,  therefore  is  entitled  to  three  delegates  in  the  Convention.  Seven  have 
been  elected  to  the  Institute  from  this  Chapter  during  the  last  year. 

WORCESTER   CHAPTER.     1892 

STEPHEN  C.  EARLE,  President. 

GEORGE  H.   CLEMENCE,  Secretary,  405  Main  Street,  Worcester,  Mass. 

This  Chapter  has  held  eight  regular  meetings  during  the  year,  with  an  average  attendance  of  five, 
with  only  general  business  before  it.  It  has  five  members  who  are  members  of  the  American  Insti- 
tute of  Architects,  and  is  therefore  entitled  to  two  delegates  in  the  Convention.  No  members  have 
been  elected  from  this  Chapter  to  the  American  Institute  of  Architects  during  the  year. 

MINNESOTA  CHAPTER.     1892 

WALTER  S.  PARDEE,  824  Guaranty  Building,  Minneapolis,  Minn. 

This  Chapter  has  held  no  meetings  during  the  last  two  years.  A  letter  from  the  Secretary, 
Walter  S.  Pardee,  states  that  they  are  taking  measures  to  organize  their  Chapter  and  get  it  into  posi- 
tion for  active  beneficial  work. 

COLORADO  CHAPTER.  1892 

ROBERT  S.  ROESCHLAUB,  President. 

F.  E.  KIDDER,  Secretary,  628  Fourteenth  Street,  Denver,  Col. 

This  Chapter  has  held  fifteen  meetings  during  the  year,  with  an  average  attendance  of  seven  at  a 
meeting,  without  dinners.  Have  had  discussions  on  the  questions  of  Licensing  Architects,  on  the 
Building  Ordinances,  Competition  for  the  Auditorium,  and  general  business.  This  Chapter  has 
nineteen  practising  members,  one  having  lapsed  during  the  year.  It  has  four  members  belonging  to 
the  American  Institute  of  Architects,  and  the  applications  of  several  pending.  It  is  entitled  to  two 
delegates  in  the  Convention.  Three  have  been  elected  to  the  Institute  from  this  Chapter  during  the 
year. 


278  ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 

BROOKLYN    CHAPTER.     1894 

ISAAC  E.  DITMARS,  President. 

A.   G.  THOMSON,  Secretary,  90  Beekman  Street,  New  York. 

This  Chapter  has  held  nine  regular  and  one  special  meeting  during  the  year  ;  supper  usually 
served  at  each  meeting.  They  have  discussed  the  new  building  laws  for  New  York,  obtaining  State 
Charter  and  new  By-Laws  ;  building  commission  ;  had  an  excursion  to  see  Ransom's  new  Concrete 
Factory  ;  had  a  lecture  on  Architectural  Photographs,  by  Mr.  Parshley  ;  a  lecture  on  Architecture, 
by  Prof.  A.  D.  F.  Hamlin.  This  Chapter  has  fourteen  practising  members,  seven  junior  members, 
and  three  non-professional  members.  One  practising  member  has  resigned  during  the  year.  This 
Chapter  has  fourteen  members  belonging  to  the  American  Institute  of  Architects,  and  is  therefore 
entitled  to  three  delegates  in  the  American  Institute  of  Architects.  One  member  of  this  Chapter 
has  been  elected  an  associate  to  the  American  Institute  of  Architects  during  the  year. 

SOUTHERN  CALIFORNIA  CHAPTER.     1894 

B.  H.  BROWN,  President. 

JOHN  P.  KREMPEL,  Secretary,  Phillips  Block,  Los  Angeles,  Cal. 

This  Chapter  has  held  seven  meetings  during  the  year,  with  an  average  attendance  of  six  at  a 
meeting.  Have  discussed  the  bill  for  licensing  architects,  and  also  a  bill  on  New  City  Ordinance  ; 
also  matters  pertaining  to  the  American  Institute  of  Architects.  It  has  seventeen  practising  mem- 
bers, three  having  resigned  during  the  year.  There  are  no  members  of  this  Chapter  belonging  to 
the  American  Institute  of  Architects,  but  the  Secretary  informs  me  that  he  has  five  or  six  applica- 
tions which  he  has  sent  out  to  San  Francisco  for  endorsement  from  members  of  the  Institute,  and  he 
is  anxious  to  organize  properly  as  a  Chapter  of  the  American  Institute  of  Architects. 

DAYTON,  OHIO,  CHAPTER.     1899 

ROBERT  E.  DEXTER,  Canby  Building,  Dayton,  O. 

The  architects  of  Ohio  have  organized  a  Chapter  with  five  Institute  members  ;  have  held  no  meet- 
ings except  for  organization  ;  will  be  entitled  under  the  Constitution  to  two  delegates  in  the  Conven- 
tion. 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL  279 

THE    ARCHITECTURAL   LEAGUE    OF  AMERICA 

AN  ANNUAL  REFERENDUM  OF  DIVERSE  ARCHITECTURAL  SOCIETIES 

ALBERT  KELSEY,  Philadelphia,  Pa.,  President. 
WILLIAM  B.  ITTNER,  St.  Louis,  Mo.,  Eirst  Vice-President. 
J.  W.  CASE,  Detroit,  Mich.,  Second  Vice-President. 
HENRY   W.  TOMLINSON,  Chicago,  Secretary. 
HERBERT  B.  BRIGGS,  Cleveland,  Treasurer. 

The  first  annual  convention  was  held  at  Cleveland,  O.,  June  2  and  3,  1899,  and  a  circuit  of 
architectural  exhibitions  was  established,  a  uniform  code  governing  competitions  in  design  was 
recommended  for  adoption  by  all  architectural  societies,  and  the  licensing  of  architects  was  discussed. 
The  sentiment  of  the  convention  indicated  first  that  scattered  architectural  clubs  have  an  important 
and  unique  civic  relation,  that  they  may  lead  their  cities'  development  in  beauty,  and  that  they  may 
and  must  interest  the  public  and.  co-operate  with  it ;  and  second,  that  much  as  is  to  be  learned  from 
the  architecture  of  the  past,  contemporaneous  conditions  offer  truer,  better  and  more  vital  inspira- 
tion. Ninety-seven  delegates  representing  thirteen  different  organizations  were  in  attendance.  Fol- 
lowing is  a  list  of  the  societies  and  voting  delegates  : 

Boston  Architectural  Club,  Irving  T.  Guild. 
Architectural  League  of  New  York,  Julius  F.  Harder. 
Society  of  Beaux-Arts  Architects,  New  York,  John  E.  Howe. 
Pittsburg  Architectural  Club,  John  T.  Comes. 
Pittsburg  Chapter,  A.  I.  A.,  W.  J.  East. 
Detroit  Architectural  Sketch  Club,  J.  W.  Case. 
Chicago  Architectural  Club,  Joseph  C.  Llewellyn. 
St.  Louis  Architectural  Club,  William  B.  Ittner. 
Cleveland  Chapter,  A.  I.  A.,  Charles  W.  Hopkinson. 
Cleveland  Architectural  Club,  Herbert  B.  Briggs. 
Toronto  (Canada)  Architectural  Club,  J.  F.  Hynes. 
T-Square  Club  of  Philadelphia,  Adin  B.  Lacey. 
Illinois  Chapter,  A.  I.  A.,  P.  B.  Wight. 

COMMITTEE  UPON  CODE  GOVERNING  COMPETITIONS  IN  DESIGN 

JULIUS  F.  HARDER,   194  Broadway,  New  York. 

COMMITTEE  UPON  ARRANGEMENTS  OF  EXHIBITION  CIRCUIT 

HENRY  W.  TOMLINSON,  Chairman,  Steinway  Hall,  Chicago. 

COMMITTEE  UPON  MUNICIPAL  IMPROVEMENT  AND  CIVIC   EMBELLISHMENT 

CASS  GILBERT,  Chairman,  New  York  and  St.  Paul. 

H.  K.  BUSH-BROWN,  New  York,  N.  Y. 

PAUL  A.  DAVIS,  3d,  Philadelphia,  Pa. 

FREDERICK  WILLIAM  STRIEBINGER,  Cleveland,  O. 

NOEL  WYAT,  Baltimore,  Md. 

GEORGE  CAREY,  Buffalo,  N.  Y. 

EDWARD  HENRI  OLIVER,  New  Orleans. 

CHAS.  MULFORD  ROBINSON,  Rochester. 

DWIGHT  HEALD  PERKINS,  Chicago. 


280 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


CONFERENCE  WITH  AMERICAN  INSTITUTE  OF  ARCHITECTS  ON 
COMPETITION  CODE  AND  CO-OPERATION 

At  the  suggestion  of  the  President  of  the  American  Institute  of  Architects  the  following  committee  was  appointed  to  confer  with  a 
committee  from  that  body  upon  the  code  governing  competitions  in  design  and  other  matters  of  mutual  interest. 

DWIGHT  HEALD  PERKINS,  Chairman.  Chicago. 
JULIUS  F.  HARDER,  New  York,  N.  Y. 
PROFESSOR  WARREN  P.  LAIRD,  Philadelphia. 
WILLIAM  B.  ITTNER,  St.  Louis,  Mo. 
J.  W.  CASE,  Detroit,  Mich. 

THE  ARCHITECTURAL  LEAGUE  OF  NEW  YORK 

215  West  Fifty-seventh  Street,  New  York  City. 

ROBERT  W.   GIBSON,   President. 
C.  Y.  TURNER,  First  Vice-President. 
H.  K.  BUSH-BROWN,  Second  Vice-President. 

Executive  Committee— -H.  K.  BUSH-BROWN,  W.  B.  TUTHILL,  WM. 
E.  STONE,  WILLIAM  H.  RUSSELL,  JAMES  BROWN  LORD,  C.  Y. 
TURNER,  E.  A.  JOSSELYN,  HORACE  MORAN,  W.  W.  KENT. 

With  the  usual  object  of  promoting  architecture  and  the  allied  fine  arts  this  Society  has  accom- 
plished much  in  its  own  field  of  work.  Beyond  the  annual  exhibitions  and  the  free  lectures  accom- 
panying them,  the  League  has  considered  the  advisability  of  a  united  exhibition  of  arts  in  New 
York.  Various  important  municipal  measures  have  been  brought  to  the  city's  notice,  their  merits 
being  urged  by  the  League.  Even  now  a  committee  has  been  appointed  to  report  on  the  advisability 
of  a  co-operative  study  of  architecture  and  the  allied  arts. 

The  Society  was  founded  January  18,  1881,  and  incorporated  November  2,  1888,  as  national  in 
character.  It  is  composed  of  405  resident  members,  sixty-nine  non-resident  members,  and  two 
honorary  members.  Eight  monthly  meetings  are  held  in  the  year,  with  an  annual  meeting  the  first 
Tuesday  in  May.     At  all  of  these  meetings  a  dinner  is  served. 

The  League  was  active  in  forming  the  Federated  Committee  on  Legislation,  composed  of  dele- 
gates from  the  leading  art  and  building  association  of  the  city,  and  this  committee  has  appointed  sub- 
committees on  the  following  subjects  :  Legislation  at  Albany  ;  Municipal  Assembly  and  Municipal 
Senate  ;  Parks,  Docks  and  Bridges,  and  Buildings  and  Streets.  Thus  reinforced,  the  League  is  in  a 
position  to  advocate  the  sweeping  reforms  for  reconstructing  the  city  discussed  at  the  regular  monthly 
meetings,  to  which  frequently  a  number  of  municipal  officials  and  public-spirited  citizens  are  invited. 

The  code  governing  competitions  in  design  and  the  licensing  of  architects  were  first  brought  to 
notice  by  this  Society. 

Since  1892  the  League  has  occupied  spacious  quarters  in  the  American  Fine  Art  Society  Building. 

Being  affiliated  with  the  Fine  Arts  Federation  of  New  York  and  the  Architectural  League  of 
America,  the  Club  touches  upon  the  work  and  interests  of  a  larger  world.  Its  usual  attendance  at 
meetings  is  twenty-nine  members  and  five  guests ;  at  the  annual  dinner,  121  members  and  twenty 
guests. 

Yearly  dues,  $15.00 ;  entrance  fee,  $10.00  for  resident  and  $5.00  for  non-resident  members. 


THE  BOSTON  ARCHITECTURAL  CLUB 

EDWARD  H.  HOYT,  President. 

HENRY  C.  HOLT,  Vice-President.  GEORGE  W.  STONE,  Treasurer. 

FREDERICK  N.  REED,  Secretary,  52  Kilby  Street,  Boston,  Mass. 

The  Boston  Architectural  Club  was  founded  and  incorporated  in  1889  to  promote  the  study  and 
advancement  of  architecture  and  the  allied  arts,  and  to  bring  into  social  relations  those  interested  in 
this  object.  Its  membership  now  includes  188  names,  classified  under  four  heads,  as  regular,  asso- 
ciate, honorary  and  non-resident  members. 

Club  meetings  are  held  every  Saturday  evening,  the  annual  business  meeting  falling  on  the  first 
Saturday  in  October,  with  additional  business  meetings  on  the  first  Saturdays  in  December,  Feb- 
ruary, April  and  June. 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


281 


An  important  feature  of  this  Club  is  the  number  of  classes  in  architectural  and  related  subjects 
held  under  its  auspices  in  charge  of  able  instructors. 

The  last  report  of  the  Library  Committee  indicates  a  most  commendable  activity  in  a  particular  in 
which  architectural  clubs  can  do  important  service  to  their  members,  by  possessing  itself  of  a  collec- 
tion of  standard  architectural  works. 

In  the  past,  a  general  exhibition  has  been  held  biennially,  and  each  year  small  exhibitions  are 
held  in  the  rooms  of  the  Club. 

The  social  spirit  is  fostered  by  numerous  musical  evenings,  and  by  the  dinners  on  the  occasion  of 
the  annual  meeting  and  at  other  times  through  the  year.  For  several  years  past,  each  year  some 
member  of  the  Club  has  been  enabled  by  the  co-operation  of  the  members  to  undertake  a  trip  of  six 
weeks  or  more  for  architectural  advancement,  subject  to  the  approval  of  a  committee  in  charge,  the 
member  chosen  receiving  $200  for  expenses  and  being  bound  to  report  to  the  Club  upon  his  return. 

A  movement  is  now  on  foot  to  secure  an  associated  club  house,  to  be  occupied  jointly  by  the 
members  of  the  Boston  Architectural  Club,  the  Boston  Society  of  Architects  and  the  Twentieth 
Century  Club. 

The  Boston  Club  sent  an  official  delegate  to  the  first  convention  of  the  A.  L.  A.,  but  has  taken 
no  further  action  toward  membership. 

The  average  attendance  at  regular  business  meetings  is  about  fifty.  The  dues  are  $10.00  annually, 
and  the  initiation  fee  is  the  same. 


THE  CHICAGO  ARCHITECTURAL  CLUB 

Art  Institute,  Chicago,  111. 

JOSEPH  C.  LLEWELLYN,  President. 
ROBERT  C.  SPENCER,  Jr.,  First  Vice-President. 
HENRY  K.   HOLSMAN,  Second  Vice-President. 
BIRCH  BURDETTE  LONG,  Secretary. 
AUGUST  C.  WILMANNS,  Treasurer. 


The  organization,  now  known  as  the  Chicago  Architectural  Club,  began  its  existence  in  1885, 
under  the  name  of  the  Chicago  Architectural  Sketch  Club.  The  present  name  was  assumed  in  1889, 
when  the  Club  was  incorporated. 

The  rolls  of  the  Club  show  a  present  membership  of  156  names,  and  the  Club  is  one  of  the  most 
active  and  progressive  in  the  country,  and  holds  a  high  place  for  its  up-to-date  spirit  and  the  influence 
for  good  it  has  shown  in  municipal  and  other  public  improvements. 

Weekly  meetings  are  held  on  Mondajr  evenings,  from  September  to  June,  the  annual  meeting 
taking  place  on  the  first  Monday  in  October. 

Lectures  are  frequently  given,  and  the  Club  arranges  for  a  number  of  dinners  during  the  year. 

The  annual  exhibition  is  always  an  occurrence  of  moment,  and  it  is  worthy  of  note  that  the 
catalogue  issued  in  conjunction  with  the  exhibition  held  this  spring  contained  no  advertisements, 
the  expenses  being  borne  by  a  number  of  patrons,  some  of  these  being  architects  and  the  remainder 
business  men  of  the  city  interested  in  the  work  of  the  Club.  This  is  a  particularly  interesting  fact, 
as  being  the  first  instance  of  its  kind. 

The  Club  has  used  its  influence  with  good  effect  during  the  last  year  in  regard  to  the  improvement 
of  the  lake  front,  the  establishment  of  one  small  park,  and  agitation  for  other  parks  and  playgrounds 
and  the  extension  of  the  park  and  boulevard  system.  The  problems  of  tenements  and  improved 
housing  have  also  occupied  the  attention  of  the  Club. 

The  Club  will  entertain  the  members  of  the  Architectural  League  of  America  at  the  second  annual 
convention,  which  is  to  be  held  in  Chicago,  June  7,  8,  9,  1900. 

The  Club  is  a  member  of  the  Architectural  League  of  America,  and  is  associated  in  its  efforts  for 
improvement  of  the  appearance  of  the  city  with  the  Art  Association  of  Chicago,  the  Municipal  Art 
League  of  Chicago,  the  Chicago  Woman's  Club,  the  Illinois  Chapter  of  the  American  Institute  of 
Architects,  the  Chicago  Architects'  Business  Association,  the  Arts  and  Crafts  Society,  the  Chicago 
Improved  Housing  Association  and  the  Chicago  Public  School  Art  Society. 

There  is  an  average  attendance  of  about  fifty  members  at  the  regular  meetings.  The  dues  for 
resident  active  members  are  $1.00  per  month,  with  an  entrance  fee  of  $10.00. 


282 


ARCHITECTURAL   ANNUAL 


THE  CLEVELAND  ARCHITECTURAL  CLUB 

ALBERT  E.  SKEEL,  President. 

WM.  R.  WATTERSON,  Vice-President. 

PERLEY  H.   GRIFFIN,  Secretary. 

STEPHEN  C.  GLADWIN,  Treasurer. 

GEORGE  W.  ANDREWS,  Librarian. 

HERBERT  B.  BRIGGS,  Chairman,  Current  Work. 

A.  LINCOLN  HYDE,  Chairman,  Entertainment. 

The  Cleveland  Architectural  Club,  "for  the  study  and  advancement  of  architecture  and  the 
allied  arts,"  was  founded  November  15,  1894.  Its  roll  consists  entirely  of  an  active  membership  of 
fifty  names,  fifteen  to  twenty-five  of  whom  are  to  be  found  on  an  average  at  the  regular  meetings, 
which  are  held  twice  a  month,  except  during  July  and  August. 

The  annual  meeting  is  held  on  the  second  Thursday  of  May. 

Lectures  are  given  by  members,  papers  are  read  and  the  Club  holds  one  of  the  exhibitions  of  the 
circuit,  and  is  a  member  of  the  Architectural  League  of  America,  having  entertained  that  organiza- 
tion at  its  annual  convention  in  1899. 

Considerable  of  the  activity  of  the  Club  has  been  devoted  to  problems  of  municipal  building  and 
improvement. 

The  dues  are  $6.00  annually,  with  an  initiation  fee  of  $2.00. 


THE  DETROIT  ARCHITECTURAL  CLUB 

Detroit,  Mich. 

MUSEUM   OF  ART 

GEORGE  H.   ROPES,  President. 
H.  A.  O'DELL,  Vice-President. 
ALEXANDER    BLUMBERG,  Treasurer. 
JOHN   A.  GILLARD,  Secretary. 
J.  W.  CASE,  WM.  REED  HILL,  FRANCIS   S.  SWALES,   Directors. 

Organized  September  25,  1895,  and  incorporated  March  14,  1896,  the  Detroit  Club  has  now  a  roll 
of  twenty-eight  active  members  and  three  honorary.  Its  interests  are  local,  and  especially  centering 
in  the  annual  exhibition.  Regular  meetings  are  held  every  two  weeks,  with  semi-annual  meetings 
in  October  and  April.  Average  attendance,  fifteen.  Many  lectures  have  been  given  in  the  Museum 
of  Art,  and  the  present  exhibition  is  able  to  vaunt  itself  as  the  largest  ever  held  in  the  West. 
Those  who  aided  in  the  success  of  this  exhibition  are  soon  to  be  tendered  a  banquet,  for  the  Club 
feels  that  this  recent  exhibit  has  brought  about  a  closer  contact  between  architects  of  the  city  and 
helped  considerably  the  influence  of  the  Club  in  its  relations  to  the  municipal  authorities. 

The  Club  seeks  to  affect  municipal  art  by  combining  with  other  Detroit  organizations.  It  is  a 
member  of  the  Architectural  League  of  America,  and  sent  a  large  delegation  to  Cleveland. 

Dues,  $1.50  quarterly  ;  initiation  fee,  $1. 


SOCIETY  OF  BEAUX-ARTS  ARCHITECTS 

New  York  City. 

JOHN  GALEN  HOWARD,  President. 

EDWARD  L.  TILTON,  Vice-President. 

CHARLES    BUTLER,  Secretary. 

J.   H.  McGUIRE,  Treasurer. 

T.  E.   BLAKE,   Cor.  Secretary,  28  East  41st  Street. 

The  object  of  the  Society  is  to  cultivate  and  perpetuate  the  principles  and  associations  of  the 
Ecole  des  Beaux-Arts  ;  it  was  incorporated  January,  1894.  Members  must  have  been  pupils  at  the 
Ecole  des  Beaux-Arts,  Paris,  in  the  department  of  architecture  ;  associate  members  must  have  been  in 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


283 


an  "atelier"  of  architecture  in  Paris  for  at  least  one  year.  Honorary  members  are  those  who,  by 
their  efforts  and  assistance,  have  contributed  to  the  welfare  and  success  of  the  Society. 

Its  student'  competitions  have  had  a  great  influence  in  arousing  enthusiasm  in  architecture 
throughout  the  country. 

A  Committee  upon  Education,  composed  of  several  distinguished  architects,  has  for  several 
years  gratuitously  conducted  these  concours,  carrying  on  as  it  were  a  correspondence  school,  open  to 
all  students  of  architecture. 

The  initiation  fee  is  $10,  and  the  annual  dues  $10  for  members  residing  within  fifty  miles  of  New 
York,  and  $5  to  those  residing  at  a  greater  distance.  The  annual  meeting  of  the  Society  is  on  the 
Monday  before  Thanksgiving,  and  meetings  are  also  held  the  third  Monday  of  February  and  May. 
Four  exhibitions  of  students'  work  held  each  year. 


THE  T-SQUARE  CLUB  OF  PHILADELPHIA 

1206  Lyudall  Alley,  Philadelphia. 

A  DIN  B.   LACEY,  President. 
HERBERT  C.  WISE,  Vice-President. 
*     WILLIAM  C.   HAYS,  Secretary. 
HORACE  H.  BURRELL,  Treasurer. 


The  object  of  the  T-Square  Club  is  to  promote  the  study  and  practice  of  architecture  and  the 
kindred  arts,  to  further  the  appreciation  of  architecture  by  the  public,  and  to  afford  its  members 
opportunities  for  friendly  competition  in  design. 

It  was  founded  in  1883,  and  its  growth  has  been  rapid  and  steady  from  the  first.  The  member- 
ship now  numbers  156  names,  classified  as  active,  associate,  contributing,  non-resident,  life  and 
honorary.  Eight  regular  monthly  meetings  are  held  during  the  year,  the  annual  meeting  falling  on 
the  first  Wednesday  in  May. 

An  important  feature  of  these  meetings  is  the  holding  of  the  monthly  competitions,  leading  to  the 
award  of  the  T-Square  Club  Travelling  Scholarship,  the  only  "club  scholarship"  in  America. 

The  Club  holds  an  annual  exhibition  and  occasionally  gives  lectures,  and  the  social  element  is 
promoted  by  several  dinners  and  smokers  held  each  year. 

The  T-Square  Club  was  instrumental  in  the  organization  of  the  Art  Federation  of  Philadelphia, 
and  is  a  powerful  factor  in  a  growing  movement  to  preserve  the  historic  and  artistic  monuments  of 
Philadelphia. 

The  Club  is  a  member  of  the  Architectural  League  of  America  and  is  in  prosperous  condition, 
the  present  year  being  the  most  successful  in  its  history.  There  has  been  an  average  attendance  of 
twenty-six  at  the  regular  monthly  meetings.  A  recent  innovation  is  the  daily  lunch  club,  at  which 
from  fifteen  to  thirty  members  meet  in  the  noon  hour,  and  much  good  has  already  accrued  to  the 
Club  from  the  consequent  discussion  of  its  affairs  and  the  working  out  of  schemes  for  its  advancement 
by  those  whose  interests  are  so  closely  allied. 

The  initiation  fee  is  $5.00,  and  the  annual  dues  the  same. 


THE  PITTSBURG  ARCHITECTURAL  CLUB 


PIERRE  A.  LIESCH,  Vice-President. 
HARRY  S.  ESTEP,  Treasurer. 


HENRY  M.  KROPH,  President. 
GEORGE  M.   ROWLAND,  Secretary. 

The  Pittsburg  Architectural  Club  was  founded  in  December,  1896,  and  has  a  membership  of 
forty-two  names,  including  active,  honorary,  non-resident  and  associate.  Meetings  are  held  and 
lectures  given  in  the  club  rooms  in  the  Carnegie  Institute,  and  the  exhibitions  are  held  in  the  art 
gallery  of  the  same  building. 

Mutual  benefit  and  the  guidance  of  public  taste  have  proven  the  most  fruitful  fields  of  activity, 
and  the  annual  dinner  is  a  pleasant  opportunity  for  social  intercourse  among  the  members. 

The  Club  is  associated  in  its  efforts  with  the  Architectural  League  of  America  and  with  the  Pitts- 
burg Chapter  of  the  American  Institute  of  Architects  as  individuals. 

The  dues  are  $6.00  annually,  the  initiation  fee  being  $3.00.  The  average  attendance  at  regular 
meetings  is  from  fifteen  to  twenty  members. 


284  ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 

THE  TORONTO  ARCHITECTURAL  EIGHTEEN  CLUB 

EDEN  SMITH,   President.  ,  Second  Vice-President. 

J.  C.   B.   HORWOOD,  First  Vice-President.  C.  H.  ACTON  BOND,  Third  Vice-President. 

ERNEST    R.    ROLPH,  Secretary  and  Treasurer. 

The  Toronto  Architectural  Eighteen  Club  was  organized  on  January  30th,  1899,  for  the  promo- 
tion of  good-fellowship  among  its  members,  who  now  number  fourteen,  all  residents. 

Regular  meetings  are  held  every  Monday  at  1  o'clock  for  lunch,  the  annual  meeting  being  held 
on  the  second  Monday  in  September. 

The  expenses  of  the  Club  are  covered  by  assessments  from  time  to  time. 

The  Club  has  by  criticism  and  suggestions  induced  the  Ontario  Association  of  Architects  (the 
parent  body)  to  take  up  seriously  the  question  of  education.  A  critical  report  was  handed  in  by  the 
Club  at  the  recent  convention  of  the  Ontario  Association.  This  report  spoke  of  the  Association's 
failure  to  bring  about  any  good  results,  a  waste  of  time  reading  useless  papers,  losing  opportunities 
for  bringing  good  exhibitions  to  the  city  and  neglect  of  properly  organizing  competitions,  and  the 
bad  effect  upon  the  public  by  members  of  the  Association  entering  unfair  competitions.  The  report 
then  suggested  that  the  whole  energy  of  the  Association  be  devoted  to  education,  and  strongly 
emphasized  the  necessity  of  an  addition  to  the  usual  theoretical  scientific  education  by  a  practical 
course  of  training  in  design,  which  should  take  the  form  of  atelier  work  based  on  the  methods  of 
the  Ecole  des  Beaux-Arts. 

As  a  result  of  this  report  a  combination  committee  of  the  Association  and  Eighteen  Club  was 
organized  to  formulate  a  general  scheme  of  education,  and  at  present  a  committee  of  the  Association 
is  working  out  practical  details  of  the  scheme  formulated  by  the  combination  committee.  New  life 
has  undoubtedly  been  infused  into  the  Association  by  the  efforts  of  the  Eighteen  Club  and  good 
results  are  looked  for. 

An  innovation  which  has  just  been  started  in  the  Club  is  that  of  sending  a  drawing,  chosen  by 
ballot,  from  the  members'  work  every  month,  to  The  Canadian  Architect.  The  editor  has  con- 
sented to  reserve  one  of  his  illustration  pages  in  every  issue  for  this  work,  and  it  is  hoped  that  this 
means  of  careful  selection  will  have  a  strong  tendency  to  raise  the  tone  of  illustrations  in  the  paper, 
besides  stimulating  competition  among  the  members  of  the  Club. 

The  Club  is  in  the  circuit  of  the  Architectural  League  of  America,  but  there  is  no  movement  on 
foot  for  affiliation  with  any  other  body  at  present,  though  there  is  a  general  feeling  that,  if  the 
Association  works  on  progressive  lines  and  adopts  some  practical  scheme  of  education,  nearly 
all  the  members  of  the  Eighteen  Club  will  join  the  Association  and  combine  their  efforts  with  it  to 
push  along  this  work  of  education.  This  of  course  would  in  no  way  affect  the  Club  as  a  separate 
organization,  as  there  is  a  very  strong  feeling  among  the  members  to  keep  its  exclusive  character 
one  of  the  strong:  features  of  the  Club. 


THE  LOUISIANA  ASSOCIATION  OF  ARCHITECTS 

This  is  the  youngest  of  the  architectural  organizations  of  the  country,  having  been  organized  as 
recently  as  February  of  the  present  year,  with  Professor  William  Woodward,  of  Tulane  University, 
as  temporary  President,  and  a  membership  of  about  a  dozen  prominent  architects  of  New  Orleans. 

It  is  an  auspicious  sign  that  the  Association  has  been  organized  to  forward  the  definite  purpose 
on  the  part  of  its  members  to  bring  the  practice  of  architecture  entirely  into  the  hands  of  trained  and 
efficient  men  through  the  passage  of  a  State  law,  "Providing  for  the  Licensing  of  Architects  and 
Regulating  the  Practice  of  Architecture  as  a  Profession." 

ST.  LOUIS  ARCHITECTURAL  CLUB 

EDWARD  G.  GARDEN,  President. 
WILLIAM  B.  ITTNER,  First  Vice-President.  FRANK  A.   P.  BURFORD,  Secretary. 

ERNEST  HELFENSTELLAR,  Jr.,  Second  Vice-President.      ERNEST  J.  RUSSELL,  Treasurer. 
ROCKWELL  M.  MILLIGAN,  \  Advisorv  S.  L.  SHERER,  )  Auditors 

ERNEST  KLIPSTEIN,  }  Advisory-  CHAS.  H.  DEITERING,  j  Audltors- 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL  285 

The  St.  Louis  Architectural  Club  was  founded  in  May,  1S94,  and  has  at  the  present  time  a 
membership  roll  of  133  names. 

Business  meetings  are  held  on  the  first  Wednesday  of  each  month,  the  annual  meeting  being  held 
on  the  first  Wednesday  in  April. 

One,  and  sometimes  two,  lectures  and  social  meetings  each  month  are  arranged  for  by  the  Club, 
the  lectures  being  held  either  in  the  Club  rooms,  at  916  Locust  Street,  or  in  the  Memorial  Hall  of  the- 
St.  Louis  Museum  of  Fine  Arts. 

At  the  first  meeting  after  the  annual  election  of  officers  it  is  the  custom  for  the  newly-elected 
Board  to  entertain  the  Club  at  the  annual  banquet. 

The  Club  is  a  member  of  the  Architectural  League  of  America,  and  holds  annual  exhibitions  in 
the  galleries  of  the  St.  Louis  Museum  of  Fine  Arts. 

The  result  of  the  work  done  by  the  St.  Louis  Architectural  Club  for  the  past  year  is  very  gratify- 
ing, inasmuch  as  it  has  placed  the  Club  in  a  position  where  it  is  recognized  as  influencing  public 
opinion  in  matters  pertaining  to  architecture,  especially  as  applied  to  municipal  art.  The  Club  is 
also  the  means  of  bringing  together  the  nucleus  of  what  it  is  hoped  shortly  to  make  an  Arts  and 
Crafts  Society. 

The  dues  are  $12.00  per  year,  in  addition  to  the  initiation  fee  of  $5.00.  The  average  attendance 
at  regular  meetings  is  about  twenty-five. 

THE  WASHINGTON  ARCHITECTURAL  CLUB 

"The  Octagon,"  Washington,  D.  C. 
THEODORE  F.  LAIST,  President. 
LOUIS  A.  SIMON,  Secretary.  FRANK  L.  MOLBY,  Treasurer. 

The  Washington  Architectural  Club  was  founded  in  1892  to  promote  the  study  of  the  art  by 
means  of  lectures,  meetings,  exhibitions  and  competitions,  and  by  the  influence  that  can  be  brought 
to  bear  upon  piiblic  taste  by  such  organizations. 

It  now  numbers  eighty  active  members,  professional  and  non-professional,  and  four  honorary 
members. 

The  annual  meeting  is  held  on  the  first  Saturday  of  June,  and  regular  meetings  occur  at  intervals 
of  two  weeks.  Lectures  and  exhibitions  are  given  during  the  year,  as  well  as  occasional  informal 
dinners. 

The  Club  is  affiliated  with  the  Washington  Fine  Arts  Association  and  with  the  Architectural 
League  of  America,  and  its  influence  is  seen  in  the  closer  co-operation  it  has  brought  about  between 
the  local  architects  and  draughtsmen  and  in  the  awakening  of  interest  in  art  matters  among  the 
general  public,  in  which  the  Club  has  taken  an  important  part. 

The  annual  dues  are  $6.00,  in  addition  to  an  initiation  fee  of  $3.00,  and  there  is  an  average 
attendance  at  regular  meetings  of  from  thirty-five  to  forty  members. 

THE  AMERICAN  PARK  AND  OUTDOOR  ART  ASSOCIATION 

Vice-Presidents  : 
CHARLES  M.  LORING,  President,  JOHN  C.  OLMSTED,  Brookline,  Mass. 

Minneapolis,  Minn.  F.  J.   PARKER,  Quincy,  111. 

WARREN  H.  MANNING,  Secretary,  LEWIS  JOHNSON,  New  Orleans,  La. 

1 146  Tremout  Building,  Boston,  Mass.  M.  L.  MOORE,  Toledo,  O. 

OSSIAN  C.  SIMONDS,  Treasurer,  LEWIS  WOOLVERTON,  Grimsby,  Ont.,  Can- 

Chicago,  111.  ada. 

THOS.   H.  MACBRIDE,  Iowa  City,  la. 

A  convention  of  this  Society  will  be  held  in  Chicago  early  in  June.  Arrangements  are  being 
made  to  hold  a  public  joint  session  in  Fullerton  Hall,  in  conjunction  with  the  delegates  to  the  second 
annual  convention  of  the  Architectural  League  of  America. 


286 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


ARCHITECTURAL  PERIODICALS 

THE  AMERICAN  ARCHITECT  AND 
BUILDING  NEWS 

211  Tremont  Street,  Boston,  Mass. 
WM.  ROTCH  WARE,  Editor. 
International  Edition,  $16.00  per  annum  ;   Single  Numbers,  50  cents. 
Regular  Edition,  $6.00  per  annum  ;  Single  Numbers,  15  cents. 
The  pioneer  in  architectural  journalism  in  the  United  States,  it  remains 
to  this  day  the  only  architectural  periodical  edited  by  a  single  mind. 

Until  recently  it  appeared  in  three  editions,  the  subscription  price  of  the 
International  Edition  being  $25.00. 

Owing  to  the  hard  times  many  of  the  $25.00  subscribers  renewed  their 

subscriptions  for  a  cheaper  edition  (one  of  which  has  now  been  abandoned), 

and  in  this  way  got  a  false  impression  that  the  journal  was  running  down  ; 

but  those  who  have  taken  advantage  of  the  reduction  for  the  International  Edition  now  find  it  as 

good  as  ever,  and  unchanged  except  in  price. 

The  American  Architect,  appearing,  as  it  does,  once  a  week,  supplies  a  great  number  of  illustra- 
tions, its  heliotype  prints  being  beautifully  clear  and  accurate.  Many  of  the  leading  addresses  and 
technical  essays  upon  architecture  appear  in  its  columns  in  the  course  of  the  year.  Its  editorials  are 
timely,  but  seldom  positive. 


Illustrated  Archit, 


URAL  RECORD.  ! 


<*■■ 


THE  ARCHITECTURAL  RECORD 

PUBLISHED  QUARTERLY  BY  THE  ARCHITECTURAL  RECORD  CO., 
14-16  Vesey  Street,  New  York. 

$1.00  per  year,  25  cents  per  number. 


Hi 


The  Architectural  Record  is,  of  all  architectural  journals,  the  one  most 
frequently  seen  outside  of  professional  circles,  being  frequently  displayed 
on  the  news-stands  and  elsewhere. 

It   usually  publishes  one    or    more    serious   and     well-written    leading 
articles  by  writers   of  eminence,   which   are    for    the    most  part  profusely 
illustrated.      The  size   of  the  magazine  compels  the   use  of  smaller  illus- 
trations than  are  customary  in  the  other  professional  periodicals,  but  they  are  always  numerous  and 
carefully  chosen  with  reference  to  the  text. 

There  is  no  editorial  department,  the  magazine  consisting  of  signed  articles  and  occasional 
plates. 

From  time  to  time  a  special  number  is  entirely  devoted  to  a  monograph  on  the  work  of  some  one 
prominent  American  architect,  under  the  title  of  "  Great  American  Architects."  These  articles  are 
fully  illustrated  with  plans  and  photographs  of  characteristic  work  by  the  architect  under 
consideration. 


THE  BROCHURE  SERIES  OF  ARCHITECTURAL  ILLUSTRATION 

PUBLISHED  MONTHLY  BY  THE  BATES  &  GUILD  COMPANY. 

Subscription  rate,  per  year,  50  cents  ;   Single  Numbers,  5  cents. 

The  Brochure  Series  is  for  its  price  and  in  its  field  one  of  the  most  entirely  satisfying 
architectural  magazines  with  which  we  are  acquainted. 

The  policy  of  the  magazine,  as  its  name  indicates,  is  to  present  monthly  a  brochure  of  architec- 
tural illustrations.  Thus,  during  the  year,  the  subscriber  receives  twelve  essays,  each  on  a  single 
subject,  with  well-written  text  and  from  six  to  ten  admirably  chosen  full-page  illustrations. 

Its  price  brings  it  within  the  means  of  all,  and  appealing  particularly  to  the  younger  men  of  the 
profession,  it  has  exerted  a  decided  influence  for  good. 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


287 


■O' 


THE         I 


SBRICKBVlLDERg 

DEVOTEDTOTMt  INTERIMS  BQ 

O  or  O 

^ARCHITECTVRE^ 

gy  IN   MATERIALS  OF  CI-/\Yv        g« 


THE  BRICKBUILDER 

PUBLISHED  MONTI II A'  BY  ROGERS  &  MANSON, 

85  Water  Street,  Boston,   Mass. 

$5.00  per  annum,  50  cents  per  copy. 


Beginning  with  the  first  of  the  year,  The  Brickbuilder  has  appeared 
in  a  new  cover  and  in  a  new  form.  The  advertising  space  is  now  con- 
fined to  the  two  inner  cover  pages  and  the  back,  and  the  new  magazine 
is  less  encumbered  with  such  matter  than  any  other,  and,  in  addition, 
the  scope  of  the  publication  has  been  increased. 

As  a  periodical  devoted  to  architecture  in  materials  of  clay,  The 
Brickbuilder  was  unique,  and  did  much  for  the  development  of  terra- 
cotta and  high-class  brickwork  in  the  United  States.  Its  progressive 
and  businesslike  publishers  soon  won  the  confidence  of  the  better  element  of  the  profession  by  their 
promptness  in  returning  drawings  borrowed  for  reproduction,  and  by  visiting  once  or  twice  a  year  the- 
leading  architects  and  clay  manufacturers  of  the  country  they  made  many  friends  and  were  enabled 
to  give  their  journal  an  up-to-date  representative  tone,  lacking  in  most  architectural  journals  until 
The  Brickbuilder  set  the  example; 

In  its  present  form  The  Brickbuilder  continues  to  carry  out  the  function  indicated  by  its  title  and 
has  added  six  full-page  half-tone  plates  to  its  regular  contents,  and  is  now  a  general  architectural 
magazine. 

Signed  articles  upon  timely  subjects  by  eminent  authorities  appear  in  each  number,  and  its 
editorials  are  written  with  a  purpose. 

Its  local  news  notes  are  the  best  published. 

In  raising  the  price,  the  value  and  interest  of  the  magazine  have  been  more  than  increased  in 
proportion. 


THE 

ARCHITECTVRAL 

vol vi    REVIEW    no  via 

AVGVST       IS99 

V 

/r  - 

' 

£S-.n  fNtm 

<6"<«-««»t 

S»»_~~>— 

««»**•« 

R^STSE?** 

C             '  -■ 

\ 

-r 

" 

THE  ARCHITECTURAL  REVIEW 

PUBLISHED  MONTHLY  BY  THE  BATES  &  GUILD  CO. 
13  Exchange  Street,  Boston,  Mass. 

$5.00  per  annum,  50  cents  per  copy. 


In  paper,  typesetting  and  general  mechanical  get-up  the  Architec 
lural  Review  is  the  most  finished  architectural  periodical  published. 
Notwithstanding  that  it  is  well  filled  with  advertisements,  front  and 
back,  it  is  a  masterpiece  in  magazine  printing,  and  makes  a  pleasant 
impression  as  soon  as  opened.  Bach  number  contains  a  signed  leading 
article,  which  is  often  profusely  illustrated  and  is  always  well  written. 
Its  full-page  plates  are  admirably  reproduced,  and  usually  display 
a  very  wise  selection  of  subjects.  A  special  feature  is  the  monthly 
review  of  current  periodicals,  containing  terse  criticisms  of  designs  and  articles. 

Its  editorials,  however,  are  frequently  more  instructive  to  those  interested  in  Boston  respectability 
and  finished  English  composition  than  to  the  student  of  architecture. 


THE  SOUTHERN  ARCHITECT 

PUBLISHED  BY  EDW.  M.  DURANT, 
214  Temple  Court,  Atlanta,  Ga. 

R.  A.  EVANS,  Editor. 
Subscription  price,  $2.50  per  annum. 
The  character  of  this  periodical  has  been  entirely  changed  within  a  short  time,  it  being  now  pub- 
lished weekly  instead  of  monthly,  and  taking  the  form  of  a  builders'  and  architects'  trade  journal 
rather  than  one  devoted  exclusively  to  the  affairs  of  the  profession. 


288 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


THE  INLAND  ARCHITECT   AND  NEWS  RECORD 

ISSUED  MONTHLY  BY  THE  INLAND  PUBLISHING  COMPANY, 
609-610  Manhattan  Building,   Chicago,  111. 

ROBERT  CRAIK  McLEAN,  Editor. 

Regular  Edition,  $5.00  per  year  ;  Single  Numbers,  50  cents. 
Photogravure  Edition,  $10.00  per  year  ;  Single  Numbers,  $1.00. 
As  its  name  indicates,  The  Inland  Architect  has  unequalled  oppor- 
tunities in  the  matter  of  territory,  drawing  on  East  and  West  alike  for 
matter  of  interest,  and  if  it  seems  at  times  to  have  an  inadequate  grasp 
of  the  situation  the  cause  probably  lies  in  the  extensive  field  that  it 
endeavors  to  occupy. 

The  plates  and  illustrations  are  principally  in  the   nature  of  photo- 
graphs of  executed  work  and  of  the  more  prominent  competitive  designs  of  the  year. 

A  number  of  pages  are  devoted  to  letterpress,  chiefly  articles  of  current  interest.  The  editorials 
are  comments  on  matters  of  contemporary  activity,  without  displaying  any  strongly  marked  policy 
on  the  part  of  the  magazine. 


ARCHITECTURE 

PUBLISHED  BY    FORBES  &  CO.,  LTD., 
160  Fifth  Avenue,  New  York. 


Eh 


$3.00  per  annum. 

In  Architecture,  New  York  has  added  a  new  architectural  magazine 
to  the  periodical  literature  of  the  profession. 

In  make-up  it  is  dissimilar  to  all  others.     Containing  no  editorial,  and 

few  if  any  signed  articles,  it  is  somewhat  lacking  in  weight  and  tone.     In 

its  illustrations,  which  are  principally  reproductions  from  American  and 

foreign  photographs,  there  is  the  same  want  of  authorship  which  is  so 

desirable,  and  which  makes  other  magazines  containing  signed  articles 

and  autograph  drawings  so  useful  and  interesting. 

In  the  publishers'  announcement  we  are  told  that  a  consulting  board  of  eminent  architects  meets 

at  the  first  of  every  month  to  pass  upon  manuscript  and  photographs  offered  for  publication  in  the 

magazine.     This  shows  that  it  is  not  the  policy  of  the  magazine  to  publish  many  drawings. 

THE  ARCHITECTS'  AND  BUILDERS'  MAGAZINE 

PUBLISHED  MONTHLY  BY  WM.  T.  COMSTOCK, 
23  Warren  Street,  New  York. 
Subscription  price,  $1.00  per  annum. 
This  is  the  old  and  well-known    Architecture  and  Building    in    a    new    form.     It    now   appears 
but  once  a  month  instead  of  weekly  as  heretofore,  besides  having  been  altered  greatly  in  appear- 
ance, size  of  page,  etc. 


MUNICIPAL  ENGINEERING-MONTHLY 

PUBLISHED  BY  MUNICIPAL  ENGINEERING  COMPANY,  COMMERCIAL  CLUB  BUILDING, 

INDIANAPOLIS,  IND. 

WILLIAM  FORTUNE,  Editor. 

$2.00  a  year  ;  Single  Copies,  25  cents. 

Devoted  to  paving,  sewage,  water-works,  parks,  good  roads,  street  construction,  cleaning  and 
lighting,  sanitation  and  bridges,  etc.,  etc. 

The  February  number  for  the  present  year,  however,  has  as  its  leading  article  a  paper  b3^ 
Frederick  Law  Olmsted,  Jr.,  entitled  "  The  Relation  of  Reservoirs  to  Parks,"  which  we  single  out 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL  289 

as  illustrating  a  welcome  departure  in  engineering  journalism,  and  one,  if  considered  in  making  out 
the  report  of  the  Committee  on  Review  of  the  American  Society  of  Municipal  Improvement,  which 
will  add  greatly  to  the  reviews  of  engineering  activity  in  American  cities  regularly  classified  and  pub- 
lished in  this  magazine. 

MUNICIPAL  AFFAIRS -QUARTERLY 

PUBLISHED  BY  THE  REFORM  CLUB,  NEW  YORK— COMMITTEE  ON  MUNICIPAL  ADMINISTRATION, 

52  William  Street. 

Quarterly,  iU.oo  a  year;  Single  Numbers,  25  cents. 

The  leading  problems  discussed  in  the  four  copies  during  the  past  year  were:  "Housing 
Problems  in  Cities,"  "Urban  Taxation,"  "City  Government  by  Taxpayers,"  and  "The  City 
Beautiful." 

Municipal  Affairs  is  not  a  technical  periodical  nor  a  money-making  publication.  It  is  in  all  truth 
a  well-considered  reform  magazine  devoted  to  the  consideration  of  city  problems  from  the  standpoint 
of  the  taxpayer  and  citizen,  containing  articles  and  symposiums  of  live  interest,  written  by  the  lead- 
ing authorities  and  enthusiasts  of  the  day. 

It  gleans  from  far  and  wide  advanced  ideas  upon  community  life,  municipal  administration  and 
city  conditions  ;  and  its  Bibliographical  Index  is  an  easy  reference  to  the  latest  books,  reports, 
pamphlets  and  magazine  articles  upon  similar  topics. 


BOOK  REVIEWS 

I  LLUSTRATED  SYMBOLS  AND  EMBLEMS,  by  H.  J.  Smith.  T.  S.  Leach  &  Co.  $5.00, 
*      cloth  ;  $10.00  for  leather. 

Symbolism  is  one  of  the  branches  of  art  which  is  most  neglected,  yet  hardly  any  of  the  arts,  not 
even  including  that  of  heraldry,  demands  greater  accuracy  in  its  perfection.  The  architect  and  deco- 
rator, frequently  guided  by  chance  alone,  are  often  unaware  of  the  significance  of  the  symbols  of 
which  they  make  use. 

A  book  has  lately  been  published,  written  by  Mr.  H.  F.  Smith,  of  Philadelphia,  which  deserves 
a  place  in  the  library  of  every  one  interested  in  symbolism.  It  is  a  compilation  of  religious  symbols, 
which  are  treated  in  full  with  great  care,  profusely  illustrated  and  accompanied  by  Biblical  quota- 
tions. The  chapter  on  the  symbols  of  the  Roman  Catholic  Church  is  particularly  complete,  as  is 
also  that  on  the  symbols  of  the  religion  of  the  Jewish  peoples. 

It  is  to  be  regretted  that  the  book  does  not  include  mythological  and  other  symbols  of  more 
modern  significance,  but  we  hope  that  the  reception  given  "Symbols  and  Emblems"  will  be  such 
that  Mr.  Smith  will  feel  encouraged  to  continue  his  good  work. 

DETAILS  OF  BUILDING  CONSTRUCTION,  by  C.  A.  Martin,  Assistant  Professor  of  Architec- 
ture, Cornell  University.     10  x  12  inches,  with  brief  text.     Boston:  Bates  &  Guild.     $3.00. 

Of  the  many  works  that  are  yearly  added  to  contemporaneous  architectural  literature,  few  can 
compare  in  usefulness  with  Mr.  Martin's  little  book  upon  the  details  of  every-day  building  con- 
struction. 

In  the  preface  he  tells  us  that  "  the  scope  of  the  work  limits  itself  to  presenting  only  such  details, 
principally  in  wood,  as  are  in  common  use  in  domestic  architecture  and  in  smaller  public  buildings." 
And  in  looking  through  the  plates  we  note  the  lucid  manner  in  which  these  are  presented  and  can- 
not too  strongly  recommend  his  method  of  printing  brief  notes  on  the  plates  themselves,  instead  of 
presenting  them  separately  in  the  form  of  text  on  an  opposite  page. 

As  a  work  of  reference  it  should  be  in  every  office  and  accessible  at  all  times. 


290 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


AMERICAN    GRADUATES    FROM    THE   FRENCH 
NATIONAL  SCHOOL  OF  FINE  ARTS,  AND  A 
LIST  OF  TRAVELLING  SCHOLAR- 
SHIP MEN  TO  DATE 


American  Graduates  in  Architecture  from  the  French  National  School  of  Fine  Arts 


J.  H.  Freedlander     .  1895 

John  V.  Van  Pelt   ....  1895 

Herbert  Hale 1895 

Edward  Denby     .......  ...  1897 

Hugh  Talent 1897 

John  M.  Howells 1897 


Theodore  Piesch 
Carey  Rodman 
Frank  E   Perkins 
J.  P.  Morgan     .    . 
Donn  Barber 
Guy  Lowell  ■    ■    . 


Charles  Butler 1898 Wyeth 1899 


898 
898 
898 


899 


Rotch  Travelling  Scholarship 


C.  H.  Blackall  . 
S.  W.  Mead  .  .  . 
Geo.  F.  Newton  . 
Edgar  A.  Josselyn 
A.  W.  Lord  .  .  . 
Harry  Bacon  .  . 
W.  T.  Partridge 
R.  C.  Spencer,  Jr. 


884 
885 
886 
887 


890 


John  W.  Case 1892 

Walter  H.  Kilham 1893 

H.  Van  B.  Magonigle .  1894 

WillS.  Aldrich  .  1895 

L.  H.  Boynton  ■    ■    .    ■  1896 

H.  B.  Pennell 1897 

Louis  C.  Newhall  1898 

■ ■  PULSIFER 1899 


Columbia  Fellowships 


McKim  Fellowships 

1890     Adolfo  C.  Munoz 1891 

1892     Alexander  McM.  Welch     .    .  .    .  1891 

1894     William  L.  Thorne 1893 

1896     George  O.  Totten,  Jr .    .  1893 

1898     John  R.  Pope 1895 

Harry  A.  Jacobs 1897 

F.  Livingston  Pell 1898 

William  E.  Parsons 1899 


The  Travelling  Scholarship  in  Architecture  of  the  University  of  Pennsylvania 


Arthur  A.  Stoughton 
Horace  B.  Mann     .    . 
Seth  J.  Temple        ■    . 
William  K.  Fellows 
William  C.  Ayres   .    . 


James  P.  Jamieson 1893 

George  Bispham  Page 1894 


Percy  Ash  ■   •   * 1895 

Albert  Kelsey 1896 


The  John  Stewardson  Memorial  Fellowship 


Louis  Herman  Duhring 1897 

William  Charles  Hays 1898 


Arthur  H.  Brockie 1899 

Alfred  Morton  Githens 1900 


The  Cornell  Travelling  Fellowship  in  Architecture 
W.  Herbert  Dole ii 


The  Austin  Fellowship  in  Architecture  of  Harvard  University 

Not  yet  awarded. 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


291 


THE   ROYAL  INSTITUTE   OF  BRITISH  ARCHITECTS 

INCORPORATED    BY    ROYAL   CHARTERS   SEVENTH    WILLIAM    IV.    AND    FIFTIETH    VICTORIA 


65TH  Session 


1 899- 1 900 


THE  COUNCIL 

JULY,   1899— JUNE,   1900 

14.  There  shall  always  be  a  Council  of  the  Royal  Institute,  which  Council  shall  consist  of  the 
President,  the  Vice-Presidents,  the  one  or  more  Honorary  Secretaries,  and  of  other  Members  to  be 
elected  at  a  General  Meeting  of  the  Royal  Institute  in  such  manner  and  at  such  times  as  By-laws 
may  from  time  to  time  prescribe. — Extract  from  the  Charter, 

President. 
1899     WILLIAM  EMERSON. 


1896     WM.  MILNER  FAWCETT, 
M.A.,  Cantab.,  F.S.A. 


Vice-P/esideuls. 


1897     EDW.  A.  GRUNING. 
1899    JOHN  McKEAN  BRYDON. 


The  Honorary  Secretary. 
ALEX.  GRAHAM,  F.S.A. 


Members  of  Council. 


FRANK  T.  BAGGALLAY. 

THOS.  BLASHILL. 

JAMES  BROOKS. 

JOHN  JAMES  BURNET,  A.R.S.A. 

W.  D.  CAROE,  M.A.,  Cantab.,  F.S.A. 

THOS.  E.  COLLCUTT. 

J.  ALFRED  GOTCH,  F.S.A. 

EDWIN  T.  HALL. 

HENRY  T.  HARE. 


ED.  W.  MOUNTFORD. 

BERESFORD  PITE. 

JOHN  SLATER,  B.A.,  Lond. 

R.  PHENE  SPIERS,  F.S.A. 

H.  HEATHCOTE  STATHAM. 

LEONARD  STOKES. 

SIR  JOHN  TAYLOR,  K.C.B. 

PAUL  WATERHOUSE,  M.A.,  Oxon. 

ASTON  WEBB,  A.R.A.,  F.S.A. 


JAMES  S.  GIBSON. 


Associate  Members  of  Council. 

H.  VAUGHAN  LANCHESTER. 


Representatives  of  Allied  Societies. 


DAVID  BARCLAY, 

Glasgow  Institute  of  Architects. 
ROBERT  I.  BENNETT, 

Manchester  Society  of  Architects. 
JAMES  CROCKER, 

Devon  and  Exeter  Architectural  Society. 
THOMAS  DREW,  R.H.A., 

Royal  Inst,  of  the  Archts.  of  Ireland. 
ROBERT  EVANS, 

Nottingham  Architectural  Society. 


CHARLES  B.  FOWLER, 

Cardiff,  South  Wales,  and  Monmouthshire 
Architects'  Society. 
WILLIAM  GLOVER, 

Northern  Architectural  Association. 
ALBERT  E.  SAWDAY, 

Leicester  and  Leicestershire  Society  of  Ar- 
chitects. 
JOSEPH  SMITH, 

Sheffield  Society  of  Architects. 


292 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


Represefitative  of  the  Architectural  Association  (Lonaori). 
G.  H.  FELLOWES  PRYNNE,  President  A.  A. 

Total  number  of  members  of  the  Council,  35.     Six  members  form  a  quorum. 
The  Council  meet  at  4.30  p.m.  every  Monday,  when  a  Sessional  Meeting  is  held  [see  Almanac] 
and  at  such  other  times  as  circumstances  require. 


The  Secretary  of  the  Royal  Institute. 
W.  J.  LOCKE,  B.A.,  Cantab. 

*%*  All  communications  should  be  addressed  The  Secretary  R.I.B.A.  at  the  Office  of  the  Institute, 
9  Conduit  Street,  Hanover  Square,  London,  W. 

ROYAL  GOLD  MEDALLISTS. 

The  Royal  Gold  Medal  for  the  promotion  of  architecture,  the  gift  of  Her  Majesty  the  Queen,  is 
annually  conferred  on  some  distinguished  architect,  or  man  of  science  or  letters,  who  has  designed 
or  executed  a  building  of  high  merit,  or  produced  a  work  tending  to  promote  or  facilitate  the  knowl- 
edge of  architecture  or  the  various  branches  of  science  connected  therewith.  The  following  is  a 
complete  roll  of  the  recipients  : 


1848  *CHAS.  ROBT.  COCKERELL. 

1849  *LUIGI  CANINA,  Italy. 

1850  *SIR  CHARLES  BARRY. 

1851  *THOMAS  L.  DONALDSON. 

1852  *CHEV.    LEO    VON    KLENZE,    Austria- 

Hungary. 

1853  *SIR  ROBERT  SMIRKE. 

1854  *PHILIP  HARDWICK. 

1855  *J.  I.  HITTORFF,  France. 

1856  *SIR  WILLIAM  TITE. 

1857  *OWEN  JONES. 

1858  *AUGUST  STULER,  Germany. 

1859  *SIR  G.  GILBERT  SCOTT. 
i860  *SYDNEY  SMIRKE. 

1861  *J.  B.  LESUEUR,  France. 

1862  *REV.  ROBERT  WILLIS. 

1863  *ANTHONYSALVIN. 

1864  *E.  E.  VIOLLET-LE-DUC,  France. 

1865  *SIR  JAMES  PENNETHORNE. 

1866  *SIR  M.  DIGBY  WYATT. 

1867  *CHARLES  TEXIER,  France. 

1868  *SIR  HENRY  LAYARD. 

1869  *C.  R.  LEPSIUS,  Germany. 

1870  *BENJAMIN  FERREY. 

1871  *JAMES  FERGUSSON. 

1872  *BARON  VON  SCHMIDT,  Austria. 

1873  *THOMAS  HENRY  WYATT. 

1874  *GEO.  EDMUND  STREET. 

1875  *EDMUND  SHARPE. 

*  The  names  of  those  deceased 


1878 
1879 


1876  *JOSEPH  LOUIS  DUG,  France. 

1877  CHARLES  BARRY,  F.S.A. 
ALFRED  WATERHOUSE,  R.  A.,  LL.D. , 

Correspondant  of  the  Institut  de  France. 
CHARLES  JEAN   MELCHIOR,    MAR- 
QUIS DE  VOGUE. 

1880  *JOHN  L.  PEARSON. 

1881  *GEORGE  GODWIN. 

1882  *BARON  VON  FERSTEL,  Austria. 

1883  F.  C.  PENROSE,  F.R.S.,  D.Litt,  D.CL-, 

F.S.A. 
W.  BUTTERFIELD,  F.S.A. 
*H.  SCHLIEMANN,  Germany. 
*CHARLES  GARNIER,  France. 
*EWAN  CHRISTIAN. 

1888  *BARON  VON  HANSEN,  Austria. 

1889  *SIR  CHARLES  T.  NEWTON. 
*JOHN  GIBSON. 
SIR  ARTHUR  W.  BLOMFIELD,  M.A., 

Cantab.,  A.R.A.,  F.S.A. 
*CESAR  DALY,  France. 
*RICHARD    MORRIS     HUNT,    United 

States. 

1894  *LORD  LEIGHTON  OF  STRETTON. 

1895  JAMES  BROOKS. 

1896  ERNEST  GEORGE. 

1897  Dr.  P.  J.  H.  CUYPERS,  Holland. 

1898  Professor  GEORGE  AITCHISON,  R.A. 

1899  GEO.  FREDERICK  BODLEY,  A.R.A. 
are  marked  with  an  asterisk. 


1884 
1885 
1886 
1887 


1890 
1891 

1892 
1893 


It  will  be  observed  that  17  out  of  52  recipients  of  the  above  honor  have  been  foreigners  ;  of  these, 
but  one  was  from  the  United  States. 

In  1874  John  Ruskin  was  selected  by  the  Council,  but  declined  to  be  a  recipient  of  the  Royal 
Gold  Medal. 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


Magnesia,  85  per  cent. 


15  per  cent.  Asbestos  Fibre 


Architects  and  Consulting  Engineers 

WHO  WANT  A  SAFE,   PERMANENT 

Steam  Pipe  ™«  Boiler  Covering 

and  one  that  will  save  most  heat — most  coal — most  money  ; 
one  that  will  pay  for  itself  in  a  very  short  time,  and  prove  a 
most  economical  investment ; 


One  Entirely  Free  from  such  Injurious  Compounds  as 

PLASTER  OF  PARIS 


a  material  composing,  to  the  extent  of  about  80  per  cent,  to 
90  per  cent.,  most  of  the  moulded  coverings  sold  as  Standard 
Asbestos,  Asbestos-Magnesia,  etc.,  etc.,  should  use 

Magnesia  Sectional  Covering 

85  per  cent.  Pure  Carbonate  of  Magnesia  and  15  per  cent,  of 
good  Asbestos  Fibre 

SAFE,    RELIABLE,    EASILY    APPLIED,    VERY    LIGHT 

Manufactured  only  by 

*»&*.        KEASBEY  &  MATTISON       .*au* 

COMPANY  fi 

Ambler,  F*enna. 

SELLING    AGENCIES    IN    ALL    LARGE    CITIES 


'^WlTMOUl 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


Every  Architect  and  Designer 

SHOULD   KNOW   THE   FOUNDATION 
AND  MEANING  OF 

€Ijitrri|  Sgmliols 

ABOUT  4OO  ARE  SHOWN  AND  EXPLAINED  IN 

S     * * 


ILLUSTRATED 


Symbols  anb  Emblems 


JEWISH,  EARLY  CHRISTIAN,  GREEK, 
LATIN,  AND   MODERN    CHURCHES 


H.  J.  SMITH 


PMlntH'tphln: 
T.  S.    LEACH   &   COMPANY 

29    NORTH    SEVENTH    STREET 
IQJDO 


Royal  Quarto,  Extra  Cloth $6.00 

Full  Seal  Leather,  wide  margins,  gilt  top 12.50 

SPECIAL  OFFER 

To  introduce  this  invaluable  work  to  the  Archi- 
tects of  America  we  offer  to  send  it, postpaid,  Until 
Ociober  1st,  1900,  to  any  member  of  the  bodies 
constituting  the  Architectural  League  of  America, 
at  the  reduced  prices  of  $5.00  for  the  Cloth  and 
$10.00  for  the  Full  Leather  Edition. 

T.  S.  Leach  &  Co.,  Publishers 

29  N.  Seventh  Street,  Philadelphia 


Ft!* 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


iii 


D'Olier  Engineering  Co 

Engineers 

125  and   127  South  Eleventh  Street 
Philadelphia,  Pa. 


Engineering  and 

Contracting 

Work 

Complete  Steam 

and  Electrical 

Installations 


Electrical 
Manufacturing 


RECENT    WORK    IN    VARIOUS    LINES 

Bell  Telephone  Co.,  Philadelphia. 

Pennsylvania  Railroad  Co.,  Altoona,  Pa. 

Philadelphia  Saving  Fund,  Philadelphia. 

Boys'  High  School,  Philadelphia. 

Strawbridge  &  Clothier,  Philadelphia. 

Boys'  House  of  Refuge,  Glen  Mills,  Pa. 

Nolde  &  Horst,  Reading,  Pa. 

Midvale  Steel  Co.,  Nicetown,  Philadelphia. 

Wm.  Ayres  &  Sons,  Philadelphia. 

Philadelphia  &  Reading  Subway  Stations,  Philadelphia. 

Lukens  Iron  and  Steel  Co.,  Coatesville,  Pa. 

Blossburg  Electric  Light  and  Power  Co.,  Blossburg,  Pa. 

Lansdale  Electric  Light  and  Power  Co.,  Lansdale,  Pa. 

Midvale  Foundry  Co.,  Allentown,  Pa. 

Piedmont  Electric  Light  Co.,  Piedmont,  W.  Va. 

Boston  Post  Office,  Boston,  Mass. 

John  Williams  Mfg.  Co.,  Philadelphia. 

U.  S.  Sugar  Refinery,  Camden,  N.  J. 

Wm    P.  Clyde  &  Co.,  Philadelphia. 

West  End  Trust  Building,  Philadelphia. 

McCallum  &  McCallum,  Philadelphia. 

Commonwealth  Title  Insurance  and  Trust  Co.,  Philadelphia. 

League  Island  Navy  Yard,  Philadelphia. 

John  B.  Stetson  Co.,  Philadelphia. 

University  of  Pennsylvania  Law  School  Building,  Philadelphia. 

St.  Agnes"  Hospital,  Philadelphia. 

Presbyterian  Hospital,  Philadelphia. 

St.  Joseph's  Hospital,  Philadelphia. 

M.  E.  Home  for  the  Aged,  Philadelphia. 

F.  T.  S.  D arley,  Philadelphia. 

P.  A.  B.  Widener,  Ashbourne,  Pa. 

Col.  Wm.  L.  Elkins,  Ashbourne,  Pa. 

Wm.  Wood,  Wayne,  Pa. 

Thos.  McKean,  Philadelphia. 

John  G.  Carruth,  Philadelphia. 

Clement  M.  Griscom,  Haverford,  Pa. 

Church  of  the  Immaculate  Conception.  Germantown.   Philadelphia. 

Church  of  the  Gesu,  Philadelphia. 

St.  Luke's  Epiphany  Church,  Philadelphia. 

St.  Francis  Xavier's  Church,  Philadelphia. 

St.  John's  Cathedral,  Savannah,  Ga. 

Church  of  Our  Lady  of  Mercy,  Philadelphia. 

Lawrence  Cement  Co.  of  Pennsylvania,  Siegfried,  Pa. 


IV 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


SHEPLEY,   RUTAN   &  COOLIDGE,   ARCHITECTS,   BOSTON 

CABOT'S    CREOSOTE    SHINGLE    STAINS 

The  original  Shingle  Stains,  and  the  standard  of  shingle-stain  excellence,  distinguishable  by  the  clearness  and  transparency  and 
soft  depth  and  richness  of  their  coloring  effects.     No  muddy  or  tawdry  colors,  no  turning  black. 

"  Creosote  is  the  best  wood  preservative  known." — Trauhvine 

Cabot's  Sheathing  and  Deafening  "QUILT."  Not  a  mere  felt  or  paper,  but  a  soft,  resilient  cushion  of  dead-airspaces,  giving 
the  most  perfect  conditions  for  the  insulation  of  heat  or  the  absorption  of  sound-waves.  Indestructible  by  decay,  uninflammable, 
repellent  to  moths  and  vermin.  Samples  and  Catalogues  sent  on  application 

SAMUEL    CABOT,    SOLE  MANUFACTURER  ^feSflS^^Mi^SCO 

215     DEARBORN     ST.,     CHICAGO  Agents  at  all  Central  Points 


McCAMBRIDGE  &  CO. 


LIMITED 


MANUFACTURERS  OF 


House  and  Ship  Plumbing  Supplies 

and  Specialties 


523,  525  AND  527  CHERRY  ST. 


PHILADELPHIA 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


THE  KELSEY  WARM-AIR 
GENERATOR 


How's 
lfour 
Heater 


Commands  special  attention  as  the  highest  type  of 
heating  apparatus.  All  the  good  points  and  none  of 
the  defects  of  others.  Simpler  and  easier  of  manage- 
ment, more  perfect  than  steam  or  hot  water.  No 
radiators  required;  can  be  connected  with  your  present 
system  of  flues  and  registers.  Takes  the  place  of 
two  or  three  hot-air  heaters. 

15,000  Satisfied  Users 


The  Makin-Kelsey  Heating  and  Mfg*  Co* 

1717    CHESTNUT    STREET 
PHILADELPHIA,  PA. 


STRAIGHT. 


Superior 
Quality. 


SOAP 


5PLIT 


2  INCH 


FireaBrick 

clay  retorts 


JAMB 


WEDGE 


LARGE    VARIETY   OF 

Circle   Brick, 
Blocks  and  Tiles. 


ARCH  SKEW   END  SKEW5IDE  URGE  KE.Y  SMALL  KEY 

Also  Distributors  "Lehigh"  Portland  Cement 


VI 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


One  grade  four  colors 

Paint  Specifications 


CALLING  FOR  THE  USE  OF 


Dixon's  Silica-Graphite  Paint 

FOR   THE  PROTECTION   OF 

Structural  Steel  and  Tin  Roofs 


STRUCTURAL   STEEL 

Before  painting,  all  dirt,  scale,  oil  and  foreign  matier 
of  all  kinds  must  be  removed  from  the  steel  work  ;  the  paint 
to  be  thoroughly  brushed  out  and  not  applied  loo  thick. 

Before  assembling,  parts  to  be  in  contact  and  enclosed 
shall  receive  one  coat  of  paint  as  specified  below. 

Before  the  steel  work  is  exposed  to  the  weatherat  mill, 
and  before  shipment,  one  complete  coat  of  Dixon's  Silica- 
Graphite  Paint,  Color  No.  3,  shall  be  applied. 

After  erection,  the  structural  steel  shall  receive  a 
second  and  complete  coat  of  Dixon's  Silica-Graphite  Paint, 
Color  No.  2. 

TIN  ROOFS 

The  tin  to  be  painted  with  one  coat  of  Dixon's  Silica- 
Graphite  Paint,  Color  No.  2,  on  the  under  surface  before 
laying. 

Immediately  after  tin  roof  is  laid,  carefully  clean  off 
the  rosin  at  seams  ;  remove  all  dirt,  grease,  etc., and  apply 
two  coats  of  Dixon's  Silica-Graphite  Paint,  Color  No.  2. 

The  paint  for  structural  steel  and  tin  roofs  shall  be 
furnished  in  original  sealed  packages  to  the  mill  and  build- 
ing site,  READY  MIXED  for  use,  as  manufactured  by  the 
JOSEPH  DIXON  CRUCIBLE  CO.,  JERSEY  CITY,  N.  J. 


PRACTICAL 

ARCHITECTS 
CONSULTING    ENGINEERS 

SPECIFY 

Dixon's 

Silica-Graphite 

Paint 

FOR  THE  PROTECTION  OF 

Steel  Structures  and  Tin  Roofs 

BECAUSE  OF  ITS 

COVERING    CAPACITY 

AND 

GREAT    DURABILITY 

Has  been  in  use  thirty  years,  and  time  records  prove  it 
to  be  the  most  economical  protective  paint  made 

Manufactured  only  by 

JOSEPH  DIXON  CRUCIBLE  CO. 

JERSEY  CITY,  N.  J.,  U.S.A. 


SILVER  LAKE  "A" 


FOR  THIRTY  YEARS 
THE  STANDARD 


A    SAFE    SPECIFICATION    FOR    SASH    CORD 


TO  PREVENT  THE  SUBSTITUTION  OF  AN  INFERIOR  ARTICLE  WE  PUT 

OUR  LABEL  ON  EVERY  HANK 

AND  AS  AN  ADDITIONAL  PROTECTION 

WE  STAMP  EVERY  THREE   FEET  OF  OUR   CORD   WITH  OUR  NAME 

IF  YOU  FIND  "SILVER  LAKE  A"  STAMPED  ON  THE  CORD  IT  IS 

THE  BEST  CORD  THAT  CAN  BE  MADE 


SEND  FOR  SAMPLES 


SILVER  LAKE  CO. 

BOSTON 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


vil 


Troy  Laundry  Machinery  Co 


•LIMITED- 


HIGH-GRADE 


(Ti 


LAUNDRY  APPLIANCES    3 


These  are  what  we  furnish.  From  long  experience  we  know 
what  you  want.  We  carry  a  large  stock  and  ship  promptly. 
In  setting  machinery  we  use  the  best  materials  and  do  work 
that  architects  accept.  The  plants  always  "work,"  and 
results  delight  proprietors.  Snow-white  linen  beautifully 
finished. 


WE    REFER    TO    LEADING    ARCHITECTS 


Send  for  Catalogue 


FACTORIES:  Troy,  N.  Y. 

Chicago,  Ills. 


SALESROOMS  :  New  York  City 
San  Francisco 


THE  de  KOSENKO 

MANUFACTURING  CO. 

DESIGNERS  AND  MAKERS  OF  FIXTURES  FOR 

ELECTRICITY,  GAS, 

AND  ACETYLENE. 

MEMORIAL  TABLETS,  ANCIENT 

AND  MODERN.     ECCLESIASTICAL 

AND  ARCHITECTURAL  METAL 

WORK  IN  BRASS,   BRONZE  AND 

IRON 

New  York 
156  Fifth  Avenue 

Office  and  Works 

N.  E.  Cor.  19th  and  Hamilton  Sts. 

PHILADELPHIA.   PA. 


vlli 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


PAINTS   IN   ARCHITECTURE 


Architects* 
Specifications 


ml 

^±sll  < 

k 

(£ry 

V] 

^ff 

72& 

/AfTz) 

^tz&'jf3Jy  ',,l^N 

^C8& 

THE  NEW  JERSEY 
ZINC  COMPANY 

71   BROADWAY 
NEW  YORK  CITY 

A  full  discussion  of  this  subject  will  be  found  in  our  pam- 
phlet "  Paints  in  Architecture,"  sent  free  upon  request. 


T  is  a  common  practice  to  specify  for  exterior 
painting  a  priming  coat  of  lead  or  of  ochre  and 
oil,  succeeded  by  one  or  two  coats  of  pure 
lead,  though  sometimes  the  more  careful 
architects  will  order  the  addition  to  the  fin- 
ishing coat  of  a  certain  proportion  of  zinc 
"  to  hold  the  lead  in  place."  It  is  generally 
better  practice  to  use  a  goodly  proportion  of 
ZINC  WHITE  throughout,  from  which  the 
best  result  will  be  obtained  if  the  materials 
are  thoroughly  combined  by  mechanical 
grinding. 

For  interior  work,  specifications  should 
require  zinc  to  the  exclusion  of  lead.  The 
result  will  be  more  satisfactory  in  beauty, 
durability,  healthfulness  and  economy,  as  no 
paint  containing  an  appreciable  proportion  of 
lead  will  hold  its  color  in  an  atmosphere  where 
gas  or  coal  is  burned,  or  where  there  is  any 
trace  of  effluvium  from  closets,  etc.,  and  all 
lead  paints  are  liable  to  "chalk"  with  the 
production  of  poisonous  dust. 


John  F.  Buchanan  Gilbert  S.  Smith 

Roswell  C.  Williams,  Jr. 

J.  F.  BUCHANAN 
&  CO. 

Electrical  Contracting 

and  Constructing  p  n  <jj  p  pprQ 

327  Bourse  Building 

Telephone  4850  PHILADELPHIA 


A  Fe<w  of   Our  Electrical  Installations 

Public  Buildings 

Criminal  Court  Building,  New  York 

New  Court  House,  Baltimore,  Md. 

Museum  of  Science  and  Arts,  Phila. 

Seventh  Regiment  Armory,  New  York 

U.  S.  P.  O.,  Pittsburgh.  Pa. 

U.  S.  Custom  House,  Cincinnati,  Ohio 
Schools  and  Colleges 

Jefferson  College,  Phila. 
Hospitals 

Pennsylvania  Hospital,  Phila. 
Hotels 

Garden  Hotel,  Atlantic  City 

Monticello  Hotel,  Norfolk,  Va. 
Business  Houses 

Real  Estate  Building,  Phila. 


GARRETT-BUCHANAN 
COMPANY 

3,  5  and  12  South  Marshall  St. 
PHILADELPHIA 

MANUFACTURERS  OF 

Water-proof  Building 
and  Roofing  Papers 

CANVAS  BACK  RED  ROPE 
WATER-PROOF  SHEATHING 

is  the  most  serviceable  and  best 
building;  paper  on  the  market 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


IX 


[no.   Willi  nils 

[Itchcll 
J  is.  Williams 


■   Works 

ii    B   Stillman 

\ 


Bronze  Figure 
"  Twilight " 


JNO.  WILLIAMS 

Bronze  Foundry  and 
Works 

Wrought  Iron  Works 

544  to  556  W.  Twenty=seventh  St. 
NEW  YORK 


Artisans  in  Ornamental 
Metal  Work 

BRONZE,  BRASS  AND 
WROUGHT  IRON 

Architectural,    Decorative 
Monumental 

To  Architects'  Designs 

Designs  and  Estimates  Furnished 


By  Oi-iN  L.  Warner       To  Architects  interested  in  above 
Sculptor  class  of  work  we  will  send  on  appli- 

cation, our  portfolio  of  twenty  illus- 
trated sheets,  entitled  "  Examples 
of  Bronze  Work"  to  Special 
Design,  Architectural,  Monu- 
mental, Decorative. 


Cast  by 

Jno.  Williams 

New  York 


2  .  _ 


■■■# 


>m&m&m&mWm&m&. 


Designed  by  Cast  by 

Bruce  Price,  Architect.      Jno.  Williams.  X.  Y 

Philip  Martiny,  Sculptor. 

Erected  in  Osborn  Hall,  Y'ale  University. 


Designed  by 

Allard  &  Son,  N.  Y. 


CAST  BROXZE  VESTIBULE!  DOORS 

Residence  of  P.  A.  B.  Widener,  Ogontz,  Pa. 

Horaci:  TRUMBAUER,  Architect 


Executed  bj 
Jno.  Williams,  X.  Y 


Designed  by  Modeled  and  cast  by 

Rankin  &  Kellogg,  Archts.,  Philadelphia,  Pa.  Jno.  Williams,  X.  Y. 

Erected  at  First  Methodist  Church.  Germantown,  Pa. 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


SAMPSON  BUILDING,  63  and  65  Wall  Street,  New  York 

CLINTON  &  RUSSELL,  Architects 
TERRA-COTTA   WORK   EXECUTED   BY   THE 


WHITE  BRICK  AND  TERRA-COTTA  CO. 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


xi 


White  Brick  and 
Terra-Cotta  Co. 

1 J6  Fifth  Ave.,  New  York 

Cor.  Twentieth 

Architectural   Terra-Cotta 

IN  ALL  COLORS 

Superior  Quality  of 

Solid  White 
Terra-Cotta 

Will  Not  Turn  Green  or  Yellow 

A  comparison  of  our  goods  will  manifest  superiority  in 

pair  of  lions  ox  portico— halter  BUiLDixr,  execution,   vitrification   and   finish 

112  \V.  42D  Street,  New  York 
Flemer  &  Koehler,  Architects  P.  Ferrari,  Sculptor  »         1    »j.       1    »   r\ 

executed  by  telephone  call       Architects  Drawings 

white  brick  and  terra-cotta  co.       1984-18TH  street       Faithfully  Reproduced 


NEW  YORK  AND  NEW  JERSEY 
FIRE-PROOFING  CO. 

Fire-Proof  Building  Material 

Hoiiow Blocks    Hard-Burned  Clay  and 


For  Flat,  Elliptical  and 
Segmental  Arches  of  every 
description. 


Porous  Terra-Cotta 


Hollow  Clay  Ceiling,  Hollow  Blocks  for  Partitions,  Hollow  Brick,  Fire-Proof 

Covering  for  Iron  Girders  and  Columns,  Hard-Burned  and  Porous 

Furring  Blocks,  Hard  and  Porous  Roofing 


A  LARGE  STOCK  CONSTANTLY  CARRIED 
ORDERS  FILLED  PROMPTLY 
SHIPMENTS  BY  RAIL  OR   WATER 


SPECIAL  SHAPES  AND  DESIGNS  OF  THE 
ABOVE  MADE  TO  ORDER  A  T  SHOR  T  NOTICE 


Presbyterian  Building,  156  Fifth  Ave.,  NEW  YORK 

Works,  LORILLARD  (Keyport  P.  O.),  N.  J. 


Xlt 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


Chas*  Emmel 


Architectural  Carving:,  Papier  Mache 
Compo,  Fibrous  Plaster  and  Staff 


383 


ALBANY  ST. 

BOSTON,   MASS. 


The  Perfection  Ventilator 


IS 

for 

Efficient 

Churches 

Strong 

Schools 

Durable 

Public   Buildings 

Storm-Proof 

Factories 

AND 

Foundries 

Handsome                e      Cars,  Ships,   Etc. 

THERE  IS   NONE  BETTER 

PRICE  INTERESTING 


BERGER    BROS.    CO. 

TINNERS'  AND  ROOFERS' 
SUPPLIES 

231  and  237  Arch  Street,  Philadelphia 


Makers  of  the  Stained  Glass  in 

the  following  lately  finished 

buildings : 

Congressional  Library, 

Washington,  D.  C. 
New  Court  House,  Baltimore,  Md. 
Hoffman  Hall,  Gen.  Theol.  Sem'y, 

Episcopal  Church,  New  York 
Carnegie  Hall,  New  York 

Rhinelander  Memorial  Church, 

New  York 
Peabody  Memorial  Church,  Boston 
St.  Thomas'  Church, 

Washington,  D.  C. 
Winona  Public  Library,  Minnesota 
St.  Peter's  Church,  Philadelphia 

Public  Library,  Newark,  N.  J. 

First  Baptist  Church,       Philadelphia 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


xiii 


Kansas  City,  Kansas,  April  5th,  1900. 

Messrs.  C S &  Co., 

Chicago,  Illinois. 
G-entl  emen : 

"Write  to-day  to  The  Fay  Manilla  Roof- 
ing Company,  Camden,  New  Jersey,  for 
samples  of  "Waterproof  Sheathing  and  Insula- 
ting Papers  for  all  kinds  of  frame  buildings. 

Their  Insulating  Papers  are  acknowl- 
edged by  cold-storage  experts  to  be  the  best 
insulators  produced.     They  -will  not  deteri- 
orate with  age,  and  can  be  made  105  inches 
wide  in  carload  lots. 

By  using  these  wide  goods  the  number 
of  joints  is  reduced  to  a  minimum,  and  the 
insulation  thereby  greatly  improved. 

Assuring  you  that  you  will  be  very 
much  pleased  with  the  results  obtained  by 
using  these  papers,  we  are, 

Yours  very  truly, 

A P Co. 


[JFJLur-, 

1706  CHESTNUT  STREET, 

PHILADELPHIA. 

METALLIC  WEATHER  STRIP  TELEPHONE 


FRANCIS  A.  BLACK 
FRANCIS  F.  BLACK 

4254  Chestnut  Street 


F.  A.  BLACK  &  SON 

Stogdale  Building 

620  S.  "WASHINGTON  SQUARE 

PHILADELPHIA 


House  Painting 
d  Decorating 
and  Paper  Hanging 


Innsbruck 


Highest  Diplomas 

and  Medals 

Awarded  by  All 

the  Late 

World's  Expositions 


Established  i 36 1 


Windows  Furnished 

to  more  than  120c 

Churches 

in  all  parts  of 

the  Globe 


an 


TYR0LESE  ART  GLASS  CO. 

(Neuhauser,  Dr.jele  &  Co.) 

52   BARCLAY  STREET 

NEIV  YORK 

Memorial  Windows  and  Mosaics 

THEODORE  ROSE,  Resident  Manager 


SOME  OF  OUR  LATEST  WORK 


Ivory,  White  and  Gold  Finishing 
Hardwood  Polishing  of  every  description 
Estimates  for  all  kinds  of  House  Repairs 


Correspondence  solicited 


Long  Distance  Telephone  3940 


St.  John's  Cathedral, 

St-  Joseph's  Cathedral, 

St.  Patrick's  Cathedral, 

Church  of  the  Assumption, 

St.  Mary's, 

Our  Lady  of  Mercy  Church, 

St.  Augustine's, 

St.  Martin's, 

St.  Josaphat's, 

St.  Vincent's, 


nnah 

Buffalo 

Rochester 

Syracuse 

Dedham,  Mass. 

Philadelphia 

Pittsburg 

Chicago 

Milwaukee 

Chicago 


XIV 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


The  American   Cement  Co* 

OWNERS    OF 

The  Egypt  Portland  Cement  Works 

The  Pennsylvania  Portland  Cement  Works 

The  Columbian  Portland  Cement  Works 

The  Giant  Portland  Cement  Works 

The  Jordan  (N.  Y.)  Portland  Cement  Works 


MANUFACTURERS   OF 

Portland,    Improved    and    Natural 
CEMENTS 

"Union"  and  Improved  "Union" 
Brands 

"Giant"  and  "Egypt  " 
Portland 


Office,  22  and  24  South  Fifteenth  Street 

PHILADELPHIA,   PA. 


ARCHITECTS 

We  call  attention  to  the  fact  that  when 

Charles  Warner  Co.'s  Lines 


are  specified,  THE  BEST  is  guaranteed 
ABSOLUTELY  and  UNEQUIVOCALLY 

NAZARETH  PORTLAND  CEMENT 

Actual  use  and  all  tests  prove  NAZARETH  to 
be  second  to  no  Cement  in  the  world  to-day. 

CEDAR  HOLLOW  LIME 

THE  STANDARD  MAGNESIA  BUILDING  LIME. 
The  others  only  claim  to  be  "as  good  as 
Cedar  Hollow." 

Also  Wrightsville  and  Hanover  High  Carbon- 
ate Building  Limes. 

BLANC  STAINLESS  PORTLAND  CEMENT 

The  only  positively  stainless  Cement  for  use 
with  CAEN  and  all  FINE  LIMESTONES  and 
MARBLES.  Witness  the  tests  by  BATTERSON 
&  ElSELE  and  others. 

IVORY  HARD  WALL  PLASTER 

Does  not  stain  delicate  coloring  used  over  it; 
does  not  crack  ;  does  not  warp  the  lath ;  is 
superior  for  hardness  and  durability. 

Charles  Warner  Co.  Et,  Del. 

General  Sales  Agents  Philadelphia 


THE  MERCER  BOILER 


THOMAS  SMEDLEY 

['resident 


THOS.  A.  HICKS 

Sec'y  and  Treas. 


ESTABLISHED  1853 


BOILERS  and  RADIATORS 

FOR  WARMING  BY 

STEAM  and  HOT  WATER 

All  parts  accessible  for  cleaning,  ECONOMICAL 

Reed  Patent  Rotating  Grate.  SAFE 

Double  Return  Flues.  DURABLE 

The  COTTAGE  Heater  for  model  homes. 
MILLS  and  0.  K.  Safety  Sectional  Boilers. 

(Columbian  and  National  Export  Exposition  Medals 
for  highest  efficiency) 

THE  H.  B.  SMITH  CO. 

510  ARCH  STREET,  PHILADELPHIA 


SMEDLEY 
CONSTRUCTION  CO. 

Cement  and  Asphalt 
Pavement  and  Floors 

Fire-Proof  Construction 
McAdam  and  Telford  Roads 

SWIMMING  POOLS 
CISTERNS  and 
FILTERING  PLANTS 

712  Stephen  Girard  Building 

'Phone  14-56  PHILADELPHIA,  PA. 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


JOHN  ATKINSON 
Brickmason  and  Contractor 

405-406  Master  Builders'  Exchange 
18-24  South  Seventh  Street 

PHILADELPHIA 


A  FEW  OF  OUR  OPERATIONS : 

Philadelphia  Bourse. 

Buildings,  House  of  Refuge. 

Glen  Mills,  Penna. 

Philadelphia  Saving  Fund  Society. 

National  Biscuit  Co.'s  Bakery. 

Drexel  Institute. 

Cellar,  Foundations   and    Superstructure,   Market 

and  Train  Shed,  Reading  Terminal. 
Etc.,  Etc. 


H  J.  SMITH 

271  SOUTH  FIFTH  STREET 
PHILADELPHIA,  PA. 


cARTISTIC 


Stained  and  Leaded  Glass 

FOR 

CHURCHES 

DWELLINGS 
ETC. 


THE  McDANIEL 
STEAM  TRAP 

is  the  best  in  the  world 
for  High  or  Low  Pres- 
sure. Discharges  the 
condensation  as  fast 
as  it  comes  to  the 
trap  and  always  holds 

a    Water   Seal,    consequently     cannot    blow     steam. 

Easy  to   repair. 

We  also  Manufacture 

REDUCING  VALVES 

RELIEF  VALVES 

BLOW=OFF  VALVES 

EXHAUST  PIPE  HEADS 
STEAM  AND  OIL  SEPARATORS 

EJECTORS  OR  WATER  LIFTERS 
and  other  Specialties  for  Steam  users 
Send  for  Catalogue 

Watson  &  McDaniel  Co. 

146   North    Seventh  Street 
PHILADELPHIA,  PA. 


13,000,000  BARRELS 

"HOFFMAN" 

CEMENT  have  been  used 
on  important  Jforks  throughout 
the  United  States 

No  other  Cement  Company   can   show   such   a   record 

Lawrence  Cement  Co, 

Sales  Office,  No.  \  Broadway,  NEW  YORK 


** 


"DRAGON" 


AND  OTHER  FIRST-CLASS  BRANDS 
OF 

PORTLAND   CEMENT 

MADE   BY 

The  Lawrence  Cement  Co.  of  Penna. 
SIEGFRIED,  PA. 


XVI 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


Goods  Worth 

^"O^Cf TVf T"l O*    are   always    in  demand. 

x                  7          O    The   demand  is  created 
by  the  universal  want  of  goods  that  can  be  de- 
pended upon.     For  a  generation    our  Paints  and 
Varnishes    have    been   supplied   to   builders   and 
owners  with  the  most  satisfactory  results. 

From  time  to  time  we  have  added  new  lines, 
so    that    whatever    is     needed    in    the    way    of 

Fillers,  Stains,  Paints,  Enamels, 

Varnishes,  Floor  Wax,  Polishes,  Etc., 

to  finish  the  modern  artistic  home  or  the  capacious 
building  for  public  purposes,  may  be  found  in  our 
products.     Our  manufactures  are  completely  up- 
to-date  and  will  interest  any  architect  or  person 
intending  to  build  or  remodel. 

Send  for  booklets,  samples  and  full  information. 

Felton,  Sibley  &  Co* 

MAKERS  OF 

J36-J40  N.  4th  St.             DAINTS  AND 
PHILADELPHIA                        A       VARNISHES 

Joel  Goldthwait  &  Co. 

IMPORTERS    AND   DEALERS 
IN 

Fine  Carpets 

AND 

Oriental  Rugs 

Specialties  in  Patterns  and  Colorings 
submitted  if  desired 

169  WASHINGTON  STREET 

NEAR    CORNHILL 

BOSTON 

HIGHEST-GRADE 

IMAGINE  a  solid  rubber   floor  made  up  of   individual 
tiles,  so  interlocked  as  to  form  a  smooth,  compact  surface, 
which  neither  jar  nor  vibration  will  crack  or  separate.    Arrange 
this  surface    in   masses  of  rich,  harmonious  color;   make   it 
noiseless,  non-slippery,  waterproof;  give  it  a  marvelous  dura- 
bility— imagine  all  these  points  concentrated  in  one  material, 
and  you  have  our 

INTERLOCKING 
RUBBER  TILING 

Picture  its  advantages  for  the  bathroom — handsome, 
waterproof,  soft  and  warm  to  the  feet.  Think  what  a  floor  for 
the  billiard  room — firm,  non->lippery  foothold,  outlasting  a 
legion  of  carpets.  Its  waterproof  and  wearing  qualities 
make  an  ideal  flooring  for  vestibules  and  verandas.  For 
yachts  and  boats  of  all  kinds  it's  the  tile — the  only  one  that 
stands  vibration  and  wrenching  without  cracking  or  separa- 
ting. 

Another  very  strong  advantage — can  be  laid  directly  over 
an  old  floo. — no  matter  what  its  material.  Send  for  samples, 
prices  and  full  information. 

New  York  Belting  and  Packing  Co. 

LIMITED 

GOODYEAR  RUBBER  BELTING  AND  PACKING  CO. 
3o8  Chestnut  Street,  Philadelphia 

IMITATION 
MARBLES 

MADE  ONLY  BY  THE 

MYCENIAN 

MARBLE 

COMPANY 

524-526  WEST  34th  STREET 
NEW  YORK 

ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


XV111 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


MARQUISE  OVER  SIDE  ENTRANCE  OE  RESIDENCE  FOR  W.  W.  GIBBS,  ESO. 


Kennedy,  Hays  &  Kelsey,  Architects 


EXECUTED  BV 

SHANNON  MANUFACTURING  CO. 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


Cope  &  Stewardson] 

and  -Architects 

Frederick  M.  Mann  I 


CLASS  OF  '73  MEMORIAL  GATE,   UNIVERSITY  OF  PENNSYLVANIA 

Executed  by 

SHANNON  MANUFACTURING  I  0 


The  Shannon  Mfg.  Co. 


MANUFACTURERS    OF 


Architectural  and  Ornamental,  Cast  and  Wrought 

BRASS,  BRONZE  and  IRON  WORK 

ELEVENTH  AND  CATHARINE  STREETS 


PHILADELPHIA 


XX 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


THERE  IS  NONE  BETTER  AND  NONE        A.    TRIUMPH     OF    PERFECTION 
"JUST  AS  GOOD"  jrrp 

"PANCOAST" 

VENTILA  TOR 

Nothing  but  intrinsic  merit  could  have  forced  it  to  so  high  a 

place  in  the  architects'  esteem 

Selected  in  preference  to  all  others  for  the  finest  buildings  in 

the  country 

GOOD  QUALITY  and  RIGHT  PRICES 
are  our  great  strong  points 

„„      r  _,      ,    ,     t  SIZES:  2  inches  to  10  feet 

Manufactured  only  by  the 

National  Pancoast  Ventilator  Co. 

Sectional  View,  showing    that    there   are  'no  MAIN  OFFICE ; 

obstructions  to  Perfect  Ventilation  723  Drexel  Building:,  PHILADELPHIA,  PA. 


THOMAS  A\.  SEEDS,  Jr. 

Contractor  and  Builder 


PHILADELPHIA 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


Stained,  Painted,  Wrought,  Mosaic 

Leaded  Decorative  Glass 

For  CHURCHES 

DWELLINGS  and  PUBLIC  BUILDINGS 

IN    EVERY   STYLE   OF   THE  ART 
FROM   THEIR   OWN 

Original  Designs 

MANUFACTURED    BY 

The  Maclean  Co. 

WORKS                                                                                 STUDIOS 

1612  to  1618  Ludlow  Street                              615  and  616  Crozer  Building 

1420  Chestnut  Street 

Memorial             Philadelphia,  pa.,  u.  s.  a. 

W  lnQO^A^S                                                                                                                                                      TELEPHONE    CONNECTION 

GAS  RANGES 

ARE  POPULAR  FOR 

MODERN  KITCHENS 

WHY  NOT  SPECIFY 

The  Fortune  Gas  Ranges 
The  Mrs,  S,  T*  Rorer  Ranges 

MADE  IN  PHILADELPHIA 
BY 

Thomas,  Roberts,   Stevenson  Co, 

Makers  of  the  Renowned 

Specialty  Hot-Air  Furnace 

and 

Active  Fortune  Ranges 

THOMAS,  ROBERTS,  STEVENSON  CO. 
Philadelphia,  U.  S.  A. 

Write  for  Catalogue 

BAYER,  GARDNER 
&  HIMES 

WORKERS  IN  METAL 

77  WEST  HOUSTON  ST. 
NEW  YORK 

Brass  and  Bronze  Grilles 

Wrought  Iron  Work         Builders'  and  Cabinet 
Office  Railings                       Hardware 
Bank  Railings                    French  Hardware 
Bronze  Tablets                   Special  Hardware  of 
Metal  Signs                             every  description 

Architects'  Designs  Carefully 
Executed 

XXI 1 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


KNICKERBOCKER  LIME 
AND  MORTAR  CO. 


and 


Lime,  Hair,  Plaster 
Cements 


Wholesale  and  Retail 


White's  Germania  and  Globe  Cements 

Brook  and  Shoebridge,  Deckerhof  and 
Dagger  Cements 

American  Cements,  Vulcanite,  Coplay, 
Atlas,  Improved  Union 

READY-MIXED    MORTAR,  Mortar  Colors 


DEPOTS 
24th  St.   below  Callowhill 

TELEPHONE   I-22-I8 

American  and  Dauphin  Sts. 

TELEPHONE  5-23-48 

PHILADELPHIA 


LAFARGE 
CEMENT 

The  only  Portland  Cement 
that  does  not  stain  lime- 
stone, granite  and  marble. 

Use  it  for  outside  stucco 
work. 


SEARS,  HUMBERT  &   CO. 

81-8^  FULTON  STREET 
NEW  YORK 


434-436  Prudential  Building 
BUFFALO,  N.  Y. 


34-36  Clark  Street 
CHICAGO 


George  A.  Fuller  Co. 

Building 
Construction 

ijy  Broadway,  New  York 


CHIC  A  GO 

Marquette  Building 

BOSTON 

Btazer  Building 

ST.  LOUIS 

Fuller  ton  Building 

BALTIMORE 

Atlantic  Trust  Building 


ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


xxiii 


ENDORSED  BY  ALL 
O  ARCHITECTS 


Used  in  all  leading  Hotels, 
Clubs.  Institutions,  etc. 


*;y-  ice  or 
PECMANIGAL 

•'REFRIGERATION,    Tile  Lined  for  Private  Houses 
-RIGERATORS.j  a  Specialty 

REFERENCES: 

^/€°LD  STORAGE) 

Offices  and  Salesrooms.  ^^       kSUS^^^PM^        r^—^  Philadelphia  Country  Club,  B.il.i. 

Pi,MiiM>fsrm*r£3  1433-35-37  Marshall  St  ^V--^~^    IBuiLOLrieg       p      .     TJnjon     Lcaeu-      Athletic 

"^JSSSSEmm       FACTORY,  1432  34  36  N  SIXTH  ST  St>j^'"  ""'"«/       Travelers'.     Rittenhousc,     Union 

^/ra'^^,^^  E.  B.  ATKINS.  M:r.  Republican,     Pen     and     Pencil, 

Maenncrchor  Clubs  o(  Philada. 
Bingham  House,  Hanover,  Lafayette,  Colonnade,  Bellevue,  Stratford  Hotels,  and  many  others:  Pennsylvania,  Presbyterian. 
Woman's.  University  Hospitals,  etc.;  P.  A.  B.  Widener.  Alex.  Van  Rensselaer,  G.  W.  Elkins,  Mrs.  G.  W.  Childs. 


Vulcanite  Tile  and 
Mosaic  Co. 

Interior  Wall  and  Floor  Tiling 
Art,  Marble  and  Venetian  Glass 

Mosaics,  Wood  Mantels  and  Tiling 
Brass  Fireplace  Furnishing 


Estimates  and  Special  Sketches 
on  Application 


Vulcanite  Tile  and  Mosaic  Co, 

1712  Market  Street 
Philadelphia 


Chas.  Stewart  &  Co. 

Bricklavers 

and 

Contractors 

estimates   promptly   furnished 
616   Race   Street 


Telephone  Connection 


PHILADELPHIA 


We  Photograph 

For  Architects     BUILDINGS 


(Color  values  properly 
rendered! 


INTERIORS 
DRAWINGS 


We  Make  Bromide  Enlargements  in 
Black  or  Sepia 

JAMES  L.  DILLON 

Shakespeare  Bid*.  1017  Chestnut  Street 


ELECTRO-TINT 

Des^n,    ENGRAVING  CO. 

Embossing 

Half  -  Tone  and  Line  Engravings 

WE  EXCEL   THE   WORLD  IN 

THREE-COLOR 
PROCESS 

ENGRAVING 

1227-29  RACE  ST.,  PHILADELPHIA,  PA. 


The  finkerton  Construction  Co. 

ENGINEERS  and 
CONTRACTORS 

Broad  Street  and  South  Penn  Square 
PHILADELPHIA 

West  End  Trust  Building 

Electric  and  Steam   Railroads,  Factory    Buildings 
Heavj   Masonry  and  Bridges 


xxiv  ARCHITECTURAL    ANNUAL 


C.  A.  BLUHHARD  BLUE  PRINT  PAPER  MFG.  CO. 

Manufacturers  and  Importers 

Blue,    White  and    Black    Process    Papers.       Linen    Prints 


MAPS,  ATLAS  SHEETS,    PLANS,  DRAWINGS,  BLUE  PRINTS,  ENGRAVINGS 

SHOW  CARDS,  Etc. 

No.  38  South  Sixth  St.,  Philadelphia,  Pa. 


m/xiimti^^  SHOW  CARDS,  Etc.  „,     , 

MOUNTING  Telephone 


FOR  CLASSIFIED  LIST  OF  ADVERTIS- 
ERS SEE  PAGE  TWELVE,  IMMEDIATELY 
FOLLOWING     TABLE     OF     CONTENTS 


\ 


wmm  wmm